LEAK LETTERS #42

Mailbagsukidoji:

Your letters. My smartass replies.Hey folks,

You have a comment and don’t want to send a letter? Please click HERE and pipe up on the message boards. Please? That thread is deader than Persis Khambatta. Now that I’ve gotten another Leak out of me, the letters are coming nice and steady. Makes me think I oughta keep it up. And I am, expect a new Leak next week. What, it’s my birthday next week? Wow, thanks for remembering!

Here’s the letters.

Come around here often?

Verbose and Good!

Mitch to the left!Jeremy writes:

I just read the latest version of the Leak Letters (#41) and I took
issue with what "Feline Goddess" wrote. That person claimed that the
magazine reviews have been uniform in praising Superman Returns and thus your assertion that the (online) reviewers couldn’t be trusted was suspect. I would like to return the favor and ask Ms. Goddess how
many of those published reviews came from magazines that are owned by
(or affiliated with) Time Warner, the very same entity that also
happens to own Warner Bros. Pictures? Time Warner has a lot to lose
if this film tanks…and its more than the $250 million spent on the
production budget. To my knowledge, that price tag does not include
the marketing costs, nor does it include the millions that Warners
spent over a decade-and-a-half trying to relaunch the franchise and
consequently wasting it on stalled productions as well as the payola
they gave to Tim Burton and Nicolas Cage for accomplishing nothing.

To me, I find everything to do with this film completely insincere.
Warner Bros. seems to be emulating Halliburton in doing whatever it
takes – except making a film we actually want to see – to artificially
ensure the flick is a hit. The difference between the two companies
is that Warners does not seem to have a competent Dick Cheney
character pulling the strings but instead has plenty of execs like Jon
"Giant Frikkin’ Spider" Peters calling the shots.

Case point. When you are a giant media company and have a hit
television series, you ultimately try to transition that series to the
big screen. Take for example Paramount. When *Star Trek – The Next
Generation* was ending, Paramount had already decided to transition
the series to feature films. When this happened, did Paramount recast
all the leads with well-known "motion picture" actors? For example,
did Rick Berman decide to give Patrick Stewart the boot and replace
him with Ed Harris? The answer is "no". Or how about Fox with *The
X-Files*? I cannot seem to recall John Cusak replacing David Duchovny
in the lead role. In both cases, the studios were smart enough not to
alienate their fanbases. Warners had a chance to do the same with
Smallville but instead chose to give the cast and its fanbase the
cold shoulder. And yet they expect those very fans to buy tickets in
order to justify their own incompetent decision making skills? No
way.

If Warners collectively had a brain, they would have transitioned the
cast of Smallville to the big screen to relaunch the studio’s
Superman franchise. This is not meant to praise the writing of the
series, but the cast. There have been plenty of times that the
writing on the series has made me groan, especially with its slavish
reliance upon "freak of the week" plotting that was tired even when
Kolchak was smiting Chicago area monsters while engaging in verbal
judo with his boss Vincenzo on a weekly basis. Yet what works with
the series is the cast. Do I think Tom Welling deserves to wear the
red & blue on the silver screen? The answer is "without a doubt,
yes". Do I prefer Erica Durance to Kate Bosworth? Duh! And would
I rather see a multi-layered performance made by Michael Rosenbaum
over Kevin Spacey’s "Dr. Evil" take on Lex Luthor? Of course. But as
a fan, I am not receiving any of this.

Instead of giving the fanbase a movie that it wanted, Warners is
giving fans a film that is merely a rehash of the Donner films with
extra special effects. Even worse, they’ve literally "jumped the
shark" by introducing a kid into the plot; a character that has
already been tagged online as "Superbastard". Sorry, but adding
children backfired on Alf and *Married with Children* a long time
ago. Perhaps when the next management team at Warners decides to give
the franchise a proper reboot, we’ll see a picture of Superman’s kid
appear on the back of a prop milk carton on the set exactly like what
happened on *Married with Children when Seven was rightfully cut from
the show. Now that would be funny. And once again, we are treated
with a lame interpretation of Lex Luthor who this time is scheming to
recreate Cobra Island out of Kryptonite. I sure hope Larry Hama is
receiving a royalty check from this, and if not, I hope he strikes up
a conversation with Ted Newsom on how to deal with studios who
"borrow" story elements without offering compensation in return. But
out of fairness, I won’t address the homoerotic nature of Lex
"penetrating" Superman with a Kryptonite shard that infects his blood
because well, that is just too easy and I would not want to be labeled
as an online slash fiction writer.

