CHUD.com Community › Forums › SPECIFIC FILMS › The Franchises › The Original Trilogy DVD Release... CONFIRMED!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The Original Trilogy DVD Release... CONFIRMED! - Page 7

post #301 of 347
Quote:
Originally Posted by UserNameIndeed
That chick was hot.
Yes. That was Koo Stark as Cami. I have a picture of her in costume that I clipped out of some old Star Wars magazine up on the wall at work.
post #302 of 347
Quote:
Well I just watched my TOD dvd, and Willie DOES run away into a tunnel in this scene. Only Short Round is captured. We then don't see Willie until after Indy has drunk the blood of Khali and she is to be sacrificed. Go and watch it - it's right at the end of chapter 19 on my dvd, at about the 1:06 mark. Then, at the beginning of chapter 22, we get an establishing shot of the palace, which then cuts to Short Round in chains in the mines. It's here that my friend says the scene with Willie and Chattar Lal should have been.
The scene occurs in the original novelization, but when I saw the film theatrically on opening night, it wasn't in the film.
post #303 of 347
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl Cunningham
:: Grabs popcorn, Milk Duds and a soda and continues to observe in an amused state. ::
Hello Mr. Cunningham. I hope you step back into the ring for the live action TV series, Mecha too. It is often more fun from here though, I agree.
post #304 of 347
Quote:
MAY 23 | In the wake of extreme fan protests, Lucasfilm is positioning its release of the original ’70s theatrical versions of the first three Star Wars movies as bonus features.

As groused about on various DVD enthusiast Web sites, including www.thedigitalbits.com and www.hometheaterforum.com, Lucasfilm confirmed the studio is not remastering these early films. The prints for the Sept. 12 DVDs of Star Wars: Episode IV—A New Hope, Star Wars: Episode V—The Empire Strikes Back and Star Wars: Episode VI—Return of the Jedi come from laserdiscs of the films released in the mid ’90s. This means that Episodes IV-V1 will be presented in widescreen but not anamorphic, thereby not making full use of modern TV screens.

Lucasfilm acknowledges that some imperfections are embedded in the prints, but director of publicity John Singh said the company felt there was little need to invest resources into sprucing up films that have already been restored to pristine form.


Special edition versions of the films with additions made by George Lucas were released in theaters in the ’90s and on DVD in 2004.

“We put a lot of time and effort into digitally restoring the negatives for the 2004 DVD releases,” Singh said. “The late ’90s theatrical versions represent George’s vision for Star Wars. We hoped that by releasing the original movies as a bonus disc, it would be a way to give the fans something that is fun. We certainly didn’t want to be become a source of frustration for fans.”

Although the prints aren’t in the best of shape, the masters used for the laserdiscs “do look good,” Singh assured.

Both old and new versions of Episodes IV-VI will be included in the Sept. 14 Star Wars sets, to be distributed by 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment. The revamped ’90s theatrical versions will be offered in anamorphic widescreen.

This release also represents the first time the movies will be available individually on DVD.

Fans have threatened to boycott buying the original Star Wars films if they aren’t cleaned up.

“These are the versions that the fans saw as kids back in the ’70s—this was how they grew up,” said Ron Epstein, HomeTheaterForum.com co-owner. “George doesn’t like these versions, and it’s not the way he wants his legacy to be remembered. But fans [are saying], ‘You aren’t doing us a favor [in putting out] what basically amounts to a laserdisc transfer.”

Aware of the uproar, Lucasfilm is in the process of directly contacting its upset fan base in an attempt to smooth things over.

Some fans had been speculating that Lucasfilm was saving its big gun efforts for the new generation DVD formats. But the company said that at this time, there are no plans to release the original ’70s Star Wars versions in high-definition.

“We absolutely appreciate the fact that these fans are so passionate,” Singh said. “It’s indicative of the fact that they care so much about Star Wars.”


http://www.videobusiness.com/article/CA6337246.html

Now they're calling the original cuts just a BONUS disc. This was not stated in the original press release. I went to the starwars.com site and found the original press release. They changed it; from this:

"In response to overwhelming demand, Lucasfilm Ltd. and Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment will release attractively priced individual two-disc releases of Star Wars, The Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi. Each release includes the 2004 digitally remastered version of the movie, as well as the original theatrical edition of the film. That means you'll be able to enjoy Star Wars as it first appeared in 1977, Empire in 1980, and Jedi in 1983."

