SCARIEST DOCUMENTARY EVER?

casWhat the hell is a "horror documentary?" Seriously, I have no idea what that even possibly means. At first I thought a "horror documentary" was a documentary about horror. But then I found out that the "horror documentary" in question is about early serial killing pioneer HH Holmes.

Holmes stalked his prey at the Chicago World Fair in 1893. He designed a whole building that was outfitted to kill and dispose of his many – and probably uncounted – victims. Holmes regained some fame recently with the stunningly dull book The Devil in the White City, which Paramount has optioned.

The "horror documentary" is called HH Holmes: America’s First Serial Killer and it’s directed by John Borowski. It will feature plenty of re-enactments of Holmes’ crimes.

Leonardo DiCaprio has his own Holmes (HH, not John) film under development as well.

In much more horrorific news, these racist geniuses named their baby "Aryan Justice."

Name your baby on our message boards!






Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

SET VISIT – THE AMITYVILLE HORROR #2

 (CONTINUED FROM PART ONE HERE)

It may have been in Kosar’s draft…or Sheldon Turner’s re-write…or Michael Bay’s pass – though I’m guessing he merely added the sequence where the Japanese drop the torpedo through the roof…

I kid Michael Bay because I love Michael Bay. Sincerely.

It may have been Andrew Douglas’s call. It may have fallen to production designer Jennifer Williams – but whosoever is to blame for the bit of architecture that places the CHILDREN’S BEDROOM IN THE ATTIC – with the beds just below the eyes of the beast – well, they should be both commended and cursed.

It’s such a loaded thing. To know what you know about the home, and to know that kids will be cozily tucked in to the evil skull of the place is – best case – unsettling.

Worst case – something really bad is going to happen to innocent children.

I’d advise preparing for the Worst Case Scenario, having seen the writing on the wall (or, more specifically, the storyboards tacked there). Kids are screwed.

And they’re everywhere on this set. Melissa George is besieged by them.

I spent my only day off babysitting the producer’s kids!” she mock laments as the kids in question remain comically underfoot. “My only day off!”

At this point, her filmic daughter Chloe Moretz does a roughly twenty-five foot sprint and leaps into George’s arms. I remember thinking that if that little girl leapt at me like that, she’d take me off of my feet – but the fit Ms. George didn’t flinch as the kid snapped into her grasp.

It was fun though – we had a slumber party, and everyone danced to Britney Spears’ Toxic.”

I thought I might uncover tawdry on-set dirt – and there you have it. Filth!

You know, what with offering day care service, you should negotiate points.”

Oh – I have points.” She demurs.

I can’t even muster a “touché” in the face of her sly little smile…so I go away. Later, behind a bank of monitors, George and I watch Ryan Reynolds go very slightly mad.

He’s going to blow people away,” she tells me.

I think she’s right. He was quite a bit creepish.

We chat a bit more about Melissa…her designs on her career…married life – all that sort of thing. And when she excuses herself (she’s off to wardrobe) I can’t help thinking “That Melissa George is very nice” as she leaves. “Maybe I won’t do what the voices in my head tell me and try to assassinate her to impress Jennifer Garner after all…”

John grabs our Gang of Four and takes us outside, where a replica of the Wisconsin boathouse – complete with a boat sitting in about four feet of water – has been built in a clearing behind the building. Craziness, this motion picture magick. Just beyond that – a most absurd sight awaits.

The crew is erecting the second story of the Amityville house in the parking lot.

The whole second story.

 Pisani tells us that this is to facilitate the complex camera moves Douglas Also, it makes it safer for the principals to play on the roof… has in mind.

But they did have Chloe in a wire rig on the roof in Wisconsin…”

So…holy shit. That’s gotta’ be the life for a six-year-old kid. Clambering about on a rain-soaked rooftop some sixty-odd feet off the ground is one hell of a way to spend your summer. If you’re in young Miss Moretz’s first grade class, you’d better come with a little something better than a conch shell for show-and-tell, or you are fucked.

So I’m in line for grub, and Ryan Reynolds (and a man who would eventually be introduced to me as his brother) move in behind me. I offer them my spot in line. Reynolds politely declines.

“You don’t understand,” I tell him. “I’m not with the production – I’m press.”

Reynolds swipes the tray away from me with comically overwrought contempt. “Give me that!” he snaps.

It’s during lunch that we’re afforded our sit-down with Andrew Douglas.

I had it in my mind to do a little legwork on the man – he’s a Brit who’d been working in advertising for years. He is primarily affiliated with Anonymous Content – a bastille that also boasts David Fincher, Mark Romanek, Gore Verbinski and Wong Kar Wai (!) amongst its ranks. There are more than a few names you’re familiar with – and a few more you’ll know soon enough. The place seems not unlike Propaganda Films was some time ago (which is no coincidence, as both organizations were started, at least in part, by Steve Golin) – a home for razor’s-edge visual stylists.

Since many of the filmmakers there are not very far removed from their film school days, I expected an Andrew Douglas to be not far removed from that sort of club-cultured, too-cool-for-school twenty-something from the land of Pop Promos kinda’ guy – a British Joseph Kahn.

What I found was that I’m almost absurdly full of shit.

Andrew Douglas is a very calm, soft-spoken, and introspective gentleman from a working class background who began his career as a photographer, eventually becoming a purveyor of artful and impressive spots (none of which feature anthropomorphic animals with “brewskis” or the music of Basement Jaxx) for some top-drawer companies.

I will not deny bugging the shit out of him the entire day. Once I had a bit of a read on him, and a feel for where he wanted to take the picture, my interest in his method and motivation grew. That he saw the project as more than a stepping-stone into features really gained my admiration.

We hear so often about some ad/video guy who shoots some slick ad taking thick cake to shoot a mindless pile o’ shit action or horror or sci-fi flick – and the guy doesn’t care about the genre, or the piece itself – he sees it as merely an A to B scenario. So he takes that Children of the Corn/Prophecy/Hellraiser/Mimic sequel with the hope that Bob and Harvey’ll let him borrow Gwyneth for a few months someday – and so he can rip the page with that Lorenzo Lamas-in-a-trenchcoat flick out of his resume.

.

As the crew prepares a setup that requires the current set to be reconfigured, I chat with Douglas for a bit – before being led once more to what I had come to call the Recovery Room (it was the only place in the studio building that was well lit and air conditioned), where Pisani sat us down with Ryan Reynolds.

When we return to the soundstage, we discover that the basement set has been completely reversed. It was disorienting enough that I had to reacquire the location of the restroom and the exit…numerous times…

Douglas steps into the basement to discuss a bit of body language with the returning Reynolds. Once they’ve an idea of how Ryan will move through the shot, Douglas calls for action.

