CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE MAIN SEWER › CHUD.COM Main › CHUD NUMBERS: Box Office Discussion Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

CHUD NUMBERS: Box Office Discussion Thread - Page 257

post #12801 of 17410
Quote:
Originally Posted by Navidson View Post

What about Pixar's Brave? I predict it winning its weekend....and if word of mouth is good, strong legs for summer.
 

 

Of the people that made predictions, Brave was predicted the top grosser for June by all but two people. Average guess is 236 million. (Those two predicted Prometheus and Snow White. Those two... are going to be wrong).

post #12802 of 17410
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeI View Post

 

Of the people that made predictions, Brave was predicted the top grosser for June by all but two people. Average guess is 236 million. (Those two predicted Prometheus and Snow White. Those two... are going to be wrong).

 

I didn't even remember calling a number on Brave.  Oops.  Oh well, might as well go down in flames.  Last chance powerdrive!  Wooo!

post #12803 of 17410

Here we go...

 

 

THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN - $275 million - I think this will underperform in Sony's eyes (if they are expecting Raimi numbers), but will still do well...........because it's Spider-Man.  Who doesn't love Spidey (aside from my wife)?  Plus it is handily positioned between Brave and Ice Age, so it will easily score the family crowd.


KATY PERRY: PART OF ME - $30 million - Outside of Michael Jackson, Hannah Montana, and Justin Bieber, these haven't done sizable business.  Then again, they really don't need to.

SAVAGES - $75 million - This looks good and the trailers seem to be playing well.  Hoping it does solid business.  Thankfully the budget was only 40.

IGE AGE: CONTINENTAL DRIFT - $195 million - The last two have almost cracked 200.  I expect this one will land in the same ballpark.

THE DARK KNIGHT RISES - $550 million - Might as well swing for the fences on this one.  There's a reason we have almost half as many releases in July as in June.

STEP UP REVOLUTION - $30 million - Each entry has made 5-10 million less than the last.  How did this get made?

THE WATCH - $120 million - I will happily be wrong on this one.

 

 

Honestly, August is going to be the most fun to predict and watch the results for.

post #12804 of 17410

I'm a little torn about the potential of Katy Perry: Part Of Me.  Doesn't it sort of depend on the part?  If it's her nipples, add another 40 mill.

 

(Don't forget to tip your waitress.)

post #12805 of 17410

Jackson and Bieber pulled in low 70s with their concert films......and Perry doesn't seem to be sitting at the same height of fame that she was a few years ago.  Unless she has a brand new album hitting before this (I'm too lazy to check), I can't see it hitting those numbers.  She probably should have done something like this a year ago.  Once again though, it's not like these need to pull in triple digits to be successful.

post #12806 of 17410

Brave will undoubtedly be the top grosser of June, but it will be interesting to see what it pulls in.  It seems to be getting mixed reviews.  I don't think I've come across any flatout negative ones, but the general consensus is that it is a lesser effort for the company. 

 

Anyway, for reference, here's Pixar's run to date (adjusted for inflation)...

 

 

$446.2 - Finding Nemo

$413.4 - Toy Story 3

$378.8 - Toy Story 2

$357.0 - Monsters, Inc.

$347.4 - Toy Story

$332.8 - The Incredibles

$311.0 - Up

$295.1 - Cars

$270.3 - A Bug's Life

$246.8 - WALL-E

$237.6 - Ratatouille

$189.6 - Cars 2

 

I'd say the average prediction on our chart for Brave is a pretty solid one.  Given the nature of the tale, I really can't see it hitting in the mid-to-high range for Pixar.  My personal prediction is probably a little low, but oh well.

post #12807 of 17410

I think it's hilarious that people are predicting an Oliver Stone movie will make more than 30 million dollars.

post #12808 of 17410

All right, I'll play for July (since it's my birthday month, I can't lose! IT'S MY BIRTHDAY.)

 

The Amazing Spider-Man: $195 million. The anticipation isn't there, but it's Spider-Man, so it'll still make money.  Never thought I'd see the day where Spidey wasn't the biggest event of the summer, but, here we are. It's not even top five.

 

Katy Perry: Part of Me: $35 million. Concert films are for fall and spring; they die in the summer.