To this:

"In response to overwhelming demand, Lucasfilm Ltd. and Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment will release attractively priced individual two-disc releases of Star Wars, The Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi. Each release includes the 2004 digitally remastered version of the movie and, as bonus material, the theatrical edition of the film. That means you'll be able to enjoy Star Wars as it first appeared in 1977, Empire in 1980, and Jedi in 1983."



I'm pretty much over it, as I'm not buying them. I just find it all amusing.
post #305 of 347
Yeah, I briefly considered it, but I'm out, too. Shitty Company.
post #306 of 347
Quote:
“George doesn’t like these versions, and it’s not the way he wants his legacy to be remembered".
What was it Han Solo said about delusions of grandeur?
post #307 of 347
Lynne Hale (publicity@lucasfilm.com):

I wanted you to know how much we appreciate the passion and enthusiasm you have for Star Wars, and thank you for sharing your concerns about our upcoming DVD release.

The DVDs being released in September will contain two versions of Star Wars: Episodes IV, V and VI – the Special Editions (which represent George’s vision of the movies) and the first versions, which will be included as bonus material. We hoped that releasing those “original” movies on a bonus disc would be a way to have some additional fun with the debut of the movies as individual DVDs. We certainly did not want it to become a source of concern or frustration for any of our fans.

As you may know, an enormous amount of effort was put into digitally restoring the negatives for the Special Editions. In one scene alone, nearly 1 million pieces of dirt had to be removed, and the Special Editions were created through a frame-by-frame digital restoration. The negatives of the movies were permanently altered for the creation of the Special Editions, and existing prints of the first versions are in poor condition.

So many fans have requested the original movies, we wanted to find a way to bring them to you. But since these movies do not represent George's artistic vision, we could not put the extraordinary time and resources into this project as we did with the Special Editions. The 1993 Laserdisc masters represented the best source for providing the original versions as DVD bonus material. Although these are non-anamorphic versions, they do preserve the original widescreen composition of the movies.

We want you to be aware that we have no plans – now or in the future – to restore the earlier versions.

We hope you will understand our decision and, again, want to let you know how much we appreciate your interest and enthusiasm.

Sincerely,
Lynne Hale
publicity@lucasfilm.com
post #308 of 347
A shorter version of that email:

Dear Star Wars Fans,

Here's your bone. Don't complain to us just because it's a dirty thirteen-year-old one. Now fuck off.

Sincerely,
Lucasfilm
post #309 of 347
"We want you to be aware that we have no plans – now or in the future – to restore the earlier versions."

P.S. - But, when Bill Gates becomes a trillionaire, George will keep beating this dead horse so he can join him in that club.
post #310 of 347
Im sure the prints are pretty clean so that does not bother me and the Williams score on a properly set up system (such as mine) will blow a away a tinkered 5.1 mix, but not being anomorphic is just plain bullshit
post #311 of 347
Interesting that "George's vision" is now once again referred to as the Special Editions. Note that the 2004 DVD release dropped the 1997 Special Edition tag, since they were supposed to be Lucas' final (as of 2004) and official versions of choice. But now they're "special editions" again. This all just goes to show that artistic revisionism is one motherfucker of a slippery slope.
post #312 of 347
That’s just so you can differentiate between the sets.
post #313 of 347
Any word on extra bonus materials. I've been a loyal lucas fan for just about as long as I live, but I all of this is such bullshit.
post #314 of 347
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hanzo Steel
Any word on extra bonus materials. I've been a loyal lucas fan for just about as long as I live, but I all of this is such bullshit.
The extra bonus materials are the original movies.
post #315 of 347
Quote:
Originally Posted by g-dude
A shorter version of that email:

Dear Star Wars Fans,

Here's your bone. Don't complain to us just because it's a dirty thirteen-year-old one. Now fuck off.

Sincerely,
Lucasfilm
Perfect g-dude.
post #316 of 347
What I hate is the attitude that the original films are looked on as some kind of blight by Lucas when they were the things that made the money that let him pretty much do whatever he wants for the rest of his life. Listening to the spin from the Ranch, you'd think that the Special Editions were what finally made the whole venture profitable.
post #317 of 347
This whole situation reminds me of that Chris Rock joke about when he got pulled over by the white cop, who told him he had stolen the car he was driving.

"He had me believing I stole my own car."

