Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The Desolate 1
Not by a long shot.
I was actually kind of dissapointed with it when I first saw it in theaters, but over the past 12 years it has grown on me considerably.
|
Seconded. The third film has a very different pulse than the other two, particularly because Holly's been almost entirely written out, and the ensemble of New York cops get their own "bomb in a school" subplot.
I found it a little jarring at first because they'd jettisoned several of the story elements (it wasn't Christmas Eve, McClane wasn't one man against many, the confines of the "arena" were expanded considerably) that I'd thought were a given. But after a glut of "Die Hard" knockoffs between '90 and '95, now I think the filmmakers were smart to try something different. It's since become the "Die Hard" sequel I revisit more than "Die Harder," although I still have a soft spot for part two.
I've noticed that "Die Harder" has been getting a lot of flak on the boards and maybe unjustly so. Dennis Franz is simply brilliant in it as Capt. Carmine Lorenzo:
"You are in my little pond right now. And I am the big fish that runs it."
And Bill Sadler's Colonel Stuart crashes an airplane that's almost out of fuel, yet it explodes magnificently! Face, Gruber!