 

Savages: $40 million. No buzz on it, the book it's based on may be great but it's not a selling point, and, well, neither is anyone involved. Sorry about the whole leading man career, Mr. Kitcsh. Maybe NBC will bankroll a Riggins spinoff.

 

Ice Age: Continental Drift: $185 million How is this at the fourth entry? This series baffles me, but there should be enough space between Brave and this that it'll hold constant with the other entries.

 

The Dark Knight Rises: $580 million. Every other studio got the fuck out of the way of this (remember what happened to poor Hellboy II?). Might not hit $600 due to the (blessed) lack of 3D, but everyone and their grandmother went to The Dark Knight, and everyone and their grandmother has been primed for four years to come back for more. Inception being an instant classic (and showing Nolan's action chops have grown expotentially with every film) brought everything to a nice simmer. As the marketing ramps up (the wisely stayed out of the way of Avengers), we start to see all that anticipation and build up starting to boil. Everyone who thought audiences were magically done with Batman after The Avengers, I hope your boots have a minty flavor. If they score a home run, it may even go higher.

 

Step Up Revolution: $35 million. Why the hell is this a summer release?

 

The Watch: $85 million. The marketing got its legs knocked out from underneath them due to the Trayvon Martin shooting, so they've had to wait until a little over a month away before even releasing a trailer, and by now, the market is being drowned out by the impending sound of The Bat. Still, it's some pseudo-counter programming, though sci-fi comedies are a hit or miss hard game. I'm going for a conservative middle ground here, as the cast should help counter-weigh the silly plot. Never thought I'd say it, but I think Jonah Hill is hotter right now than either Stiller or Vaughn.

post #12809 of 17410
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sebastian OB View Post

I think it's hilarious that people are predicting an Oliver Stone movie will make more than 30 million dollars.

World Trade Center managed $70 million, though it was playing straight to the red states at a time when red stating it was a box office boost. I think the summer days will allow it to eck itself to $40 million; hardly a win. Unless it turns out to be uniformly terrible (not an outside prospect, sadly), in which case I might have overpredicted a full double the actual.

post #12810 of 17410
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sebastian OB View Post

I think it's hilarious that people are predicting an Oliver Stone movie will make more than 30 million dollars.

 

Kind of a weird thing to say since most of his movies have.

 

That said, he hasn't made anything more than a passable curiosity in almost two decades.  The potential of the film is all in how it plays.  It looks great, but I don't trust the guy as a filmmaker anymore.

post #12811 of 17410

So why was Taylor Kisch a big deal again?

post #12812 of 17410

Canadian charm?

post #12813 of 17410

Here's the July pics so far. The books are still open. 

 

julypredicts1.png

Click to embiggen.

post #12814 of 17410
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ambler View Post

So why was Taylor Kisch a big deal again?

 

He wasn't.  This doesn't seem too different from the Sam Worthington thing.  He's just someone who wasn't expensive and got cast for these big movies.

 

Berg had already worked with him on Friday Night Lights.  According to the commentary, Stanton and his producer both liked what he did on Friday Night Lights and made him a frontrunner for the role based on that.

 

I'd be curious to know which he got cast for first.

post #12815 of 17410

Spidey- 210 million

 

Savages- 48 million

 

Katy Perry Won't Show Us Her Nipples- 39 million

 

Ice Age Whatever- 189 million

 

TDKR- 540,000,009

 

Step Up Step Up Revolution- 34 million

 

The Watch- Fuckyou million

post #12816 of 17410

Let me check my conversion chart here... is fuckyou million $100 million?

 

ETA: The 9 extra dollars for TDKR is there, just not visible on the chart.

post #12817 of 17410

No, it's $0.  I'll probably be the low man on that one, but whatever.

post #12818 of 17410

The Amazing Spider-Man - $200M. Talked about it to the point of nausea (and got a stalker out of it!) $225M is best case scenario. We're looking at another Superman Returns (For the record, big Superman Returns fan!)

 

Savages - 30M. Ah yes, yet another "Let's have alternative programming against the July 4th tentpole" release from Universal. Because it worked so well for Public Enemies and Larry Crowne. Oliver Stone remains an alienating figure and we can't have Taylor Kitsch avoid another flop, cant we?

 

Katy Perry: Part of Me - Who Gives a Fuck M. They presumably cut the Russell Brand "Inside of You" music video?

 

Ice Age: Continental Drift - $190M. A franchise to consistently pull in just under $200M domestic and the public is still digging em? I imagine history will repeat itself.

