CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE MAIN SEWER › CHUD.COM Main › CHUD NUMBERS: Box Office Discussion Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

CHUD NUMBERS: Box Office Discussion Thread - Page 248

post #12351 of 16671

Say what you will about Scott's 00's track record, it has to be the longest sustained streak as an A-list director in his whole career. It's easy to forget that before Gladiator put him back on the map as Mr Sweeping Visual Epic he'd been looking pretty aimless and borderline washed up for a long time. That movie was pretty much the last chance saloon. He might've had flops since, but he's never come close to totally slipping out of relevance the way he seemed to for much of the 90's.

post #12352 of 16671

IYeah, if we're talking simply box office here he seems to hit really big at the beginning of the decade then taper off. Every. Single. Decade.

 

 

Date Title (click to view) Studio Lifetime Gross /Theaters Opening / Theaters Rank
5/14/10 Robin Hood Uni. $105,269,730 3,505 $36,063,385 3,503 5
10/10/08 Body of Lies WB $39,394,666 2,714 $12,884,416 2,710 11
11/2/07 American Gangster Uni. $130,164,645 3,110 $43,565,115 3,054 3
11/10/06 A Good Year Fox $7,459,300 2,067 $3,721,526 2,066 17
5/6/05 Kingdom of Heaven Fox $47,398,413 3,219 $19,635,996 3,216 8
9/12/03 Matchstick Men WB $36,906,460 2,711 $13,087,307 2,711 12
12/28/01 Black Hawk Down SonR $108,638,745 3,143 $179,823 4 4
2/9/01 Hannibal MGM $165,092,268 3,292 $58,003,121 3,230 2
5/5/00 Gladiator DW $187,705,427 3,188 $34,819,017 2,938 1
8/22/97 G.I. Jane BV $48,169,156 2,043 $11,094,241 1,945 7
2/2/96 White Squall BV $10,292,300 1,524 $3,908,514 1,524 15
10/9/92 1492: Conquest of Paradise Par. $7,191,399 1,008 $3,002,680 1,008 18
5/24/91 Thelma and Louise MGM $45,360,915 1,180 $6,101,297 1,179 10
9/22/89 Black Rain Par. $46,212,055 1,760 $9,677,102 1,610 9
10/9/87 Someone to Watch Over Me Col. $10,278,549 894 $2,908,796 892 16
4/18/86 Legend Uni. $15,502,112 1,187 $4,261,154 1,187 14
6/25/82 Blade Runner WB $32,868,943 1,325 $6,150,002 1,295 13
5/25/79 Alien Fox $80,931,801 757 $3,527,881 91 6
post #12353 of 16671

That is a hell of a fucking career, I have to say. Just goddamn spectacular. Even the bad movies are interesting and entertaining.

post #12354 of 16671

Crazy to think half that body of work was done past the age of 60. And it's probably one of the most restlessly genre-hopping filmographys this side of Soderbergh.

 

I've long felt that Scott has three or four great iconic movies and a bunch of decent/good ones (and some shit ones). I think, one more great one and he'll have done a man's job. I don't know if we'll get one but fingers crossed between Prometheus and that Cormac McCarthy project he's still got some gas in the tank.

post #12355 of 16671

Would it be accurate to say that Daniel Craig doesn't have that much of a instant draw among audiences? They watched DRAGON TATTOO because it was a Fincher/Book adaption. COWBOYS because of the Scifi aspect and Harrison Ford?

post #12356 of 16671

Yes....yes it would.

post #12357 of 16671

Yep, sad but true.  That might change after he exits the role on down the road, but I suspect it will hold for the time being.  Hell, even Connery's career outside of the franchise really didn't start to take off until the mid-80s....almost 20 years after he debuted in the role.  Dragon Tattoo and Tintin aside, Craig just needs to be a bit pickier about his projects between 007 outings.  Leave stuff like Dream House, Defiance, and Cowboys & Aliens to others. 

 

And stop angling for more franchises!  Save that shit for when you are no longer Bond!  He's had two failed attempts already and Dragon Tattoo could end up being a third if Sony ends up deciding not to pursue the sequels.

post #12358 of 16671

A litany of us being very, very wrong

 

I was curious and decided to comb through our April posts and find our predictions for what Avengers would do. I used the Movie Moan podcast as well. 

