CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE CHEWERS › Drafts & Lists › Variety Names The 10 Biggest Flops Of 2006
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Variety Names The 10 Biggest Flops Of 2006

post #1 of 12
Thread Starter 
We all could have figured these, but I think it's good to re-examine why these films flopped. What's interesting about 2006 was that you could easily do this list with another ten financial debacles- it's been a colorful year for financial studio debacles. The list:

A Good Year- Russell Crowe is scary.
Lady in the Water- Awful and deserved.
The Fountain- Not enough Ewoks?
All the King's Men- Sean Penn.
Basic Instinct 2- Duh.
Flushed Away- Americans hate Brits?
Flyboys- The kids aren't WWI fans.
Freedomland- Sam Jackson- box office venom?
Poseidon- Why was this greenlit?
The Wicker Man- You bitches!

The article...

Hollywood diagnoses its audience.

Weighing a film's success is easy. Just add up the box office grosses and DVD sales. Failure however, is more complicated to assess. Financial loss is divided between various studios and other equity resources. And international box office receipts can pull a presumed dud out of the water. Finally, as this past year demonstrated, 'underperforming' can mean making $133 million domestically -- think 'Mission: Impossible III'. Nonetheless, using an admittedly inexact science, herewith are the biggest losers of '06 as determined by an inhouse Variety poll, as well as theories of what went wrong. There were many more winners over the last 12 months, but how can we close out the year without one last bah humbug ? First and foremost in determining the list was the ratio between a film's cost and its revenues. Thus smaller-scale pics that stumbled were not considered. (Note : Several of these movies were co-financed, thus the loss is not always fully on the back of one studio). As for trends, it's notable that none of the flops were comedy or horror pics, and that very few were mega-budget films. For the most part the films were midrange adult dramas and/or period dramas, as well as a smattering of remakes.

A Good Year. Domestic North American gross : $US 7 million.
Fox faced a challenge in selling the pairing of director Ridley Scott
and Russell Crowe in something other than a Gladiator-like action pic.
Marketing for the film, based on the Peter Mayles novel, conveyed this
unease, and the film failed to reach a broad aud. The light-hearted
romp, set in the South of France, was not an obvious sell to Crowe's
male fans and failed to capture the females. News Corp. chairman Rupert
Murdoch publicly deemed the pic a 'flop', predicting it would lose $US
20 million. The film has fared slightly better overseas, where it's
grossed $US 19 million.

Lady in the Water. Domestic North American : $US 42 million.
Knives were out for the movie, and director M. Night Shyamalan, before
it was released, thanks to a book about the making of the movie in
which Shyamalan comes across as whiny and self-important. After
Disney passed, Shyamalan took the project to Warner Bros., which put
muscle behind the marketing of the $75 million pic but was unable to
sell it strongly to auds who may be tiring -- or at least too knowing
of Shyamalan's artistic formula. And though Paul Giamatti has a
following, it is more arthouse than big studio. Foreign coin provided a
$US 30 million boost.

The Fountain. Domestic North American gross : $US 9 million.
Originally intended as a $US 70 million project with Brad Pitt and Cate Blanchett, pic shut down when Pitt left to film Troy, tossing away $US 18 million in pre-production costs. Resurrected on a smaller budget of $US 35 million, the pic lost some of it's star wattage with a new cast of Hugh Jackman and Rachel Weisz. A transcendental love story that spans 100 years, pic proved too complex for auds and most critics alike and was up against crushing competition when it opened
Thanksgiving weekend: Deja Vu and the still strong-holding Happy Feet
and Casino Royale.

All the King's Men. Domestic North American gross : $US 7 million.
When it comes to winning formulas, King's Men had it all : an all-star cast (Sean Penn, Kate Winslet, Jude Law), an Oscar-winning screenwriter and director (Steve Zaillian) and a Pulitzer Prize-winning property. And the original film version, starring Broderick Crawford, won an Oscar in 1949. Yet the film failed to resonate with a broad aud, perhaps because it felt more like a niche pic dressed up in flashy trimmings. It's opening weekend also was overwhelmed by the success of Jackass Number Two with the younger crowd. Negative buzz was stirred by the fact that the pic, which cost about $US 55 million, was held a
year for re-editing.

Basic Instinct 2. Domestic North American gross : $US 5 million.
Perhaps the biggest buzz killer of all was that Sharon Stone didn't uncross her legs, a move that helped propel the original 1992 film into some version, anyway, of a classic. Pic also suffered from not starring the original film's cast (no Michael Douglas sparks) and from being released so many years after the first pic, when there was no real demand for a follow-up. Auds presumably sensed the exploitative strategy. Critics were no kinder: David Edelstein quipped, 'They
replaced the director's Viagra with Valium'. Sony, which released the $US 70 million film (the German film fund IMF3 provided financing), tried to blunt the blow by not screening the films for critics.