In conclusion, if people like Feline Goddess wish to trust "plant"
reviews written months ago, then so be it. I’d prefer to not see the
film in order to teach Warners to listen to its fans instead of
dictating what the fans wish to see. The lessons learned from *Batman
& Robin* taught Warners to respect the Batman character and the end
result was that the majority of the fans subsequently embraced *Batman
Begins*. Perhaps Warners will learn to do the same with Superman.
Maybe then when the so-called "Metropolis" (sequel film to
Smallville themed film hits the silver screen, we can all agree
that Superman has returned. But until then, I think I’ll spend my
movie dollars on seeing the return of Captain Jack just like the rest
of the general public will this summer.

Nick’s Reply: Well said. I will never "get" the appeal of Smallville but I’m the guy who doesn’t watch Battlestar Galactica either. That said, preach on!

(SEND A LETTER)

Come around here often?

Batman Begins Fan Naught.

Mitch to the right.John writes:

…IS such an incredibly overrated bore that each time
someone brings it up as some sort of high water mark
for comic movies I want to fucking vomit.

But that’s what movies are all about, those who have
taste (anyone who enjoyed the hell of out Superman
Returns) and those who don’t (The Batman Begins(to get
lame ten minutes in) crowd and anyone who defends
their like of that piece of shit X-3).

And for the love of Christ, I wish people would stop
glorifying the Donner films (the first two). They
would have been shit without Reeve owning the role as
he did, and they are almost pathetically laughable
even with him present.

Otis and Gene Hack….man, et all can suck my ass.
Terrible camp all around, and a Lois who as much sex
appeal as Bea Fucking Arthur.

Nick’s Reply: Holy shit. You’re bonkers!

(SEND A LETTER)

Come around here often?

Advice.

Mitch to the left!Cody writes:

I’m a long-time reader of CHUD and a huge fan of the site. It’s a really cool community for a high school student who aspires to have a career in entertainment journalism… I clearly have a lot to learn.

That said, I was wondering if, for curiosity’s sake, you could answer a few of my questions about how you got your foot in the door in such a huge way. I’m graduating soon, and I’m interested in following a similar path.

Basically all I’d like to know is: how’d you do it? How did you manage to insinuate yourself into the industry in such a way that you are sent passes to advanced screenings, dvds for review, and invited to all those press junkets and set visits? I’m especially fascinated by it because you seem to have established yourself without any prior connections to the movie and journalism industries. Did you just start your site, and they eventually came to you, or did you actively seek their support yourself?

Anyway, if you’d made it this far, I thank you for your patience with this obnoxious, wide-eyed youth…

Nick’s Reply: When I got my so called foot in the so called door there was really no door. About a decde ago, sites like these (or mailing lists, as this originated) were out there but there was no real set of standards and the film business had no grasp on how to deal with it.  I get this question a lot and I always cringe a little. Most everyone has their minds set on the benefits: the free screenings, the early screenings, the DVD screeners, and all that jazz. It’s a cause and effect thing and I think it needs to be. You need to earn those benefits in my mind. Once you have an editorial focus, opinions that offer something to folks, the work ethic, and the writing ability and web design ability to make them all come across you start doing your thing. Eventually, people will notice and you’ll get a crack at the perks. My advice: Don’t copy anyone. Don’t expect goodies and don’t do it for the goodies as they’re a blessing and a curse. Do it out of passion always. Otherwise, you’ll just be one of those rotten apples that spoil it for the others.

(SEND A LETTER)

Come around here often?

The Goods.

