CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE CHEWERS › Reader Reviews › V for Vendetta seen!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

V for Vendetta seen!

post #1 of 26
Thread Starter 
Thank you, CHUD!!!

I saw ‘V for Vendetta’ tonight. My first impression of the movie is “Damn… that was good!”

The following is a spoiler free mini review. I’ll start off by telling you that I am a comic geek. However, I am a comic geek who has never read any of the associated DC/Vertigo comics.

I know… a travesty. I should flog myself.

The movie was outstanding. The action scenes were well done. Don’t be surprised by how few there are, the movie still rolls through to it’s conclusion like the London symphony orchestra on a freight train. That’s not to say you the audience are pulled through. There are surprises, times where you are not sure what is real and what isn’t. The visual effects are more than believable, if sometimes a tad protracted in the case of certain explosions. The audio is great. I’ll not get the 1812 overture out of my head for days. There are times when V gets a little too quiet, so bring your hearing aids if you need them. You wouldn’t want to miss an important piece of information. The dialogue is outstanding. When V makes his first speaking appearance he makes a speech that had to be shot in quite a few takes. He never lets up. Hugo Weaving plays the character perfectly. Again, remember I have not read the comics. So, how do I know for sure?
Natalie Portman is not just a window dressing in this one. Her character, Evey, is really the central point to the film. She is the ‘every’ person that V struggles for. Of course, it’s more than that, but I’ll let you see that for yourselves.
Stephen Fry, playing a television executive, is funny, witty and enjoyable any time he is on screen. Stephen Rea, playing Chief inspector Finch, is an honest cop looking for truth in an untruthful world. His choices are a central part of the story. In fact, his character makes one of the most important decisions in the film. John Hurt as the power hungry Chancellor Sutler is a bit over the top with the theatrics, but I assume that is all part of the character. There is a definite link between his character’s actions and words to another real life dictator half a century or so ago…
There are other actors and characters that stood out. I’m too sleepy to go through them all. The movie was around 2.5 hours long… it’s late here.
I’ve heard that this film could be making a political statement. Some may take it that way, V is a terrorist. You cheer for him because he’s supposed to be the good guy, but he uses all the tools and tactics that a modern terrorist might use. Try to remember that his world, his Great Britain is not the same as todays. It’s a totalitarian regime. Go see this movie and root for the ‘good guy’, even if he does some terrible and unforgivable things.
Just go see it. Make your own mind up. Skip the burger and fries one day and use that money to enjoy yourself at the movies.
post #2 of 26
I've got tickets for Wednesday. Can't wait.
post #3 of 26
That review read like you were paid to write it.
post #4 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt OCallaghan
That review read like you were paid to write it.
because obviously, it COULDN'T POSSIBLY be that good...
post #5 of 26
I bet he gets paid by the word, and he's a conspicuous moron.
post #6 of 26
Thread Starter 
Graynadian: Thank you! I have never been called a Conspicious Moron before!

Cobra: The movie was that good.

Matt: Where's my check? You promised me big money for this review!

Last night I felt I had to put something down on 'paper'. The movie really did impress me that much. I was worried that I was just hepped up on adrenaline. It was a good crowd. It was a fun crowd. I went with a friend from work. On his right was a couple who had never been to a screening before. To my right was an interesting couple. The young lady sitting right beside me was very outgoing. She ran for snacks before the movie started, when she returned I joked that I had sold her seat. In return, she offered to kick my ass. It just got better after that. I never got her name but she was fun and she obviously enjoyed the hell out of the movie. Her husband was relatively quiet at first, but he became vocal, cheering and laughing at the movie as it progressed. There was a young lady in front of us we had been giving that 'guy' lookover while waiting in line. She was very cute in her tight jeans. How cute was she? She was so cute it took me several looks before I noticed the prosthesis on both arms. Oh, it was a good and lively crowd. This may have swayed my opinion some.
I was also tired. It had been a long day at work. I decided that even though I was not at my best, I was going to post something of a review. I've seen Nick complain in the past that he sends out all these passes and rarely does someone discuss or review the movie. This was for you, Nick.

Now someone send me some money.

Conspicious Moron... heh. I like that, I really do.

