CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE MAIN SEWER › CHUD.COM Main › Thoughts on UNITED 93
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Thoughts on UNITED 93 - Page 2

post #51 of 59
Thread Starter 
i think that what makes ALGIERS not a neofactualist film is that it includes fictional characters.
post #52 of 59
Quote:
Originally Posted by devincf
http://filmcritic1963.typepad.com/re...nited_93_.html

I had a very long phone argument with Cole on Saturday morning about this film in which he dismissed my personal anecdote of receiving a cell call on a plane in flight when I had forgotten to switch off my phone.
This guy, that's his critical website? And they let him review movies?
post #53 of 59
His other reviews are just as bad as that one.
http://filmcritic1963.typepad.com/re...potter_an.html
EDIT: He gave The Wild FOUR STARS. I'm speechless.
post #54 of 59
Quote:
Originally Posted by detonathor
His other reviews are just as bad as that one.
http://filmcritic1963.typepad.com/re...potter_an.html
EDIT: He gave The Wild FOUR STARS. I'm speechless.
Wow, it's like he mixes every shitty movie critic cliche into one annoying internet package. There's moral grandstanding and righteous indignation (his Devil's Rejects review), there's hyperbole-overuse (every review), and there's shitty shitty shitty shitty shitty shitty shitty unfunny pseudo-"clever" taglines before every review. That and the header to his site is just him stroking his cock to the sounds of his own ego.

Sites like that make me appreciate CHUD.com that much more.
post #55 of 59
Quote:
With the inane promise of making the "darkest" Harry Potter movie yet, Mike Newell (producer on "The Constant Gardener") takes on directing duties to issue a gruelingly sluggish film in the latest installment of the vastly overrated franchise based on J.K. Rowling’s eggheaded children’s books.
I bet if he wanted to, he could make this opening sentence go on forever.
post #56 of 59
This article, written by me, ran in today's copy of our campus newspaper. It's basically an overview of the debate about the film, responses from students and locals and my own experience scattered throughout.


T-town reacts to 'United 93'

As I was looking through my movie notebook, which contains every movie I've seen in the theater in the past three years, I realized that no movie has ever been as high on my radar as "United 93." This comes as no surprise, as the film is easily the most debated since "The Passion of the Christ."

This movie has been the talk of the Internet film community and the entertainment media since it was announced. Discussions have been about the morality and appropriateness of making the movie at all, or at least this soon after 9/11, as well as whether this was an attempt by greedy Hollywood blowhards to capitalize on a major tragedy.

I remember reading many message boards and news articles containing responses like this post from the CHUD.com message boards, written in reaction to the first teaser trailer for the film: "Was this film really necessary, considering how much coverage the event has already had and how it only happened five years ago? Movies are primarily made to make money."

Controversy arose in New York when the first teaser was shown, as it was met with cries from people who thought it was too soon. Eventually the trailer was pulled from the theater because it was considered too upsetting.

Rob Keith, a senior majoring in telecommunication and film, shares a similar sentiment. "It is a subject that does not need to be made into a film," Keith said. "I have not forgotten the events of that day and do not need a film to remind me."

If you have turned on any news station in the past week, you had a good chance of seeing debates about the film. While the discussions on TV revolve mostly around the previously mentioned issues, the conversation in this region of the country revolves mostly around whether people can handle it.

My crimson-blooded mother is in the camp that won't see "United 93" because the emotions brought on by 9/11 are likely to resurface because of the movie. Tess Foster, a junior majoring in English, agrees. “I watched the trailer before the movie Inside Man and that alone was emotional overload. I would never say that I will NEVER be ready to see the movie; all I'm saying is that I'm not ready right now.”
If not for the fact that I am a movie fanatic, I would've probably not seen the movie either.

The film ended up completely wrecking me emotionally; my head was in my lap as the credits rolled because I was sobbing uncontrollably.

After the show, not a sound was heard aside from the noise I was making as the audience members slowly made their way out of the auditorium.

Several students who attended the same screening congregated outside the theater afterward to discuss their feelings. One junior who wished to be identified only as John said that "it's a tough movie" and the film is "inspirational."

Jessica Juliana, a sophomore majoring in accounting, applauded the film for not exploiting the event "like Pearl Harbor with its lovey-dovey story."

"They didn't ham it up at all," she said.

Two locals also chimed in on the film. Tommy Townsend, a UA alumnus who served in the Army for 33 years, said, "It really made you 're-angry,' you know what I'm saying? The commercials said everybody really ought to see it, and ... they really ought to see it."

When asked whether they thought the movie was at all inappropriate, his wife, Cathy Townsend, responded, "Absolutely not. It was very respectful." She added that the film was "very realistic [and] very powerful."

One of the most interesting reactions came from Japanese exchange student Rui Taniguchi, who is studying political science and criminal justice. When he spoke of seeing the events of 9/11 unfold while in Japan, he said, "We did care about it, but we were just bystanders. Most people were really calm and cool about it."

Before the film, I was visibly nervous, and he asked me why I was agitated. He repeated several times that "it's just a movie." However, the film clearly gave him a new perspective on the events of that day.

"I was trembling," Taniguchi said of his experience with the film. "I wasn't thinking that these things actually happened. The movie made it real for me, really real."
post #57 of 59
At first I wanted to have nothing to do with this movie, but I'm definitely not one of the "it's too soon" people. As far as that goes, at the end of the day it's a movie and if you want to see it you will and if you don', well, you won't. It's just something that seems too 'real'. I was in Manhattan on 9/11 and it's all a bit of a blur at this point, and it hardly seems like it all could have happened. I still remeber the smell down in the area for weeks and weeks after and I'm pretty sure I'll never forget it. I go to movies more for the escapist experience and to have a good time. This definitely doesn't fall into that category, but I'm starting to feel like I should go see it. It stings now just thinking about it and I'm pretty sure the experience will have an emotional effect on me, but that's ok. Might be good for me.
post #58 of 59

Liar. You'll have to come back and  try again next week my corny friend. 

post #59 of 59

Wow. You revived a 5 year old thread for that?

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: CHUD.COM Main
CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE MAIN SEWER › CHUD.COM Main › Thoughts on UNITED 93