CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE MAIN SEWER › CHUD.COM Main › 007 May Be Their IQ
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

007 May Be Their IQ - Page 2

post #51 of 76
I've said it before and I'll say it again. Craig could eat Brosnan for sunday brunch and spit out the teeth and nails.
post #52 of 76
Seconded. Those guys are deluded. It is a point that so much hatred has been spewed over this topic. Im sure the overemotional shrieking grief and venomous rants of twats will return, but its good to know that theyre talking out of their behinds.

Next the transfans.....
post #53 of 76
Anyne who signed that petition and is still retarded enough to be posting on the internet deserves a good school yard beating. I've never seen a more thoroughly delusional bunch of wusses in my life. If Craig had been good they'd look like complete idiots. That the film is a huge worldwide critical and commercial success, almost entirely because of Craig's masterful performance, should banish them from the internet.

Kind of fitting to find out that it's really some psychotic Pierce Brosnan stalker bitch. I used to think these people were just film fans with terrible taste, now they're certifiably insane.
post #54 of 76
Quote:
Originally Posted by mascan42
[Angry Typing Guy]This is not what I'm used to! This is different from what my normal daily experience is! Be like everything else in my life!"[/ATG]
Someone's been listening to Brian Regan!
post #55 of 76
Honestly, looking at that site made me fear for Daniel Craig's life. The people on that site have crossed a very big line, which ain't easy on the internet, and should be forced into therapy. Because they might be dangerous.
post #56 of 76
All kidding aside, it really looks to be an unwell woman at the helm of that mess. And honestly, after a year of fully expecting to be vindicated, months upon months of truly believing, and telling everyone who'd listen (imagine being the cublicle neighbor of the lady who runs the danielcraigisnotbond website) that Casino Royale would not only be terrible, but tank financially, there is no way on earth that person could ever come to terms with how wrong she was.

So now she's put up a wall of denial. I (and you) know gay people who don't know they're gay, because their minds cannot accept it. This is the same defense mechanism at work. Don't fear for Craig; pity the people in this woman's real life who can't escape her brand of crazy.
post #57 of 76
Upon further reading, I'm surprised this broad didn't try to blow up a movie theater on CR's opening night. She's still probably planning on the gay nightclub, though.
post #58 of 76
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Riviello
Someone's been listening to Brian Regan!
Actually my guess is Opie and Anthony. Okay, back to thread..
post #59 of 76
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dario Delfino
Sites like these are there for the hater to justify his hatred, and they seem to have an echo chamber effect - the more they spew hate, the stronger the hate gets, it just keeps getting louder as it bounces off itself.
Which is why I'm a little confused as to why we're giving it so much of our attention.
post #60 of 76
As a digression, since I have nothing much to add to the main thrust of this thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaz
But this is James Bond for crying out loud. Having different actors play Bond is the norm now and if anything, it makes the series even more interesting over the years. You can't go onto any film forum anywhere in existence without seeing that immortal question at least once : Who was the best Bond? I can't think of a single other film franchise which generates that amount of interest in the lead character.
I'd agree that Bond is definitely the champ of the "Who's the best" debates. That said, I'd toss in Batman, and specifically Keaton vs. Bale, along with the villains in a solid second place.

I've seen Sherlock Holmes debated often too, albeit in a pleasant manner. Most Sherlockians I know are quite good natured and well adjusted.
post #61 of 76
Forget about Daniel Craig for a minute....

Imagine how crazy the fanatics would've gotten if the new James Bond was Peter Karrie.
post #62 of 76
Damn. Gio beat me to the joke!
post #63 of 76
The more traditional Bond fans found the article. I like how polite they all are about this crazy broad. "She sounds dangerously fanatical and presents quite repulsive opinions.", "she's really revealed herself to be a proper dangerous nutcase. What a horrible woman."
post #64 of 76
Hilarious. This stuff activated my diaphragm as nothing else did today.


Still I think that the "FAN question" deserves an in depth editorial and more than the "these nerds and fundamentalists aren't us/me" rethoric.

I mean what the fuck is a fan? This expression is way too unspecified and overused.
User Name did a nice attempt of uncovering that mystery his own quasi-sociological way. This woman or whoever this person is, has as it seems some serious problems with men, herself and a stalker like affinity to Pierce Brosnan. Has this anthing to do with being a BOND FAN anyway? Isn't it more like a call for attention? Alright, they use the F(an)-word but in the end it's more like an utilization to belong somewhere to stand in for something, to "make a difference". It's a substitute for true values, it seems. But what do I know....

I just wanted to say that there are questions Devin touched in his two (or more?) FAN editorials that should be asked and maybe answered.
What is a fan?
What is he allowed to do?
Especially as in today's public world fans are critics and run websites, are invited to talkshows and have gained an immense power. They may be rationally thinking people with much intelligence and a talent for writing but they're still some kind of fans.

sorry if some of these english words are messed up and used in a wrong or confusing way.
post #65 of 76
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Prankster
Which is why I'm a little confused as to why we're giving it so much of our attention.
Because its funny as fuck?
Ain“t we all sadists around these boards who just happen to love to see retards running all quaida into the minefields of their broken dreams of having a live?

And Devin:
Please. Could you keep on writing stuff like this about transfans et al?
It is your goddamn obligation to show the lemmings the cliff.
Seriously.
post #66 of 76
I wonder if this will pale in comparison to the inevitable shitstorm that will follow JJ Abrams recasting Kirk and Spock.

Speaking of Star Trek and over the top fans, fan-financed Trek films starring original cast members? Yikes.
post #67 of 76
You guys got it all wrong!

...because "A View to a kill" was waaay better than "Casino Royale".
I know because I heard from my friend about someone who saw it before, so I don't need to see it myself to revel in it's awesomeness.
post #68 of 76
They took the domain name danielcraigisnotbond.com because icantcometotermswiththefactthatiwanttododanielcrai gupthetailpipe.com was taken.
post #69 of 76
Again, it's a woman. Her name is Deanna Brayton. Why'd we all assume it was a guy behind it?
post #70 of 76
Oh, is it really? That's interesting.
post #71 of 76
Because in regard to internet geekdom we all have the low selfesteem that considers ladies as somewhat more grounded on the planes of reality?
Or Pornmaterial.
post #72 of 76
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jan Travolta
Because in regard to internet geekdom we all have the low selfesteem that considers ladies as somewhat more grounded on the planes of reality?
Perhaps. It just seems like most of the bellowing about Craig I've seen on the net has been from men.
post #73 of 76
That's valid, but poke around that site long enough and you realize it's less to do with disliking Craig and more to do with stalking Pierce Brosnan. The content would be exactly the same if the site ended up having to be called cliveowneisnotbond.com.

Not sure if the homophobia is just reaching for something against Craig or not, though. I want to send her screencaps of Pierce Brosnan's gay hitman pool scene from The Long Good Friday.
post #74 of 76
I should have read through the thread and looked at the site more extensively before I commented (though in my defense, I knew it would be annoying and I wanted to avoid reading as much of it as I could).
post #75 of 76
Is he doing a voice, or does this poor bastard really talk like this? And he might be masturbating.
post #76 of 76
Is that guys show really called 'The Jewish Conspiracy'?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: CHUD.COM Main
CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE MAIN SEWER › CHUD.COM Main › 007 May Be Their IQ