New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Lethal Weapon

post #1 of 117
Thread Starter 
With the impending release of Kiss Kiss Bang Bang, I thought I'd check out this classic for old times sake. The only difference being this was the director's cut.

It's such a well made action film. Donner's direction is stylish but not at the expense of the story. I wonder what this film would be like if it was directed by Michael Bay.

The story, by now, is so standard it's become cliche, only Donner's direction and Shane Black's script elevate it. Another great thing is the score, aside from Kamen's contributions it's a pretty unorthodox score with Clapton and Sanborn providing an emotional theme for Riggs and Murtaugh. Clapton, in particular does a fantastic job with his lyrical playing, I can't imagine the film being without it.

I wish more action films had a christmas setting like this and Die Hard.
post #2 of 117
One of my favorite action films from the 80s. I completely agree that on the surface it's a very traditional action movie story, that really has no business working as well as it does. In my opinion that's something it shares with Last Boyscout, which works on many of the same levels.

I think apart from a good script and the direction, they had two leads with great chemistry and some good bad guys to work with.
post #3 of 117
The movie may seem standard today, but it was a little different in it's time. I remember seeing it at the theater as like a twelve year old, and being quite shocked that Riggs was suicidal. You didn't see that everyday at the cinema in 1987. I think this is the movie, or one of a few, that created the action movie template of the mercenary bad guys, the special forces badasses wreaking havoc. Without this movie, would you have been able to make the leap to the vague Eurotrash baddies of Die Hard?
post #4 of 117
One of my fave action flicks of all time. Busey is great as Joshua and the ending fight between him and Riggs is one of the great fight scenes in cinema.

I personally prefer part 2, but it's hard to choose since they both are equal in quality, IMO.
post #5 of 117
48 HOURS sort of started the mismatched buddies trend for the 80's but LETHAL WEAPON perfected it. With the exception of a couple other Black scripted films not many have come close to matching WEAPON's combination of dialogue, characters, and action.

Dragon is right about the music. The Sanborn and Clapton stuff is great to hear as the duo rides around town. But I also love Kamen's work when the action really starts to move in the film's second half.

So to people who have seen the director's cut, what do you think of the scene with Riggs and the schoolyard gunman? I like the scene on its own but I wonder if having 2 scenes (this and the one in the tree lot) of Riggs proving how reckless he is so early is a bit much.
post #6 of 117
Thread Starter 
I wish they had kept the gunman scene instead of the tree lot scene, I thought it gave us a better look at Riggs disregard for his own life.

'You're one pyscho son of a bitch, but you're good'

There was also the scene before it where Riggs throws his beer bottle at the TV.

That scene with him putting the gun in his mouth before breaking down into tears is quite powerful, Gibson was excellent in that scene, not many action films gave us an action hero who cried.
post #7 of 117
Absoloutly, it's amazing to watch that scene and then think of how the series evolved into being way too goofy by the time they got to 4. But that scene with the gun in his mouth, along with the one where Glover has the gun to Gibson's head are really well done. Those scenes could have come off laughable in other films but they never do here.
post #8 of 117
I must be the only person who absolutely hates LW2. I remember seeing it in the theater with my family, and they all loved it, but I was disgusted.

Totally off topic, but who do I have to kill to get rid of that Mirrormask pop up?
post #9 of 117
Neil Gaiman.
post #10 of 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Balmudo
I must be the only person who absolutely hates LW2. I remember seeing it in the theater with my family, and they all loved it, but I was disgusted.

Totally off topic, but who do I have to kill to get rid of that Mirrormask pop up?
Let me know if you find that guy so I can kill him again, and so that I can pop up and kill him again, and again, and again.

Stunned to see the hate for LW2. To me the first 2 in this series are like the first 2 films in THE GODFATHER and TERMINATOR trilogies. I may have a preference but not enough to really argue about them because they're all perfect for their respective genres.
post #11 of 117
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moltisanti
Absoloutly, it's amazing to watch that scene and then think of how the series evolved into being way too goofy by the time they got to 4. But that scene with the gun in his mouth, along with the one where Glover has the gun to Gibson's head are really well done. Those scenes could have come off laughable in other films but they never do here.
"What do you wanna hear, man? You wanna hear that I don't think about takin' a bullet, well I do, I even got a special one, sawn off around the edges, blow the back of my head off, do the job right. Every single day I wake up, every. single. day I find a reason not to do it, you know why, this is gonna make you laugh, doing the job"

Such a great speech and Gibson nails it.

