CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE CHEWERS › The Chewers Catch-All › On-line vs. real life personas
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

On-line vs. real life personas - Page 3

post #101 of 137
almostsexy,

I doubt you'll ever know for sure, purely because some people will just play around with their answers. All part of the mystery of human nature. I am impressed that you've gotten so many good replies. Maybe you've given everyone something to think about.

However it turns out, it's been an interesting read.
post #102 of 137

Message board etiquette

Sorry if this has been discussed before,

I’ve been thinking about this one for a while, about the differences between how someone might act in person vs. their online "persona". Someday I'm sure some bright spark will write a paper on this but meantime I thought a discussion could be cool.

People do treat each other differently online to the way they do in real life, even in a place like chud where Nick et el strive for a "pub/home" concept to the boards. Now I know sometimes people can wind us up but if you were face to face with someone would you really wind them up as much as happens on the web?

I’ve also noticed that people can be discussing a film and a person will chime in with simply how bad it was or you are stupid for liking it. Now in a bar you wouldn’t go up to someone else’s conversation and do that so what motivates someone to do it online?

There is a real nastiness to some comments as well, beyond simple sarcasm and into the realms of deeply personal attacks. Personally I think if you don't like someone ignore them, taking time out of your day to make their life hell seems a little obsessive and pointless. I mean yes you might drive them away but a lot of discussions get ruined because of it.

Any thoughts on this?
post #103 of 137
post #104 of 137
It was actually that thread that gave me the idea for this one, what I driving at is reasons why people act different. Prehaps there arn't any and its just par for the course, but I do find it interesting that their is an acceptance of less social behavior if you can't see the other person.
post #105 of 137
It could be the fact that annonymity and not having to look people in the face allows posters to insult other users without any sort of guilt. If you can't see the person's face, you don't know how hurt they are by your comments, and you can easily ignore their ripostes. It's having your cake and eating it.

Also, with conversations being in print, and with time delays, people often take offence where it's not intended, and fill in the conversational blanks in a manner that suits their mood.

People bring a lot of their personal baggage onto message boards too. So if you're having a shitty day you can snap at someone online and feel good about yourself, rather than shouting at a friend or spouse and having to apologise. This also comes out when people go on huge tangental rants in their posts because they have no outlet for their ire in the real world. No one will cut them off in the middle of a paragraph, and someone, somewhere might listen. They've wanted to say this thing for ages, but there hasn't been the slightest opportunity in real life, so they shoehorn it into a thread via the most tenuous links. One might even identify another poster as "symptomatic" of a social attitude that you despise, and choose to attack them online to get it of your chest, rather than actually dealing with the problem, or the people you know who are guilty of it.



P.S. - I am usually this long-winded in the real world.
post #106 of 137
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Savage
It was actually that thread that gave me the idea for this one, what I driving at is reasons why people act different. Prehaps there arn't any and its just par for the course, but I do find it interesting that their is an acceptance of less social behavior if you can't see the other person.
Gosh, so why not just add to that useless thread, instead of starting a whole new useless thread to talk about the same exact thing?
post #107 of 137
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brad Millette
Gosh, so why not just add to that useless thread, instead of starting a whole new useless thread to talk about the same exact thing?
Useless?
post #108 of 137
People act slightly different on the internet!

There, the thread's done now. Useless.
post #109 of 137
The point of the thread was useless, but I actually think Geoff and (sigh)Almostsexy brought up some interesting issues in the last half.
post #110 of 137
hahahaha

That's rich.
post #111 of 137
Ah Internet tough guy, when the meek get pissed off and abuse code.
post #112 of 137
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brad Millette
Gosh, so why not just add to that useless thread, instead of starting a whole new useless thread to talk about the same exact thing?
Looks like you got your wish sport. And its not usless, there is no local reason why people act differently on the net beyond the fact they think they can't get away with it.

Which makes me wonder if the kind of people that do it on the net are insecure in real life.
post #113 of 137
You are implying that the way we act in real life is somehow more dignified.
post #114 of 137
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Savage
Looks like you got your wish sport.
He got his "wish" because he was right about not needing to start a new thread about the exact same topic.
post #115 of 137
Brad and Jason, in a tree.
post #116 of 137
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Savage
And its not usless, there is no local reason why people act differently on the net beyond the fact they think they can't get away with it.

I'd like to point out that this sentence makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.
post #117 of 137
I would hope so yes
post #118 of 137
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brad Millette
I'd like to point out that this sentence makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.
That’s supposed to say logical serves me right for not checking my post.
post #119 of 137
Seriously, reread that and try to actually decipher what you wrote. There's more wrong with it than just misuse of the word "local".

Think before you type, kids.
post #120 of 137
The message board as local bar analogy doesn't hold up in a place like this.
post #121 of 137
fact: if those with a propensity for the obnoxious on this message board carried themselves in the same way IRL, they would be shit out of friends, work, and would not be long for this world.
post #122 of 137
Obnoxiousness like presenting opinion as fact?
post #123 of 137
Fact: Elephants are the only animals that can stand on their heads, but cannot jump.
post #124 of 137
obnoxious like presenting opinion as an aside to getting in an objectionable or insulting remark.
post #125 of 137
I saw an elephant jump, arsehole.
post #126 of 137
You're a liar.
post #127 of 137
post #128 of 137
Holeee mack-ah-rahl! I done nevah seen an elephant fly!
post #129 of 137
http://chud.com/forums/showpost.php?...&postcount=361

I used to fear Andrew Clarke, I do so no longer.
post #130 of 137
Gusset has his flaws, but you called Event Horizon a visual tour de force.
post #131 of 137
Yeah but I don't go around deriding other people's choice in films.
post #132 of 137
Didn't Ken Savage used to be the troll known as EvilBeaker?
post #133 of 137
Holy shit, naked baby photos.
post #134 of 137
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobClark
The message board as local bar analogy doesn't hold up in a place like this.
Pretty true.

By now, half the clients would have been shot, stabbed, raped and their bodies mutilated. While the rest is cheering on.

That's a selling point right there.
post #135 of 137
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winterfell
Pretty true.

By now, half the clients would have been shot, stabbed, raped and their bodies mutilated. While the rest is cheering on.

That's a selling point right there.
No, fabfunk is just a scavenger, not a predator.
post #136 of 137
Quote:
Originally Posted by devincf
Didn't Ken Savage used to be the troll known as EvilBeaker?
I used to post on Scorched Planet till I realised they were a bunch of racists if thats what you mean. But I've never tried to hide that, and wasn't that like 3 years ago? You have a longer memorey than I do, id forgotton all about it.
post #137 of 137

Pretty funny breakdown of this on another board...

...just saw this thread and I recently read a breakdown of online personas on a college sports website that I frequent. It's sports-centric but it mentioned Chud.com AND I thought it pretty well defined the different categories of posters lurking out there.

http://http://utahstate.scout.com/2/520203.html

Message boards are a love/hate thing with me. Sure love some of the content, sure hate most of it. But what the hell, it beats workin'.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: The Chewers Catch-All
CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE CHEWERS › The Chewers Catch-All › On-line vs. real life personas