Douglas and Collister begin edging closer and closer to an exceedingly grim-looking George Lutz – who’s alone in the basement feeding the wood burning stove and inhabiting the frame in a simultaneously sickly and intense manner, if that makes any sense. He looks pale and gray and clammy – but he moves with speed and purpose. The head is dead but the body is moving with real ferocity. It would seem that at this point, he’s well on his way to self-destruct mode…

Part 3 Soon!






Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

INTERVIEW: SIN CITY PRESS CONFERENCE #2

 (READ PART ONE HERE!)

Robert Rodriguez actually left the room for 10 minutes only to come back with a new group of actors for the second Sin City press conference. Benicio Del Toro and Jessica Alba were not as lovey duvey as the previous group. They just got right back down to business for more in depth probing Sin City questions.

Q: Jessica, your character was topless in the comic book. Why did you want to play the character and why wouldn’t you do it topless?

Jessica: She was bottomless too. I wanted to do this movie because Robert Rodriguez was directing it, first and foremost. I didn’t really know it was a comic book when I read the sides, when I saw that he was directing something. I just tell my agent every month what is Robert doing? I want to do something with him. And Lee, one of my agents, has a really relationship with Robert and said, “You got an opportunity.” And I was like, “Excellent.” So I took that opportunity and ran with it. I auditioned the old fashioned way, went in for the casting director, put myself on tape and he had to approve. And it was like a week of “Does he think I suck? I just don’t want him to think I suck. I don’t care if I get the role. I just don’t want Robert to think I suck.” And he didn’t think I sucked and he came down and I read with him and I looked at the, by that time, I looked at the graphic novel and I saw all the pictures. I then found out she was a stripper and was bottomless and topless and, nudity was an option. We could have done it if we wanted to, I just felt too—

Q: Was it really an option?

Jessica: It absolutely was an option. Robert said that we could do it if we wanted to and obviously it would have been more authentic. But I felt like dancing around with a lasso and chaps was gonna be sexy enough. I think being nude, for me, would have been distracting and I really couldn’t be bottomless for my dad. He would really—I don’t know, he would disown me. He would freak out.

Robert: We retained the sexiness of it and people, like in the comics, the world in the comics, they just think Nancy is the sexiest person in the world and you did that. That’s all we needed to get across.

Q: Was your relationship with Willis’ character weird or uncomfortable with him as a father figure?

Jessica: Nancy doesn’t think of him as a father, she thinks of him as her knight in shining armor. So I just came at it from that point, and she just waited till she was old enough to really be in love with him and have that relationship completely. I think she always looked to him as her soul mate from the beginning. She’s kind of an old soul from when she’s a little child, talking to him and reasoning with him, saying that she’s trying everything and she’s going to write him and so, I didn’t think it was creepy at all.

 Robert: Yeah, it’s a great love story because he doesn’t realize she’s grown all those ages, she’s like the only person there for him while he’s in prison and he comes out. Frank got the idea cause he was at his mother’s house and there’s this beautiful woman walked in, and there’s the kitchen, and he’s like, “Oh my god,” then she turns around and says, “Hi, Uncle Frank!” And he’s like “Oh my god, my little niece is grown up.” He felt like such an idiot for looking at her but she became a woman in front of his eyes. He hadn’t seen her in years and that’s where he got the idea for. And I had some of that when I first met you, you came over to the set, you were like 16, she was kinda dorky, really kinda thin. And I was like, “She’s so cute.” And I was really looking at her cause she was an Alba and there were very few Latin actresses, and I was really watching her from then on hoping that she would still be around for another movie. And then, now she’s like, it’s almost like that feeling, I remember when she was [little].

Q: Jessica, you have three major movies in the next couple months. Is this year going to change things for you?

Jessica: I’ve been doing this for 11 years so it definitely isn’t an overnight thing and if people then know about me, I don’t entertain or act for myself or else I would just act in front of the mirror, so I actually like having an audience and people being affected by stuff that I’m in. I love entertaining and they all happen to come out this year and the more, the merrier.

Robert: There’s nothing more satisfying than— because she’s already been in Dark Angel and people already knew who she was so she was a great choice but to be there, having her on the set, having her dancing, and photographing her, taking this picture and then when I had to go to Comicon and create these pictures for the actors to sign, I picked this picture and I said “She’s amazing.” And just seeing her explode there, part of seeing that happen in front of your eyes and then just seeing her go to another level and it was just really exciting. And working with somebody like Benecio who’s got an Oscar, who’s been there and done a lot of things, and yet doing new things with someone like that, that was really incredible too. It was finding how much talent people have and how much you can explore and always rediscover, or discover for the first time. When I got Benecio, he was looking at the books and said, “I want to look more like this guy in the comic. I want to get a nose piece and a chin piece.” I said, “Hey, go to the magic man, go to the make up guy, he’ll put that stuff on you.” He got the character so quick.

Q: Benicio, how did you approach the role and being directed by Tarantino?

Benicio: I was approached by Robert. I think we met at the Vanity Fair thing, the Oscar party, and she said something really strange, like “Don’t cut your hair.” And my hair was pretty long. He goes, “Don’t cut your hair.” I go, OK. Then I met him here at the Four Season and he showed me, he had done a trailer or the opening sequence of the movie and it just looked amazing.

Q: Were you familiar with the books?

 Benicio: I wasn’t familiar with the books. I was familiar with Frank’s work in Batman and stuff and since then, my preparation was really talking to the Wizard about— [Robert] got that nickname, I gave him that nickname. We just walked in and everything was green and I had seen how it looked already because he had shown me the beginning of the movie, the opening sequence. It was like being in the office of the Wizard of Oz thing.

Robert: He worked on it. It was interesting to watch his process. He worked on it with the book, he got the makeup. He showed up on the set and we had three jacket choices for him. That was part of getting into the characters, putting on the costume and he wanted to look as much like the character as possible. Everybody did because they were really playing a character and they could cut loose and we did one test of him, he put on his jacket, the one he liked, we put him in front of the camera. This is the test on the green, and I’m going to put it on the DVD, because he walks out and turns around and is like he was already in the character. He just walked out and I was like, “It’s him.” His eyes were doing this really spooky thing and Frank was getting creeped out. We hired Benecio, but somehow we got Jackie Boy. It’s the best thing in the world to see an actor transform and within a day, we shoot very fast.

Benicio: Yeah, the Wizard goes really fast. He makes it easy and cheap.

Robert: That’s the Latin way. Faster, cheaper, better. He’d come in and he’d have half a day to find that character. He did pre work, but he showed up, put on the costume, and he’s doing it. That’s what’s so great about these actors is that they came in—

Benicio: You know what happened, you trust. You just trust and you throw yourself in and it becomes a rehearsal that becomes glorified in a way.

