CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE CHEWERS › Reader Reviews › Around the World in 80 Days (2004)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Around the World in 80 Days (2004)

post #1 of 9
Thread Starter 
With the great delay between the completion and release, the blink-and-you-missed-it trip through the theaters, and the generally poor reviews, this movie had the smell of disaster all over it. Fortunately, I have a weakness for both kung fu and the Victorian inventor genre (and how often am I going to see those combined?), so I was compelled to check it out.

This is by no means a great film, but it's an amusing and breezy two hours, and certainly one of Jackie Chan's best western movies, faint praise though that may be. For Hong Kong fans, it gives us Wong Fei-Hung, and the role is played by Sammo Hung, which is a nice little reunion. There's also a brief appearance by Maggie Q. As out-of-place as the martial arts action feels in a Jules Verne adaptation, it's good vintage Jackie choreography, and it's a lot of fun to watch.

Also fun to watch is Steve Coogan, though he's given little to wrap himself around. Cécile De France, in a role so far removed from Haute Tension that I utterly failed to recognize her, is adorable as the love interest, and Jackie Chan's comic skills are on good display much of the time. The cameos are a mixed bag. Arnold Schwarzenegger gets to spoof himself as a self-involved prince (though one wonders if he gets the joke). Luke and Owen Wilson are wasted as the Wright Brothers. Rob Schneider as an American hobo is just irritating, but that goes without saying. On the other hand, Mark Addy gets to say "You had me at the nipples", so that's got to be worth something.

The whole package is presented as a wholesome family picture, and it certainly seems to be. There's nothing terribly objectionable or troubling here, but not much all that interesting either, other than the visual style used for the traveling transitions, which I quite liked. It's harmless and fun; nothing I'd buy or rewatch, probably, but nothing I'd regret wasting two hours on either.
post #2 of 9
Pretty much my reaction to it as well. I think it just got lumped in with Jackie's apocalyptic run of awful movies of that time - The Medallion and The Tuxedo in particular - and never really stood a chance.

I don't own it, and probably never will, but I'm glad I made the effort to see it.
post #3 of 9
I also enjoyed the film far more than the reviews had led me to expect. Certainly nothing great, but there are a number of good laughs primarily due to Coogan's dry delivery. Schwarzenegger is an absolute riot, and Jackie's not bad but he does better comedic action in Shanghai Knights. The woman was just awful.


Phileas Fogg: [the Black Scorpion leader threatens him with his bracelet] Your threats do not frighten me, nor does your silly bracelet.
[a blade pops out of the bracelet]
Phileas Fogg: All right, it's not silly.
post #4 of 9
i watched it when it came out on dvd and i have no recollection about it at all. so it couldn't have been as bad as people said, but it didn't leave a lasting impression either.
post #5 of 9
i watched it when it came out on dvd and i have no recollection about it at all. so it couldn't have been as bad as people said, but it didn't leave a lasting impression either.
post #6 of 9
Actually, I was a bit disappointed, because until that movie, Steve Coogan never disappointed me. I can't deny the fact that he was a pretty good Phileas Fogg, but sometimes I felt script didn't let him do enough. They should have used him more and and cut down on the goofy Chan a bit. Anyway, there were some nice bits and actors (especially ultra-charming Cécile De France) throughout the film, but as whole I probably didn't enjoy it anywhere near as much as you guys. I think they chose the wrong guy to sit in the director's chair.
post #7 of 9
Thread Starter 
Cutting down on Chan wasn't an option, since he was one of the producers. And he really did provide most of the excitement.
post #8 of 9
Hopefully Cécile De France was able to pay for braces after this movie.
post #9 of 9
my son is named Phineas so I must like this movie.

although I really don't know why half of the movies made have the title character as Phileas and the other half have the main character's name as Phineas.

Is there some country dirivitive of Phineas to Phileas? Like from British to French?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Reader Reviews
CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE CHEWERS › Reader Reviews › Around the World in 80 Days (2004)