DVD REVIEW: CHICAGO JOE AND THE SHOWGIRL

RUN OFF WITH ME!BUY IT AT AMAZON: CLICK HERE!
STUDIO: Artisan
MSRP: $14.98
RATED: R
RUNNING TIME: 105 min.
SPECIAL FEATURES:
• chapter search. make it chapter 11.

The Pitch

“It’s Badlands in Britain!”

The Humans

Kiefer Sutherland (Flashback), Emily Lloyd (Cookie), Patsy Kensit (Lethal Weapon 2)

The Nutshell

In WWII London, US Army deserter Karl Hulten, 22, and would-be stripper Betty Jones, 17, attract each other with made-up identities drawn from Hollywood films… and then embark on an amateur crime spree that quickly escalates to murder.


Emily was transfixed by the Leave It to Beaver marathon.


The Lowdown

It’s very easy to forget, even while watching, that Chicago Joe and the Showgirl (1990) is closely based on a real-life case. The film even opens with an unusually specific disclaimer: “This is a true story; none of the names have been changed; none of the events have been altered.” Why, then, is what follows so unbelievable? One problem is structure. Unless the viewer has prior knowledge of the historical case the early scenes have no rhyme or reason, no internal logic. It comes across as a pastiche, with the actors– not the characters– posing unconvincingly as gangster stereotypes.


"Man, that limey’s taillights are really bright. And he’s driving backwards."


Then there’s the visual strategy: ‘40s London is represented through matte paintings, miniatures, rear-projection, and forced-perspective sets. Is this a stylized world seen through the eyes of movie-crazy sociopaths… or merely period production on a low budget? Director Bernard Rose has exhibited a strong vision on other projects: his previous film was the little-seen Paperhouse (1988) and he followed with the underrated Candyman (1992), but here his efforts come across as wannabe Dennis Potter. The less said about the ‘Hollywood-style’ fantasy point-of-view sequences, the better.


The Big Cheap.


Sutherland and Lloyd do what they can. The later scenes give them the best material to work with, and Lloyd in particular really comes alive once the blood starts to flow. A sequence midway through, in which ‘Georgina’ goads ‘Rick’ into bludgeoning a friendly hitchhiker, is the one perfectly judged point in the film.

The musical score is worth a brief mention. Fans of the animated Batman series will recognize the signature tones of the late Shirley Walker, mixed in among Hans Zimmer’s more conventional big-band arrangements. I can’t comment on Mike Southon’s cinematography, for reasons to be explained below.


"You’re gonna have to tap me harder than that, big guy."


The Package

I suspect we wouldn’t be getting this release if Mr. Sutherland hadn’t recently hit it big on TV. The transfer is among the worst I’ve ever seen on DVD—it looks scarcely better than the VHS version, and may have been made from the same master. The image is grainy, murky, panned-and-scanned, and vertically distorted. Since so much of the film depends on the visuals creating a subjective reality for its deluded characters, this is unforgivable.

5 out of 10







Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

THE FEW. THE PROUD. THE RAPED BY TOXIC HILLBILLIES.

Thing doesn't believe in a mixed gender military.If the American message/allegory in The Hills Have Eyes wasn’t subtle enough, viewers won’t have to think too hard when they view the upcoming sequel on March 2, 2007.

As you know, in The Hills Have Eyes 2, families have learned taking shortcuts through remote deserts is for suckers. But the National Guard hasn’t. Taking a page from the Aliens meets Southern Comfort book of sequels, we learn yet again that armed soldiers do not an ass-kicking force make when training missions turn into rescue missions turn into shooting, screaming, we’re dead missions.

The trailer was released a few weeks ago and for your first-person refreshment, can be found here, but there’s some juicy images for your deconstructing pleasure not in the teaser. One, (pictured here) shows us a lovely looking National Guard soldier getting the piss choked out of her by Thing after 40 years of living as a hermit in the desert. Or is it a loving embrace? There’s a couple others at the official site, one including a group of National Guardsmen (looking exactly like actors dressed up like National Guardsmen) all tore up and limping out of a shanty.