Q: What about the sequence where you’re a talking corpse head?

Benicio: That’s when Quentin came in and what do you call it, the special guest director?

Robert: Yeah. But you guys flowed with it. You’d think it’d be weird, with suddenly a new director coming but the sequences all kind of stand alone. They were all prepared for anything.

Benicio: We sat down and we talked about it. Is it a voice over? Is the character going to really talk? And Quentin talked about, “Well if you talk like this, we lose the voice over, come back down.” It was all done there on the spot.

Robert: The coolest thing is I kept the camera rolling so I’ve got a lot of that footage. There’s one 16 minute take where I just kept rolling from the position of the real camera, not like behind the scenes, the real camera. So you are just like, you get to see all process. You actually get to see Quentin come into frame and give you all direction, and you’re like “Aren’t we supposed to-oh it was pretty good, we’ll just improvise this little scene.” You guys were just going off.

Benicio: It was like organized chaos.

Robert: You guys were talking all over the place and it was just brilliant. People are going to learn a lot from that. I’m going to put that on the DVD. An uninterrupted 16 minutes and you’ll see pieces that we used and you’ll see a lot in between with Quentin coming in and being like “No, I think we it should be like this.” On camera, FX guys coming in and fixing your neck.

 Benicio: We had a great group of FX guys.

Robert: Seeing you guys be that creative on the spot and we’re rolling. We’re not cutting. You hear the camera guy and the assistant director going, “You’re still rolling,” and the sound guy going “We need to change the battery.” While we were still rolling, you guys were just being creative.

Benicio: The clock was ticking the whole time. You could hear it.

Q: You mentioned the Latin way, what is the significance of being Latin in Hollywood?

Robert: What’s cool about this is, someone was just asking me, “What’s the difference between now and when you started with Latin women in Hollywood?” I thought, when is started, I had to go find a Salma Hayek. There were no Latin actress working in the industry. Antonio came from Europe and was working on the Almodovar movies. But it was very hard here because studios were afraid that if we cast the Latin people, people are going to think the character is Latin and it was just a very weird time. So I had to break these people by putting them in movies that were just popular entertainment movies like Desperado, that is an action film, movies like Spy Kids, where the kids were Latin but that’s not part of the story. It really helped change thing. Wherein this movie, I’ve got Benecio, I’ve got Jessica, I’ve got Rosario Dawson. There’s a lot of Latins not playing Latin roles. They were just hired ’cause of their talent and ’cause the characters they are playing weren’t Latin characters and I didn’t even think about it, “How did I get so many Latins in this movie? There weren’t that many Latin characters.” It’s because you don’t seem as being that labeling, you just go for the best talent possible and it’s about deciding about this time period now.

Jessica: I don’t know Benecio’s experience, but it’s a lot different for me because I only used to get breakdowns for Maria, the Janitor’s daughter messing around with the white kid and it was such a classist bizarre thing ‘cause I grew up in the United States. My mother’s white, my father’s Mexican and my father is very dark and my mother is very fair and I came out how did and they always want to pigeonhole you and it’s bizarre and we’re just people living in society. And I never think about it until people make me think about it. And this industry has definitely made me think about me being a Latin girl, up until I was 18 and I did Dark Angel and Jim basically, “You are the future of the race.” And that basically what Dark Angel was where you are just a mixture and you’re not going to talk about it. It’s done and you are just a human being going through the struggle of whatever you are going through on your journey. Now it’s very liberating working with people that aren’t going to pigeonhole you as the janitor’s daughter.

Benicio: I also think that not only in the acting, but there’s a lot more filmmakers than probably when you started. We were from the same class. There’s a lot of Latinos right now, a lot of filmmakers and writers that are Latin too.

Robert: And they aren’t doing necessarily Latin work.

Benicio: Exactly. And that adds up to that pool.

Q: Did the green screen let you be more creative?

Benicio: It reminded me of theater. I trained as a theater actor and you had a bare stage and you had to pretend, one prop and you are in the middle of 8th Ave. and traffic is just going by. So it reminded me a little bit of that and that made it fun, going back to basics in some ways for me.

 Jessica: I’m not very experienced in theater. The only training I ever had was David Mamet’s theater company, the Atlantic Theater company. And that’s all I did was go on these little stages and imagine things, but they were in small rooms so the difference is you still had to shout and project your voice, but everything was little bit bigger and with Robert, it’s very specific. He fine tunes your performance so it’s kind of a marriage of film and theater I felt.

Q: What are the challenges of working from a comic?

Robert: You’d do different things. Sometimes I’d ask Frank, “You completely jumped screen direction here. Suddenly you—“ And he’s like, “Oh, that’s the way you lay out the wording. Judging where things lay.” Oh, that makes total sense, you have to lead the eye to tell the story that way, wherein editing and filmmaking, you have to almost go left from right and make sure when you cut, you don’t have a different, disorient the audience in any way. You can do that in comics, you can’t do that in movies. It’s just some adapting stuff to play and that’s kinda why we shot on green screen cause you put in the background and you strip it to its bare essentials so that you are always focusing on the actor or the character or whatever it is you really wanted to draw attention to and not have this over stimulus to have them shoot on a real set. Like if I shot Jessica now, this way against you, you all would be really distracting to them on a set. Where if we shot against a green screen, I could pick and choose which faces we’re gonna see, how much of anything we’re gonna see, and you can do close ups ideally on everything in the way its composed and that’s the beauty of Frank’s work and what I wanted to do with the cinema so it became very specific. Sometimes, you felt like you were in a theater stage then I would come in and be like, “Well you kind of have to do this because of the way we are laying it out.” It became very specific to the way down to like an eye blink or something.

Q: How did it affect the actors’ processes to take direction from both Frank Miller and Robert?

Benicio: One at a time. That’s it basically. I’m attentive to like put a face with the director. I for the most part, I turn to the wizard, cause he hired me. But I did have conversations with Frank, and Frank did have input on stuff. A lot of stuff.

Q: What kind of stuff?

Robert: Just knows so much about the characters.

Jessica: The character, like the backstory.

Benicio: Also like, “Hey, you know, maybe you should have a cigarette here, because we’re doing, we already, you know we’re doing the scene where my head goes in the toilet with the cigarette on” and “ok, so I’ll pull out the cigarette here, on this moment here.” You know, stuff like that. And from that to the background of the character. So, that was no problem whatsoever.

Jessica: It was very self-indulgent I think, because we just kind of got to talk each director’s ear off about our characters, and we kind of really like talking about characters we play and ourselves because we’re all kind of narcissistic.

