CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE MAIN SEWER › Movie Miscellany › Practical make-up and effects at their finest
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Practical make-up and effects at their finest - Page 2

post #51 of 235
Quote:
Originally Posted by stump
Videodrome was mentioned earlier. The scene that sticks out to me is the head bashing towards the end. That seems to hold up pretty well today. I think there's some impressive sound design happening there as well.
Can't forget about the guy getting shot with the cancer gun. That scene is pretty impressive as well.
post #52 of 235
Quote:
Originally Posted by stump
Videodrome was mentioned earlier. The scene that sticks out to me is the head bashing towards the end. That seems to hold up pretty well today. I think there's some impressive sound design happening there as well.
Yeah, the feedback from the dropped mike was pretty awesome.
post #53 of 235
Thread Starter 
Videodrome videos:

"Don't keep me waiting"

Chest Vagina

26 Minute roundtable discussion between David Cronenberg, John Landis, John Carpenter, and Mick Garris:

Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
post #54 of 235
Quote:
Originally Posted by myself
This thread needs some discussion of hilariously bad make-up effects too, like the overwrought transformation scene in The Beast Within, which is pure latex masturbation. Shot of actor panting, convulsing and drooling with latex appliances. Shocked reaction (i.e. cutaway "dog shot" to hide transition to different make-up). Shot of fake head expanding with bladder effects. Shocked reaction. Repeat for three full minutes with blaring "THIS IS SCARY" music.
Too late to edit. I put it on YouTube.
post #55 of 235
Thread Starter 
Looks more like the fault of the editor. Lazy editing there, feels like they used every second of footage they shot.
post #56 of 235
The shots in Dead Alive where the dude gets his face pulled off,or the dude gets his ribcage taken out,or the shots of the baby running which were obviously a midget in a costume. All perfect.
post #57 of 235
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick Ripoll
26 Minute roundtable discussion between David Cronenberg, John Landis, John Carpenter, and Mick Garris:

Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Awesome! Thanks Patrick.
post #58 of 235
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick Ripoll

26 Minute roundtable discussion between David Cronenberg, John Landis, John Carpenter, and Mick Garris:
One of these things is not like the other...
post #59 of 235
Thread Starter 
True, but you see them discussing the importance of makeup men in PArt 2 and 3, plus I found it while searching for Videodrome clips and I didn't want to forget about it.
post #60 of 235
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryan S~
One of these things is not like the other...
Mick Garris is the host/moderator.
post #61 of 235
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Jim Slade
Mick Garris is the host/moderator.
Where he belongs!


Speaking of sound, I think I should make note of some movies that have great new gunshots that aren't the normal stock dirty Harry stuff. As far as I know, the rifle Brody fires at the end of Jaws is definitely the sound of a real m1 garand. I always wondered and if anyone can verify that for me it'd be aprreciated. It was a only a few rounds that he popped off and if Spielberg actually went to the lengths to record new sounds for that I think it's noteworthy.
Heat is always one to mention, even though as far as I know there was no sound mixing and they just left in the sounds of the blanks (correct?) Miami Vice appeared to do the same. You couldn't tell any of the guns apart, and for me that made it seem real.
Saving Private Ryan and Band of Brothers pretty much changed my outlook on sound effects all together.

And stabbing sound effects- Patrick, have you seen CHOPPER? There's one big time shanking in there and I remember the sound effects were not the usual stock stuff. Twas gross.
post #62 of 235
that's on the criterion release for videodrome. it's good.
post #63 of 235
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Dickson
How about Alien? The facehugger bursting out of the egg and the chestburster scene are both masterfully done and genuinely scary.
Out of all the movie monsters, the Alien franchise is still number one. The Predator is a guy in a suit, the dinosaurs from Jurassic park might as well be giant Pac-men, King Kong is an 18 inch model with rabbit fur. But the xenomorph is a monster. A real monster.
post #64 of 235
wow, I hadn't even seen the latest Chud Kill when I brought up Maniac.
Not the greatest movie, but there's some good suspense and effects.

