PEOPLE, PEOPLE, we can't have parents actually taking responsibility for what their kids do. That would be ludicrous.
post #51 of 100
7/23/05 at 7:16pm
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
| seal-raping cuntwaffle |
|
Originally Posted by Moose of Doom!
|
|
Originally Posted by Richard Dickson
Is The Sims next?
And you know, I'm pretty sure Mario and the Princess are not married, yet sharing a castle. |
| What percentage of all games made would you say are violent, based upon your previous definition of violence in video games? This gets to a fundamental lie being propagated by the video game industry. GTA [Grand Theft Auto series] has sold 30 million units, with San Andreas expected to hit 20 million on its own. It's the #1 seller in the world right now. That fact alone does not square with ISA and ESRB's dodge that "the majority of games are not violent or M-rated." What matters is how many units delivered are violent, and to whom they are being delivered. |
| Back to my older post, and another fact discovered in my travels: Forget highest profile title with an AO......Congrats Rockstar. You've officially created the ONLY CONSOLE GAME with an AO rating. |
|
Originally Posted by Jacob Singer
It just pisses me off that this is yet another ploy to demonize the gaming industry while letting shitty parents completely off the hook. I couldn't care less how many copies of GTA Rockstar sells at Wal-Mart. Parents will continue to ignore the clear game ratings and politicians will continue to assume that all video games are children's entertainment.
|
| MATURE Titles rated M (Mature) have content that may be suitable for persons ages 17 and older. Titles in this category may contain intense violence, blood and gore, sexual content, and/or strong language. |
| ADULTS ONLY Titles rated AO (Adults Only) have content that should only be played by persons 18 years and older. Titles in this category may include prolonged scenes of intense violence and/or graphic sexual content and nudity. |
| Thank God. I'll be the first person to download and patch my PC version of "Grand Theft Auto." I want to shoot people in the face, bang prostitutes, traffic drugs, steal cars, and terrorize police officers without this filthy smut in my game. Frankly, I'm appalled that Rockstar would allow such wholesale corruption of our youth. Years from now when America has become a withered husk of the morality it once stood for, historians will look back at what triggered it all and point to one event: a boolean variable that unlocked a simulated sex scene in a video game. |
|
Originally Posted by Y3k-Bug
Clear game ratings? Have you actually read the distinction between Mature and Adults Only ratings?
|
|
Originally Posted by cognizant
The original rating was 17 and over for this game right? Arent people over 17 allowed to have sex in America anyway? Hell, dont kids see sex all the time in the media anyway!?
|
|
Originally Posted by Congressman Fred Upton of Michigan
"It appears that the publisher has blatantly circumvented the rules in order to peddle sexually explicit material to our youth, and they should be held accountable. A company cannot be allowed to profit from deceit."
|
|
Originally Posted by wydren
How is it not clear?
|
|
Originally Posted by Y3k-Bug
Did you even bother to read the entire post? According to what they define as M and AO, a game that has longer scenes of explicit sex and violence rises above the M category, and ends up as Adults Only. Which is why I say that it isn't clear; how do you quantify longer, exactly? GTA is a game that can easily run upwards of 100 hours and features prostitutes, stealing, murder at random, and general mayhem. According to the way the ratings are set up, I don't see how it wasn't rated AO to begin with, if for no other reason than to avoid having the game hurt by retailers not carrying it due to the AO tag. To say that the ESRB and the industry aren't guilty of kinda really looking the other way over this issue is silly. I'll be the first to admit there are some laughably asinine parents out there, but it's pretty obvious that the industry isn't paticularly interested in rating games in any way that would really mean anything.