Robert: There were some things that I knew how to answer, and some things I knew that “oh we have to go to Frank for that. I don’t know the answer to that, let’s go find out, I want to know. Hey Frank, how come you did this?”

Jessica: So what happened when…?

Robert: I explained to Frank, sometimes being a good director is just being a good audience. You don’t really have to go in and tell them all the time, “Do this do that do this do that”. Sometimes you just want to create that environment where they feel safe enough to do things that they’re going to suprise you. We had such terrific actors, unless we had something really specific we wanted or needed, it was really just seeing them bring it to life. Having material, the material is very self-evident, they’re just bringing it to life, and that’s what you want to see. You don’t really want to get it the way of that. So you don’t want to have to direct, necessarily, if you don’t need to.

Q: Going from Spy Kids to this, how do you choose what you want to direct when you pick a project?

 Robert: It just depends on how it grabs you. It’s got to be something that excites you. That’s why I pursued Frank just like a wild dog, trying to find him so we could do this movie. Because once I got into my head that this it was possible and I did a test and I saw what it was looking like, I knew I wouldn’t get this excited about another project for a long time. I had to hunt him down and find him and convince him somehow that we were going to do this movie, cause I could already see it and I wanted to do it, really bad. So, it just felt right. That’s why when people get in my way, the DGA goes "Oh you can’t do a movie like that," "Well I’m leaving". It’s like a train that’s rolling and everyone jump aboard ‘cause it’s just too new, it’s too right. And it feels like that way for other things. The Spy Kids movies as well. It was a way to do something about my family in a way that was entertaining, by just making them spies. My family as spies basically. The bad ideas and the ideas you don’t get excited about fall away, and the ones that come forward are the ones that get your blood pumping, that get your heart pumping. And the ones you can’t sleep until you do them, those are the ones that keep me up all night; keep me working.

Q: Robert, do you feel that you owe a debt to Sky Captain, and do you see this technique as the future of movie-making?

Robert: They were kind of both at the same time. I’d just done a bunch of movies on green screen. I’d done the Spy Kids that even the props weren’t there, because it was all simulated from the game. Even though they said that was the first movie done on green screen, I actually already had been doing that. But when I did Sin City, I hadn’t seen any materials on Sky Captain. I didn’t really know they were doing a green screen movie with HD. I had already been doing that for a while. I shot the test and I went and showed Frank the material and, it’s very different because we were shooting on green screen not just to save money, which is kind of why they were doing that, but it was really the only way we could capture these images and get that black and white style. If you shot it in a real environment, all these things just go grey, because they’re all midtones. You have to isolate the actors from the background in order to create that very stark black & white, to create a black & white that you’ve never seen before, because if you watch a black & white movie, it’s really grey and white, because of all the midtones. And we had to get rid of all of those, the way Frank did with pen and ink. So, I realized this is going to be a total exercise in things I’ve been doing. That’s why I felt comfortable doing it, ‘cause I’d already done all this stuff as a photographer, as an effects supervisor, coming up with these ideas.

Q: This is for Benicio and Jessica. After doing all the work, can you talk about seeing yourself in that environment the first time, the first time you saw how the wizard put it all together for you, and can you also say if you’ve got a favorite scene from the movie?

Benicio: You know, it met the expectations when I saw the movie. Surpassed it. You know what happens when you’re in a movie, for me, like I just do come in and work for five days, and I’m out. We just basically know one story. We usually look, when I see a movie, is the other stories that attract me more than my story. I’m looking at my story going like "Oh, no, ooooh". But, it’s the other stories and it’s just hard to pick one moment. I really enjoy the under water stuff. I don’t know, it was something about it.

Robert: Did you find it easier to watch yourself in this? Mickey did, because he was in make-up and was really playing a character. Did you find it easier to look at yourself, because you’re really playing someone so different and even look different? I got him to do it, to come watch himself on the HD monitor. He said "I never could’ve watched, but this is different".

Benicio: I’ve seen Mickey watch himself, and it’s like that’s an extreme. I happened to be in a screening room. Mickey Rourke was sitting in front of me, and it was a movie that he was in and I was in and I really saw him like shrinking in the seat. I’m going like, "What about me?" But yeah, I think it was easier. You know, the movie has that world that grabs you so hard-core. I think good movies make it easier for you to watch yourself, if you suffer from that same thing that Mickey has and which I do too. I find it hard for me to watch myself on the screen. Kind of boring really. The movie has such a world that grabs you that it was a ride. You just took it and enjoyed it.

 Jessica: Yeah, I just felt like I was a little pea, a little line in this music, this piece of music that was beautiful like from beginning to end. I wanted to rewind it and see the whole thing all over again, because I don’t think I got to really like have all the images that I want in my mind. There was so much, you know, it was so visual and overwhelming and all the characters were so specific. And it’s great.

Robert: You can watch yourself?

Jessica: I’m critical of myself, so I’m waiting for my part to be over so I can get on with enjoying the movie. That’s sort of my thing. But you made my skin look nice. Thanks.

Q: Jessica, how did you prepare for this movie, as far as working out, learning the lasso, ant dancing that you did?

Jessica: I work out anyway just because it’s healthy to work out and women have health problems; especially in my family. So I work out just to be healthy anyway so that was already part of it. And I went to strip clubs to see how strippers do it, and I realized that; I wanted a choreographer and Robert said no, and I was like "Ahhhh, OK" and he’s like "Just feel it. We’re gonna play music and you’re just gonna feel it."

Robert: I wanted it to come from you. I did that with Salma Hayek in Dusk ‘Til Dawn. She wanted a choreographer, said "I don’t know how to dance." But, I’m not going to have you doing dance moves. I want something more primal than that.

Jessica: Mind you he’s saying Salma Hayek in ‘Dusk Til Dawn, the sexiest dance I’ve ever seen on camera ever. And he’s like, "It’ll be like that", and I was like, "Like that? Are you serious? I have to live up to something.” Like it’s iconic, there hasn’t been a sexier dance ever, and she wasn’t naked.

Robert: She was very nervous too.

Jessica: And she was gorgeous.

Robert: And she was just there. You do it and you go up there and I just knew; you know how to dance, it’s gonna be something people wish they could choreograph.

Jessica: He says that. My heart was beating so fast. I was so nervous. And then I had some Texans teach me how to rope and lasso.

Robert: She’s out there in the back ropin’ and spinning the gun. She whacked herself in the head a few times. By the time she got to the stage, we were just all watching. "Oh the tape ran out Robert". "Oh OK".

Q: Jessica, can you talk a little bit about how Fantastic Four is different? Then also say about Into The Blue?

