CHUD.com Community › Forums › POLITICS & RELIGION › Political Discourse › Bloomberg Quits GOP, Rumbling of a 3rd Party Candidate Stirs in The East
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Bloomberg Quits GOP, Rumbling of a 3rd Party Candidate Stirs in The East

post #1 of 10
Thread Starter 
NYT article

Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg of New York announced this evening that he was quitting the Republican Party and changing his political affiliation to independent.

The announcement came after Mr. Bloomberg gave a speech denouncing partisan gridlock in Washington, stirring renewed speculation that he is preparing to run for president in 2008 as an independent or third-party candidate.

“I have filed papers with the New York City Board of Elections to change my status as a voter and register as unaffiliated with any political party,” he said in a statement issued while he was in California delivering political speeches.

“Although my plans for the future haven’t changed, I believe this brings my affiliation into alignment with how I have led and will continue to lead our city,” the mayor said.

Mr. Bloomberg, a billionaire businessman, is a former Democrat who won the New York City mayoralty in 2001 by running as a Republican against Mark Green, the Democratic candidate. He easily won re-election in 2005.

The mayor, who cannot by law seek a third consecutive term, has said he had no plans to run for president, but he has declined to shut the door completely on a White House bid.

“We have achieved real progress by overcoming the partisanship that too often puts narrow interests above the common good,” Mr. Bloomberg said in his statement. “As a political independent, I will continue to work with those in all political parties to find common ground, to put partisanship aside and to achieve real solutions to the challenges we face”

He added: “Any successful elected executive knows that real results are more important than partisan battles and that good ideas should take precedence over rigid adherence to any particular political ideology. Working together, there s no limit to what we can do.”

....
post #2 of 10
wow. the only way a third party candidate could viably run would be through deeeeeep pocketbooks. large checks. bigs lines of credit. Ross Perot type of rich.

and, apparently, Bloomberg rich. i'd love to see an independent come out and shake things up with the Big Boys.
post #3 of 10
Quote:
A Bloomberg entry would roil the already volatile and wide-open race to succeed President Bush.

"If he runs, this guarantees a Republican will be the next president of the United States. The Democrats have to be shaking in their boots," said Greg Strimple, a Republican strategist in New York who is unaligned in the race.

The belief among some operatives is that Bloomberg's moderate positions would siphon votes from the Democratic nominee. Others say it's not clear and his impact would depend on the nominees.

Former Democratic Party Chairman Donald Fowler said Bloomberg would be "a disturbing factor to both parties," but the mayor would probably draw more Republican votes simply because "Republicans are more disenchanted than Democrats."

"Democrats are pretty happy with their candidates," Fowler said. "The Republicans are absolutely in disarray."

He called Bloomberg "an exceptionally capable guy" who is "hard-nosed and accomplished," but argued that the obstacles for a third-party candidate are so daunting that it would be nearly impossible for Bloomberg to win.

In 1992, Perot captured 19 percent of the popular vote as Democrat Bill Clinton seized the presidency from incumbent Republican President George H.W. Bush. Independent Ralph Nader played the spoiler in the 2000 race, taking votes from Democrat Al Gore in a disputed election won by President George W. Bush.

Most polls find Bloomberg drawing votes from Republicans.

"He could have a significant impact on the campaign," said independent pollster Scott Rasmussen. "Nationally there's a significant segment of the electorate that would give serious consideration to Bloomberg as a candidate."

Strategists say he could mount a third-party campaign by stressing that he is a two-term mayor in a Democratic city and that he built his reputation as a political independent, social moderate and fiscal conservative.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070619/...mberg_politics

The more, the merrier.
post #4 of 10
We could very well see a three way race between a sitting New York Senator, a sitting New York City Mayor, and a former New York City Mayor. It's a subway election! And I see Bloomberg drawing more from Republicans now, but more from Democrats as people learn about his social views and political history as a Democrat.
post #5 of 10
Bloomberg seems like a pretty sensible guy on most issues. I know it's a pipe dream, but anything to weaken the big two is a good thing.
post #6 of 10
Always nice to see independents giving the big parties headaches, although I don't know if Bloomberg is the man to make the sweeping changes we so desperately need.
post #7 of 10
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yahoo! News
...said Greg Strimple, a Republican strategist in New York who is unaligned in the race.
Wtf? Does anyone expect me take this journalist seriously?
post #8 of 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pop Zeus
Wtf? Does anyone expect me take this journalist seriously?
The journalist quoted a Republican strategist who said this helps the Republicans. Then she quoted a former Democratic Party Chair who said it probably helps the Democrats on the whole. That seems pretty balanced to me. It illustrates the point that no one really knows right now how Bloomberg's possible candidacy would affect the race next year.
post #9 of 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pop Zeus
Wtf? Does anyone expect me take this journalist seriously?
Fuck that guy. He probably wasn't even at the Fantastic Four screening.
post #10 of 10
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonvoight's car
The journalist quoted a Republican strategist who said this helps the Republicans. Then she quoted a former Democratic Party Chair who said it probably helps the Democrats on the whole. That seems pretty balanced to me. It illustrates the point that no one really knows right now how Bloomberg's possible candidacy would affect the race next year.
Its the 'unaligned' part that irks me. There is no such voucher for impartiality with the Dem. Do they really expect me to believe that the Republican is somehow more credible? It really is just fucking awful writing.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Political Discourse
CHUD.com Community › Forums › POLITICS & RELIGION › Political Discourse › Bloomberg Quits GOP, Rumbling of a 3rd Party Candidate Stirs in The East