In terms of BAD effects: though it still frightens me because of childhood memories, and is gory and good - the Poltergeist face tearing looks pretty bad, mostly because the dummy looks nothing like the actor from the previous shot.
post #65 of 235
Quote:
Originally Posted by le Stephanois
Speaking of sound, I think I should make note of some movies that have great new gunshots that aren't the normal stock dirty Harry stuff.
Stock now, but when Harry Callahan's gun was first heard, that was some kind of revolutionary foley shit.

Also, the foley guy used an old pair of his dad's shoes for Dirty Harry's walk, because they always sounded authoritative to him.

That's all the nerd foley trivia I have.
post #66 of 235
Of course, the absolute king of practical effects is still Eraserhead.
post #67 of 235
Quote:
Originally Posted by le Stephanois
Speaking of sound, I think I should make note of some movies that have great new gunshots that aren't the normal stock dirty Harry stuff.
Remember when Leia's blaster (a stormtrooper's rifle) made that sound in the Star Wars Special Edition? That was...an odd choice. It couldn't possibly have been accidental.
post #68 of 235
Actually I don't remember that. We should probably have a thread for "Movies that use the Dirty Harry magnum sound". If I remember correctly, Magnum P.I.'s gun had the sound as well.
post #69 of 235
Not to take away from the on going make up discussion, but no computer will ever equal the time and money and madness spent making 2001.

Not to mention it also has the scariest human acted primates as well.
post #70 of 235
I just bought the Terminator 2 "Extreme" DVD and slogged through the first disc's all-at-once commentary/slideshows/behind the scenes/subtitle commentary feature. It surprised me just how much was done with practical Stan Winston effects -- basically every shot of the T-1000 blown apart, split down the middle or cleaved down the side, for instance.

Before I watched with the commentary on, I was marvelling at how well at least half of the CGI had held up... and it was actually because it wasn't CGI at all.
post #71 of 235
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackspades22
I just bought the Terminator 2 "Extreme" DVD and slogged through the first disc's all-at-once commentary/slideshows/behind the scenes/subtitle commentary feature. It surprised me just how much was done with practical Stan Winston effects -- basically every shot of the T-1000 blown apart, split down the middle or cleaved down the side, for instance.
And the final shot of the Terminator's eye light going out after it's crushed in the first movie is a bunch of tinfoil, an LED light, and Stan Winston blowing cigarette smoke just off camera. Awesome.
post #72 of 235
Thread Starter 
Great make-up that stands the test of time: Frankenstein. Jesus Christ, this amazes me. It doesn't have the same horrifying effect it may have had on audiences in the 30's but it looks just as real as it ever did. It's an easy one to fall back on, but I submit that it's the finest monster ever created, to this day.

Besides the Manitou.
post #73 of 235
Quote:
Originally Posted by 70sCinema
Stock now, but when Harry Callahan's gun was first heard, that was some kind of revolutionary foley shit.
Are you sure that was foley? I'm only asking because guns firing almost always fall under effects because they aren't reproduced "live" like foley.

If it was foley that is some seriously cool stuff. They would've had one helluva stage to capture it on. Never mind really great engineering.
post #74 of 235
I'd have to recheck the book I read it from (Malpaso), but I'm pretty sure the same guy who did the foley did the gunshots, though it might not have been recorded foley-style.
post #75 of 235
Watching the Pan's Labyrinth special features last night... awesomely designed and executed creatures there. Sure, there's some CGI assistance in altering the legs and eyes of Pan & Pale Man, but there's some beauty, creepiness, and brilliance in the makeup and performance. GDT's Hellboy definitely had much of this magic as well.

Some of my favorite animatronics/practical creature effects:

- Jim Henson's Dark Crystal/Labyrinth/Storyteller... such a wide variety of creatures of all shapes and sizes (many designed by Brian Froud) and all with PERSONALITY.

- F**kin ESB's Yoda. Truly a character. It's amazing how much reality and believabilty is there= lightning that they haven't been able to capture since.

