CHUD.com Community › Forums › POLITICS & RELIGION › Political Discourse › "CO2 is not a pollutant": Cheney & Friends vs. Humanity
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

"CO2 is not a pollutant": Cheney & Friends vs. Humanity

post #1 of 11
Thread Starter 
Excerpt from "The Secret Campaign of President Bush's Administration to Deny Global Warming" By Tim Dickinson, Rolling Stone

Quote:
"They've got a political clientele that does not want to be regulated," says Rick Piltz, a former Bush climate official who blew the whistle on White House censorship of global-warming documents in 2005. "Any honest discussion of the science would stimulate public pressure for a stronger policy. They're not stupid."

Bush's do-nothing policy on global warming began almost as soon as he took office. By pursuing a carefully orchestrated policy of delay, the White House has blocked even the most modest reforms and replaced them with token investments in futuristic solutions like hydrogen cars. "It's a charade," says Jeremy Symons, who represented the EPA on Cheney's energy task force, the industry-studded group that met in secret to craft the administration's energy policy. "They have a single-minded determination to do nothing - while making it look like they are doing something."

It's now almost impossible to fathom that back in 2000, after then-candidate Bush vowed to place caps on carbon pollution, top climate scientists believed he was just the man to take action on global warming. "It looked like we could finally get beyond the fray that had consumed the Clinton administration," recalls James McCarthy, a Harvard climate scientist who co-chaired the previous report issued by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which gaveled down the very day Bush was inaugurated in 2001.

Even at that point, the science was in. The U.N. panel linked "most of the warming observed over the last fifty years" to "human activities." That judgment aligned with the National Assessment on climate change, a landmark federal report commissioned by Bush's father in 1990 and completed just before Bush was elected in 2000. The assessment projected dire impacts from global warming - from the extinction of maple trees in New England to a catastrophic loss of snowpack in California. "If we do nothing," McCarthy says, "the lack of water in California will force a mass exodus."

But those who were expecting a Nixon-to-China moment from Bush on climate weren't counting on the influence of the vice president and his industrial patrons. In March 2001, Whitman traveled to Italy for climate talks with European allies. She affirmed Bush's commitment to regulating greenhouse gases - a position she had vetted with Condoleezza Rice and Chief of Staff Andy Card. But what Whitman didn't grasp was that when it came to climate, the president was largely irrelevant.

Whitman should have had her doubts. Prior to joining the Cabinet, she sought personal assurance from Bush that the EPA would be able to call its own shots without deferring to the CEQ - the Council on Environmental Quality, a policy arm of the White House. As Whitman recalls it, Bush made no effort to mask his bureaucratic ignorance. "What's CEQ?" he asked blankly.

Cheney took full advantage of the president's cluelessness, bringing the CEQ into his own portfolio. "The environment and energy issues were really turned over to him from the beginning," Whitman says. The CEQ became Cheney's shadow EPA, with industry calling the shots. To head up the council, Cheney installed James Connaughton, a former lobbyist for industrial polluters, who once worked to help General Electric and ARCO skirt responsibility for their Superfund waste sites.

Industry swiftly took advantage of its new friend in the White House. In a fax sent to the CEQ on February 6th, 2001 - two weeks after Bush took office - ExxonMobil's top lobbyist, Randy Randol, demanded a housecleaning of the scientists in charge of studying global warming. Exxon urged CEQ to dump Robert Watson, who chaired the IPCC, along with Rosina Bierbaum and Mike MacCracken, who had coordinated the National Assessment.

Exxon's wish was the CEQ's command. According to an internal e-mail obtained by Rolling Stone, Connaughton's first order of business - even before his nomination was made public - was to write his White House colleagues-to-be from his law firm of Sidley & Austin. He echoed Exxon's call that Bierbaum, the acting director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, be "dealt." In the end, each of the scientists on Exxon's hit list was replaced. "It was clear there was a strong lobby and activity against me by some in the energy industry - especially ExxonMobil," says Watson.