The Hills Have Eyes 2 will be directed by Martin Weisz, music video auteur de jour, with a script by Wes and Jonathan Craven. THHE 2 stars some beautiful people who don’t really look like any Guardsmen I’ve known or seen, because people who look like thin-armed, brow-tweezed and flowey-haired models usually don’t go into the Guard, they go into modeling and schools for bad acting.






Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

INDY’S 500

http://chud.com/nextraimages/holyold.jpgWhat is the definition of passion for a project? Let’s looks at some quotes from George Lucas in regards to the next Indiana Jones film, which apparently will begin shooting for real next year:

"Very interesting mysteries."

"Mostly it’s the charm of Harrison that makes it work."

Let me contain my enthusiasm, for this hyperbole is astounding. Not that I need ol’ George to create buzz for the film. It’s an Indy film. There’ll be anticipation, I just wonder how much. At the Rome film festival, George announced that they are indeed making the film, especially considering that they’ve finally put the apparently brilliant Frank Darabont script behind them and moved onto less interesting and dimmer things. Hooray for George!

Here’s hoping the shooting script is "moderately interesting" and "sufficient" so I too can get enthused.

Indiana Jones and the Resounding Indifference arrives on screens most likely in 2008.






Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

BLAME RESIDENT EVIL

Lost PlanetGood news. Now you can heap even more loathing upon what Resident Evil has wrought in the lusty makeout session between gaming and film. In a bid to subsidize costs from an increasingly tough market in gaming, Capcom, the video game developer of classics like Vulgus, Kai, Block Block and… oh yeah, Resident Evil and Street Fighter, is expanding their ambition for all things licensed.

With Resident Evil‘s success, Devil May Cry and Onimusha under development and Street Fighter giving a double nut kick to Bison and Jean-Claude Van Damme in 2008, the Japanese video game powerhouse is on the move with not only licensing, but production as well. At the very least, Capcom will be more heavily involved with film and game tie-ins not seen since the spectacularity that was and is Cadillacs and Dinosaurs. They’ve even hired a Hollywood liason (Germaine Gioia, formerly of THQ) and have plans in moving some Japanese developers to LA. Will Capcom’s Hollywood push include potential film properties of Dead Rising (time to sue, Mr. Romero!), Lost Planet (pictured above) and Megaman? Who knows, but this move seems a natural progression for a big gaming company like Capcom, as game developers and Hollywood tighten their derivative grip on one another.

While involvement like this can only resurrect the teased out debate of video game movies always sucking, the video game aspect is irrelevant. A bad video game movie isn’t any more terrible than a bad book, short story, skit, screenplay or based-on movie. Terrible movies that dry hump 2-3 hours of our lives at a time are bad based on execution, (be it acting, directing, production design, budget, etc.) not simply because the source material happened to be based on a video game (check out any one of the worst of 2006 lists). Unfortunately, bad doesn’t mean unsuccessful, as the Resident Evil series is Sony Pictures most successful franchise, right behind Spider-man.

At some point, the time and love will be invested in material coming out of a video game to put the whole argument to rest. In the mean time, does this just mean more shitty genre movies, or seeds of genre hope being planted for a future of fun cinemetic entertainment? You decide.






Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

DVD REVIEW: GOAL!

Goal! cover

BUY IT AT AMAZON: CLICK HERE
STUDIO: Touchstone
MSRP: $29.99
RATED: PG-13
RUNNING TIME: 118 minutes
SPECIAL FEATURES:
• "The Beautiful Game" featurette
• "Behind the Pitch" featurette
• Full-length commentary
• Happy Mondays’ music video
• Highlights from World Cup games

The Pitch

"It’s
every soccer-loving kid’s dream come true!"

The Humans

Kuno
Becker, Stephen Dillane (King Arthur), Anna Friel (the bloody
countess in the upcoming Bathory)

The Nutshell

Think, if
you will, of life as algebra. 0 + x
> 11. Let x be a protagonist. Until
we know what x is, the inequality stands.
Over the course of a given feel-good movie, the value of x increases until it satisfies the conditions of the inequality.

