One of my favourite films from when I was kid, probably the only horror which really scared me back then. I just got in on DVD and having not watched it since the 90s I was mildly concerned that the film would fail to hold up to my older expectations.
What I found was that as an adult the film was no longer about a treble voiced hook handed killer but was very much about the 'victim'.
In actuallity as I rewatched the movie it started to seem that maybe the Candyman doesn't actually exist within the movie world.
Whereas my child eyes simply saw the archetypal monster my adult perceptions started making me doubt what I originally thought the purpose of the film was.
It is my view now that the Candyman in the film does not exist, he is just a cipher created by subconcious mind of Helen as a proxy for her murderous ways, a tyler durden of the horror world if you may.
My first reason for this belief is the fact that Helen herself states that the candyman is just a fabrication by the residents of the Cabrini Green to mask the horrors of their everyday life.
Then there is the fact that the Candyman does not take a form until we have heard the story of his creation and have witnessed the 'real world' Candyman at work (the one who assaults Helen in the toilets).
When we meet the Tony Todd Candyman he is very much a warped amalgamation of the man who attacked Helen with elements of the 18th century Candyman she has heard about.
We are only ever shown the Candyman kill once, the other attacks happen off screen, when Helen's doctor is killed before her eyes. Yet again this could merely be the candyman stepping in as a replacement for reality.
Also the words 'It Was Always You Helen' could be taken to mean that she is the killer...
Anyone care to share?
What I found was that as an adult the film was no longer about a treble voiced hook handed killer but was very much about the 'victim'.
In actuallity as I rewatched the movie it started to seem that maybe the Candyman doesn't actually exist within the movie world.
Whereas my child eyes simply saw the archetypal monster my adult perceptions started making me doubt what I originally thought the purpose of the film was.
It is my view now that the Candyman in the film does not exist, he is just a cipher created by subconcious mind of Helen as a proxy for her murderous ways, a tyler durden of the horror world if you may.
My first reason for this belief is the fact that Helen herself states that the candyman is just a fabrication by the residents of the Cabrini Green to mask the horrors of their everyday life.
Then there is the fact that the Candyman does not take a form until we have heard the story of his creation and have witnessed the 'real world' Candyman at work (the one who assaults Helen in the toilets).
When we meet the Tony Todd Candyman he is very much a warped amalgamation of the man who attacked Helen with elements of the 18th century Candyman she has heard about.
We are only ever shown the Candyman kill once, the other attacks happen off screen, when Helen's doctor is killed before her eyes. Yet again this could merely be the candyman stepping in as a replacement for reality.
Also the words 'It Was Always You Helen' could be taken to mean that she is the killer...
Anyone care to share?