|
| NEW YORK - A woman upset that she bought the video game "Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas" for her 14-year-old grandson without knowing it contained hidden, sexually explicit scenes sued the manufacturer Wednesday on behalf of consumers nationwide. Florence Cohen, 85, of New York, said in the lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Manhattan that the game's manufacturer, Rockstar Games, and its parent company, New York-based Take Two Interactive Software Inc., engaged in false, misleading and deceptive practices. She sought unspecified damages on behalf of herself and all consumers nationwide, saying the company should give up its profits from the game for what amounted to false advertising, consumer deception and unfair business practices. Cohen said in the suit that she bought the game in late 2004 for her grandson when it was rated "M" for mature, for players 17 and older. According to the suit, she directed that it be taken away from her grandson, which was done. |
|
Originally Posted by Mr_Trick
The woman is doing this on "behalf of consumers nationwide". Pretty ballsy to say that every consumer who bought this game is upset over this.
|
|
Originally Posted by Ahoatam
I've been a huge fan of the GTA franchise since the original came out in 97-98. I've been following this story for a couple of weeks, and it's been a long, strange trip.
Obviously, Rockstar went too far by creating the content in the first place. They seemed to think this might be a bit too much, thus the removal from the final content of the game, but they were stupid not to remove it entirely from the disks. GTA has always been heavily modded, especially the PC releases. It was only a matter of time until someone found it. This was discovered on the PS2 version by modders about two months after the games release, and three months before the game went gold on xbox/PC. Modding isn't really possible on PS2 games, but the modders start poking around the disks to get an early start on their PC mods. Message boards have "Hot coffee" discussions dating back to January, so it's not unlikely Rockstar knew their secret had been found. They still had a chance to pull the code from the PC/xbox version. But they didn't, and hot coffee was exposed two days after the PC version hit the shelves. The other stupidity school was taught by the politicians, who obviously don't have their fingers on the pulse of the electronic entertainment industry. It's already been pointed out that there are several examples of games with simlar content, but GTA is the big fish and the chance people had been waiting for. I think the most unfortunate result is the removal of the game from store shelves. Like the death sentence that is an NC-17 rating, this could irreperably hurt Rockstar, and end this franchise for good. It's also evidence that the ratings system is flawed. Just like films, if retailers won't sell AO games, then publishers will fight and bride to get an "M" rating, when their titls cleary deserves an AO. If retailers would allow the content on their shelves, the system might prove to be more solid. BTW, San Andreas has shot to the top of the Amazon.com top sellers list (available through third parties linked there), and will continue to be sold there, at its regular price. Anyone who spends $75 to get one on ebay is a total sucker. |
| Of course, I admit that there's one charge against video games that is a slam dunk. Kids don't get physical exercise when they play a video game, and indeed the rise in obesity among younger people is a serious issue. |
|
Originally Posted by gravedigger
An open letter to Senator Clinton about her awesome proposal to waste $90 million in taxpayer money
Not really anything we haven't seen before but it's still fun to read. |
|
Originally Posted by T_M
$90 million for a study that's already been done numerous times. It all boils down to "Look! I can be *moral* too! Give me votes!" That said, I'm not sure how far it will go. The whole FTC investigation seems somewhat overblown and unnecessary, and everything has pretty much been revealed up to this point.
|
|
Originally Posted by gravedigger
Also, am I the only one who NEVER tries to kill a cop unless it's part of a mission? Even if I have to break into a squad room or something, I'll do whatever I can to not kill Johnny Law. I'd much rather kill pushers and hos, at least I can get some cash out of them.
|
| As any monkey will tell you, here at ThinkGeek we love delicious Hot Coffee. Sometimes we like it standing up, sometimes on our knees, and sometimes we just like to sit back and enjoy someone else serving us Hot Coffee. A lot of people like Hot Coffee, and a lot of people have been talking about it. Too many people have been talking though, and the goverment is taking away our Hot Coffee. They're replacing it with Decaf. Decaf sucks. |

|
Originally Posted by FrankCobretti
I'm still trying to understand why chasing someone down & carving 'em up with a chainsaw (ok, that was GTA II, but still) is perfectly acceptable entertainment, but dry humping is totally out of the question.
|