Mitch to the left!Aaron writes:

I’m gonna keep this short so as not to bore the piss out of anyone. I read your piece on web film criticism with much interest and thought I’d just add my two penneth. I enjoy reading the opinions of others, from the earnest to the totally crazy. Sure, some folks are less than honest. Some have been coerced. Others do obviously have hidden (or not so hidden) agendas, axes to grind, what have you. Opinion can be swayed. It can be bought outright. But I believe any sane, intelligent film lover will have the capacity to see what exactly what reviews are: opinion. No matter how misguided or cloak-and-dagger the shennanigans behind them. If you have a brain you will read, absorb but then – crucially – see whichever flick for yourself and make up your own mind. It’s sad to think that some people will be misled or have their minds made up for them by others regarding any piece of art. But fuck them. They’re idiots. Maybe those of us that can judge things for ourselves are a dying breed. Maybe less and less people can see through the bullshit these days. Sure, it makes me sad but (shrugs shoulders) what are you gonna do? As long as I have my own soul and my own mind I will continue to read reviews and articles and what-have-you and not take them at face value. I’ll continue to like what I like and hate what I don’t. Not be swayed by anybody. And that’s just fine by me.

So, once again, Nick – great article. That’s why I come here. A smattering of intelligence and debate amongst the anarchy. I sincerely hope to ‘see you’ around these parts again soon.
All my best to you and yours, mate.

Nick’s Reply: Thanks man. I’ll try to keep the intelligence down to a smattering!

(SEND A LETTER)

Come around here often?

Support.

Mitch to the right.Carl writes:


Not for Nothin’

Great to see the Leak back at CHUD. You are still my go-to site for movies. Not only my go-to, but my only. I like being in the know about movies, but I will not wade through the bullshit. The point is – CHUD.com is the best. But, it is better with you around. Good luck with the big shark. Bring on the Leak.

Come around here often?

Comic Rant.

Mitch to the left!Ryan writes:

Re: Your comics rant.

I’m not really sure I see your point. If there are more indie books being published now than ever before and you even admit an abundance of quality stuff is on the shelves, how do you arrive at "all I see is a medium that losts its way and became a goddamn chore."? There has always been mainstream, trendy, over-hyped crap, and there always will be. It’s nothing new, and it doesn’t spell the death of the industry, much less the medium. I go to the shop almost every Wednesday and see that crap staring me in the face. I usually walk right past and pick up some quality comics. Is it that hard to ignore or fight against (with your wallet)?

Your editorial sounds dangerously like the complaints of someone out of the loop and pissed about it. Someone…well, old. Especially that Manga comment.

Glad to see the leak back,

Ryan

Nick’s Reply: There’s no loop to be in. You either go to the shop or you don’t. The rant was more a look at the business with disgust and sadness, and a lot of that comes from the shit Wizard chooses to cover and how they do it but also at how many of the indie stuff is being done to create a property rather than create a compelling contribution to the medium. Dave Davis and Sean Fahey will eventually do a much better job than I.

(SEND A LETTER)

Come around here often?

We Choose Well.

Mitch to the right.Joseph writes:

Back when Running Scared first came out in theaters, I would have never even thought twice (or once) about seeing it, other than the recommendation CHUD gave it. I never saw it in theaters, but it was top of my list when it came out this past Tuesday. As expected, I loved the hell out of it. I rarely see movies in theaters anymore, but I try to see whatever I can once it’s out on DVD. Like Shaun of the Dead before it, Running Scared drew in a person who normally doesn’t see that genre of film (I’m probably a minority on this site, but Tarantino flicks don’t do it for me and these kind of shoot ’em ups usually bore me to tears). I’m excited to see Kiss Kiss Bang Bang. I’m sure it will exceed expectations.

P.S. Ever seen Little Otik, a rather bizarre but hilarious film from the Czech Republic?

Nick’s Reply: I have seen Otik and have it proudly in my collection under "W" for Wood Beings Who Kill. The next little film you’ll want to recommend to everyone is The Amateurs, starring Jeff Bridges. Really fun stuff.

(SEND A LETTER)

Come around here often?

Earth Was Askin’ For It.