 

 

  • Greg Clark - Less money than Hunger Games, won't beat HP's OW
  • Phil from Movie Moan- 120 opening / 320 domestic
  • HarleyQuinn22 - limp to 300
  • FilmNerdJamie - 340 (125 opening)
  • Shawn from Movie Moan - 350
  • User_32 - +/- 400
  • Ambler - Iron Man numbers (318 million)
  • Dark Shape - 350-375, 60% drop second weekend, 161OW
  • Arjen Rudd - 355
  • Sebastian OB- Definitely 400
  • MikeI - 200M opening is crazy, 145 OW
  • felix - 360 domestic
  • CreepyThinMan - easily over 400

 

Sadly, CreepyThinMan had the most optimistic and therefore the most accurate prediction.

post #12359 of 16671
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul C View Post

Say what you will about Scott's 00's track record, it has to be the longest sustained streak as an A-list director in his whole career. It's easy to forget that before Gladiator put him back on the map as Mr Sweeping Visual Epic he'd been looking pretty aimless and borderline washed up for a long time. That movie was pretty much the last chance saloon. He might've had flops since, but he's never come close to totally slipping out of relevance the way he seemed to for much of the 90's.

 

I don't think he's ever had a flop.  Just a quick look on boxofficemojo and all his movies at least broke even, if you take in account World Wide and Domestic B.O. 

post #12360 of 16671
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Rain Dog View Post

 

Nah if you recall when Del Toro jumped ship the film was still being talked about as if it may end up being another year or two away from production because of the whole MGM rights issue. Del Toro made what looked like a pretty understandable decision at the time.

 

Wasn't it Cameron who pushed Del Toro not to do the Hobbit?

 

Found it:

 

 

"I was telling him for a long time to get out of that thing because there is only room for one captain on the ship," Cameron says. "Instinctively I knew that Peter was going to take over and do the movie. Guillermo, to his credit, didn't listen to me and wanted to do continue and had some great designs - and I have seen all the designs."

"Of course he would have done a spectacular job, but don't we want to see Peter do it? He should do it and Guillermo should do his thing. That's what I told both of them - you should just stay in your corners."

post #12361 of 16671
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeI View Post

A litany of us being very, very wrong

 

Sadly, CreepyThinMan had the most optimistic and therefore the most accurate prediction.

 

"Nobody knows anything... except CreepyThinMan."

- William Goldman

post #12362 of 16671

So how about that Men in Black 3 ? The first two did 50 M opening and that was 15 and 10 years ago respectively so this should make at least that amount this weekend, right? Anything below 50 M would be a disappointment. 

post #12363 of 16671

I don't know.  The second wasn't that great, and the BO sorta reflected that relatively speaking.  It's also quite a while ago, so I could see it not being that big a draw, at least domestically.  Useless sequel way after the iron's gone cold and all that.

post #12364 of 16671

One thing I've learned in the last fifteen years is that Will Smith has a seemingly endless fanbase that'll watch him in any old shit, he's as teflon coated and as sure a bet as Adam Sandler.

post #12365 of 16671

True.  But, will it be enough?  How high is the budget anyhow?

post #12366 of 16671
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Rain Dog View Post

One thing I've learned in the last fifteen years is that Will Smith has a seemingly endless fanbase that'll watch him in any old shit, he's as teflon coated and as sure a bet as Adam Sandler.

 

Unless he's committing jellyfish suicide in Seven Pounds.

post #12367 of 16671

That movie grossed $168M worldwide.

post #12368 of 16671

If the promotional screening I went to tonight was any indication, MIB is still a draw for kids. Or parents who already have five billion kids just like free screenings.

post #12369 of 16671

Little bit of A, and a little bit of B.  The cartoon was actually pretty solid.

 

They probably could have just pulled material from that for movies if they were allowed to.

post #12370 of 16671
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeI View Post

A litany of us being very, very wrong

 

I was curious and decided to comb through our April posts and find our predictions for what Avengers would do. I used the Movie Moan podcast as well. 

 

 

  • Greg Clark - Less money than Hunger Games, won't beat HP's OW
  • Phil from Movie Moan- 120 opening / 320 domestic
  • HarleyQuinn22 - limp to 300
  • FilmNerdJamie - 340 (125 opening)
  • Shawn from Movie Moan - 350
  • User_32 - +/- 400
  • Ambler - Iron Man numbers (318 million)
  • Dark Shape - 350-375, 60% drop second weekend, 161OW
  • Arjen Rudd - 355
  • Sebastian OB- Definitely 400
  • MikeI - 200M opening is crazy, 145 OW
  • felix - 360 domestic
  • CreepyThinMan - easily over 400

 

Sadly, CreepyThinMan had the most optimistic and therefore the most accurate prediction.

