CHUD.com Community › Forums › SPECIFIC FILMS › The Franchises › 50 Reasons Lord of the Rings Sucks
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

50 Reasons Lord of the Rings Sucks

post #1 of 21
Thread Starter 
[I assume this hasn't been posted already, I did a search and nothing came up. Sorry if this is a repeat thread. Anyway, it's food for thought]


1 Fellowship of the Rings and Two Towers were shoved down our throats.

I've heard some students are even forced to read some novelization of the movie in their literature classes. Ridiculous. Does Hollywood run our classrooms now?


2 Greed.

Hollywood can't make a movie these days without crapping out a sequel the next year to squeeze more money out of the sheep. Guess what; there's ANOTHER LOTR movie coming this Christmas. Gee, I wonder what will bring Rocky out of retirement this time?


3 Quality Control at New Line.

Millions of copies of the LOTR DVDs have thick black bars at the bottom and top of the screen throughout the film. Didn't anyone catch this? You know what happens at the end, in the extreme foreground and extreme upper sky? Neither do I. Bush league, guys.


4 They switched Darrens on us!

Look closely in Fellowship and you'll notice the human member of their party is played by two different actors at different points of the movie (it takes a sharp eye to notice, but one of them has red hair, one black).


5 Quality Control at New Line, II.

In the massive Mt. Doom battle scene at the beginning of Fellowship of the Ring, a DVD pause reveals at least half a dozen of the 50,000 Orc Warrior extras are wearing modern tennis shoes.


6 Speaking of Orcs...

The Orcs were obviously stolen from PC game maker Blizzard and its Warcraft series. Too bad Blizzard is apparently too scared to sue New Line over it.


7 Racism.

Percentage of protagonists in Fellowship who are white: 100. Meanwhile the black antagonists and their black crow spies and their black glass seeing ball inhabit their black towers and perform black magic. Gosh, I wonder if there's some symbolism there?


8 Gold: The Stretchy Element.

The ring, which is seen to be at least two inches in diameter at the beginning to fit the polish sausage-sized finger of Sauron, suddenly fits Frodo's child-sized finger later. I guess this movie takes place in a world where rings magically change sizes on their own.


9 Violence.

Give me one reason that story couldn't have been told without all the fighting.


10 Horse sense.

Why didn't they take horses on their quest? Or even better, why didn't Gandalf's giant flying bird friend haul them into Mordor? Watch out, Frodo! All of your methods of transportation have been swallowed by the Dark Lord of the Plot Hole!


11 Retracted.*

See below.


12 Return of the Living Dead.

In FOTR, if you watch closely during the Inn scene, Frodo and his crew are shown getting stabbed by the Ring Wraiths. Then, five seconds later, they are fine again. Note to the director: try proofreading your movie before you release it to the public.


13 Did someone say plot hole?

Liv Tyler's character is seen easily defeating nine strong supernatural beings, even though she is clearly a woman.


14 The Battle Droid Syndrome.

The mutated muscular soldiers of Mordor turned out to be hilariously ineffective fighters, a dozen of them held off by a single dying human. Apparently they made the beasts by crossing Orcs, Goblins and the French.


15 Sloppy CGI.

Gandalf's smoke boat at Bilbo's party is pretty impressive, but smoke cannot be made to travel horizontally, thus revealing it to be nothing but a cheap special effect.


16 The Asbestos Wizard.

We all saw Gandalf fall into the molten core of Middle Earth after his battle with the firebeast thing in part 1. Well, I guess the Gandalf action figure must have sold well, because in the slap-together sequel Two Towers, Gandalf is back. Perhaps it was voodoo, a la the corpse in Weekend at Bernie's II (look closely and you'll notice LOTR steals several elements from the WAB films).


17 Invisible Implausibility.

Every time Frodo or Bilbo went invisible with the ring they should have also gone BLIND. Your eyes cannot function unless light is reflected off the cornea. If light passes through it (as must be the case with invisibility) sight is no longer possible. Also, rings do not turn you invisible.


18 The Asbestos Wizard, II.

The giant fire beast thing at the end of part 1 was breathing a firey breath hot enough to send heat-distortion waves through the air. The sheer temperature of the air should have burned off Gandalf's beard and eyebrows. None of my reading on evolutionary biology reveals a single reason why a particular race of humans would develop unflammable facial hair as this would provide practically no advantage in either survival or mating.


19 I'll have to rent that one.

The rushed-through story the screenwriter threw in as the first ten minutes of Fellowship of the Ring looked a lot more interesting than the movie we were forced to watch. Why didn't somebody make a movie off that instead?


