CHUD.com Community › Forums › CULTURE, HUMOR, & FREE FORM › Misc. Culture › Guys and Dolls: A Real Doll documentary
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Guys and Dolls: A Real Doll documentary - Page 2

post #51 of 213
I'll go poke around and look it up, but I'm hung up/puzzled on where you draw the distinction.

If we equate "fucking" with "having sex", "having intercourse" or "getting laid" (and in our culture, it's safe to assume we do), I don't know that I can call any solo activity that ends with me ejaculating anything other than "masturbation". If I humped my favorite pillow all night long, I'm not gonna pass a polygraph saying I had sex last night.

I mean, no one teaches masturbation (not in public school, at any rate), so we all come up with our own techniques, but pleasuring yourself is just that.
post #52 of 213
Thread Starter 
Yeah, I need examples, man! Especially after you called me the s-word. Here I thought I was as open as a doorframe, and now I'm told that I'm sheltered because I'm apprehensive of people that fuck inanimate objects.
post #53 of 213
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg David
So if I don't do those things, I'm not having sex?
My point is, there is such a big disconnect caused by the lack of little things like that that the idea of someone spending 6,000 dollars on one is a bit creepy.

I mean, how much is a bunch of bananas? 4, 5 bucks?
post #54 of 213
Thread Starter 
Shit, they're 99 cents at Publix.
post #55 of 213
Add in some KY, maybe some soft music, you got yourself a stew goin', baby!
post #56 of 213
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick Ripoll
My point is, there is such a big disconnect caused by the lack of little things like that that the idea of someone spending 6,000 dollars on one is a bit creepy.
A prostitute in Vegas can run a thousand dollars an hour. Is that out of the realm of consideration as well? If you have enough money, any amount is thinkable.

Which reminds me that nobody has addressed my point about action figures and toys. How much is too much to spend on those, and where do we draw the line on fetishistic behavior? If it involves sex, it's sick?
post #57 of 213
I'm not judging anyone on the cost, or the choice of fetish.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg David
If it involves sex, it's sick?
If it REPLACES sex, it's a problem.
post #58 of 213
A thousand dollar prostitute is a person.

If someone spends thousands of dollars on action figures they are pathetic. But usually it's over a period of time.
post #59 of 213
Thread Starter 
While the Webster definition may be different, I'm pretty sure that fetishistic behavior is inherently sexual according to today's usual usage of the word, even if it doesn't involve fucking something.
post #60 of 213
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil!
I'm not judging anyone on the cost, or the choice of fetish.
No, Patrick did.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil!
If it REPLACES sex, it's a problem.
I don't see why. Having sex with a mannequin hurts no one.
post #61 of 213
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick Ripoll
But usually it's over a period of time.
Oh man - bingo on that.

I mean, the "inherent value" thing regarding the action figures is sort of shaky, especially when you consider somebody who buys paintings.
post #62 of 213
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim N.
While the Webster definition may be different, I'm pretty sure that fetishistic behavior is inherently sexual according to today's usual usage of the word, even if it doesn't involve fucking something.
Fetish defined as any unhealthy preoccupation is a legitimate use of the term. And personally, I think somebody who lays down thousands of dollars on action figures, Magic cards, or whatever else have you, is pretty unhealthily preoccupied. Then again, as I said, if you've got enough money, any amount is disposable.
post #63 of 213
Thread Starter 
Someone sent me Davecat's blog. I should e-mail him and bring him in here.
post #64 of 213
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg David
I don't see why. Having sex with a mannequin hurts no one.
I mean a problem in that it's going to emotionally retard the guy using it. Human interaction is important.

And yes, I get that pursuing a real relationship might be extremely challenging or painful for some folks.

I dunno. I've been watching a lot of old classroom scare films lately.
post #65 of 213
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim N.
Yeah, I need examples, man! Especially after you called me the s-word. Here I thought I was as open as a doorframe, and now I'm told that I'm sheltered because I'm apprehensive of people that fuck inanimate objects.
No, because you said that anything other than masturbation or sex with a woman is weird. Which would include homosexuality, by the way.

Sorry I backed up a bit, but I missed that post.
post #66 of 213
Thread Starter 
I don't think anyone implied that these people are hurting anyone. I didn't even say they hurt themselves. Hell, they're making society better by not reproducing.
post #67 of 213
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil!
I mean a problem in that it's going to emotionally retard the guy using it. Human interaction is important.

And yes, I get that pursuing a real relationship might be extremely challenging or painful for some folks.