They
don’t call math "the beautiful sport" for nothin’.


Enthusiasm. I like it.

The Lowdown

There are
genres that stray too often into formula, and then there are genres that exist
only as a formula. The garden-variety inspirational film fits into the latter.
The term "inspirational" applies to those films which replicate a
certain character arc: starting from point A, or "the bottom," and
rising to point B, or "realization of wildest, unrealistic dreams." There
are methods to avoid tripping over well-worn ruts in the writing of inspirational
stories, but they all sketch the same exponential graph of time against
character achievement.

Despite
the sincerity of many entries in the genre (Miracle, for example),
there is something almost adolescent about the way they are adapted for the
screen. Their stories represent pure fantasy. "Gee," says the child.
"It sure would be neat if my favorite sports team would pick me, out of a
group of my peers, to play professional ball with them. I would be so
cool." Your fantasies may vary. Mine usually do. The drama is in the
distance traveled between points A and B, not in the nature of the destination.

However,
the natures of both the origin and the destination define the characters; when
those character aspects are dismissed and folded into the formula, then we get
a boring movie. Goal! is just such a movie. All the nuance and interest in our
protagonist
Santiago‘s origin is baked out of the
script. His family are illegal immigrants; his father doesn’t want him to dream
for anything big; and he has asthma. These obstacles are broad, and
featureless. What’s worse, they’re transient. The story kicks through its plot
points with barely a glance over its should for the impact the past might have
on the present. Another contribution to the movie’s smooth, unnatural feel.


Sweet Zombie… Mother Mary?

There are
some nice diversions along the way, though. The soccer matches are nimbly paced
and exciting throughout, which is good since they crop up pretty frequently.
The ferocity of opposition shown by Santaigo’s father is initially compelling,
but stands as too transient an obstacle to successfully inject much drama into
the proceedings.

I’m kind
of tired of the mode of inspirational storytelling that operates under the
creed "the ends obviate the means." In order to get a true sense that
the protagonist accomplishes something, the beginning of the journey has to be
as compelling as the end. Goal! smoothes over the
complications that are so necessary when, well, overcoming complications. Such
featureless distance, combined with an unchallenging role for the lead, make
the film energetic but directionless.

The good
news is that if you violently disagree with my criticism, there are two sequels
in production.


Are you inspired yet?

The Package

This is a
decently filled disc, with very little in the way of fluff material. There’s a
featurette called "The Beautiful Game" which is essentially a profile
of the game of soccer and its worldwide following. Another featurette,
"Behind the Pitch," targets the most interesting of behind-the-scenes
topics: that of how the on-field scenes were shot and choreographed.

The
full-length audio commentary with the filmmakers is decent as far as these
things go, and offers a good context for the creation of the story, the casting
of
Santiago, and the cultural interest behind
a soccer movie featuring a quasi-American.

The other
two features are less noteworthy, being a music video from the band Happy
Mondays, and a highlight reel from World Cup games.

5.5 out of 10






Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

MARCH OF THE VIRGIN SOLDIERS

http://chud.com/nextraimages/501st.jpgAs much as we can give George Lucas plenty of shit for
ruining his own Star Wars franchise with the subpar prequel films, the guy
knows how to keep that machine moving forward. His latest bid to make sure Star
Wars
(and all of its ancillary products, now available at all fine retailers
near you) stays in the public eye is to essentially take over the Rose Bowl
Parade on New Years Day.

Lucas is going to be the grand marshal of the parade, and he’s
going to bring a “Star Wars Spectacular” with him. The Spectacular will include
two floats – one representing Naboo, the other representing the Forest Moon of
Endor, complete with Ewoks swinging from trees, 200 storm troopers, eight Twi’lek
dancing girls and the 176 piece Grambling State U marching band, who will be
playing “Main Title,” “Imperial March” and “The Throne Room” from the Star Wars
soundtrack (now available at all finer record stores near you).