 

The Dark Knight Rises - $500M. Getting closer by the day and the anticipation is nuts (Word is it's taken up as much as 80% of Fandango's current ticket-sales!) Could seriously take the 3-day record back from The Avengers (Will at the very least get damn close...and break the midnight/single day records). As recent as a month ago, I wouldn't have said a repeat of a half-a-billion domestic gross was possible. Said $440M (with $460M as best case scenario) previously. Already eating those words.

 

Step Up Revolution - I'm going to say $1, Bob!. No fucking clue.

 

The Watch -  $100M. Sounded intriguing. Until I saw the trailers. Could be an acceptable substitute while Bats 3 butt-fucks ticket-sales (a la Step Brothers and Pineapple Express during The Dark Knight phenom).

post #12819 of 17410
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcnooj82 View Post

He wasn't.  This doesn't seem too different from the Sam Worthington thing.  He's just someone who wasn't expensive and got cast for these big movies.

At least Worthington starred in actual big movies that made over 100 M domestically.
post #12820 of 17410
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bailey View Post

No, it's $0.  I'll probably be the low man on that one, but whatever.

 

Gimme a hug you magnificent bastard.

post #12821 of 17410
Quote:
Originally Posted by User_32 View Post


At least Worthington starred in actual big movies that made over 100 M domestically.

 

Well, he was cast in major roles in both Terminator Salvation and Avatar before he had been in anything anywhere near that successful.  That's what I was referring to.  

post #12822 of 17410
Quote:

Originally Posted by Greg Clark View Post
 

Sorry about the whole leading man career, Mr. Kitcsh. Maybe NBC will bankroll a Riggins spinoff.

 

Nah, Kitsch can still coast for awhile.  He's still on the "hot" list (including a potential Hunger Games role) and he's still Peter Berg's go-to guy.  Kitsch has at least two more Berg films lined up (Lone Survivor & Friday Night Lights 2.0), so as long as Petey directs...he'll have a job.

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bailey View Post

 

Kind of a weird thing to say since most of his movies have.

 

That said, he hasn't made anything more than a passable curiosity in almost two decades.  The potential of the film is all in how it plays.  It looks great, but I don't trust the guy as a filmmaker anymore.

 

True, but I'd say this is the most commercially viable project he's done since Any Given Sunday (1999).  I'm not expecting triple digits here, but I think it will do fine.

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by mcnooj82 View Post

 

Well, he was cast in major roles in both Terminator Salvation and Avatar before he had been in anything anywhere near that successful.  That's what I was referring to.  

 

Surely you jest!  Who wouldn't go...

 

"Hey, let's give that Aussie dude with supporting and bit roles in Hart's War, The Great Raid, and Rogue the lead in three of the biggest genre pictures of 2009 & 2010!"

 

Who, Joon?  WHO?!?!?!?!?!?

post #12823 of 17410

Honestly, I doubt quality matters at all for Brave. At this point, people are going to see a Pixar movie, full stop. And while this may be less appealing to the geeks, it's gonna be HUGE with little girls. And bigger girls. Same audience as Hunger Games, basically. And like Hunger Games, it'll attract a decent male crowd too, on the strength of the Pixar name.

 

I'm not playing the box office game with everyone else because I generally suck at it, but if Brave doesn't top $250 million I'll be astounded.
 

post #12824 of 17410

It's also a good movie.  I mean, you could say it's not one of Pixar's best, but it's not like it's some sort of terrible movie.

post #12825 of 17410
Quote:
Originally Posted by S.D. Bob Plissken View Post

Surely you jest!  Who wouldn't go...

"Hey, let's give that Aussie dude with supporting and bit roles in Hart's War, The Great Raid, and Rogue the lead in three of the biggest genre pictures of 2009 & 2010!"

Who, Joon?  WHO?!?!?!?!?!?

James Cameron took the chance. Then everyone else went "James Cameron makes the biggest movies in the world, maybe he knows something we don't. Let's cast his guy."
post #12826 of 17410

Quality definitely has nothing to do with it.  Pixar films open big.  Pixar films with great word-of-mouth play like crazy.  I'm not so certain his will have the latter.  Hope I'm wrong, but this one seems to be falling a little flat with audiences.  They WILL show up and show up big on opening weekend, but this doesn't seem to have the kind of "must-see" buzz that Pixar films usually have with the masses.

post #12827 of 17410

You're saying that because, as with Cars, this one is pitched at a non-geek audience. In this case, younger girls. Of course the geeks aren't as excited about this as they were for Wall*E or The Incredibles.

post #12828 of 17410
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Clark View Post

Prometheus is going to fall like a stone.

