Quote:
|
Originally Posted by El Topo
Oh yeah, the story itself is pretty crappy, and there are lots of cheesy moments, but if more big-budget films were as visually abstract we'd get more interesting films. It's good to see special-effects put to such use, again like in Hulk.
|
Only if the special effects
serve the story. Like
Hulk. Not here where it's just indulgent nonsense that bares little meaning to the story. The final scene is about as deep as
Tron.
Quote:
| Also, to see any film try to faithfully depict the visual effects of psychedelic drugs is a good thing in my book, and Blueberry is the biggest film that's ever done it, and on that level it is a complete success - it carries across the ritualistic and mind-numbing and life-changing aspects of drugs very well. The hallucinations are the subject of the film, not the story itself. |
Why ? So drop outs can snigger to themselves about how cool and edgy the picture is ? It's hardly visionary or particularly cutting edge filmmaking and appears to be the sole gimmick on which the picture relies.
Requiem For A Dream or
Fear & Loathing... do a far better job of wranlging the almost unquantifiable experience of drug use without having to resort to a panifully juvenile "gee whizz" kalidascopic mess to get that across. They use cinematic techniques and storytelling.