Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Martianman
Ugh, Stuber. You're taking a hit with the picks this week.
|
going 7-6 into tonight. not bad. but I've done better.
41-17? Shit, if I knew Rodney Harrison was that more important than Ty Law or Lawyer Milloy, I would have gone with the ESPN crew and picked LT kicking their cans. I'm in inclined to think that this week I was finally convinced of what some teams actually are.
New England: Still pretty good, but coming back down to earth as far as the rest of the pack. Currently playing around 11-5 possibly 10-6. That kind of regular season usually doesn't get past the divisional round.
Buffalo: Their defense is supposed to be tremendous, and pretty reliable even without Takeo Spikes; and with their backfield, how could Losman lose? Well, the little fucker has found a way. And I feel for Tim Russert.
Denver: They've shalacked (sp?) two very good teams in as many weeks, one a huge division rival on Mon. Night. Mike Anderson is running well, the defense are playing like crazed men, and Plummer isn't making his usual assload of bad throws. It seems I have a tendency to go for the jugular and miss completely. I believe I said something along the lines of, "Mike Tice's job is in trouble, blah blah blah, Mike Shanahan will lose his job at the end of the season." Well, one looks definite while the other is not even close. Right now, DEN is playing good enough to be the #2 or #3 seed come Week 17. But that's a ways away.
NY Giants: I honestly think Eli Manning has arrived. Plaxico Burress, 174 Rec Yds in the 1st half? Barber hasn't lost a step.... yet. And their defense is relatively no-named but playing dependable.
On the other side... I thought Mike Martz would be more level-headed this year because of Steven Jackson's ability.
62 passing attempts vs. 13 rushing attempts. I don't care how bad you're losing, that won't bode well.
*I also have the STL backfield currently occupying 2 roster spots on my fantsy team. Way to go, Stuber.