Mitch to the left!Russell writes:

Michael Crichton is the only person who makes sense in the Global Warming debate. He argues that we Humans are an insignificant blip in time and space. We showed up soon after the last Ice Age (which we did not cause) and we will disappear when the next Ice Age comes around (which we again will have no influence over). The real Inconvenient Truth is that we are as powerless as a flea on a dog. We could all kill ourselves tomorrow…and there are numerous Earth First wackos that believe that’s the only logical solution…and Global Warming would continue unabated since it is the Sun that drives the weather. You concede, I’m sure, that Human activity has no effect on the Sun. Furthermore, there are internal geothermal forces below the earth’s crust so powerful that one Mount Saint Helens eruption like the one in 1980 spews forth in one week more carbon monoxide than all the cars ever made. The reason the subject of Global Warming is so near and dear to leftist anti-Christians such as yourself is that you can dream of possessing god-like powers. What can be more god-like than Saving the Planet or Preserving Endangered Species? Why, it’s like replaying Genesis 1. "And Man said ‘Let there be Spotted Owls!’ And Lumberjacks were expelled from The Rainforest. And it was Good." All you manage to do is display vanity and conceit, nothing more.

On a practical level, another Inconvenient Truth is that pollution is the worst where poverty is the worst, and the cleanest communities are the wealthiest. And the reason is obvious: clean air and clean water are expensive and only wealthy nations can afford to spend the money necessary to clean their environment. So, the solution to both poverty and pollution is wealth. But of course the Kyoto "solution" is to lower our standard of living, eventually to make us as poor as the Third World nations that live in squalor. Once again, Socialists and Liberals get it exactly backwards. Al Gore needs to find something useful to do like Jimmy Carter. Build a Habitat for Humanity home for a Hurricane Katrina victim.

Nick’s Reply: I think this is a response to Devin’s review of Gore’s film or an article on it. I also like the fact that this person (hummerfan@hummer.net) isn’t biased at all.

(SEND A LETTER)

Come around here often?

Constructive Criticism.

Mitch to the right.Gary writes:

Your reviews suck

Nick’s Reply: So, you’re a fan, g.yambor@comcast.net. I have not pleased g.yambor@comcast.net with the review prowess of CHUD.com. Of the many readers out there, one of the biggest fans is not g.yambor@comcast.net.

(SEND A LETTER)

Come around here often?

SPAM OF THE DAY!

Mitch to the left!

Cheyanne writes:

chuck i never got an email 4rm her! sorry i was just excited but now im sad well i hoe she does so uknow cuz i just want to meet her!! or talk to her thats all even on the phone come on pleze!!!where does she act i want to act there too!!!!!

Mr. Grunt and Point’s Reply: God, I wish this were an exaggeration of netspeak amongst the barely almost legal.






Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

HOUNDING THE HITCHER

 If it’s anything like the original (and I have to imagine it’ll have significant similarities), the currently shooting remake of The Hitcher won’t exactly be overpopulated. But replacement road loon Sean Bean will have a new lawman on his tail, and it’s a guy with a little experience in that department.

Actor Neal McDonough (Boomtown, Minority Report) will play the film’s skeptical cop who helps and/or hinders new victims Sophia Bush and Zachary Knighton as they flee Bean’s desert predator. Off topic, it just occurred to me that McDonough would make a pretty good Ozymandias should they ever actually make a Watchmen movie. Still further off topic, I just realized it was McDonough’s voice coming out of Bruce Banner when I was smashing the shit out of everything a few months ago in the Incredible Hulk Xbox game.

Back on topic, it sounds like Rogue and Platinum Dunes’ version of the 1986 thriller will have a fair amount of bedlam – the carnage kings at KNB are handling the bloodshed. Commercial/music vid guy Dave Meyers is directing the flick, from a screenplay by Jake Wade Wall and Eric Bernt. Expect further detailed coverage of the production in the coming months here and on sister site Creature Corner.






Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

JOHNNY DEPP SUCKS

http://www.chud.com/people/johnnydepp.jpgBlack Film is reporting that Will Smith’s I Am Legend has found its bad guy – none other than Johnny Depp. The site claims that Depp will be playing one of the film’s vampires, and quite probably Will Smith’s neighbor, who becomes the head vampire.

I Am Legend is, of course, based on the Richard Matheson novel, where one lone man survives a biological plague that turns the rest of humanity into undead bloodsuckers. He has to try to survive while testing his own blood to see if he carries the cure to the disease. The book has been adapted before into Charlton Heston’s The Omega Man, one of the all-time great white power sci-fi movies.

Would anyone mind getting vamped by Depp? I have a female friend who says that Johnny Depp couldn’t rape someone – it would always be consensual. Having met the guy I can confirm this. As for the casting – that’s not confirmed quite yet, but we should be hearing more soon.