Jessica: Fantastic Four couldn’t be more different. Fantastic Four is a family movie. I play a scientist who has a problem expressing her emotions, and her DNA was altered and when she does express her emotions she goes invisible. So when she’s screaming she goes invisible, when she’s having a melt-down she goes invisible, and she’s completely frustrated. And the man that she’s in love with ignores her and she goes invisible. So that’s very frustrating. It’s very big and it’s a huge movie for Fox and there’s a lot of pressure that it does well. So, it really couldn’t be more different. Into The Blue, I did that a long time ago. Jim Cameron has been sort of kind of talking about maybe doing a comic book that involves scuba diving. Fathom is sort of like this girl under water. I had been talking to him about possibly doing something like that, and this movie came up and I hadn’t scuba dived in seven months, and they were going to give me a decent paycheck to scuba dive in the Bahamas for five months, and I was like "cool". That’s honestly why I did that.

Q: How do you keep style from overwhelming the story?

Robert: The thing about the book is that they go hand in hand. I mean, to make a regular movie out of Sin City would have robbed it of how much the images worked on it. That’s what we loved about it, was that they were great stories on their own, but also the images are what really hit you first. So that’s the effective pattern. People see a trailer and they say, "This looks unbelievable" because the visuals in it, they’re not getting any story, they’re just getting the visuals. And so then you know it’s working. It goes hand in hand. That’s what’s so great about Frank’s books, and what’s made them so enduring and so astonishing in the comic world, is that they’re very complete as stories, very original as stories, but then the visual element is also just revolutionary. That’s why I wanted to make a movie out of it, because if I could put that on the screen, people have never seen that before. It’ll be a really new experience for them.

Q: Do the actors fear that it could overwhelm your performances?

 Benicio: No. I don’t know if I’m competing with palm trees and stuff like that, but I did feel like usually in movies, less is more. But in this movie, one of the reasons to do it, in some ways, was to do more is more. More over-the-top, what we call over-the-top, it’s conducive for that.

Robert: We used the images a lot, and he’d look at the panels and go, "OK, I get my hand cut off here, but in the next panel I’ve got the gun again. How did I get it out of my hand? Maybe I should go chew my fingers off the gun". They’re coming up with ideas to fill in the panels, and then "maybe I should take the hand and put it in my pocket.” I said "For later. Maybe someone can sew it back on.” We were laughing about that "for later.” That wasn’t in the book, but sort of in between the lines because the book jumps from panel to panel, and it was very creative for them to come up with things that help the story, fill in the story and filled in the characters. And the whole reason to shoot on green screen was to really strip away the backgrounds and the effects, to really make what was important important, which was the performances of the actors, and that’s how his comics are. Sometimes there’s just black behind an actor, I mean in the comic in the character. So that you’re really just looking at their eyes or the performance and the characters. You need to be what pops out more. That’s what people are going to walk away from here, is how unique Yellow Bastard is, or the Elijah Wood character and Jackie boy or Nancy. You’re thinking about the characters, you’re not thinking about all that other stuff.

Give pole dances on our message boards!






Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

MCP: BUNGIE SAYS, “DOWNLOAD THIS!”

Halo!For weeks, rumors
have been flying about Bungie’s planned Halo 2 expansion pack. What
would be included? How many new maps? Do we have to pay for it? And did Bungie finally
stop counting its money long enough to write a proper ending for the solo
campaign? This morning, most of these questions were answered as the company
released specs for the unassumingly titled Halo 2 Multiplayer Map Pack. And I
was really hoping they’d spell ‘pack’ without the ‘c’.

Here’s
the skinny. The multiplayer expansion will feature nine new maps, two videos (a
mini-doc on the design process and an animated short set in New Mombasa) and
all the updates previously available via Xbox Live. The price for all that?
Anyone without a Live connection will pay $19.99.

But in
these days of Steam, downloadable content that never materializes and free
downloadable content we have to pay for, things are a little more complicated
than that.

In April,
four of the maps will be available for download. Two (Containment and Warlock)
will be free, sponsored by…Mountain Dew. Dude! It’ll be totally slammin’ to grab a Dew while I’m leaning out of a Banshee! For the remaining pair, Sanctuary and
Turf, you’ll have to shell out six bucks to play. And on June 28, the other
five maps will be available for download for $11.99. Note that the two video
features from the retail disc aren’t mentioned in this online ponzi scheme.

And it’s
not over yet. According to Bungie’s own site: By late summer, ALL the maps will be available for free. But you’ll
still have to shell out for the two videos, unless m4sT3rCHEEF186 has finished
coding that Xbox bit torrent client by then.

Details
on the first four maps are freely available over at Bungie’s
site
.






Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

NEW ZEN KOAN: WHAT IS THE FINAL CUT OF A STAR WARS MOVIE?

vsdCatching a movie projected digitally can be a rewarding experience – the picture clarity and brightness is astonishing, and the pre-movie ads and trivia bullshit are often animated! And as Star Wars fans know very well, you may even see a different movie than the folks catching it on celluloid.

That will be the case with Revenge of the Sith which, just like Attack of the Clones, will have a slightly different digital version. "The digital version of the movie will be different from the version that goes out on film. That has to be locked down so much earlier, whereas the digital can go right up to a week-and-a-half before the film comes out," Darth McCallum tells Empire Magazine.

Let’s divorce this from Star Wars for the sake of argument. While it’s nice that digital gives filmmakers more prep time, maybe the answer is to not set release dates before work on a movie begins? What’s interesting is that I had thought (and I think that Lucas did as well) that digital projection would be a lot more widespread by now. This really makes you wonder how much of a point there is in directors pursuing 3D tech before the last "next-gen" film technology even becomes remotely commonplace.






Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

CLONE WARS STRIKE ONLINE

 I didn’t catch any of the first Star Wars: Clone Wars animated shorts on the Cartoon Network, opting instead to wait for the eventual DVD release, and I’m glad I did because getting them in one somewhat cohesive package was a great way to see them. Unsurprisingly, I found them more entertaining than Episodes I and II, thanks mostly to Samurai Jack creator Genndy Tartakovsky’s groovy designs and concepts that are excitingly executed (that goofy jousting sequence aside).

The cartoon quickies bridge the gap between Attack of the Clones and the eventual disappointment of Revenge of the Sith (hey, I realize there’s a lot of perceived negativity on CHUD regarding the prequels, but I truly think disappointment is a perfectly realistic expectation at this point), detailing the adventures of Anakin, Obi-Wan, future Stormtroopers and soon-to-be-extinct Jedi.

The latest episodes (now with 78% more Wat Tambor!) are currently airing on Cartoon Network, but if you don’t get basic cable, ya deadbeat, or just want to put them on your laptop or personal media player for some saber action during your commute, you can now download Chapters 21-25 of Volume II. And hope General Grievous looks as cool interacting with humans in Episode III as he does slashing Flash-animated Jedi.