Until Benny Hill becomes the greatest English Hero I remain,
Joey

P.S. As an added bonus for the guys, imagine Natalie Portman dressed like a naughty young tart. Now go see the movie... your imagination couldn't do the real thing justice.
post #7 of 26
I got a press invite as well, I loved it - I really did but then i really dig 1984/big knives sorta movies. Whereas my better half thought it was a total waste of time. I haven't read the comics but the universe that they do explore in the movie feels consistent. I was moved at several junctions and I felt that they managed to pull off articulate hero with big knives quite well. Will it change minds and open souls, that I am not so sure. But me love it long time...and john hurt is hilarious, pissing all over his Winston but then I'm a fan of base level irony. And Benny Hill needs to be dug up and have a exo suit wrapped round him so that he can dance for me long enough to summon the rage to put him back in the ground.
post #8 of 26
I was at the Atlanta screening last night as well; in the back near the guy who composed the "I Love Natalie Portman" 'poem'.

Didn't love the movie, but liked it alot. I read and really enjoyed the comic a few years back, it still sits on my shelf and I've been meaning to re-read it. I've been anticipating this movie for awhile, and my anticipation got kicked into high gear after the Butt-numb-a-thon reviews and finding out that yes, you never see Hugo Weaving's face the entire movie.

Anyway, thought it was well done. Seemed just a tad bit long and during V's first over-the-top V-filled speech I was a little worried, but it all came together nicely. My favorite part: Stephen Fry and Natalie Portman watching his show together.

The debate was already going on in the lobby; "He was a straight-up terrorist! He was evil!" "He wasn't bad enough or creepy enough!" "He was bad! I can't cheer for that!"
post #9 of 26
I'd like to hear more input from ATL chewers who've read the TPB. I'm still not sure I want to see this.
post #10 of 26
I was really disappointed in the changes to the book, and that probably colored my take on the film--mixed, but leaning slightly negative.

Even if I try to take the book out of my head, though, there are some really shitty, clichéd choices made at the story level. It's frustrating, as, given the subject matter, pandering to the audience seems unneccesary.
post #11 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob Rocco
I'd like to hear more input from ATL chewers who've read the TPB. I'm still not sure I want to see this.
Rocco. See it.
post #12 of 26
i never read the book. but from what i can tell, the movie looks pretty bad. i can't imagine it will live up to the expectations. looks like a more expensive (but just as bad) version of Barb Wire but with a stupid mask instead of big boobs. maybe i'll rent it on DVD.

i think one of the things that is working against me already, is that horrible tag line for the movie... "An uncompromising vision of the future from the creators of the Matrix." first off, tells me nothing about the movie. secondly, it's such a self-stroking way to sell the film, that it already makes me want to hate it.
post #13 of 26
I went to the NYC premier. My friend got me into the VIP room with Hugo, the Wachowskis, Natalie, and the president of WB. Joel Silver was there, too. Very cool stuff and mostly really good people, too.

I didn't like the movie that much at all.
post #14 of 26
Was Larry Wachowski in drag or post-op?
post #15 of 26
I didn't actually get the chance to see, but I think he was dressed in normal (male) business attire. Someone pointed the Wachowski Brothers out to me while we were in the VIP room and I couldn't tell who they were since I didn't know what they looked like and was distracted by Portman. Silver had some audaciously colored get up on that worked somehow nonetheless.

Weaving has a crazy beard now, by the way.

I've been depressed for the past two days since I'm not a movie star or producer, by the way...so much so that the movie seems totally inconsequential. That said, it's growing on me but I still don't think it's a good film.
post #16 of 26
Watching V for Vendetta was the greatest cinimatic experience of my life.

It is the most exciting and most important movie I have ever seen. I was electric walking out, I was laughing and vibrating like an eight year-old.

It is funny, it is sad, it is inspiring, and it is riveting throughout, with only a few formal Wachowski action scenes, all better than anything in the last two Matrices. This is Natalie Portman at her best, and Hugo Weaving plays V to perfection. In fact, I cannot recall a weak performance throughout the entire film. This film would be unrecognizable to someone who had only seen the Matrix Reloaded and Revolutions.