And a special message to the guy who met Black Film’s Wilson Morales in a video store on 46th Street and asked about me: Yes, Wilson does know me, and any punches you have for me can be delivered to him!






Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

DAILY GRABOID 6.30.06

What is this? Every single day of the week (almost), a new "Graboid", a single moment grabbed from a random movie, appears on this site for you to guess the name of the film, share with your officemates, or discuss on our message boards. Sometimes the Graboid will be very easy and sometimes it’ll be as obscure as obscure gets. So read the news, read the reviews, and enjoy a screencap each and every day for your guessing pleasure.

As of 5/15/06, the Graboids are archived right here!
Guess and discuss today’s Graboid on the Message Boards.
Send an email about this feature.






Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

GOD TO SCHNEIDER: CONSIDER YOURSELF WARNED

http://chud.com/nextraimages/dickhead.jpgThe Lord God, who goes by the professional name Yaweh, reached down from the heavens Wednesday and smote Rob Schneider, giving the “comedian” a serious warning to cut it the fuck out with all the shitty movies already.

The smoting occurred on the set of Big Stan, on which Schneider is making his directorial debut. In the film ratlike Rob plays Big Stan, a con man who gets sent to prison and learns kung fu to protect himself. Sounds scintillating.

Schneider’s people are denying the role of God in the on-set smoting, claiming that the grotesque mockery of a human being collapsed due to food poisoning and heat stroke. They did confirm that Schneider, insipid cockgoblin that he is, has returned to directing Big Stan, undeterred by Yaweh aka Big Sky Daddy’s ultimatum.

The Lord God was unavailable for comment, but his spooksman, The Holy Ghost, did say to remember what he was like in The Old Testament, when he was “keeping it real.”






Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

TRAILER: HARSH TIMES

 He’s already proven he can handle dragons, inner demons, Gotham’s criminal element, 1980s Manhattan and Angus Macfadyen, but now Christian Bale is in a whole new world: South Central Los Angeles.

In Harsh Times, Bale is a former solider who joins former Six Feet Under corpse-artist Freddy Rodriguez for a little fun and a whole lotta trouble (the movie’s been described as "the West Coast version of Scorsese’s Mean Streets"). The flick comes from Training Day writer David Ayer, making his directing debut that seems to have captured Bale’s magnetism and ferocity.

Ordinarily I make it a strict policy only to post Quicktime trailers (why oh why won’t all the studios universally accept this as the only viable format?), but in this case I’ll make an exception since the material looks too solid to skip. No idea when it’s actually hitting theaters, unfortunately.

CHECK OUT THE TRAILER HERE!






Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW: BILL NIGHY (PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN 2)

http://chud.com/nextraimages/pirates2nighyposter.jpgUsually I don’t interview someone until after I’ve seen their movie, but in the case of Bill Nighy and Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest that was impossible. I wish I had seen the film first, though, because I would have been floored when Nighy told me that no part of his Davy Jones character is done practically. It’s an astonishing and seamless bit of CGI, very next generation stuff. And it isn’t just Davy Jones – his whole crew is the kind of monsters that would have sent a younger me running to the toy store immediately after the credits rolled.

Of course all that CGI would be useless if it wasn’t part of the performance of a great actor. Whether it’s as the slowly zombifiying Phillip in Shaun of the Dead or the burnt out rock star in Love, Actually or Slartibartfast in The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, Nighy has been appearing in some of the better movies of the last few years and always improving them with his performance. And in some movies, like Underworld, he’s one of the few things actually worth seeing. In Pirates 2 he takes the step up from character actor to lead villain, playing the evil and immortal captain of the cursed Flying Dutchman, and the titular dead man whose chest everyone is after.

Q: The last couple of years have been really great for you. What’s made the difference?

Nighy: I suppose what I would say is that I was in a Richard Curtis movie, which usually means a whole half of the world goes to watch it, and it kind of raised my profile, not least in America. It made me more usable around the place, it made me more castable. It’s extremely satisfying.

http://chud.com/nextraimages/pirates2nighy1.jpgQ: The past couple of years have also been packed – is there a point where you realize that you’re saying yes to too many movies and that you’re not leaving yourself time to enjoy the success?