I don't mind LW2, the only thing that bothers me is Riggs seems to take sadistic pleasure out of making fun of Murtaugh and it get's worse with the other sequels.

I did like the scene where Riggs visit's his wife's grave.
post #12 of 117
Yeah, Riggs does get more comical starting with 2 but some if it is genuinely funny stuff with the "Guys like you don't die on toilets" scene and the gags involving Murtagh's daughter in the condom commercial. I think I was talking a few weeks back how I love that the film snaps into serious mode when all of the fellow officers get killed off and Riggs finds out the truth about his wife's death. Those are the moments where part 2 really shows how great a sequel it is.
post #13 of 117
Add me to the list of those who don't care for LW2. Just doesn't add anything for me.

And I also think the Riggs/Joshua fight at the end of LW smacks of "Holy crap, the movie's almost over and we haven't had these two face off yet!" It just seems incredibly tacked on, especially the way they segue into it -- "You wanna go for the title?" Clumsy.
post #14 of 117
Thread Starter 
"We have a shipment on merchandise arriving" "Why don't you guys just call it heroin"

I liked the fight but I found the slo-mo scene where Mr Joshua get's shot over the top.
post #15 of 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Balmudo
I must be the only person who absolutely hates LW2. I remember seeing it in the theater with my family, and they all loved it, but I was disgusted.
Thirded. Love the original it doesn't get much better. Gibson nails the role perfectly and the banter between Riggs and Murtaugh never comes off as tacky as it could have.
post #16 of 117
Yeah, LW2 was a harbinger of the even more brutal follow-ups in the franchise.

I remember the Lethal Weapon novelization being pretty decent, actually.
post #17 of 117
First one is fantastic beyond words, if for no other reason than -

Your winner, due to tap-out via triangle choke . . . RIGGS!

Need more realism like this in movie fights . . . nowadays more than ever.
post #18 of 117
Lethal Weapon is a great flick, but I prefer the second one, just a little bit.
Also, I wish there was a seamless branching bit for the DVD's of these, the theatrical version of Lethal Weapon is better than the "director's cut". Stuff like the schoolyard scene just came off as silly to me.
post #19 of 117
Lethal Weapon is one of the five greatest action films ever made.

Sign me up for not caring much for the second one. I guess my main problem was that I liked his wife's death being a senseless accident. It brought a more tragic element to his character's mood swings. If somebody was behind it, and he's able to take that person down, it sort of cheapens his character journey in the first film.

I wish they still made action movies with character development. Somebody needs to reinvent that.
post #20 of 117
Good point about the wife's death. Just out of curiosity, what are the other four films?
post #21 of 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nigel St. Buggering
Lethal Weapon is one of the five greatest action films ever made.

Sign me up for not caring much for the second one. I guess my main problem was that I liked his wife's death being a senseless accident. It brought a more tragic element to his character's mood swings. If somebody was behind it, and he's able to take that person down, it sort of cheapens his character journey in the first film.

I wish they still made action movies with character development. Somebody needs to reinvent that.
Good call about the senseless accident thing, I had actually forgotten all about that for some reason, it's been a few years. I still prefer it though, maybe I'll bust out my widescreen VHS tapes and watch them again.
I'd say Die Hard would be one of the other 4, what else?
post #22 of 117
This'd be perfect if it wasn't for that shitty song over the end credits: "Love is a lethal weapon", indeed.

Same goes for BIG TROUBLE IN LITTLE CHINA, actually.

Otherwise, LW1 kicks my ass and yours. Love Gibson's first bust, where he pulls out the Stooges routine before fucking up the bad guys (excellent headbutt!) and hyperventilating himself out of the zone. Nice use of the trademark Gibson crazy-eyes.

LW2 is a worthy sequel, and the fight between Gibson and Derrick O'Connor's nimble stunt double is pretty awesome. Made a lot more sense than the ridiculous Riggs-Mr Joshua face-off.

Let us not talk of 3 and 4.
post #23 of 117
Good to see the LW love. I've always thought that LW and Die Hard were probably the most influencial action films of the 80s. My favorite offshoot of the mismatched cop pairings, by the way, is definitely the disgruntled cop/dog subgenre popularized by the likes of K-9, Hooch, & Top Dog.