 

It's on pace to fall about 55% this weekend, which really isn't that bad considering its natural frontloadedness and 25% Saturday drop.

 

Amazing Spider-Man - 265
Katy Perry: Part of Me - 29
Savages - 22
Ice Age: Continental Drift - 188
The Dark Knight Rises - 535
Step Up Revolution - 39
The Watch - 68

 

I'm at a point where I think The Dark Knight Rises could outgross The Dark Knight domestically, which I'd never considered a realistic possibility before.

 

EDIT:

 

The Dark Knight Rises accounts for 16% of today's Fandango sales.  That's massive.  Big films make a splash the day they go on sale as the early birds rush to buy tickets, but I've never seen something this far out make up that big a percentage of sales in the days after initial availability.


Edited by The Dark Shape - 6/14/12 at 6:18pm
post #12829 of 17410
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Prankster View Post

 

I'm not playing the box office game with everyone else because I generally suck at it, but if Brave doesn't top $250 million I'll be astounded.
 

 

You should play. The odds are on that we all suck at it.

post #12830 of 17410
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Prankster View Post

You're saying that because, as with Cars, this one is pitched at a non-geek audience. In this case, younger girls. Of course the geeks aren't as excited about this as they were for Wall*E or The Incredibles.

 

Geeks aren't factoring into this.  Forum and comment chatter means nothing when it comes to something like this.  I'm talking about parents and kids in the real world here.  I will gladly admit I'm wrong if this stomps the ever living shit out of half the Pixar numbers.  I'm just not expecting it to.

post #12831 of 17410
Brave looks super marketable to me. People have been saying around here that the marketing isnt getting it done, but to me it appears to be doing just that. We shall see.

Spiderman - 240
Katy Perry - 40
Savages - 42
Ice Age - 155 (on the wane, is my bet)
Dark Knight - 545
step Up - 34
the Watch - 65
post #12832 of 17410

My guesses.

 

Amazing Spider-Man - 235. I just have a feeling that, as much as I've hated the marketing so far, the Spidey name is going to go a long way towards making this one a hit. Green Lantern managed over $100 and it was the absolute pits. No way this one doesn't go at least double that. And possibly further.


Katy Perry: Part of Me - 50. This is a tough one to judge, as it's hard to predict the appeal of a Katy Perry film. Hannah Montana and Justin Beiber did really well, but they were aimed at the rabid tween demo. Perry skews a little older, right? (I'm a very unhip 31, I have no clue) Will her audience pay to see it?


Savages - 40. Oliver Stone doesn't make hits, but this one will do okay on the strength of its pretty great trailer and "hot" young stars.
 

Ice Age: Continental Drift - 175.  This feels like a necessary evil for parents of young ones. It'll do the franchise's usual strong, unflashy numbers.
 

The Dark Knight Rises - 525.  The ceiling on this one is hard to predict. It's going to open HUGE, but whether this one achieves the same insta-adoration as TDK will determine whether it sails into the 500s and beyond or slows down in the low 400s. I'm going to be optimistic. If everything clicks again, look out.
 

Step Up Revolution - 40. About in line with the last one.
 

The Watch - 80. On the strength of its cast only. If it's good, it'll go higher.

post #12833 of 17410

Surprised you guys don't realize 99% of people won't know or care that Oliver Stone directed "Savages."

post #12834 of 17410

I've argued for a while on other forums that The Dark Knight Rises can't possibly get to $200m without 3D, it just can't. But I'm starting to think the impossible might actually happen. If it gets to $200m it's (and I hate having to type this as a Whedon fan) a bigger achievement than The Avengers reaching $207m.

 

Brave will do just fine. A lot of us will prefer Wreck-it Ralph is my guess, but Brave seems designed to appeal to young girls in the same way Cars was designed to appeal to young boys. Disappointing that Pixar would opt for lowest common denominator again, but we can hardly be surprised.