- Stan Winston's creatures: JP Dinosaurs, Pumpkinhead, Predator, Monster Squad, She Creature, Zathura, Amy in Congo

- Chiodo Bros.' creatures: Killer Klowns, the Critters series, Team America

- Rob Bottin's creatures: Legend, the Thing, Robocop, Howling, Total Recall, Explorers

- Rick Baker's creatures: AWIL (duh), Harry & the Hendersons, MIB, and his apes in Mighty Joe Young/Gorillas in the Mist/POTA/Greystoke. I think it's really depressing to look at Rick Baker's AWIL and compare it to his latest werewolf stuff in Cursed.

- Chris Walas' creatures: GREMLINS!, the Fly, Enemy Mine

- Carlo Rambaldi's creatures: E.T., Neverending Story (I think it was him)

- Steve Johnson's creatures: Big Trouble in Little China, Ghostbusters, Freaked

I recommend BEHIND THE MASK and No Strings Attached: The Inside Story of Jim Henson's "Creature Shop" for some good reading.

Some other great books (and dvds) here: http://www.monstermakers.com/library.html
post #76 of 235
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Dickson
Savini in Dawn of the Dead, anyone?
Gah.... I hate to disagree with an esteemed veteran chewer, but I'm going to have to disagree with you on this one. While I love Dawn of the Dead, am a fan of Savini's work, and hold the movie in high regard for the genre, the effects by and large weren't that great even for the time. Too many guys in blue/gray paint and the zombie that gets the helicopter head chop has the tallest forehead in the history of horror.
post #77 of 235
Thread Starter 
While you have valid points, I don't think you can write off his work in Dawn of the Dead that easily. The blue make-up had to be applied to SO many extras with SO little time and money, that it's forgivable. At the very least, it's far out-weighed by the inventiveness of the kills and the sheer gruesomeness of it all. It may not have all been seemless and realistic, but it had a ton of personality and it really made the movie.
post #78 of 235
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick Ripoll
While you have valid points, I don't think you can write off his work in Dawn of the Dead that easily. The blue make-up had to be applied to SO many extras with SO little time and money, that it's forgivable. At the very least, it's far out-weighed by the inventiveness of the kills and the sheer gruesomeness of it all. It may not have all been seemless and realistic, but it had a ton of personality and it really made the movie.

I agree with you 100%! But this thread is about practical effects at their finest. There is ALOT of personality to the effects in Dawn, and they are used effectively. But they aren't ground breaking, and are even at times shoddy. It's the direction (love the shuffling undead) and mood that takes the viewers focus away from the lesser effects.

I am not disparaging the effects, but I wouldn't put them in the pantheon of the most awe inspiring visual work.
post #79 of 235
Thread Starter 
When I said "at their finest" I meant the best of the good and the goofy. The best part about practical make-up and effects is that even when they're bad, they're great. Not to say Dawn of the Dead was bad by any means, but it's certainly worth mentioning. Particularly because it's X rating (or unrated) allowed Savini to really go nuts.
post #80 of 235
Ah, got ya. Then may I extend a nomination for a number of effects from Troma's catalog.

They can do more with a cantaloupe *see the Toxic Crusader* than some effects houses can do with the best programs.
post #81 of 235
Thread Starter 
Writing my review for Gvodzi (Nails) reminded me: Flawless Eraserhead pupetry and make-up. Creeps the living shit out of me. Has Lynch ever come out with the official word on how he did that?
post #82 of 235


I dread to think how this would of looked CGI.

...and to answer your question; no...and deep-down I hope he never does.
post #83 of 235
What's the current status of Rob Bottin's career at this point? Is he still so worn down by The Thing that he doesn't do tough work anymore and settles for easier jobs like Fight Club (which, while it does have some very complex and realistic-looking wounds, is faaaar from a creature feature), or is he even further from that and nearly retired at this point?
post #84 of 235
Gah, this should of gone with my above post.