20 Magic Mechanics.

Experts on the occult say in order for a wizard to floorspin a fully-grown man like Gandalf, he'd need three magical staffs, not two.


21 Finders, keepers.

So Bilbo, who we are supposed to identify with as a protagonist, finds a piece of someone else's jewelry and just keeps it for himself? That's funny, because I would expect a good man to submit it to the local Lost and Found so it could be claimed by its owner. It makes me wonder if he bought that hillside house or if he was just squatting.


22 Go-Go Gadget Arrow Sprouter.

Legolas shoots arrow after arrow at his enemies, and yet the number of arrows in his quiver never decreases. I guess elves have glands on their back that secrete arrows.


23 Watch out! He's going to explode!

The heroes are shown eating again and again, and yet no one ever goes to the bathroom throughout their entire quest.


24 Meesa gonna make theesa movie suckah!

The character of Gollum in The Two Towers was entirely computer animated (a cheap effort to cash in on Jar Jar Binks Mania) but was just a dim shadow of George Lucas' effort. Thank you, Peter Jackson. Thank you right to Hell.


25 Propaganda.

The Elves, clearly the most advanced and wise species, are also clearly gay.


26 Speaking of Elves...

Elves are beautiful and wise and tall? Great warriors? Makers of fine lightweight weapons? Our modern knowledge of elves has observed only an ability to make cookies and toys. All the elves in the film are portrayed as living in a warm paradise (Rivendell) but our own information tells us the aforementioned group of toymaking elves work and thrive in the arctic. Hey, Mr. Jackson: Research is half of writing.
post #2 of 21
Thread Starter 
27 Homage or theft?

The "happy village of little people" idea was stolen from Willow.


28 Homage or theft II?

The wise old wizard character was stolen from Harry Potter.


29 Homage or theft III?

The "travelling on our quest through a corn field" scene was stolen from Shrek.


30 Homage or theft IV?

The character of the rebellious-but-helpful Ranger was stolen from Val Kilmer in Willow.


31 Homage or theft V?

The concept of the violent dwarf was based on Al Pacino.


32 Homage or theft VI?

The "old man looking through the door hatch at the approaching little people" scene was stolen from A Clockwork Orange.


33 Homage or theft VII?

The cantina scene with a noisy bar filled with a mix of otherworldly species was stolen from Cecile B. DeMille's One Night in an Alien Bar.


34 Homage or theft VIII?

The incident with the flock of evil magical spying crows serving the All-Seeing Eye was based on an actual incident.


35 Homage or theft IX?

The character of the Giant Evil Flaming All-Seeing Eye was based on former President Jimmy Carter.


36 Homage or theft X?

The character of Elrond was based on Agent Smith from The Matrix.


37 Weighty issues.

AKA "Plot Hole No. 273." Even with all that walking and light eating, the character of Sam only got fatter.


38 Realism, schmealism.

Liv Tyler's immortal elf volunteers to give up her eternal life for a single romance with a human man. Could any man really be that well endowed? I find it unlikely.


39 Hair Today, Gone Tomorrow.

The most advanced civilization is that of the elves, which are long-haired, new-age types? Sorry, Mr. Jackson, but modern science has proven that in any modern civilization, hippies would be extinct.


40 Too many notes.

No movie should be over two hours long. Did we need that whole thing in the mine in part 1? What about that almost-infinite battle scene in part 2? Didn't it seem like they were just adding pointless scenes in the middle to pad it? It's like they decided beforehand they wanted three hours for each film and used filler to flesh them out.


41 Too many notes, II.

I just want to re-emphasize the above point. There is no reason entertainment can't be concise.


42 Too many notes, III.

Too many characters to keep track of. The dwarf was clearly only there as a token dwarf character to sell tickets to lucrative movie-going dwarf demographic. Lose him.


43 Rationalization for violence.

Why, in part 1, is the black octopus creature painted as the bad guy when it attacks, when one of the fellowship had clearly been throwing rocks at it?


44 The Shoeless Land.

The Hobbits both 1) refuse to wear shoes and 2) run a livestock-based farming economy. Wouldn't they constantly be stepping in crap? Why doesn't the movie address this issue?


45 Casting.

Why couldn't Frodo have been played by Christopher Walken?


46 Casting, II.

Why couldn't Gandalf have been played by Bruce Campbell?


47 Casting, III.

Why couldn't Bilbo have been played by Vin Diesel?