He hates the originals, fine, whatever. A lot of filmmakers hate their own work. But once it's in the public zeitgeist, it no longer belongs to you. Most sane filmmakers will admit this. Lucas for some reason can't get over the fact that he made them in the 70s and 80s... you didn't like the technology, okay... then why the fuck make the movies to begin with? All that aside, accept the fact the originals are landmark films, from that period, and at the very least deserve the same quality given to the special editions.

Sometimes I feel like I'm the one who's nuts.
post #318 of 347
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colt45
But once it's in the public zeitgeist, it no longer belongs to you.
I don't necessarily agree with that -- I think any artist has the right to go back and tinker with something they created. But the public has the right to hate that tinkering. And such tinkering should not completely blot out the existence of the original.
post #319 of 347
Imagine if the "special edition" of every classic film was the only version you could buy, or if those undeniably classic films got this shabby treatment upon DVD release. The world would be a much poorer place for movie fans. (Btw, I know there's a huge difference between those two suppositions. One is a much bigger foul than the other.)
post #320 of 347
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Dickson
I think any artist has the right to go back and tinker with something they created.
Yeah, but no TRUE artist would ever do that - they'd be too busy creating, you know, more art.
post #321 of 347
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Dickson
I don't necessarily agree with that -- I think any artist has the right to go back and tinker with something they created. But the public has the right to hate that tinkering. And such tinkering should not completely blot out the existence of the original.
I dont disagree with the rights of the artist, they can sodomize the original IPs for all I care. But to ignore the significance of your own creation is downright absurd. To play dumb, and create silly excuses as to why you wont give the original classics the same treatment as your revisions frankly pisses me off. It's not about the right of the artist, it's about give and take. There's a such thing as courtesy; hell Lucas is one of the most moral filmmakers in the biz. The irony of his behavior is downright eerie.
post #322 of 347
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colt45
But to ignore the significance of your own creation is downright absurd. To play dumb, and create silly excuses as to why you wont give the original classics the same treatment as your revisions frankly pisses me off. It's not about the right of the artist, it's about give and take. There's a such thing as courtesy; hell Lucas is one of the most moral filmmakers in the biz. The irony of his behavior is downright eerie.
That was the point I was making earlier. Lucas seems to want to ignore that the initial impact of his beloved saga was made by the films in their original state. All his tinkering in the world won't change that, and to try to act like the fans' continued embrace of them is some kind of misguided nostalgia is almost insulting.

I remember when his alma mater USC was doing a decade-by-decade film retrospective and wanted to use Star Wars for the 70s, and he refused to allow them to use the original 1977 cut of the film, thereby completely undermining its usefulness as an example of 70s filmmaking. He's retroactively rewriting film history, and not for the better.
post #323 of 347
While I still in concept defend Lucas' decision to go back and alter his creation anyway he wants, it's the marketing angle of this that really bugs me.

I don't care enough about the movies at this point to give a rat's ass about Han shooting first or whatever. For all I care the next release of these movies can have farting armpit noises in place of John Williams' score.

BUT, to announce a product after years of consumer demand, only to recant and say 'sorry you got so excited about being offered an inferior product, that's not really the point of you buying these again anyway' screams of a crappy company being found out and going into damage control.

I believe them when they say it would have been expensive to produce higher-quality product, but I have a difficult time believing it would have been impossible, and a much harder time believng it would not have been profitable for them in the end.
post #324 of 347
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Ellis
I believe them when they say it would have been expensive to produce higher-quality product, but I have a difficult time believing it would have been impossible, and a much harder time believng it would not have been profitable for them in the end.
I'm just not so sure about the profitable part. While they might be able to just use the already cleaned up & restored footage used in the 2004 release (not sure exactly how the digial restoration process works), they would still have to clean up the parts not used in the Special Editions. That would cost a pretty decent amount. Add to that at whole new sound mix, because obviously dialogue and music cues would be off from the SE versions. Then, factor in people that don't really care to repurchase this series when they've already bought the 2004 release (families, non-film fans, etc.).

It really boils down to a small group of people (when compared to everyone out there buying SW on DVD) that demand this, and would be willing to repurchase the special editions this release.

I haven't bought any of the SW DVDs because I know that someday they'll be released on HD-DVD, and by that point, I'll probably have an HD set. I have the OT on VHS (birthday present) and I'm willing to wait this out.

