Quote:
|
Originally Posted by yt
In trying to understand what's happening in Venezuela, it seems to me that Chavez has definitely crossed the line, but so have the forces stirring up instability and strife in his country. If his actions cause his people to lose faith in him as a leader, I'm pretty sure they'll do something about it. But you can't forget that the US has an agenda w/r/t Chavez and the Venezuelan oil industry, so if you want to genuinely attempt to comprehend what's happening there, without being on the ground, you should follow the story through other information streams beyond the US mainstream media.
|
Trying to understand the situation in Venezuela has little to nothing to do with trying to understand the relationship between Bush and that country. To be quite honest, I'm surprised Bush is even aware of Venezuela, Latin America has been ignored since the Clinton administration to today.
If you want to understand what is going on in Venezuela, you should be looking at the history there and the abuses the rich have imposed on the poor, the dissatisfaction of the masses against the oligarchy and how Chavez is abusing that frustration to his advantage.
People overplay the US involvement in Venezuela, just because there was some US involvement in the failed "coup" to whatever degree (assume it was invented here in the US for the sake of argument), it has little to do with explaining how things have gotten to this level.
As far as the US media is concerned, I find your opinion on this curious, because from what I can see Venezuela doesn't exist if you watch the news here. Bias would be a welcome thing as a matter of fact, since Venezuela is almost a non item in this country.
International media has been pretty much negative on Chavez of course, not surprising when reporters without borders is condemning your actions.