There was only one scene that was not IMO totally synchronous with the spirit and plot of the movie (V v Bishop), and everything else was awesome.

If it lures the mainstream, this movie will have a greater impact on politics than any I can ever recall. It is too proud to be subtle, but too smart to be overbearing. The Avian Flu mention was the only time I thought they were pushing the metaphor, and even then it was fleeting and negligible. If Ebert didn't run tings this would be an Oscar nominee in 11 months.

SEE IT!!!!
post #17 of 26
Damn, i'm sooooooo jealous... That's must-see movie for sure. Man, i just wanna see it!!!!!
post #18 of 26
Also, if you haven't read Moore's novel yet, don't. I find that I'm more likely to get attached to the specifics of a book and then find fault in a movie's generalities, rather than vica versa. The movie is a solid work of art in its own right, there is no need to compare it to the less relevant, more complex book.
post #19 of 26
I must have seen a different movie entirely. Yes, the performances were good. Yes, it looked amazing.

But the script made no sense, the action sequences were short and in close up so hard to make sense of, the characters had bizarre and random motivations. I can't say more without giving too much away, but I couldn't understand why these people behaved as they did at all. Politically, it was a mess, but I agree that it may have some consequences if a lot of people see it....although with as muddy an ideology as it has, what consequences it will have beyond right wingers getting pissed off and left wingers gloating in their love of its poorly-defined liberal message is unclear.

P.S. I agree with most of what I think it was trying to say politically, although it was about as subtle as an anvil to the face.
post #20 of 26
It's a Joel Silver movie, for crissakes. The man has never even stood next to subtlety at a urinal.
post #21 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ Fischer
It's a Joel Silver movie, for crissakes. The man has never even stood next to subtlety at a urinal.
Very true. You should have seen his suit.

But, truth be told, I blame the Wachowskis equally. They do some things well; subtle political commentary (and avoiding LONG monologues to explain simple points) is not one of them. For $60 million, the movie looks amazing, though. Technically, it's flawless and it has a real sense of scope. So maybe it's just the fact that comic books inherently aren't subtle at all that helped the visuals achieve such a grandiose beauty, but made the political commentary and character motivations muddled, incomprehensible, and over-the-top.
post #22 of 26
Subtelty was never part of the novel either, though.
post #23 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by Policar
I must have seen a different movie entirely. Yes, the performances were good. Yes, it looked amazing.

But the script made no sense, the action sequences were short and in close up so hard to make sense of, the characters had bizarre and random motivations. I can't say more without giving too much away, but I couldn't understand why these people behaved as they did at all. Politically, it was a mess, but I agree that it may have some consequences if a lot of people see it....although with as muddy an ideology as it has, what consequences it will have beyond right wingers getting pissed off and left wingers gloating in their love of its poorly-defined liberal message is unclear.

P.S. I agree with most of what I think it was trying to say politically, although it was about as subtle as an anvil to the face.
I don't see how this movie's politics could come across as muddled, because V really didn't try and elaborate too much on what he was after. I would go so far as to call the novel pro-anarchist, and the movie anti-fascist. I got the feeling from the movie that the message is not to move towards any particular liberal ideology, just to move away from fascism and proto-fascism. Perhaps a subtle distinction, but one that I think validates the movie to a certain degree.
post #24 of 26
Saw the movie yesterday. Yes, there are a number of topical references but none are out-of-context in the atmosphere of the film. Overall I thought it extremely well done. The characterizations had depth, the plot never felt muddled, and the themes (while simplisticly drawn at times) were convincingly presented. Well done.
post #25 of 26

puberty has been bad to natalie portman...

... at least, to her acting ability. or maybe it was suffering george lucas. but i maintain she hasn't been truly good in a movie since she was jailbait.
post #26 of 26

Aaaaaaa

This is a dangerous movie to like. You can see some asshole surveilling you based on your review. See if theres a mainstream reviewer that's enthusiastic about this movie or tries to suggest it's anything other than a dumb super hero movie. I doubt it.
I commend the makers of this film for having the balls to insinuate the London Bombings, 911 etc were False Flag ops.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Reader Reviews
CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE CHEWERS › Reader Reviews › V for Vendetta seen!