I dunno. I've been watching a lot of old classroom scare films lately.
Clearly, those guys were emotionally and socially stunted to begin with. I doubt this is going to do further damage. These people had trouble relating to women and making social connections. That's why they bought the dolls in the first place. And that's why they're easy targets, and probably not indicative of the typical consumer. As you said, it's shooting fish in a barrel.
post #68 of 213
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg David
No, because you said that anything other than masturbation or sex with a woman is weird. Which would include homosexuality, by the way.
He can't call it "weird"? he didn't say it was "wrong", or "against God". "Weird" ain't exactly pitchforks and torches.
post #69 of 213
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim N.
I don't think anyone implied that these people are hurting anyone. I didn't even say they hurt themselves. Hell, they're making society better by not reproducing.
I think one of them actually mentioned that as a plus to the whole thing, actually.
post #70 of 213
But calling homosexuality weird (which wasn't even what he had in mind when he said that) WOULD fall under the definition of "sheltered".
post #71 of 213
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil!
He can't call it "weird"? he didn't say it was "wrong", or "against God". "Weird" ain't exactly pitchforks and torches.
That's a bit of an overreaction, don't you think? I didn't call him a fundamentalist.
post #72 of 213
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg David
No, because you said that anything other than masturbation or sex with a woman is weird. Which would include homosexuality, by the way.
I phrased it poorly, so I don't blame your interpretation. It's not what I meant. Sex (in it's broadest, all-consuming sense involving more than one person) or masturbation was what I was shooting for, and that fucking plastic stuff (or fruit, or animals, or whatever you can come up with) as unsettling. Now if there's something else that I'm forgetting, lay it on me and I'll apologize and say "Oh yeah, forgot about that."
post #73 of 213
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg David
Clearly, those guys were emotionally and socially stunted to begin with. I doubt this is going to do further damage. These people had trouble relating to women and making social connections. That's why they bought the dolls in the first place. And that's why they're easy targets, and probably not indicative of the typical consumer. As you said, it's shooting fish in a barrel.
Sure, but I wasn't talking about the guys in the doc. Any guy, whatever facade he's maintaining in public, is doing himself emotional damage by exclusively fucking an inanimate object. Just like your hips want to pound something, so too do other parts of your body want to connect and interact with a living thing.

(Man, the potential sigs this fucking thread has yielded)
post #74 of 213
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg David
That's a bit of an overreaction, don't you think? I didn't call him a fundamentalist.
Well, it's 2AM and I'm high. Gimme a pass on that one.
post #75 of 213
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil!
Sure, but I wasn't talking about the guys in the doc. Any guy, whatever facade he's maintaining in public, is doing himself emotional damage by exclusively fucking an inanimate object. Just like your hips want to pound something, so too do other parts of your body want to connect and interact with a living thing.
But this is where the potential damage of this documentary enters into it. You're assuming, because of these particular guys, that anybody who buys a RealDoll is only having sex with it, and not with real people. And that's where I think the thing is probably misleading.
post #76 of 213
Thread Starter 
I think one thing we're all forgetting is that Greg David is a "sick fuck."
post #77 of 213
By the way, I just want to thank everybody for being able to have an intelligent discussion on this subject. This sort of thing would result in screaming and name-calling on other forums. Then again, Swedish Miyagi hasn't seen this thread yet.
post #78 of 213
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim N.
I think one thing we're all forgetting is that Greg David is a "sick fuck."
Interesting that I referenced Swedish Miyagi at the same time you did. We need help.
post #79 of 213
Thread Starter 
It's like we're calling him.

It's 1:30 where I'm at. I'm seriously worried about what happens when everyone else wakes up.
post #80 of 213
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg David
You're assuming, because of these particular guys, that anybody who buys a RealDoll is only having sex with it, and not with real people.
I'm not. Certainly some guys bought it for the variety or whatever. But surely men exist who are fucking these things because they've stopped talking to real women. I'm just saying anyone who IS exclusively fucking the doll might want to think about that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg David
By the way, I just want to thank everybody for being able to have an intelligent discussion on this subject. This sort of thing would result in screaming and name-calling on other forums. Then again, Swedish Miyagi hasn't seen this thread yet.
Holy shit, why did you just do that?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim N.
It's 1:30 where I'm at. I'm seriously worried about what happens when everyone else wakes up.
Or when the bars close.
post #81 of 213
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim N.
It's like we're calling him.

It's 1:30 where I'm at. I'm seriously worried about what happens when everyone else wakes up.
They'll be reading all of this with a raging just-woke-up erection. That's going to cause some problems.
post #82 of 213
Thread Starter 
College taught me that people can put their wieners in a variety of things if it's just for laughs and get away with it. I find this to be an interesting side note.
post #83 of 213
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil!
I'm not. Certainly some guys bought it for the variety or whatever. But surely men exist who are fucking these things because they've stopped talking to real women. I'm just saying anyone who IS exclusively fucking the doll might want to think about that.
In that case, this doc probably is representing them. I have to think that anybody who buys one of these things because they don't want to deal with actual people anymore is probably pretty far gone to begin with. I mean, that's full-on misanthropy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil!
Holy shit, why did you just do that?
It's okay, you have to say his name three times into a mirror to make him appear.
post #84 of 213
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim N.
Sex (in it's broadest, all-consuming sense involving more than one person) or masturbation was what I was shooting for, and that fucking plastic stuff (or fruit
Better back the fuck off, Tim.
post #85 of 213
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim N.
To be fair, I think fucking those fake pussies you can get at sex shops is creepy, too.
There's definitely a gender double standard. If you were dating a woman and found out she had a dildo or vibrator, most guys would think it was cute and naughty, in a "this girl is sexually liberated! giggity!" kind of way. But a lot of women would be creeped out by a Fleshlight, and even more so by a guy spending thousands of dollars to hump an object that resembles the corpse of a porn star.