I still enjoy the climactic fight scene in LW. What's wonderful about it is that the bad guys have already been thwarted - there's no practical reason to fight. Doesn't matter though because a score must be settled! Excellent.
post #24 of 117
Good to see the LW love. I've always thought that LW and Die Hard were probably the most influencial action films of the 80s. My favorite offshoot of the mismatched cop pairings, by the way, is definitely the disgruntled cop/dog subgenre popularized by the likes of K-9, Hooch, & Top Dog.

I still enjoy the climactic fight scene in LW. What's wonderful about it is that the bad guys have already been thwarted - there's no practical reason to fight. Doesn't matter though because a score must be settled! Excellent.
post #25 of 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by burtyoung
I still enjoy the climactic fight scene in LW. What's wonderful about it is that the bad guys have already been thwarted - there's no practical reason to fight. Doesn't matter though because a score must be settled! Excellent.
But it's a fight the character Riggs has become at the end of the movie wouldn't fight. He doesn't need to prove anything anymore. He's gotten his victory.
post #26 of 117
I like the LW2 reveal that his wife was murdered. A lot of it has to do with how great Derrick O'Connor was at describing the incident. Then to toss Riggs into the water where he sees Patsy Kensit dead is just a 1-2 punch that really gets you anxious as to how Riggs is going to kill every single one of those guys.

I also love how LW2 opens with the title of the film (with the Looney Toons theme playing in the background) and then starts right in the middle of a chase scene. That's a testament to how well the characters were developed in the original that you could start the first sequel that way. There are other moments in part 2 that I always enjoy. Roger debating whether to take the drug money at the end, the death by surf board that occurs during the middle chase, and Pesci's rant about drive-in restaurants. His rants got tired by the time it got to LW4 but it was funny the first time around.
post #27 of 117
Couldn't agree more, Moltisanti.

Part 1 may be slightly better in quality but I feel LW2 does the best job at combining the series trademark humour and action. I also felt that Arjen Rudd and Peter (played by Derrick O' Conner) were a slimy pair of bad guys. None of the villains in LW 3 were very memorable and as flawed as it is, LW4 had a compelling baddie in Jet Li (though he still wasn't up to par with the baddies in Pts. 1&2).
post #28 of 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Subotai
Good point about the wife's death. Just out of curiosity, what are the other four films?
Well now I have to actually think about what I said. Let's see...

Raiders of the Lost Ark. For some reason, people never think of this movie when they talk about action films. Well it is. And it's incredible.

Lethal Weapon. We've already gone over that.

Die Hard. Second only to Lethal Weapon in the way it combines blistering action with relatable, vulnerable heroes.

The Killer. Hey, I didn't say American action films, did I? You could substitute Hard Boiled for this without upsetting me. I think they're about neck in neck.

Mad Max 2/The Road Warrior. Some people would say this is a science fiction film, and therefore not an action film. Those people ride special buses to school. The second best chase scene ever filmed, after Raiders.
post #29 of 117
Thread Starter 
What about 'The Matrix'?
post #30 of 117
Roger Murtaugh must be the most hated man on his block. He has a constant parade of bad guys driving cars through his house and kidnapping his family. Plus, his kids' friends all end up dead.
I'm surprised his wife hasn't divorced him by now.
post #31 of 117
That action movie list is curiously devoid of anything older than 1981. The first Dirty Harry movie, Peckinpah's The Getaway, Bullitt for that matter, all these belong on a greatest action movie list. And no Walter Hill on there, for shame.
post #32 of 117
Pretty sure he means "five most influential action movies of the 80's."
post #33 of 117
48 Hrs. is pointedly missing, then. It created the template for every buddy action film ever since.
post #34 of 117
48 HOURS definitely started the buddy trend of the 80's and then those movies started to get better with RUNNING SCARED and perfected with LETHAL WEAPON.

I'd also say COMMANDO was pretty influential in the 80's. It wasn't the first of the "1 man against an army" films but it was the best and all the ones that would come later seemed to want to emulate it.

I'd credit THE TERMINATOR with kicking off the great sci-fi/action explosion that lasted about a decade.
post #35 of 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moltisanti

I'd also say COMMANDO was pretty influential in the 80's. It wasn't the first of the "1 man against an army" films but it was the best and all the ones that would come later seemed to want to emulate it.