I love Star Wars (even the prequels, but in a different way) but I refuse to purchase these more than once. It's weird, because I purchased the Indy set on DVD, and yet I'm completely willing to re-purchase it when it comes out on HD-DVD. But I won't do it with Star Wars, because it and it's fans are just being milked for every dollar Lucasfilm can squeeze out of it.

EDIT: Ok, I just checked my email, and buddy of mine sent me these two pics, and I thought I'd post 'em here. First one is fully CG, created in Zbrush (3d modeling program). Second one is a look at what The DaVinci Code should've been...

I guess he was husky as a child!!


post #325 of 347
We're not talking about a major clean job. Most fans are up in arms and have stated they don't care about super clean prints. WE JUST WANT ANAMORPHIC. Before we knew there was going to be non-anamorphic, we were okay with the 2.0 sound. We were cutting Lucas alot of slack because we assumed he'd, you know, follow an ethical code and release basic anamorphic transfers, even if they were dirty, we didn't give a shit and would understand they couldn't afford a massive clean job. In fact, I was positive the prints wouldn't be very good, but I had no idea they'd have the audacity to release laserdisc boots without anamorphic. It's akin to buying one of the boots from ebay or something. At this point, I wouldn't be above exploiting Star Wars by grabbing the boots, something I was leary of before.

Lucas used to hand out profit points to people who contributed to Star Wars' success... you know, the DP, editor, staff. Some would become instant millionaires from Lucas' gesture. Yet the fans continually get shitted on, and we're the assholes.
post #326 of 347
Lucas has one last chance to make amends on home video: the inevitable six-film super-deluxe-boxset. It really should follow the ALIEN QUADRILOGY template:

- 2 discs for each film: 1) Seamlessly-branched, top-notch presentations of the Original Cut and the Final Cut, with commentary and 2) tons of all-new extras specifically devoted to that film.
- 1 or more archival discs for additional vintage material, trailers, etc.

If Lucas delivers that, I'll be a truly happy STAR WARS fan again...for the first time since 1997. Otherwise, I have my LDs and DVD bootlegs and I'll never buy any Lucasfilm product ever again.
post #327 of 347
Quote:
Originally Posted by Litmus Configuration

If Lucas delivers that, I'll be a truly happy STAR WARS fan again...
I wouldn't hold my breath.
post #328 of 347
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colt45
It's akin to buying one of the boots from ebay or something.
At least my boots are anamorphic, with a pretty decent 5.1 mix. It's sad that the black market variety of these films have gotten a better transfer than the official ones.
post #329 of 347
The X-O Project is a ways off from being completed, but hopefully those guys'll be able to make it happen. In some levels of geekdom, what they're attempting could be considered heretical, but a DIY digital remastering of the vintage SW trilogy is surely cause for canonization.
post #330 of 347
I'm still waiting for the fucking Apocalypse Set, with 5 discs for each of the original trilogy installments (the original version, the '97 special edition, and the '04 special edition, and two loaded special features discs), 4 discs for each of the prequel trilogy installments (theatrical version, DVD version, and two special features discs), and then Empire Of Dreams' disc, the Star Wars Holiday Special disc, a disc for each of the Ewok TV movies, and a couple more general special features discs. Basically two to three times bigger than that massive Matrix set that came out recently.
post #331 of 347
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt Halbauer
The X-O Project is a ways off from being completed, but hopefully those guys'll be able to make it happen. In some levels of geekdom, what they're attempting could be considered heretical, but a DIY digital remastering of the vintage SW trilogy is surely cause for canonization.
I'm very impressed by the amazing/insane work being done by the X0 Project. I'm just wondering how it will get distributed. I guess the same way any bootleg does. But at the rate they're going, they probably won't be done with the whole trilogy until two or three new home video formats from now.
post #332 of 347
From The Digital Bits:

Quote:
Also today... a follow-up on something we've been telling you to expect for quite while now. 2007, as you may well be aware, is the 30th anniversary of the original Star Wars' debut in theaters. You'd have to be stupid not to know that Lucasfilm is going to have big DVD release plans with which to celebrate the anniversary, and we've been telling you that was the case for many months now. Indeed, during our last visit to the Ranch for the DVD release of Episode III, producer Rick McCallum confirmed that a box set of all six films was going to happen eventually, and animation director Rob Coleman even let it slip that the puppet Yoda from Episode I had already been replaced with a new CG Yoda to match Episodes II & III for the "future" release. T-Bone over at Star Wars Universe recently speculated about this box set, and we've been quietly checking in with our industry sources on it as well. Well, we've confirmed it: There IS a big, ultimate, 6-film Star Wars anniversary DVD box set planned for 2007. There will be more changes to the films, and there will be LOTS of new, never-before-seen special features - all the good stuff that was held back by Lucasfilm from the original Trilogy DVD release a few years ago. Think deleted scenes and more. We don't know if good, genuinely-REMASTERED versions of the original theatrical editions of the films will be included or not (though how you could call the set "ultimate" without them, we don't know). We don't expect high-definition versions yet, as those formats are just too new. We don't have ANY other details for you yet, so please don't ask. But as you consider whether or not to purchase the "limited edition" DVDs due on 9/12... we thought you should know that more IS absolutely on the way next year. 'Nuff said for now.
post #333 of 347
STAR WARS: Openly contemptuous of its fanbase since June 1999.
post #334 of 347
Thats it - Im downloading them.....thanks George.
post #335 of 347
Star Wars is becoming like Star Trek its just never gonna die. When is that tv show coming?
post #336 of 347
which one - live action or Tarkofskys animated one?

Its true - it never ends....
post #337 of 347
Unfortunately, Genndy has nothing to do with the new "Clone Wars" Animated show. He was asked by LFL to come back to oversee it, but politely declined. Which I can understand, he's too creative to be pigeon-holed in this one more-than-established universe.

The new animated series is actually quite different. For one, the characters and designs have been redone. And it's also being made entirely CG.
post #338 of 347
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl Cunningham
The new animated series is actually quite different. For one, the characters and designs have been redone. And it's also being made entirely CG.
I've been wondering about this series. Is it basically going to retell the same events from the CLONE WARS cartoon?

Further adventures within the same time frame?
post #339 of 347
They will be all new stories (with possibly a recurring major event here or there) but will take place during the same time-frame: the 3-4 years between AOTC and ROTS.

The episodes will also be about 23-25 minutes each (to account for full 30 minutes on TV).

To be honest, I'm still a bit perplexed by the decision to do a completely new (and different) animated series set within that same finite time period.
post #340 of 347
Doesn't this series have more of an animatic done for the films look to it?
post #341 of 347
Are the events from the CLONE WARS going to be cannon? Or will we get new verisons of events.

Eh, perplexing, indeed.
post #342 of 347



Top is the official release. Bottom is one of the fan-made LD transfers
post #343 of 347
I guess it depends on what you consider canon. The cartoon shorts often conflicted with the comics. But you can make a good arguement around the fact that on the hierarchy of media, anything film wins out, especially with things like Star Wars. But the whole Asaj Ventress death and fight is totally different in the comics.
post #344 of 347
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason@Star-Wars.net
Doesn't this series have more of an animatic done for the films look to it?
Eh, sorda. It's more stylized than that.
post #345 of 347
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fatboy Roberts



Top is the official release. Bottom is one of the fan-made LD transfers
...and I take it these fan made transfers - which to my ever-so-slightly trained eyes look sharper - are torrent-able?
post #346 of 347
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason@Star-Wars.net
I guess it depends on what you consider canon. The cartoon shorts often conflicted with the comics. But you can make a good arguement around the fact that on the hierarchy of media, anything film wins out, especially with things like Star Wars. But the whole Asaj Ventress death and fight is totally different in the comics.
Per Lucasfilm, whenever there's a conflict between the latter, pre-Episode III cartoons and Labyrinth of Evil -- essentially -- Labyrinth "wins." There are several noted differences between the two stories (Grievous's kidnapping of Palpatine, et al), and where a discrepancy arises, the novel takes priority, being considered the more detailed.

In fact, the Tartakovsky cartoons are regarded in-universe as an entertainment "dramatization" of those events, which vary from "true" account (LoE) in certain respects...similar to the "true" Stargate SG-1 universe differing from the "fictionalized" 1994 feature film; the Macross TV series differing from the "fictionalized" Macross: Ai Oboete Imasu ka? movie, etc.
post #347 of 347
For anyone still interested in this, this site has posted a few clips in xvid format, including the Greedo scene. They look... not half bad actually. In my opinion, at least.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: The Franchises
CHUD.com Community › Forums › SPECIFIC FILMS › The Franchises › The Original Trilogy DVD Release... CONFIRMED!