CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE CHEWERS › Reader Reviews › Tokyo Drifter
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Tokyo Drifter

post #1 of 8
Thread Starter 
http://spikemarshall.blogspot.com/20...o-drifter.html

Seijun Suzuki’s Tokyo Drifter is one of those movies which is all about the experience. A stunningly shot, vibrantly designed gangster movie which like Goddard’s ‘À bout de soufflé’ perfectly reflect the revolution that was occurring in cinema at the time. In fact in many ways Tokyo Drifter epitomises the cool that is often associated with the French New Wave.

Tetsu and his boss Kurata are ex-gangsters looking to put their life of crime behind them and go straight. When a rival gang, not convinced of their intentions, sabotages Kurata’s loan Tetsu is drawn back into the underworld. Following a bloody confrontation Tetsu finds himself fleeing from Tokyo for his life.

Tetsu, an ice cool hitman in a pastel blue suit, isn’t your typical amoral gangster. He follows a samurai’s code of honour and has undying loyalty to Kurata even when offered an incredible position within the rival gang. He is just the personification of cool unflinching and determined to carry out whatever task he is handed.

The film is simply a joy to look at with Suzuki’s eye for visual design proving to be consistently astonishing. While the film open’s in grainy black and white, with a scene where Tetsu gets roughed up, it soon develops into a pastel coloured flurry of wild and vivid set design.

Everything bursts with life and vitality from the crisp red of the baddies suit, to the purple glow of the nightclubs and luscious whites of the snow-capped mountains where Tetsu makes his retreat.

It’s a shame then that with all of these wonderful design elements that the story at best fails to engage and at worst is outright boring. The main problem lies in the fact that not many of the scenes connect very well and it soon starts to feel like a series of set pieces which all form together to create one basic narrative. While the individual scenes are engaging enough and the concepts throughout the movie varied and interesting the overall package doesn’t gel together as well as Suzuki’s later masterpiece Branded to Kill.

That’s not to say the film is terrible, in fact it has some moments that are pure cinematic moments and some truly inventive ideas. The assault on the snowy yakuza headquarters in the 2nd act of the film is a truly wonderful piece of action and the final confrontation is a moment of pure celluloid magic.

It comes down to the fact that this film is very much style over substance. What is interesting is that while Branded to Kill inspired a large amount of western directors, look at Ghost Dog: Way of the Samurai for evidence, Tokyo Drifter seems to have resonated far more with Japanese directors.

Certainly Takashi Miike fuses the sheer abusive violence of Kinji Fukasaku with the more surrealistic elements of Suzuki; Tetsu constantly whistling his own theme tune is a device that perfectly demonstrates the internal logic of Tokyo Drifter. Beat Takeshi also seems to have taken composition and plotting elements from Suzuki, in fact Tetsu can be seen as beta version of the characters that will appear in films such as Hana-Bi.

What Suzuki ultimately accomplishes is a film which while uneven has moments of pure genius and which has tangible influences even today.

I would recommend this as a curio for people interested in seeing where contemporary Japanese directors got their inspiration. For anyone wanting a film which is pure entertainment then Suzuki’s Branded to Kill, a film which eventually ended his studio career, is a far safer bet.

7/10

*images at link given
post #2 of 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spike Marshall
http://spikemarshall.blogspot.com/20...o-drifter.html

It’s a shame then that with all of these wonderful design elements that the story at best fails to engage and at worst is outright boring. The main problem lies in the fact that not many of the scenes connect very well and it soon starts to feel like a series of set pieces which all form together to create one basic narrative. While the individual scenes are engaging enough and the concepts throughout the movie varied and interesting the overall package doesn’t gel together as well as Suzuki’s later masterpiece Branded to Kill.
Interestingly enough, this paragraph pretty much sounds like a very accurate description of Branded to Kill, except of course, for the part about being boring, which it certainly isn't. That movie is largely incomprehensible on first viewing, and has little to no continuity from scene to scene. Suziki seems to have had little interest establishing plot in his film, to such an extent that when there actually is a drop or two of plot exposition in the second half of the film, it seems not just unnecessary, but jarringly conspicuous. Explicitly understandable story-telling just isn't that important to this guy, and I'm amazed that he's able to keep my attention as well as he does without its presence.