Flushed Away. Domestic North American gross : $US 61 million.
An unfortunately apt title for a pic that could cost DreamWorks Animation $90 million. The DreamWorks-Aardman alliance has historically yielded better reviews than grosses, but that reality was stark with a film with a budget of about $US 150 million (if it was made much more cheaply, pic likely wouldn't have made this list). The release date also was less than ideal, considering the glut of family films in the market and the unforeseen blitz of Borat. And pic was up
against an unusually competitive year for animated films, with nearly every major studio unspooling a feature toon.

Flyboys. Domestic North American gross : $US 13 million.
Despite producer Dean Devlin's best efforts (he shopped the film to every studio, finally locking distribution with MGM), Flyboys failed to take off, confirming Hollywood's prejudice against WWI films. Today's most teen auds, who generally swarm out on opening weekend -- aren't wowed by antique, wooden planes and without a star cast the film dive-bombed. Lucky for Devlin, almost half the cost of the $US 60 million film was covered by Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison whose son David, one of the top acrobatic pilots in the nation, stars in the
film.

Freedomland. Domestic North American gross : $US 12 million.
Savvy auds are suspicious of films released in the graveyard month of February, particularly films such as Freedomland that are pushed from the awards-heat-seeking month of December. Director Joe Roth had worthy intentions, but the critics were unkind and auds didn't warm to the grim retelling of Richard Price's dense novel about a kidnapping that sets off racial strife in New Jersey projects. Despite a top-rate cast -- Julianne Moore, Samuel L. Jackson, Edie Falco, the film died a quiet death.

Poseidon. Domestic North American gross : $US 60 million.
Movie posters of an overturned ship presciently forecast the fate of this $160 million remake of a campy 1972 disaster pic. Rather than re-enact the kitsch, director Wolfgang Petersen opted for a serious thriller that was perhaps too reminiscent of another big movie about a sinking ship. As Warner Bros. chief Alan Horn said earlier this year : 'I heard a 15-year-old girl say, 'I've seen a luxury liner go down ; I saw Titanic'. On a smaller budget the pic would've suffered less disastrously, though overseas grosses came somewhat to the rescue, bringing in $US 121 million.

The Wicker Man. Domestic North American gross : $US 23 million.
Fans and even the original film's director were vocally dismayed by plot tweaks in Neil LaBute's remake of the 1973 cult horror pic that included swarms of killer bees and that had the film's lead (Nicolas Cage) turn into a pill-popping madman. As for tapping new auds, the $US 40 million film faced the dilemma of not fitting neatly into either the horror or thriller genre. And Cage's mopey face didn't make for titillating marketing. Warner Bros. tried to protect it by not screening for critics, to no avail.
post #2 of 12
Is it you or the author of that article that's responsible for using the non-word
"aud"?

Who has such a lazy jaw that they can't say the whole fucking word?

I mean, UCK!
post #3 of 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat Dragon
Is it you or the author of that article that's responsible for using the non-word
"aud"?

Who has such a lazy jaw that they can't say the whole fucking word?

I mean, UCK!
Yeah, I was going to say something about that last night but I ended up getting sidetracked. I realize Variety is a trade publication, but the writer's use of "Aud" and "Pic" is really fucking annoying.
post #4 of 12
That's standard Variety-speak, probably because those words add up on page after page of movie biz (ha!) articles. More alarming is the use of "it's" for "its".
post #5 of 12
Variety still likes to use words like boffo and abbreviations like syndie. It's pretty annoying.
post #6 of 12
Fair list, except for "The Fountain". Sadly, I've yet to see it, but it debuted with a whimper with an anemic advertising campaign (TV spots are still the most effective advertising), a modest screen count. Most of these other films were expected to do well. If WB had those plans for "The Fountain", it didn't seem like it.
post #7 of 12
If the reported budget is to be believed, then THE GOOD SHEPHERD should be handed a slot on this list fairly soon.
post #8 of 12
Variety has had that style for something like 70 years. Can we stop being annoyed by it yet?
post #9 of 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moltisanti
If the reported budget is to be believed, then THE GOOD SHEPHERD should be handed a slot on this list fairly soon.
I haven't seen it yet. But the cast is amazing, the subject matter is interesting, and its had a greater presence on TV and marketing push than almost any film this fall. And yet, the movie itself just looks extremely predictable and dull. I don't know that you can blame the studio on that one.
post #10 of 12
As awesome as that cast is, something about that movie just screams "Wait for the DVD." Maybe because it's a crowded market and if I'm going to choose from the more thought provoking films it would be CHILDREN OF MEN, assuming that ends up in my area soon.
post #11 of 12
Thread Starter 
I refuse to believe that movie cost over $100 million. I believe it probably had a budget in the area of "Syriana", but $100 million? NOTHING FUCKING HAPPENS IN THE MOVIE.
post #12 of 12
Variety is using this style because it saves space. Which is the most important thing when trying to fit a title in a newspaper page.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Drafts & Lists
CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE CHEWERS › Drafts & Lists › Variety Names The 10 Biggest Flops Of 2006