GET ‘EM HERE!

Remember why you love Star Wars on our message boards!






Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

DVD REVIEW: MISS CONGENIALITY (LDE)

I'm hot.  Buy me!BUY IT AT AMAZON: CLICK HERE!
STUDIO: Warner Home Video
MSRP: $24.98 RATED: PG-13
RUNNING TIME: 110 Minutes
SPECIAL FEATURES:
Commentary by Sandra Bullock and co-screenwriter Marc Lawrence
Commentary by director Donald Petrie
Includes movie ticket to Miss Congeniality 2: Armed and Fabulous (expires 5/7/05)
Two making-of documentaries: "Preparing for the Pageant" and "The Pageant"
Three additional scenes
William Shatner hosts "Do You Have What It Takes to Be a Beauty Queen?" quiz
Theatrical trailer
Sneak peek footage of Miss Congeniality 2
CD soundtrack to Miss Congeniality 2


The concept of the double dip in DVD retail is nothing new. In fact it seems to be becoming the rule rather than the exception. I’m trying to think back to how this may have come about – whether or not this trend was ushered in by a similar practice in other media. Other than the re-releases of the original Star Wars trilogies in the late ‘70s and early ‘80s, I don’t remember too many movies that came out time and again for more bank. That’s why God made sequels. And in the ‘80s, you could generally be assured – other than the Star Wars flicks – that if you bought a tape, you were pretty much good until maybe some special anniversary edition of the flick came out, or until you bought that wave of the future – the laserdisc.


After the Wonder Woman project stalled, Halle Berry snatched up Catwoman and Jennifer Garner got Elektra, the only option Bullock had left was to do a bold reimagining of the Swiss legend with Super Heidi


(As a side rant, I’ve bought my Star Wars tapes, DVDs, I’ve seen the originals, the re-releases, the special editions and the prequels. All that’s left is to finish up Clone Wars, see ROTS, get the DVD, plunge headlong into my forties and beyond and end up in a nursing home where I’ll be drooling in my Froot Loops while watching the inevitable Episodes 7-39 on Oxygen. 3-D or no, you’re not getting more than $40 of my money from here on out, Lucas, ya smarmy bastard…)

(Ahem.) TV you say? Well let’s be honest, TV is rerun city. You’re lucky to get an original episode of your favorite show. TV makes its money off of the double dip, and the triple dip, the 5,286th dip… So TV aside, where do the studios get off throwing movies out there on disc again only a few years, or even a few months after we’ve bought the first? The issue was covered in a previous review (here), where you get an inside look into how the studio bosses think. In the past there’ve been Special Editions, Limited Editions, Collectors Editions, even Extreme Editions. I’m personally waiting for the Pulp Fiction: Gimp Edition, complete with leather zip-open case, ball gag and extra footage of Ving Rhames getting ass-pirated with guest commentary by Marv Albert.


"
All I can say is that I had a hangover ‘THIS BIG’ when I signed on to co-star in
On Deadly Ground…"


Since the DVD double dip is pretty much a fact of life these days, I’m of the opinion that if the studios are going to do it, there better be some pretty good shit on the disc or extras to make it worth my while. Subsequently, I’ve recently had a go-round with the second coming of one of Sandra Bullock’s most successful movies of the last ten years, the presumptuously titled Miss Congeniality: Limited Deluxe Edition.

The Flick

The last time I can think of a government agent going undercover as a contestant in a beauty pageant was when Jaime Sommers did the deed in an episode of The Bionic Woman. And considering that Bullock was once a bionic woman herself, there was definitely some kind of cosmic back door thing going on here. Tomboy FBI Agent Gracie Hart (Bullock) is a klutzy, disheveled poster girl for unappreciated government employees everywhere. Having issues with punching the male species out since childhood, she ends up getting overzealous during an FBI sting operation and causes an agent to get shot. She’s then relegated to Starbucks duty while her partner, Matthews, (Benjamin Bratt) is assigned to run his first operation – to catch a serial bomber, the “Citizen,” who has recently threatened to blow up the Miss United States pageant.


In addition to information on his exploitation of mutants, Mystique found much more disturbing things on Stryker’s computer…


They decide to put in an agent undercover and although Bratt is a damn pretty man, Hart gets the call, despite being on the outs with her boss, Asst. Dir. McDonald (Ernie Hudson). What follows next is a process rivaling the NASA operation in Armageddon where Hart is starved, waxed, coiffed, manicured, pedicured, waxed again and varnished into beauty queen shape. She comes out of the whole deal looking like…Sandra Bullock. The two people running the pageant are former winner Kathy Morningside (Candice Bergin) and pageant host Stan Fields (William Shatner in his 4,234th ham/ditz/camp/letch role). And to get Hart as much coaching as possible, the FBI brings in former pageant coach supreme and super snooty fairy, Victor Melling.


A Vermont 9.0, a Montana 8.0, a Nebraska 9.5, a Kansas 8.5.
Translation: an LA 4.5, an LA 4.0, an LA 4.75, an LA 4.25…


Once amongst the other contestants, Hart has to split time between pageant preliminaries, posture and etiquette sessions with Melling, FBI meetings, being on the lookout for the Citizen and just learning how to be one of the girls. She quickly bonds with Miss Rhode Island (the wholesome girl), Texas (the overconfident hometown bitch), Hawaii (the bigger bitch), New York (the closet lesbian) and California. Almost immediately, Hart is a fish completely out of water as she has issues with her body, issues with the assignment and issues in general. Her situation isn’t helped by the fact that Morningside never wanted her there in the first place. She’s so obsessively overprotective of the pageant that she’s scary – kind of like the most diehard Jacko fans.


Caption A: Shatner discovered fans at a typical TJ Hooker con are quite a bit hotter than at a Star Trek con.
Caption B: Probability that Shatner nailed at least half the chicks on that stage: 76.4%


Anyway, Hart barely makes her way through the pageant preliminaries. She blasphemes our Lord and savior Jesus Christ during a group breakfast. She then gets a little tackle happy with a gun-carrying Texan during the talent competition. She trips and falls flat on her face on national TV and she has breast issues during the swimsuit competition. And when she runs into trouble with her televised talent competition, she throws an impromptu self defense class using Matthews as her punching bag. At various phases of the pageant, the Citizen is preparing his little surprise in the form of a tiara with a bomb in the crown. Eventually however, McDonald shuts down the operation when the Citizen is captured in another state and the FBI officially rules the threat to the pageant as being over. But Hart isn’t convinced that that’s true and decides to stay on the case alone and as a civilian. Her fears are soon realized and it’s up to her to save the day – in an evening gown and pumps.