The storm troopers won’t just be any old dudes in costume –
they’ll be members of the 501st Legion, a national group of people
dedicated to making Civil War re-enactors look cool – these people buy and
maintain their own completely accurate replica Star Wars outfits, which costs
them in the hundreds and hundreds of dollars. They then gather and discuss what
a mockery they have made of the life God has given them. At the parade many of them plan to stand very near the Twi’leks but never actually engage in any conversation with them.

Lucas put out a call to his Legion, and he got 700 audition
tapes. This isn’t the first time that Lucas has mobilized his personal army of
IT professionals and comic store employees – he had members of the 501st
show up at Episode III premieres around the world. What’s disturbing about
this, though, is that Lucas can activate these people at any time – essentially
he’s the Osama bin Laden of a great, unwashed sleeper cell of Al Queera
terrorists all over the world. While our attention was overseas the real threat
was forming right here at home. What Star Wars movie did I see that in, anyway…

(BTW, yes, those are really the members of the 501st drilling for the parade. Photo by Roy Wuang from their home page)






Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

CONTEST: GET PRIMEVAL ON THIS POSTER

http://chud.com/nextraimages/primevalkit.jpgFinally, a “Create Your Own Poster” contest that I think will really let your sick little imaginations fly. The contest is for Primeval, coming in April, and the image kit (which you can download below) is filled with stuff like what you see on the right. I love it. I love the severed hand with an eyeball sitting next to it. It turns out I am easily amused.

The contest is simple: use the image kit (download it here) and create a poster. You have to come up with a “graphic” tagline “that best describes the terror that PRIMEVAL’s killer sets on his victims.” You mail it to me at devin@chud.com and I pick the best one. That, along with the winners from other sites, goes to the creators of Primeval, who will choose their favorite. The big winner gets “an autographed mini-poster print of their creation and a DVD pack of five of the greatest serial killer movies (SEVEN, SAW, SILENCE OF THE LAMBS, THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE, and FROM HELL). The grand prize winning entry will also be showcased on the official film site at primeval-themovie.com

Sounds awesome. For those not up to date on Primeval, here’s a link to the trailer, and below is the synopsis. My comments after the synopsis:

In one of the most remote places on earth, a bloodthirsty serial killer has claimed over 300 victims, and is still at large to this day. Now, inspired by the true story of the world’s most prolific killer, comes "Primeval," a nail-biting horror-thriller that follows an American news crew determined to capture this terrifying murderer alive. The danger begins as producer Tim Freeman (Dominic Purcell, "Prison Break"), cameraman Steven Johnson (Orlando Jones) and their rag-tag team set out on a journey up-river in search of their subject. But the deeper they probe into the mystery of this elusive assassin, the deadlier their trip becomes.

The killer is a giant crocodile. I don’t know why this is being kept secret in the advertising since I think it’s fucking awesome. But just so you know when you’re coming up with the sickest possible poster, it’s a big ass croc.






Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

NICK’S TOP 15 of 2006

http://chud.com/nextraimages/bestof06.jpgWhat a weird year. For the longest time it felt like the year wouldn’t have enough standout entries that I’d have to rely on them to fill the year but thankfully, things righted themselves rather quick and one of the more diverse years unfolded. It’s not an easy year for individual awards, but a very nice one for years. It’s also nice to have a few less snooty choices in here.

Devin was the main opinion behind the site in 2006, and though I piped in when I could, now’s my chance to finally share with you guys my picks for the best of the best. It’s not a very controversial list.

Or is it?

My Worst from 2006
My Worst from 2005
My Best from 2005

http://chud.com/nextraimages/06nickflick15.jpg15. Hostel (Devin’s Review) (Russ’s Review) (Buy the DVD)

The fact an Eli Roth is on my "Best Of" list scares me more than any horror film. I hated Cabin Fever. Hated it. I also hated seeing a guy who had one film under his belt lumped alongside (called Masters of Horror before Showtime ruined the term) the greats of the genre before truly earning it. After this, he’s getting there. What is considered ‘torture porn’ by many somehow has stuck to my ribs long after I saw it, and it’s one of the better DVD releases of the year because of it. Though I had more fun with Feast and Slither, this is the horror flick to make my list. So much for me not liking Eli Roth.