I've certainly had long, long periods of frustration where I wasn't getting any, but the Five Knuckle Shuffle got me through it; not once did I ever entertain thoughts of sticking my dick in the Uncanny Valley.
post #86 of 213
Is this really not representative of the average customer of these dolls? The guy who designed the dolls seemed to imply it, they're meant for people who can't socialize and interact with real women.

I also find it interesting that these guys order these dolls with all these exaggerated proportions, one wonders if they would find sex with real looking women unsatisfying because they don't match what the dolls look like at all. To say that these men objectify women is an understatement. They also continually bring up the argument that they don't have to spend much money on food or gifts, showing that they are at the core that not only are they lonely but are very selfish and self centered individuals.

I was really disturbed by the guy who fixes the dolls though. He just handles them without gloves or washing them off, there's no way I would touch these things without any type of body armor knowing what these guys do to them.

And yes, this is really weird, and not surprising that women would be freaked the hell out by it as demonstrated by that couple at the end. The lady was trying to be "open minded" in front of the cameras, but there's no way any self respecting woman is going to accept going out with a person that has all these dolls hanging around his apartment.
post #87 of 213
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Jim Slade
But a lot of women would be creeped out by a Fleshlight, and even more so by a guy spending thousands of dollars to hump an object that resembles the corpse of a porn star.
Exactly, after watching the doc, there's certainly a necrophiliac vibe coming off these guys that I'm sure fabfunk could describe in greater detail to us.
post #88 of 213
Jackie Treehorn must have a bunch of these.
post #89 of 213
I kind of felt bad for The Nuge when he said he once met this woman and she called him a week later... to look after her kids while she went on a date.

If these guys have completely given up on women and just need something to hump AND want to spend 6,000$ on these things, why the fuck not? Sure, they're funny cuz they're all dorky and creepy and shit, but they're not hurting anyone.

Also, you are my hero, Greg.
post #90 of 213
All we were saying was that they were creepy.
post #91 of 213
Yeah, right, if you're into this, go for it. But it is what it is. It's fucking just as much as jerking off with your hand is. If you direct this much emotion towards an inanimate object you definitely have problems.
post #92 of 213
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luca S, proud owner of Real Doll
Also, you are my hero, Greg.
fixed.
post #93 of 213
Quote:
Luca S., proud owner of furry Real Doll
Fixed.

Wait a minute that's not better at all!
post #94 of 213
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luca S.
Also, you are my hero, Greg.
I don't need that kind of pressure.
post #95 of 213
Thread Starter 
I bet Luca bought Annie Mae.

http://www.realdoll.com/dpcs64/annamae/annamae010.jpg

NOTE: Seriously, don't fucking click that if you want to retain your sanity.
post #96 of 213
I'm guessing Duke Fleed has a whole set of those, each one dressed as a different Sailor Moon character.
post #97 of 213
I'm just making it to the end of this thing. I couldn't finish last night. That repairman segment is hilarious. His lady-friend is pretty hot too. But even he says it's a "high form of masturbation".
post #98 of 213
So just to get a female perspective, I was telling my wife about this thread. She actually went to the site and poked around (heh...poked), and found something much more disturbing: you can buy just the torso. That's right, for a bargain-basement price, you can go completely Ed Gein on it.

Pretending that a RealDoll is a real girl kind of pales in significance to fucking a limbless, headless torso.
post #99 of 213
I don't see the difference. You can also buy a pocket pussy.
post #100 of 213
Quote:
Originally Posted by stump
I'm just making it to the end of this thing. I couldn't finish last night. That repairman segment is hilarious. His lady-friend is pretty hot too. But even he says it's a "high form of masturbation".
That's okay, I can disagree with him too. I'm a professional at this whole disagreement thing.

The thing is, I don't entirely disagree that it is in function. Not to start this whole thing up again, I'm just saying that for some people, the standard form of self-handling probably gets old after a while, and you just want to go through the actual motions of fucking, even if you're the only one making any motions.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Misc. Culture
CHUD.com Community › Forums › CULTURE, HUMOR, & FREE FORM › Misc. Culture › Guys and Dolls: A Real Doll documentary