 

Ahem. I was pretty adamant that it would cross 400 as well.

 

What can I say, I'm not usually right about these things, so let me have my moment.

post #12371 of 16671

SHARE IT WITH CTM!!!

post #12372 of 16671

Besides the unpredictable nature of when a true box office phenomenon will hit, CTM also has the additional handicap of being clinically insane; so I think we have to give him a little more credit than you guys.

post #12373 of 16671
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Prankster View Post

 

Ahem. I was pretty adamant that it would cross 400 as well.

 

What can I say, I'm not usually right about these things, so let me have my moment.

 

Apologies, Prankster, I only checked April's posts through the opening and didn't see a prediction. I did have to scan about 450 posts though so I suppose I may have missed one (is there an antonym for humblebrag? Or is this even the opposite of that?)

post #12374 of 16671

GO TO YOUR ROOM.

 

I mostly did it in the context of the people saying "Oh yeah, DKR is going to TROUNCE the Avengers" and me arguing otherwise.

 

Speaking of which...what do we think of DKR's chances now? Or do we want to go down that road again?
 

post #12375 of 16671

Depends on your expectations. Trumping Avengers in terms of opening weekend numbers? (No but will get close) Overall? (Nope) Does it break $400M? (Easy) $500M? (Possible) $1B WW? (Yep).

post #12376 of 16671

Meanwhile, Avengers did $5.6 million yesterday and passed Star Wars for #5 on the all-time domestic box office list.  It's also #4 all-time world-wide, and Disney's highest-grossing release ever.

post #12377 of 16671
Quote:
Originally Posted by FilmNerdJamie View Post

Depends on your expectations. Trumping Avengers in terms of opening weekend numbers? (No but will get close) Overall? (Nope) Does it break $400M? (Easy) $500M? (Possible) $1B WW? (Yep).

Top's out at 465M.

 

Book it.

post #12378 of 16671

Have it at $440M myself.

 

Figured we're looking at $180-190M 3-day.

post #12379 of 16671
Dark Knight predictions:

$140,000,000 OW
$375,000,000 domestic
$850,000,000 worldwide
post #12380 of 16671
My DKR predictions:

$140,000,000 OW
$375,000,000 Domestic
$850,000,000 Worldwide

I'm on the "no Joker, no records" bandwagon.
post #12381 of 16671

What I'm interested in seeing is whether The Avengers can beat Titanic domestically. It'll be a big stretch, for sure, but it doesn't seem impossible. (Worldwide, it doesn't seem to have a shot, but it hasn't opened in China or Japan yet, so who knows?)
 

post #12382 of 16671

It would be worth it for The Avengers to beat Avatar if only so we can get a card like these in the grand tradition

 

star%20wars%20jaws%5B6%5D.jpg

 

Picture 1.pngPicture 2.png

 

star%20wars%20et%20movie%5B8%5D.jpg

 

drawing-of-star-wars-on-titanic-george-lucas-to-james-cameron.jpg

post #12383 of 16671

Now I wonder if Cameron wrote himself a letter...

 

Besides, he's too busy setting up asteroid moon bases powered by the rage of sharks to pay attention to Hollywood anymore.

post #12384 of 16671
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Clark View Post

Now I wonder if Cameron wrote himself a letter...

 

 

Dear Jim, YOU FUCKING RULE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Love, Jim.

post #12385 of 16671
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Clark View Post

Now I wonder if Cameron wrote himself a letter...

 

Jim, Congratulations! You've done it again! Your pal, Jim. 

 

EDIT: Haha, beat me!

post #12386 of 16671

Someone asked about MIB 3's budget.  Most sources give it as 250 Million production costs, plus at least another 100 Million for marketing. 

Yes, Will Smith is the biggest draw around, but if it gets bad or even tepid WOM and reviews, even Smith might not be able to pull MIB3 into the black.

post #12387 of 16671
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Clark View Post

Now I wonder if Cameron wrote himself a letter...

 

Besides, he's too busy setting up asteroid moon bases powered by the rage of sharks to pay attention to Hollywood anymore.

 

Someone really needs to do a mock-up of Cameron as Blofeld.

post #12388 of 16671
Quote:
Originally Posted by S.D. Bob Plissken View Post

 

Someone really needs to do a mock-up of Cameron as Blofeld.