48 Casting, IV.

Why couldn't Strider have been played by a monkey?


49 The Score.

The background music wasn't nearly funky enough for me.


50 What's that smell?

As bad as the Lucasfilm leaks were with his last film, the filmmakers of Return of the King already have the novelization out in paperback. I've seen it at Barnes & Noble already. As if we needed any less of a reason to go see it.

-Dr. Albert Oxford, PhD
London Film Institute



*RETRACTED REASONS LORD OF THE RINGS SUCKS:


11. Damn you, gravity!

The giant firebeast thing is defeated by Gandalf when he destroys the bridge, sending the creature plunging to its death... despite the fact that it has wings.

This was retracted when a reader pointed out that the wings, like the rest of the beast, were made of shadow and fire and thus would be useless for flight. Thanks for the tip!

-----------------------------------------

Shamelessly stolen from pointlesswasteoftime.com
post #3 of 21
Ugh.....what? I agree with El Topo on some these statements but Come The Fuck ON! Gollum a dim imitation of Lucas's Jar Jar Binks? Gollum is a fully realized character with better CGI, an actual relevent character in the story, and is better CGI. Oh and not 100% annoying and distracting.
post #4 of 21
How about everyone just go to Pointless Waste of Time right now and read all of it and then we can have a discussion about what we've read.
post #5 of 21
I refuse to be a part of this tomfoolery.
post #6 of 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by chappers
Ugh.....what? I agree with El Topo on some these statements but Come The Fuck ON! Gollum a dim imitation of Lucas's Jar Jar Binks? Gollum is a fully realized character with better CGI, an actual relevent character in the story, and is better CGI. Oh and not 100% annoying and distracting.
uh ...
post #7 of 21
Umm ... that's all clearly a joke, folks. And a pretty damn funny one, too.
post #8 of 21
i agree with most points, especially the ones about being way too long, and the fillers
post #9 of 21
I swear to God. You people would lay your hand on a hot griddle, scream, and then immediately do it again.
post #10 of 21
CaptainAmerica do you really mean to imply that Jar Jar binks is not only better CGI than Gollum but also a non-annoying infantile character?
post #11 of 21
Wow.
post #12 of 21
chappers... this... list... is... a... joke... from... a... humor... website... called... pointlesswasteoftime.com.

There, I said it reeeeeeeeeal slow, since you seem to have a learning disability.
post #13 of 21
Quote:

Liv Tyler's character is seen easily defeating nine strong supernatural beings, even though she is clearly a woman.
Genius.
post #14 of 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by Agent Helix
chappers... this... list... is... a... joke... from... a... humor... website... called... pointlesswasteoftime.com.

There, I said it reeeeeeeeeal slow, since you seem to have a learning disability.
*Gasp*
post #15 of 21
AHHH, mu apologies to all...I read the original posts this moring when I was still half asleep and dreading going to a meeting so I was cranky to start my apologies again.

Oh... and Agent Helix for being such a cocksucker kindly go fuck yourself.
post #16 of 21
He's right though.. its clearly a joke... I mean at first I wasnt positive becuase it was mostly just abunch of points that real morons probably got confused about, like them all getting 'stabbed' at the Inn.. but once you hit the entry about how

"Liv Tyler couldnt beat the Ringwraiths cuz shes clearly a woman"

... well, by that point anyone who still thinks its a serious list has an even lower outlook on human society than I do. I actually stopped reading the list at that point and went straight to the replies to see if anyone was buying it.. alas
post #17 of 21
I may have come off looking slow I admit it. Though in my defense I stopped reading after I read about the Gollum vs. Jar Jar comparisons because I couldn't fathom taking anything else this "person" said seriously...and Agent Helix very bluntly told me it was a joke. Which I should realized by that point anyway. Hey everybody has their individual moments that make them look like a dullard.

In fact because I let my sleep addled brain lead me into some shit I should change my Sig for a few days to a more appropriate quote....
post #18 of 21
well that site has a disclaimer: This site is intended for mature audiences...
post #19 of 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by chappers
CaptainAmerica do you really mean to imply that Jar Jar binks is not only better CGI than Gollum but also a non-annoying infantile character?
This is funnier than the list.
post #20 of 21
chappers;

Don't send me PMs about this and take the jokes like a man.
post #21 of 21
Touche...I guess sometimes you just step in shit and it takes awhile to wear off your shoe.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: The Franchises
CHUD.com Community › Forums › SPECIFIC FILMS › The Franchises › 50 Reasons Lord of the Rings Sucks