Liked your review though. Does Drifter have as much luminously shot rough sex as Branded?

Ah, who am I kidding? I'll see it anyway....
post #3 of 8
I prefer Tokyo Drifter than Branded to Kill. Sure it doesn't make any sense but just looks so great and there's so much style, energy and attitude through it all, I just love it.

One of the best looking film I've ever seen. It's just not for everybody.
post #4 of 8
Tokyo Drifter – like Dr. Gonzo - is one of God’s own archetypes. Sure it’s style-over-substance, but what style! Certainly the film is one in the eye for those who believe Japanese cinema was provincial and inward-looking during the 60s. TD seems to exist in some weird chrono-spatial dimension – something you half expect Roland from King’s The Dark Tower to inhabit – in which the tropes and images of American Westerns/Gangster movies and British 60s Carnaby Street psychedelic-swing flicks have all been mashed together to form some weird bastard offspring that’s hideously colourful and cacophonous yet impossible to drag your eyes from. Indeed, at times it seems more sixties than the sixties could ever have dreamed to be.

It’s a 10/10 film for me.

P.S. The guy in green – whose name escapes me – deserves a mention for looking like he could wipe Danny Trejo off the planet merely by combing his hair.
post #5 of 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geoff Foster
TD seems to exist in some weird chrono-spatial dimension – something you half expect Roland from King’s The Dark Tower to inhabit – in which the tropes and images of American Westerns/Gangster movies and British 60s Carnaby Street psychedelic-swing flicks have all been mashed together to form some weird bastard offspring that’s hideously colourful and cacophonous yet impossible to drag your eyes from. Indeed, at times it seems more sixties than the sixties could ever have dreamed to be.
I really like the Dark Tower comparison. There's also a lot of Nouvelle Vague influence in Tokyo Drifter. I understand perfectly why many would not like this film but it's also a 10/10 for me.
post #6 of 8
Thread Starter 
It's not that I hate Tokyo Drifter. I love the music, style, set dressing and overall tone. I just think that it moves a bit too slowly at times to maintain any sort of tension. I also watched it after Branded to Kill, and once you've seen assassination by way of drain pipe nothing quite seems the same.
post #7 of 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spike Marshall
It's not that I hate Tokyo Drifter. I love the music, style, set dressing and overall tone. I just think that it moves a bit too slowly at times to maintain any sort of tension. I also watched it after Branded to Kill, and once you've seen assassination by way of drain pipe nothing quite seems the same.
I agree it’s slow and almost impenetrable at times. But then so are Kubrick movies. I enjoy watching Seven Samurai, but its pace is that of a dripping tap.

I think the problem most Westerners have with TD is that it’s at cultural aphelion from them. First of all it’s a 60s movie. It’s very difficult for someone who never lived through the 60s to explain precisely what it was all about. Secondly it’s a Japanese 60s movie, and Japanese culture is not something the average Westerner can’t get to grips with easily. Thirdly, it’s a Japanese 60s movie that’s parodying US and British culture and film tropes. If that combination doesn’t make your head spin nothing will.

I wish my copy had a commentary track recorded by someone involved with the film (or a critic, preferably Japanese) who could provide me the cultural reference points I’m missing. I’m sure I’d love the movie even more.
post #8 of 8
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geoff Foster
I agree it’s slow and almost impenetrable at times. But then so are Kubrick movies. I enjoy watching Seven Samurai, but its pace is that of a dripping tap.
Yes, but even though the Seven Samurai is slow moving, it does move with a clarity of purpose. At times it feels like what you are watching in Tokyo Drifter has little to do with anything. I just think with a few more narrative links it could have been a perfect movie.

Like you said though me being a 20 year probably means that I have too much of a disconnect from the era being invoked. I don't mean to be be argumentitive I just wanted to try and undefame myself, as the entire 'it moves slowly' arguement is a bit of a bad one to use.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Reader Reviews
CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE CHEWERS › Reader Reviews › Tokyo Drifter