Nighy: I haven’t reached that point yet, and I’m actually on vacation now. It’s slightly enforced because a couple of things fell through, but I am taking an opportunity while promoting Pirates and Stormbreaker, another movie I’m in, to have a leisurely summer.

The tendency is to grab it while it’s there, and while there are good opportunities available and you don’t want to turn them down, I do think you’re right. It is a syndrome and you can get caught up and in the end it defeats the object. But I don’t think that’s happened yet.

Q: With Pirates how much of Davy Jones is make-up and how much is CGI? How much of Bill Nighy are we actually seeing?

Nighy: It’s an entirely CGI creature. It’s informed by everything I said and did on the day, but in terms of technology it’s not me at all.

Q: So you’re wearing a motion capture on the set?

Nighy: You wear deeply unsettling trousers which are quite tough to wear. Trust me, especially when you’re surrounded by people like Orlando Bloom and Johnny Depp who look so glamorous in their terrific pirate costumes. You have dots on your face and you have dots all over your track suit thing. It takes a couple of days to get used to it.

The good news is that the process has moved on, so you don’t need lots of blue screen or green screen; you’re actually allowed into the normal population.

Q: So they’re just painting something over you and using your actual performance?

Nighy: Yes. I’m surprised actually at how many of the decisions I made on the set and the movements and the little things that I did have survived and arrived on the screen. It’s satisfying.

They do this thing where they cyberscan you; they put you in a mysterious truck and they put you on a podium and they run machines up and down your body. You see the shape of your body forming on all these computer screens. When they finally get to your feet they say, ‘Now we have all your information. Now we have your data.’ And you say, ‘Can I go home now?’ and they say, ‘Don’t be ridiculous.’ They put tiny cameras, like a series of four or five tiny cameras, directed just at your face, and they have you perform a scene for those cameras on occasion so they can minutely record everything your facial muscles are likely to do. So they’re able to keep that.

Q: Does wearing these trousers and having these dots on your face change the kind ofhttp://chud.com/nextraimages/pirates2nighy4.jpg performance you give? Are you using different acting muscles?

Nighy: I think that must be the case. Apart from anything else the level of performance is hard to pitch initially because it’s a unique situation. Gore Verbinski, the director, was very good at tuning the performance to what he considered the right level. But finally you have to remember you’re going to have an octopus growing out of your chin and one of your legs is a crab leg and one of your hands is a claw. So the size of your performance and the tone of your performance is informed by that. It’s a unique thing, I never engaged in this kind of thing before, so there is an awareness of that.

Q: Is there something more similar to stage acting when you’re doing special effects stuff like this, where you’re relying more on your imagination than anything else?

Nighy: Yeah, I guess that might be the case actually. That does kind of ring a bell. I think you have to make another little leap of imagination, because you’re not appearing conventionally in the movie and you’re not appearing conventionally on the set either – you don’t have a costume and you don’t have conventional make-up. You are kind of on your own to some degree in your head, and it does require a slightly large leap of the imagination.

Q: You did some work on Hot Fuzz, the new Edgar Wright film.

Nighy: It’s more of a personal appearance. Half of the English acting community is in this movie. Everybody dug Shaun of the Dead so profoundly that there’s a queue to be in the next one. Hot Fuzz, as you probably know, broadly speaking is city cop goes rural. Simon plays the hero and it’s incredibly, stupidly funny. I went and did a couple of days on it.

I’ve also done a movie called Stormbreaker, which is the first – hopefully – of a series of adaptations of books about a teenage James Bond kind of hero. The hero is Alex Ryder, and he’s a schoolboy who saves the world. I am sort of M – myself and Sophie Okonedo do what Judi Dench does on her own in James Bond. Mickey Rourke is the villain.

Q: Did you get a chance to act with Mickey Rourke?

Nighy: I didn’t. We had a couple of scenes, but I didn’t really get a chance to work with him, which was a shame because I’ve admired him for many years, as everybody has. He was great, and if you want a villain, look no further.