Times got a little tough for Bratt after the Julia Roberts breakup…


Miss Congeniality is a decent enough comedy. Bullock is about as good as I’ve seen her since Speed – equally mixing the comedy and sex appeal. The supporting cast is also good, especially Caine, who is simply incapable of sucking (okay he wasn’t Olivier in On Deadly Ground, but Olivier wouldn’t have been Olivier in that movie…). Likewise, Shatner is given another ham role to play, but he isn’t given as free a rein as his fans, including me, are accustomed to seeing. Bergin is fine as the nutbag pageant host. She and Shatner have recently been reunited on Boston Legal. Unfortunately, they’re not given as much to do here as they are on the show, and their good chemistry is pretty much wasted. Then there’s Benjamin Bratt, who’s just the best looking side of beef this side of Brad Pitt…or uh, so the ladies seem to think… He and Bullock also work well together and Bratt shows that he’s more than just a pretty face, and a luscious body, and dimpled wonder…. Uh, it’s easy to see why chicks dig him…


Anyway, the choice to have Hart be a falling down klutz is an element that wasn’t really needed as Bullock did a good enough job of creating Hart as a tomboy and anything but a beauty queen. She’s also getting fairly good reviews in the upcoming sequel (which is why this Deluxe Edition came out in the first place), even if the movie generally isn’t. But here, she’s pretty good and so is the movie.

6.8 out of 10

The Look

The movie actually looks pretty good also. With dozens of chicks subbing as pageant contestants, sometimes in bathing suits, sometimes in lingerie, there’s plenty of eye candy to go around. The transfer is also good, so we can all especially admire Benjamin Bratt’s oh so pretty mug…

8.3 out of 10


Somehow I thought seeing Sandra Bullock’s cans might be a more rewarding experience…


The Noise

Not that there’s anything to really give the woofers a workout, the Dolby 5.1 Surround doesn’t disappoint nevertheless. You know, I just realized how nice Benjamin Bratt’s voice sounded… (Dear God is there something wrong with me?)

8.2 out of 10

The Goodies

Deluxe Limited Edition? As far as the disc goes, hardly. As far as the extra stuff that comes with the disc, I’d have to say yes. But admittedly there is a lot of stuff on the DVD itself:

Commentary by Sandra Bullock and co-screenwriter Marc Lawrence: It’s mostly Bullock and Lawrence vamping about the fun they had on the set, how much fun everybody was, and how much fun…aw the hell with it.


Forget it, the last caption ruined it for me.


Commentary by director Donald Petrie: Petrie has directed a few notable flicks like Mystic Pizza, Grumpy Old Men and Welcome to Mooseport. He’s capable of crafting a decent comedy, and he seems to know his stuff, which is reflected in his commentary. It’s not the most exciting two hours of voiceover, but it wasn’t bad either.

Two making-of documentaries: "Preparing for the Pageant" and "The Pageant": Boilerplate featurettes with talking heads, outtakes, etc.

Three additional scenes: They weren’t missed.

William Shatner hosts "Do You Have What It Takes to Be a Beauty Queen?" quiz: Gotta admit, I couldn’t even get through this. The questions seemed to go on and on and on. After I kept answering that I’m not only a beautiful person outside but also a beautiful person inside or guys can’t see past my good looks, I shut off the DVD player and went to go eat some cookie dough and watch Oprah.


Producers were less than dazzled by Bullock’s screen test for Man-Thing.


Sneak peek footage of Miss Congeniality 2

Theatrical trailer

Movie ticket and soundtrack CD to Miss Congeniality 2: Okay, now you’re talking deluxe (at least somewhat deluxe anyway). The DVD comes with these promotional items for the sequel…corporate synergy whoring at its best. As far as double dips go, and considering the asking price, this ain’t half bad. If you’ve got to take your girl to see the sequel, this set has half paid for itself already. As far as the CD goes, I’m not a music critic by any means, and with Yahoo! Music and music stations on digital cable, I’ve pretty much stopped buying CDs long ago. But the CD has a good mixture of old and new schools. My picks? Any CD that has The Ohio Players’ “Fire”, The Staples’ Singers’ “I’ll Take You There,” plus Pink, Patti LaBelle and Ike and Tina, not to mention Paul Anka, I’m gonna be bumpin’ it in the ’64.

9.2 out of 10

The Artwork

In a word: crap. Airbrushed crap. The original movie poster was pretty clever in mixing Gracie Hart’s FBI and beauty pageant motifs. It got the message across simply enough and Bullock was definitely easy on the eyes. This is a pale imitation and Bullock looks like she was molested by an ex-Cosmo artist.

2.3 out of 10

Overall: 7.6 out of 10





Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

SCREENING: THE BALLAD OF JACK AND ROSE

.Devin had this to say about the latest Daniel Day-Lewis flick:

"The Ballad of Jack and Rose is an often engrossing
character piece, filled with small moments of beauty and sadness.
"

…and the fact that Devin also also describes Krispy Kreme donuts the same way shouldn’t discourage you. It’s one of those films that people who respect film ought to see. Read Devin’s quite positive review of the flick right here.

I found out that there’s a screening next Thursday in Atlanta and we’re a part of it! I also realize that it’d be next to impossible to get these passes into your grubby mitts in time I we entrusted the US Postal Service so we’ll do this one a little differently.

So, instead of the typical plea for SASE’s, I just ask that interested parties use the email link below if they can make it (it’s at the Tara) and I’ll add you to the list. It’s just that easy sometimes. If for some reason I exhaust my pass supply quickly, I’ll amend this page, so keep an eye out and enjoy the film. I won’t be there, so if one of you folks wants to be my person at the scene to hand the passes out, please let me know.

ENTER TO WIN





Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

DVD REVIEW: END OF THE CENTURY – THE STORY OF THE RAMONES

Buy me!BUY IT AT AMAZON: CLICK HERE!
MSRP:
$19.99 RATED: Unrated
RUNNING TIME: 150 Minutes
SPECIAL FEATURES:

Theatrical Trailer
Deleted Scene: "Clem Burke as Elvis Ramone"
Joey Ramone radio interview from FM 106.3
Johnny Ramone interview excerpts
Richie Ramone interview excerpts
Marky Ramone drum techniques
Joe Strummer interview excerpts
Tommy Ramone interview excerpts
Debbie Harry and Chris Stein interview excerpts
"Who Wrote What On the First 3 Albums" by Tommy Ramone

Note: Due to an unavoidable technical issue, this review has no screencaps. They’ll be back with the next review!


