CHUD.com Community › Forums › CULTURE, HUMOR, & FREE FORM › Humor › Unprecedented Child Custody Ruling
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Unprecedented Child Custody Ruling

post #1 of 5
Thread Starter 
This may have already circulated in another forum. Even so, this tragic story is worth repeating.

Quote:
Unprecedented Child Custody Ruling

Ypsilanti, Michigan

August 24, 2005

A seven-year-old boy was at the center of the courtroom drama today when
he challenged a court ruling over who should have custody of him. The
boy has a history of being beaten by his parents and the judge initially
awarded custody to his aunt, in keeping with child custody law and
regulations requiring that family unity be maintained to the degree
possible.

The boy surprised the court when he proclaimed that his aunt beat him
more than his parents and he adamantly refused to live with her. When
the judge then suggested that he live with his grandparents, the boy
cried out that they also beat him

After considering the remainder of the immediate family and learning
that domestic violence was apparently a way of life among them, the
judge took the unprecedented step of allowing the boy to propose who
should have custody of him.

After two recesses to check legal references and confer with child
welfare officials, the judge granted temporary custody to the Michigan
Wolverines, who the boy firmly believes are not capable of beating
anyone.
O-H.... I-O! Go Buckeyes!
post #2 of 5
Dude, thank you for that article. i haven't laughed that hard in a while.
post #3 of 5
I knew something was up, and only realized as I read the punchline. Good one, my friend.
post #4 of 5
Though always good for a laugh I think that joke has been around longer than the concept of beating children, and where I come from the boy wants to live with the Oakland Raiders.
post #5 of 5
Michigan 34, (11) Michigan State 31
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Humor
CHUD.com Community › Forums › CULTURE, HUMOR, & FREE FORM › Humor › Unprecedented Child Custody Ruling