Q: I’ve heard he’s very intense in real life.

http://chud.com/nextraimages/pirates2nighy2.jpgNighy: Yeah, but amiable and he was in good form. Alicia Silverstone plays the governess, and Robbie Coltrane is the prime minister. And they spent some money – it’s an attempt to make a British action film, which there aren’t many. It would be great if it comes off, not the least because there are six other books.

Q: Going back to Hot Fuzz for a second, has the success of Shaun changed the way Simon and Edgar work?

Nighy: Nothing is going to change Simon or Edgar in terms of the way they work. It’s just as funky, it’s just as much fun. They’re such nice guys – you must have met them.

Q: I sure have.

Nighy: Then you know what they’re like. They’re just the sweetest guys, and they’re so funny. Simon and Nick Frost, his comedy partner, they just make you laugh all day long. I remember on Shaun of the Dead a large part of my role was bleeding to death in the back of the Jaguar in a very hot summer period with a pipe up my trouser leg up to my neck pumping warm, sticky blood down the front of my shirt. It should have been a miserable gig but in fact they just made me laugh. I don’t think I’ve ever laughed as much as in the back of that car. You’re sitting in a pool of sticky blood, your underwear is soaked in fake blood all day long; it’s not a funny situation. But Simon used to make me laugh all the time. I’m so fond of them, and I was so pleased Shaun of the Dead was a hit. I always figured it would be.

Q: You did? It seemed like such an out of left field success. I was shocked that it connected as widely as it did.

Nighy: I wasn’t, but [Simon and Edgar] were. They thought, ‘Well, they gave us some money to make a movie and maybe we’ll have some fun or something.’ But I think it’s just properly funny – they can really write. They’d never written a proper feature film before, but they worked it out: there were three gags on every page, all the relationships resolved, everything dovetailed at the end. It was a sort of 20something sort your life out movie which happened to take place during a zombie attack. And it turns out they know everything there is to knowhttp://chud.com/nextraimages/pirates2nighy3.jpg about zombies. That’s a hard balance to hit – comedy and zombies. As they joked at the time, it was the birth of a genre – a romzomcom.

Q: How hard is it to balance the light tone of the Pirate films with being the big villain? Do you get to be funny at all, or are you only terrifying?

Nighy: I hope there’s a couple of gags in there, but I don’t think so. Maybe in 3 I’ll get a couple of gags. Off the top of my head – I can’t believe I’m saying this, but I don’t think I get any gags. But that’s other people’s jobs – my job is to be scary. And to be tragic.

Q: So you’re a tragic villain?

Nighy: I’m a tragic figure, yeah. I’ve been damaged and hurt so badly that I suffer, and the only release that I get from my suffering is when I can arrange for other people to suffer. It’s pretty good stuff. It’s not just some scary weirdo. Although he is a scary weirdo. But he is also slightly complex.

Q: Do you have the Davy Jones toy?

Nighy: No, but I’m looking forward to it. All my friends want one. I’m going to try to get as many as I can. I’ve already been a vampire toy from the Underworld movie, which I was always quite impressed with. I was always impressed that my Underworld toy came with two extra daggers. I just know that when you were a kid that would have been such a big deal that you got two free daggers.

But yeah, I’ll be a toy. I think you probably won’t be able to buy a pizza without…

Q: Without seeing you.

Nighy: Well, Johnny and Orlando and Keira. I don’t think you’ll want to see me when you’re eating your pizza. Maybe in the sushi store.






Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

DVD REVIEW: SETTING SUN, THE

Buy me!BUY IT AT AMAZON: CLICK HERE!
STUDIO: Pathfinder Home Entertainment
MSRP: $19.98
RATED: NR
RUNNING TIME: 119 Minutes
SPECIAL FEATURES:
Filmographies and still gallery


The Pitch

"How do you say, Vive la resistence! in Chinese?"

The Humans

Diane Lane (Unfaithful), Masaya Kato
(Gozu).

The Nutshell

Ah,
opium. The opiate of the masses. Back in the 1930s, when
Japan was struggling to finance its
illegal occupation of
China, and turned to the drug economy
and the harvesting and sale of opium. One young Japanese soldier, Kaya (Kato),
finds himself doubly caught between the two countries, first when the Chinese
drug lords start a war-within-a-war against the Japanese opium business, and
again when he falls in love with a beautiful resistance leader (Lane).