 

The Amazing Spider-Man has major problems that have been discussed everywhere ad nauseum. It'll probably get past $200m based on the reputedly superb 3D and blitzkrieg marketing, but it wouldn't shock me if he ends up in Avengers 2 to detox the brand.

 

 

So, predictions:

 

TDKR $580m

Brave $240m

Spidey: $230m

post #12835 of 17410
Quote:
Originally Posted by yads View Post

 

Brave will do just fine. A lot of us will prefer Wreck-it Ralph is my guess, but Brave seems designed to appeal to young girls in the same way Cars was designed to appeal to young boys. 

 

Give it a little more credit than that.  It's Brave, not "Pretty Dresses."

post #12836 of 17410
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bailey View Post

 

Give it a little more credit than that.  It's Brave, not "Pretty Dresses."


I can only go by the trailers and clips, but I'd say it's a fair comment. I know that by this point we've all got impossible expectations of Pixar, but Brave feels more like a Dreamworks product to me.

 

The Variety review said this about it: ""Brave" seems a wee bit conventional". From what I've seen you could probably add "and formulaic" to the end of that sentence.

post #12837 of 17410

I guess people were really waiting to get up in Pixar's shit all this time, because I'm surprised how eager everyone is to proclaim this movie a disappointment. And everyone I go (online), everyone is saying it looks like a Dreamworks movie.

 

Just for reference, here's a piece of Brave marketing:

220px-Brave_Soundtrack_Cover.jpg

 

and here's something from Dreamworks' latest, Madagascar 3: Europe's Most Wanted:

Madagascar%203%20Main.jpg

post #12838 of 17410

I can't speak for anyone else, but I certainly wasn't "waiting to get up in Pixar's shit". I love Pixar. I even like Cars. But something has been 'off' about Brave, from the mixed buzz during production to the trailers that were borderline insipid. And the early reviews seem to bear out that it's not among their best work.

post #12839 of 17410
But the more films they release the harder it's going to be to keep topping their best. Walt Disney had the same problem in his own lifetime. The reviews aren't even mixed. Every review has said it's good. Just not great. Basically on par with the best of Dreamworks (ie How to Train Your Dragon, Kung Fu Panda). I don't know if I'd call that a "disappointment".
post #12840 of 17410
Quote:
Originally Posted by User_32 View Post

But the more films they release the harder it's going to be to keep topping their best. Walt Disney had the same problem in his own lifetime. The reviews aren't even mixed. Every review has said it's good. Just not great. Basically on par with the best of Dreamworks (ie How to Train Your Dragon, Kung Fu Panda). I don't know if I'd call that a "disappointment".


If it's as good as How To Train Your Dragon I'll be delighted.

 

I didn't mean to infer that the movie will be a disappointment, just that the tone appears to be more juvenile and less universal than Pixar's finest.

post #12841 of 17410
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dark Shape View Post

I'm at a point where I think The Dark Knight Rises could outgross The Dark Knight domestically, which I'd never considered a realistic possibility before.

 

Ditto.

 

But beating The Avengers domestic (let alone worldwide)? Nope.

post #12842 of 17410

Amazing Spider-Man seems like a bit of an odd-duck at this point.  On one hand, it's the Anti-Prometheus in that the "geeks" are dismissing it due to the rebootquel nature of the thing and the early "Spider-man Begins" tone the marketing took.  On the other hand, regular non-geek folks love Spider Man...but I don't see/hear regular non-geek folks "buzzing" about the movie at all...to the point that some people are surprised to find out it's even coming out this summer (compare to Avengers and The Dark Knight Rises which darn near everyone knows/knew was coming this summer).  Then there's  the IMAX 3D preview I saw before Prometheus that did look pretty freaking spectacular (ha!) as far as the 3D went, plus the more recent previews that have made it look...not terrible, at the very least.

 

I guess the real question will be:  Does Sony consider Batman Begins/Superman Returns numbers to be a Batman Begins level "success" or a Superman Returns level "failure?"  Given the supposedly-trimmed budget for ASM (which if true, it does look like the studio got the most for its' money), I would lean towards the former, but who knows?  Plus, I'll go out on a limb (albeit not too far) and say that international gross on this will surpass any of the Raimi films, which will probably be enough to push it into "definitely gonna get a sequel" range. 

post #12843 of 17410

I thought the sequel was already a done deal?

post #12844 of 17410
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jmacq1 View Post

I guess the real question will be:  Does Sony consider Batman Begins/Superman Returns numbers to be a Batman Begins level "success" or a Superman Returns level "failure?"

