CHUD.com Community › Forums › CREATURE CORNER › Creature Corner Main › Final Destination 3 Review
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Final Destination 3 Review

post #1 of 9
2/10/06 at 12:38pm
Thread Starter 
Is up!

Discuss...
Reply
post #2 of 9
2/10/06 at 12:48pm

hmm..

"We are spared the creepy yet supliferous character of William Bludsorth, played by Tony Todd."

I think he means "superfluous." I think.

If only other horror franchises would consider just putting people in the meat grinder like the FD movies, then maybe it wouldn't be so bad. Final Destination's Death is the Kane Hodder for the new millenium. Killtastic.
Reply
post #3 of 9
2/10/06 at 1:06pm
Thread Starter 
Damn spellcheck...
Reply
post #4 of 9
2/10/06 at 1:16pm
I'm really excited to see this. Going after work today. Though I have to say I enjoyed the second one a lot more than the first. The ending also felt tacked on in the original, where as the second one at least had some sensible resolution. Well, sensible for this franchise anyway.
Reply
post #5 of 9
2/10/06 at 1:57pm
I'm not trying to be a dick, but that review really needed some tighter editing.
Reply
post #6 of 9
2/10/06 at 2:15pm
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brad Millette
I'm not trying to be a dick, but that review really needed some tighter editing.
Sorry I forgot to refresh the checked review.
Reply
post #7 of 9
2/10/06 at 3:59pm
Cool, Greg. I'm really looking foward to this.

I agree with Supremo- I liked the second one better. The first was good too, but the second just said "you know what? Fuck reason- let's just kill these people"

Pure guilty pleasure.
Reply
post #8 of 9
8/5/06 at 3:22am
Okay, now that I finally got around to seeing this, I have one big question - how in the hell do the Final Destination movies keep getting away with R ratings? I was completely shocked with the amount of gore that was allowed in the 2nd one when I first saw it. I hadn't seen something that gory in a theater in years. FD3 has even more bloodshed by far, in some truly disgusting ways. When something like Hostel is considered the height of gore, when it actually isn't that out there, how does FD get this stuff past the ratings board? Is it because it's so over the top and not caused by the hand of another person?
Reply
post #9 of 9
8/5/06 at 3:27am
Hostel is more gruesome while Final Destination is more over the top. I think the tone and way the violence is treated is more important than the physical amount of blood.

Quote:
...and not caused by the hand of another person?
I think this has a lot to do with it as well.
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Creature Corner Main
CHUD.com Community › Forums › CREATURE CORNER › Creature Corner Main › Final Destination 3 Review