A month after Exxon's fax, Whitman got her first sign that the EPA was no longer in charge of climate policy. "When I made the statement in Italy that something might happen on CO2," she says, "the utility industry got really engaged, and all of that caused a rethink." In a move Cheney is suspected of engineering, conservative senators Jesse Helms, Chuck Hagel and Larry Craig wrote the White House on March 6th seeking a "clarification" of the president's policy.

Two days later, the climate "rethink" was laid out in a memo by a team of advisers loyal to Cheney - two of whom, Andrew Lundquist and Karen Knutson, would go on to lead the vice president's energy task force. The memo - provided to Rolling Stone by a former administration official - concluded that Bush's campaign promise to regulate CO2 "did not fully reflect the president's position" and that "it would be premature at this time to propose any specific policy or approach aimed at addressing global warming." The authors dismissed both the IPCC and the National Assessment, writing that "the current state of scientific knowledge about causes of and solutions to global warming is inconclusive and ... must await further scientific inquiry."

When Whitman heard that Bush was wavering on warming, she "broke through the palace guard," as the president had urged her to do, and marched into the Oval Office. "I wanted to tell him that there were ways to call for a cap on carbon that wouldn't hamstring the economy," she says, "and that it was vitally important we not be seen as ignoring the issue of climate change." But before Whitman could even present her case, the president cut her off. "It was clear the decision had already been made," she says.

As a dumbstruck Whitman walked out of the Oval Office, she bumped into the true Decider. There was Cheney, collecting the envelope from a secretary that contained Bush's "clarification" on climate-warming pollution - which he was on his way to deliver, in person, to his allies in the Senate.

Although the letter was signed by the president, it bore Cheney's unmistakable stamp. Quoting the language of the vice president's energy staffers almost verbatim, it not only reversed Bush's promise to regulate CO2, it also made a sweeping new declaration: that carbon dioxide "is not a 'pollutant' under the Clean Air Act." (The administration would cling to this untenable position for six years, until the Supreme Court ruled in April that federal law compels the EPA to take regulatory action on climate pollution.)
Read the rest at RollingStone.com
post #2 of 11
I think Cheney and co should spend some time in Cameroon.
post #3 of 11
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Master Shake
I think Cheney and co should spend some time in Cameroon.
Yeah... that's a scary $%#$@*& story.
post #4 of 11
I really just don't understand how leaders can do NOTHING for thier citizens. If you asked me to name one good thing Bush has done for me I couldn't name one. On top of that you have morons who think Bush is a gift from God and is the best thing to happen to this country. When you look at history and see Hitler, Stalin, Castro and all other dictators you see that during their time they shit all over their country and in the end they just waste everyone's time because eventually everything they did is undone. Don't they realize this? FUCK I wish we had good leadership where people actually cared. I wish we could raise Ben Franklin and Thomas Jefferson from their grave and have them be president and vice president.

FUCK YOU DICK!!!
post #5 of 11
We've known since Reagan's day that trees are the major cause of pollution. Also, ketchup is a vegetable.
post #6 of 11
Hah, caught you!
Ketchup is a fruit.

Dumbass.
post #7 of 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Prankster
We've known since Reagan's day that trees are the major cause of pollution. Also, ketchup is a vegetable.
You forgot about cows.
post #8 of 11
Quote:
Originally posted by stelios
You forgot about cows.
Cows are vegetables?

That Cameroon story is amazing.
post #9 of 11
Salt water isn't a pollutant either, but I doubt anyone would want it mixed into their supply of fresh water.
post #10 of 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Lyczak
Cows are vegetables?
Yes. In the landmark 1883 case Nix v. Hedden the supreme court ruled that though botanically the tomatoe is a fruit, it is considered a vegetable in regards to the Tarrif Act. I'm guessing the same principle applies here.
post #11 of 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Lyczak
Cows are vegetables?
No, but there are some retarded, paid by the oil industry studies that claim that livestock is a big factor in CO2 production, almost as big as cars.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Political Discourse
CHUD.com Community › Forums › POLITICS & RELIGION › Political Discourse › "CO2 is not a pollutant": Cheney & Friends vs. Humanity