 

Pure guess. The latter based on nothing else but the marketing. It changed from straight-up admitting it was the origin again (the teaser a year ago in front of Captain America) and then pulled a 180 ("Learn Spider-Man's Greatest Secrets!") Feels like an attempt to "trick" people into thinking its another Spider-Man adventure just with a new cast a la Batman Forever.

 

Personally I'd say $200M gross is a good thing under these circumstances.

post #12845 of 17410
Quote:
Originally Posted by yads View Post

I've argued for a while on other forums that The Dark Knight Rises can't possibly get to $200m without 3D, it just can't. But I'm starting to think the impossible might actually happen. If it gets to $200m it's (and I hate having to type this as a Whedon fan) a bigger achievement than The Avengers reaching $207m.

 

Remember, Avengers sold way more tickets (25 or 26 million , as I remember, versus 22 million) than Dark Knight AND had a big 3d boost. Rises would need to sell a lot more - probably pushing 30 million tickets - opening weekend. A lot of people are going to go but I doubt 10% of the country is going to.

post #12846 of 17410
Quote:
Originally Posted by FilmNerdJamie View Post

 

Pure guess. The latter based on nothing else but the marketing. It changed from straight-up admitting it was the origin again (the teaser a year ago in front of Captain America) and then pulled a 180 ("Learn Spider-Man's Greatest Secrets!") Feels like an attempt to "trick" people into thinking its another Spider-Man adventure just with a new cast a la Batman Forever.

 

Personally I'd say $200M gross is a good thing under these circumstances.

 

I dunno, I've heard/read (admittedly from a source so vague I can't even recall where it was) that what we would traditionally consider the "origin" is basically the first fifteen minutes of the film.  So...yes, it's getting rehashed, but you could make the argument that it's not an "origin movie."

 

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben Grimm View Post

 

Remember, Avengers sold way more tickets (25 or 26 million , as I remember, versus 22 million) than Dark Knight AND had a big 3d boost. Rises would need to sell a lot more - probably pushing 30 million tickets - opening weekend. A lot of people are going to go but I doubt 10% of the country is going to.

 

I think Forbes had it pegged at TDKR needing to sell 28 million tickets opening weekend to tie with Avengers.  I'm in the "doubtful" camp when it comes to TDKR beating or meeting Avengers' opening weekend, or even necessarily $200M opening weekend, but it will get darn close to the latter, and may surpass Avengers in overall domestic gross by the time it closes out its' run (honestly, there's less succeeding-week competition for DKR than there was for Avengers, and DKR's weekdays will likely be significantly stronger due to it still being summer and school not being in session)...if word of mouth is good. 

post #12847 of 17410

What if Rises sucks?  2012 seems to be the summer of disappointment.  Major, geek loved directors fucking up anticipated films.

post #12848 of 17410
Quote:
Originally Posted by yads View Post


I can only go by the trailers and clips, but I'd say it's a fair comment. I know that by this point we've all got impossible expectations of Pixar, but Brave feels more like a Dreamworks product to me.

 

The Variety review said this about it: ""Brave" seems a wee bit conventional". From what I've seen you could probably add "and formulaic" to the end of that sentence.

 

There's a difference between "a wee bit conventional" and "Hey, we're the most respected animation house in the world, let's make a series of movies about talking cars so we can make 8 billion in merchandising revenue!"

post #12849 of 17410
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ambler View Post

What if Rises sucks?  2012 seems to be the summer of disappointment.  Major, geek loved directors fucking up anticipated films.

I doubt that it will suck, but i question whether or not it could possibly live up to the expectations that everyone seems to have for it. If it's the slightest bit underwhelming or if it has an ending that really puts people off, i don't see how it will do the massive repeat business of TDK or THE AVENGERS.
post #12850 of 17410
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ambler View Post

What if Rises sucks?  2012 seems to be the summer of disappointment.  Major, geek loved directors fucking up anticipated films.

 

Sadistic part of me wishes Nolan out-gays Batman & Robin just to see everyone's faces drop during the midnight screening.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: CHUD.COM Main
CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE MAIN SEWER › CHUD.COM Main › CHUD NUMBERS: Box Office Discussion Thread