 

You-Only-Live-Twice-Blofeld-Donald-Pleasence.png

post #12389 of 16671

Has anyone else noticed that — much like the TV spots for Ghost Protocol — the TV spots for Rock of Ages barely show Tom Cruise?

 

I know it's a supporting role this time, but man, at one time they would've sold the shit out of him being in a movie. Not any more.

post #12390 of 16671

Maybe they want to keep his exact look a surprise?

post #12391 of 16671

As someone who grew up in the 80's, I have no interest in Rock of Ages. Glamrock will forever be a blight on humanity, nostalgia for hair metal is like fondly looking back at that time you had diarrhea for 3 days.

post #12392 of 16671
Quote:
Originally Posted by dudalb View Post

Someone asked about MIB 3's budget.  Most sources give it as 250 Million production costs, plus at least another 100 Million for marketing. 

Yes, Will Smith is the biggest draw around, but if it gets bad or even tepid WOM and reviews, even Smith might not be able to pull MIB3 into the black.

 

My guess is that it will scoot into the black for global grosses, but barely. The "sense of obligation" canard I've read re: TDKR seems far more applicable to MIB3. Other than kids, is anyone really, really excited about this?

 

I expect AVENGERS to win this weekend again. I'm actually hoping it does.

post #12393 of 16671
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelM View Post

 

I expect AVENGERS to win this weekend again. I'm actually hoping it does.

 

Avengers is looking at between 30-35 million (maybe a little more with Memorial Day's influence, but not much). I would be shocked if MIB3 doesn't beat that.

post #12394 of 16671
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3nnui View Post

As someone who grew up in the 80's, I have no interest in Rock of Ages. Glamrock will forever be a blight on humanity, nostalgia for hair metal is like fondly looking back at that time you had diarrhea for 3 days.

 

....but it was so slimming!

 

So, GI Joe 2....is the bump up from international 3D tickets really going to cover the cost of dumping it out of theaters a month before release? I have to think all the ancillary advertisements tied into the movie can't be stopped at this point. Cereal boxes and slurpee cups have all been created and likely shippped. I wonder if McDonalds will have happy meal toys for a movie that won't come out for a year?

post #12395 of 16671
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeI View Post

 

Avengers is looking at between 30-35 million (maybe a little more with Memorial Day's influence, but not much). I would be shocked if MIB3 doesn't beat that.

 

You know what? You're right. MIB 3 will likely win the weekend, due it being the new dog on the block. Here's hoping AVENGERS come in a close second.

post #12396 of 16671

MIB3 has got to take in around 650 Million minimum world wide to just break even (given that the studio only gets roughly half the box office take world wide;the other half going to the theaters owners cut,distribution costs, local taxes and fees and other overhead expenses) Unless it is really,really delievers in a way that MIB 2 did not it's in trouble. Yeah, Will SMith sells tickets but MIB3 will have to sell a lot more then the usual Smith vehical does to get into the black.

 

As for the decision to put back GI Joe Retaliation a whole year for 3D conversion this is the dumbest move I have seen any studio make for some time. Whatever extra bucks they hope to get by adding 3D is going to be less than all the marketing money they have just flushed down the toilet with this move. ANd they will have to start all over selling the movie again next year. I could easily them breaking the record for money spent marketing a film on this thing.Not to mention a huge backlash frorm the fanbase,which is furious. Yeah,most of them will still come next March but with lowered expectations, which will damage the  Word Of Mouth,which is important in selling a film like this.

Idiotic move. The Irony is the marketing was working;it was making GI JOe look much better then the first, but now Paramount/Hasbro just tossed that in the crapper as well.

Between Battleship bombing and now this fiasco,I would say that Hasbro's attempts to break into film production are off to a really shitty start.They should stick to making toys because as film producers they seem to be hopeless.

post #12397 of 16671

After seeing this backlash. Think they'll backtrack and change their minds?

post #12398 of 16671

You don't decide on a 3D conversion a month out.  They clearly think they have more serious problems with the film, ones that aren't going to be affected by fan outcry.

post #12399 of 16671

I see MIB 3 doing about 70 this weekend.

post #12400 of 16671

Man nobody was close with those predictions. You never really know, but i started sensing the possibilities of something huge a few weeks before 'Avengers" opened, and it's  surpassing even my expectations. What a monster of a hit this is turning out to be.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: CHUD.COM Main
CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE MAIN SEWER › CHUD.COM Main › CHUD NUMBERS: Box Office Discussion Thread