Rambaldi's alien in action...
post #85 of 235
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stormin
What's the current status of Rob Bottin's career at this point? Is he still so worn down by The Thing that he doesn't do tough work anymore and settles for easier jobs like Fight Club (which, while it does have some very complex and realistic-looking wounds, is faaaar from a creature feature), or is he even further from that and nearly retired at this point?
What creature features are worth Bottin's time? Most of his bread-n-butter is CGI anymore. In fact, a lot of the younger helpers in Baker and Bottin's shops, if you look at their IMDB pages, have gradually switched to 3D modeling and other CGI-centric jobs in the last decade.

But yeah, in the last ten years, Fear and Loathing, Fight Club, and Mr. Deeds. A twilight of signing things at conventions awaits him.
post #86 of 235
Bottin's work in se7en... should've been mentioned much sooner than this.
post #87 of 235
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick Ripoll
Writing my review for Gvodzi (Nails) reminded me: Flawless Eraserhead pupetry and make-up. Creeps the living shit out of me. Has Lynch ever come out with the official word on how he did that?
I have heard rumours, but they were apparantly disproved.
So no, and so it should be.

I still find it hard to believe the thing actually was a puppet, and that's a sign of brilliance.
post #88 of 235
All the Evil dead monsters have a pretty, sort of half disgusting half cartoonish look to them. I'm incuding blood as a monster here.

I'll second the dead alive love but I'm gonna call it Braindead. It's silly, but super inventive.

The car splat from robo cop scared the bejesus out of me hen I was a kid.

I for one also miss Models in Sci-Fi films.
post #89 of 235
Quote:
Originally Posted by Graham


I dread to think how this would of looked CGI.
See the end of A.I.
post #90 of 235
Quote:
Originally Posted by 70sCinema
I'd have to recheck the book I read it from (Malpaso), but I'm pretty sure the same guy who did the foley did the gunshots, though it might not have been recorded foley-style.
Ah...cool. Thanks!
post #91 of 235
In keeping with the anti-CGI sentiment, I miss a really nice matte shot now and then. Whitlock was the man.
post #92 of 235
I'll give a try and say

Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (90)
Mostly due to lighting, good angle shots and blocking. Still these were the best costumes of the trilogy (the 2nd film had better vocal sinc but thats it).
post #93 of 235
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Jim Slade
See the end of A.I.
Argghhhh!!!
Thanks, A LOT, for reminding me of that...
post #94 of 235
Thread Starter 
Watching The Fly reminded me of how important it was to match the person to the make-up. Would the make-up be as effective if Goldblum wasn't Seth Brundle? I doubt it.
post #95 of 235
IMDB says Michael Keaton was offered the role, but that doesn't sound right.
post #96 of 235
Thread Starter 
Michael Keaton wouldn't be as good, but I can see it. He couldn't be as lovably dorky as Goldblum, though.
post #97 of 235
I mean I'm not sure I believe the trivia. In 1985, Keaton was light comedy only. Someone else was offered it, but I can't remember.
post #98 of 235
Quote:
Originally Posted by horrid
All the Evil dead monsters have a pretty, sort of half disgusting half cartoonish look to them. I'm incuding blood as a monster here.
There's some fantastic work done in Evil Dead and the subsequent sequels. I can't remember if Raimi did the work himself or hired a pro but either way, it was fucking great.
post #99 of 235
Thread Starter 
According to IMDB the special make-up effects were done by Tom Sullivan, who also was an animator for Evil Dead 2 and Army of Darkness, but he wasn't a pro. Evil Dead was his first credit and he didn't work again til Evil Dead 2, so I'm betting he was a longtime friend of Sam. But I wouldn't be surprised if Sam helped.
post #100 of 235
I never knew Bottin did "Seven".
It figures, though.


And no, I'll never call it "Se7ven", how do you even pronounce that?
"Sesevenven"?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Movie Miscellany
CHUD.com Community › Forums › THE MAIN SEWER › Movie Miscellany › Practical make-up and effects at their finest