.
Totally false.
Commando was a low rent Rambo rip-off.
post #36 of 117
Clark You Crazy Mutha!
post #37 of 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moltisanti
48 HOURS definitely started the buddy trend of the 80's and then those movies started to get better with RUNNING SCARED...

.
post #38 of 117
When gay 80s fashion reached it's peak!
post #39 of 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by wadew1
Clark You Crazy Mutha!
I'm on the ragged edge!
Somebody shoot this prick!
Shootmeshootmeshootmec'mongrrrgrgrllrrlglgrrr!
post #40 of 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by wadew1
When gay 80s fashion reached it's peak!
That's Detroit's finest!
They took down Jimmy Smits!
post #41 of 117
Jimmy Smits in TIGHT BIKINI BRIEFS. Every male character in this movie had to be shown in their 80s underwear at least once.
post #42 of 117
I'll never forget the scene of Dan Hedaya runnin' round in his tighty whiteys. So, so, sexy.
post #43 of 117
the only thing hedaya should be showing off is the MASSIVE SHOULDER HAIR he displayed in Alien Resurrection.
post #44 of 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobClark
Totally false.
Commando was a low rent Rambo rip-off.
By Rambo do you mean FIRST BLOOD? Because I've always thought of that as more of a drama that was actually trying to send some sort of message than an action film. If you're talking about the actual follow up called RAMBO then COMMANDO is in no way a low rent rip-off. It only came out 5 months after RAMBO and it surpasses everything in RAMBO.

You guys can run those RUNNING SCARED photos all you want. It's a funnier film than 48 HOURS and the action is staged better. Deal with it.
post #45 of 117
He has medusa style shoulder hair that can strangle the life out of his foes.
post #46 of 117
Of course I meant First Blood Part 2. Don't you dare underestimate me.
Commando filmed fast, as rip-offs often did to cash in on a trend. This was when Ahnuld was still a poor man's Stallone and filmed dreck like Conan The Destroyer. And while history has revealed Commando to be the superior film, it was Rambo that sparked the One Man War phenomenon. Commando came and went. It was a mild hit at the time, but no where near as popular as Stallone's Vietnam opus.

And Police Academy 2 was also funnier than 48 Hrs.
That doesn't make it a better cop movie.
post #47 of 117
Maybe I'll concede you the RAMBO point, but like I said it's not just the humor that makes SCARED better than 48 HOURS. The action, the dialogue, and the villains (I like Landham and Remar, but Smits was better than both of them) are all better in RUNNING SCARED.
post #48 of 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moltisanti
The action, the dialogue, and the villains (I like Landham and Remar, but Smits was better than both of them) are all better in RUNNING SCARED.
You must be smoking crack.
Nothing coompares to Remar using a whore as a human shield while shooting cops and yelling "C'MON PIG!"
And Sonny Landham driving a big bus. A BIG BUS! C'MON!
post #49 of 117
I'm with Moltisanti on this. Running Scared is one of my favorites. Though obviously not in the top five. Great comedy, great action, great cast. I will defend that movie to the death. You german shepherd bastard.

And incidentally, I don't quite understand why people would ask me to list my five favorite action films if they're going to argue with it. Just post your own lists. Then we can all argue. But in order to justify myself:

The original Dirty Harry really wasn't much of an action film, meaning it didn't actually have a lot of action sequences in it. The reason that the 80's is so prevalent on my list is that the modern action film as we know it was really invented in the eighties. I'm sure people will argue this, which is part of the point of these forums. Have at it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragon Ma
What about 'The Matrix'?
What about it?

And I really don't see Rambo as being particularly influential. In point of fact, if any one film single-handedly destroyed Stallone's career as an actor, it was that one. He may as well have flushed his Academy Award nominations (that's weird to think about now, ain't it?) down the toilet at that point, because after that, he was a drooling, muscle-headed killing machine. Nobody would even consider him for a part that didn't involve a machine gun. And by the same token, the action movie in general began to take a downward turn after that film. Rambo became a nationwide joke for years to come, signifying everything that was wrongheaded about action films.
post #50 of 117
Remar and Landham were just slightly elevated DEATH WISH thugs. Smits was the real deal, a true class act villain. Just thinking of him yelling "Noooooo!!! My Coke!!!" makes me wish he'd drop the nice guy persona he's been forced to play the last 20 years on TV.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Films in Release or On Video