There’s a pretty good chance that if you hung out in the New York City rock scene between the 70s and 90s you ran into Joey Ramone. Here’s my Joey story:

My friend Pat and I were in the Village, headed down to someplace on Avenue A, by way of St. Marks Place. As we got to the corner of Third Avenue and St Marks we saw a commotion – some kid was laying in the middle of the street, surrounded by a crowd. It turned out the kid had been in a fight at a nearby club, The Continental. He had been slashed with a knife, run out of the club and then been clipped by a cab. He was on his back in the street, bleeding and crying.


Someone called an ambulance and the crowd grew. Behind me I heard some assholes catcalling, yelling out that the kid was a pussy. Finally, one of the assholes said, “Take my picture!” He went out to the kid, kneeled down next to him and smiled for the camera.


That asshole was Joey Ramone.

The Flick

Here’s the thing about every single rock documentary – they all start the same way. They have to set the music scene so that you can understand why the band whose story you are watching was important. Invariably said band will have changed all the rules and attitudes of music, and the documentarians want you to understand what the status quo was before they show you how it was demolished.


End of the Century, being a rock doc, does that. Thankfully it does it well, and it does it quickly, because it soon becomes apparent that the interesting thing about the Ramones wasn’t that they changed music in any way, but that they managed to stay together in order to do it.


Other bands might have had more high profile dysfunctions, but the Ramones easily slips into the history books as the band with the most interpersonal animosity and hatred – and they somehow managed to stick together for over twenty years. And they managed to do that while never quite getting the level of success that they so desperately craved.


Like most New York City kids I grew up immersed in the Ramones. I spent a lot of years of my life in Forest Hills, the neighborhood they came from – I remember wandering around trying to figure out where Dee Dee and Tommy might have hung out. Directors Jim Fields and Michael Gramaglia do a great job of following the four punks out of Queens using almost nothing but their own words and recollections.


Joey Ramone, of course, died before the film was made, so we have archival footage of him, as well as the memories of his mother and brother. The Joey stuff is inevitably sad – he comes across as nothing so much as a wounded boy.


Dee Dee died at some point after the completion of the film, but Fields and Gramaglia got plenty of footage of him – including his groundbreaking explanation for why the hell he recorded a rap album. Dee Dee is alternately funny and pathetic. The guy’s a mess, and you have to respect the fact that he made it as long as he did. All the surviving Ramones also speak – including Ritchie Ramone, dressed bizarrely in a suit.


The most surprising Ramone has to be Johnny, though. The guy comes across as nothing but a complete and total asshole. He’s in your face and unapologetic about being a completely selfish and nasty person. After a while you have to admire that in him – the guy has been a prick since day one, and like his hairstyle and clothes he’s stuck with being a dick for decades.


Some of the stories are incredible. They aren’t Hammer of the Gods level mudshark fucking- they’re stories about the band driving in a van for an entire tour and almost never talking to each other. They’re about Johnny walking offstage after the final Ramones performance and not even saying goodbye to anyone. They’re about the petty small things that plagued the band for its entire life, and because they’re so relatable they’re very fascinating.


The oral history aspect of the band is great, but the real treat is the live footage of the Ramones, much of it from their very early days before anybody even knew what CBGBs was. The band was simply fierce – their live sound is unlike what they caught on records.

Unfortunately not all of the live footage contains live sound – on some of the scenes record material is overlaid. I imagine the sound elements of that footage wasn’t up to snuff, but it is disappointing.


One of the more surprising things to me was that not only were the Ramones never terribly successful but that they very much wanted to be. It’s sort of just assumed that bands from the “punk” era eschewed mainstream success, but the Ramones furiously courted it and strangely never found it. Again, growing up in New York it was impossible to imagine that the Ramones didn’t get played on the radio, but according to the film they had a real problem crossing over out of their small fanbase. It’s sort of amazing – what the Ramones played was simply pop music with different guitars – they’re very much what would have happened if the Beach Boys grew up riding the F train instead of waves. And brain damaged. This would have been something I would have liked to see explored more.


The End of the Century serves both as a perfect introduction to the Ramones and an advanced course for fans. There are not a lot of music documentaries that leave me feeling like I really learned all that much – The Beatles Anthology was one of the few and that was about fifteen hours long. Usually rock docs are nice for the footage. End of the Century doesn’t sport much interesting footage beyond the early concert stuff – the Ramones weren’t documenting themselves. But the movie manages to create the kind of comprehensive and interesting picture that you usually only get from picking up a book.


Funny, sad, compelling and with a completely awesome soundtrack, End of the Century is one of the finer rock documentaries of all time.

8.8 out of 10

The Look

The picture quality goes from decent to awful, depending on where the footage you’re watching comes from. Obviously a lot of the older, archival material looks like crap, but even the newer stuff isn’t that strong – it looks to have been shot on 16mm and video. The film is presented in non-anamorphic widescreen.

6.0 out of 10

The Noise

There’s a Dolby 2.0 and 5.1 track. The 5.1 track is surprisingly poor – the hissing and ambient sounds from many of the interviews becomes quite aggressive in this mix. At any rate the great Ramones songs were lo-fi stereo masterpieces, and they sound great in 2.0.


7.0 out of 10

The Goodies

All you really get is a number of deleted scenes, which add up to about 38 minutes. At least one of the scenes – Tommy going over who wrote which songs – is vital for any fan’s understanding of the music. None of the deleted scenes seem completely extraneous, but that was the only one that I wish had been incorporated in the film somehow, as the authorship of songs was something I kept wondering about.


Not really an extra, but the menu screens all play classic Ramones tracks – but not all the way through!


7.4 out of 10

The Artwork

An iconic image of the band with their classic logo. You don’t get much more representative than this. It’s a touch generic, but when you realize that these guys kept the same outfits and haircuts from the 70s to the 90s, that can’t be helped.

8.4 out of 10

Overall: 8.8 out of 10






Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

TRAILER: BEWITCHED

I don’t particularly like being a negative prick (sometimes) but I’ll be damned if Bewitched doesn’t look like a waste of talent. Will Ferrell? Nicole Kidman? Michael Caine? David Alan Grier?!

And here I thought they were simply turning the old television show into a contemporized film. You know, something that centered around a witch. I guess I was wrong. It seems to be a Hollywood movie about Hollywood… and a witch.

Scathing industry observations will no doubt be made. Edgy!

If nothing else, there is Will Ferrell who hasn’t to this day let me down (regardless of what I might think of a couple of his films). Let’s hope that trend continues.

Bewitched (which also stars Shirley MacLaine, Jason Schwartzman, Stephen Colbert, and Steve Carell) twitches its way into theaters June 24th.

CHECK OUT THE TRAILER HERE!


Well, at least you got a fat paycheck on our message boards!






Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email