The earliest blue-screen work was filmed because, well,
some guy thought it looked pretty.

The Lowdown

That’s
about all the historical context you’re going to get when the film kicks off.
The audience gets tossed into a cabaret fistfight with little in the way of
context to anchor the drama. That would be all right — action-oriented
introductions have been used well in the past, as long as they are explored
well in later scenes — except that all subsequent action scenes are about as
divorced from context.

It’s hard
to gather where attention was paid to this film’s creation. The story is a
simple lovers-as-metaphors-for-nations affair, the technical facets are nothing
noteworthy, and the characters are almost all underwritten. It’s this last one
that’s the most grievous error. The only two characters that get an inch of
dimension are the leads; the rest are just automatons, emotionally blank.

The mood
of the film follows suit, with about as much sizzle as a clump of dirt thrown
on a bed of embers. The historical facts are used as lynchpins for the story,
but it follows this sort of rhythm throughout:


Length of sex scene: 40 seconds. Cuts to continuity: all of them.

1)
Narrator introduces historical event (in fifty words or less)

2)
Characters react to that event like lions reacting to the crack of a whip

It’s
obvious that historical accuracy was not the goal of the picture, but the
character story doesn’t step up to fill in the cracks. The love story is
hopeless, with baffling alternations between fiery passion and frigidity.
There’s an earnestness about the whole ordeal, but it’s inadequate to carry the
narrative alone.

The Setting Sun fails on its screenplay. It’s a
melodrama, in that it is governed by events, not characters, but
writer/director Ro Tomono seems to have thought he was writing a character
piece. The result is a confused, loping film, and an historical drama that
skimps on both fact and fiction.


"Don’t look now, but I think we’re about to be ambushed by condiments."

The Package

There are
some frequent, but minor, problems with the color balancing and saturation in
the transfer. There’s nothing else particularly noteworthy about the video. The
cinematography is workmanlike, but clean. The soundtrack is riddled with
effects that break the illusion of natural occurrence because they’re mixed
louder than everything else, which gives the film kind of an accidental
cartoony feel.

As far as
bonuses, well: filmographies and a still gallery. Have fun!

5.7 out of 10






Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

TRANSFORMERS TEASE YOU

ascacThe teaser trailer for Michael Bay’s Transformers movie is up at the official site right now, a couple of days ahead of the expected July 4th launch (what the heck are we going to get at Comic Con at this rate?).

I had been actually getting a little interested in this movie over the last few weeks – I don’t have the nostalgia for toys and cartoons of my youth that so many of my peers do, so it was taking me some time to warm up to the concept. That said, this teaser does nothing for me either way – most of it seems to be the Southwestern desert badly standing in for Mars. There’s a quick outline of a Transformer (Megatron?) and then some transformerizing titles. I was hoping for something more, and for something that had less of an X-Files meets War of the Worlds vibe.

I expect there will be more stuff coming down the pike – it seems like this teaser went live early in response to Aint It Cool’s (now gone) picture of a Transformer. That’s the kind of stuff I want to see, and maybe I will have a chance in San Diego.

Click here to go to the official movie website.






Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

SOUTHLAND TALES WILL BE TOLD

http://chud.com/nextraimages/southlandtalesposter-small.jpgRichard Kelly’s follow up to Donnie Darko, Southland Tales, received an incredibly venomous reception at the Cannes Film Festival this year – you get the impression that a video of a Chinese woman in high heels stamping on kittens would have gone over better. The film was said to be too long and boring and unfocused and generally terrible, which comes as less of a shock if you’ve seen Kelly’s tone deaf Darko Director’s Cut.

For a while there was worry that maybe the film would never even get a release – they call it getting Tidelanded, I believe – but Sony has stepped up and said that they’ll release it. There’s no word on which arm of the Sony megacorporation will handle it, but it won’t be home video, according to Sony Home Entertainment president Ben Feingold. “[I]t will be theatrical.” The when and the how are trickier, according to Feingold: “(Richard) is going to complete his edit and when we see his cut, we’ll figure out the distribution plan."

This is all good news for the people who hold out hope for the film despite almost universal revulsion at Cannes. Kelly best hurry up his edit, though – the film is set in 2008, and if he doesn’t get moving it’ll be a period piece when it comes out.






Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email