Current Rating: 8.0 out of 10

Contributing
Factors:
Mutilated lips gives a kiss on the wrist…

Performance to
Savor:
Eythor Gudjonsson. Pronounce that shit on your own time.

P.R. CHUD.com
Pull-Quote:
“A singular horror flick in a year filled with copycats!”

http://chud.com/nextraimages/06nickflick14.jpg14. Rocky Balboa (CHUD Review)

I wanted to like this, I really did. How could I not? It’s a Rocky film, a rite of passage or at least a chance to see polished, shirtless men delivering flurries of hateful punches upon one another. Thankfully, Stallone’s return to the form is a return to form and a heated security blanket on a cold winter’s eve. It’s got enough flaws to fill Mickey’s coffin, but it still retains that magic. And Cuff and Link’s ancestors are in it. That goes a long way.

Current Rating: 8.0 out of 10

Contributing
Factors:
Nothing goes down smoother than vintage Balboa.

Performance to
Savor:
Stallone!

P.R. CHUD.com
Pull-Quote:
“That old sonovabitch still has juice in him yet!”

http://chud.com/nextraimages/06nickflick13.jpg13. Running Scared (CHUD Review) (DVD Review) (Buy the DVD)

Wayne Kramer already cut his teeth with The Cooler, but this was a revelation, a violent and profane romp through the looking glass and actual proof that Paul Walker could carry the shit out of a film if he wanted to. A really stylish and creative romp that doesn’t flinch from ultraviolence or ultrapubichair. This is a really unique film and one that deserves to be seen. It’s not really a guilty pleasure, either. It’s an actual pleasure. New Line came out of the gate strong with this, and then it all went to shit.

Current Rating: 8.0 out of 10

Contributing
Factors:
Impressive filmmaking. Great work by Paul Walker and Vera Farmiga. That child molesting scene.

Performance to
Savor:
Gulp… Paul Walker.

P.R. CHUD.com
Pull-Quote:
“A sleeper in the truest sense of the term. See this flick!”

http://chud.com/nextraimages/06nickflick12.jpg12. Crank (CHUD Review) (Buy the DVD)

The most manic and fucking insane major release of the year, this little bastard is amazingly crafted entertainment, fueled by genius and powered by nitrous oxide and semen. Jason Statham spends an hour and a half being the baddest, baldest action hero looking for adrenalin you’ll ever see. Without rules, action films are capable of so much, and this is proof of it. Stay through the credits too.

Current Rating: 8.0 out of 10

Contributing
Factors:
The most playful and inventive filmmaking in town. Jason Statham kicking all the ass he can muster. Video game undercurrents.

Performance to
Savor:
The Transporter.

P.R. CHUD.com
Pull-Quote:
“If you don’t enjoy this you belong in Amanda Plummer.”

http://chud.com/nextraimages/06nickflick11.jpg11. The Good Shepherd (CHUD Review)

It’s paced like a snail’s Kama Sutra, but it works. Robert Deniro and Eric Roth’s detailed look at the birth of the CIA through trials and tribulations with the Soviets, Cubans, and our own double agents is a rewarding one and though Angelina Jolie is wasted as the neglected wife and Matt Damon doesn’t age as convincingly as one would hope, there’s a lot to love here. Very subdued work by Damon is complemented by a really nice turn by Oleg Stefan as his Russian adversary. A nice smart thriller in a year that needed one.

Current Rating: 8.0 out of 10

Contributing
Factors:
A new facet to Matt Damon. Robert Richardson at the top of his game. Great supporting work from Deniro, Baldwin, and more.

Performance to
Savor:
Oleg Stefan.

P.R. CHUD.com
Pull-Quote:
“A rich and complex bit of American cinema. Now touch my nipples!”

http://chud.com/nextraimages/06nickflick10.jpg10. The Illusionist (Buy the DVD)

In a year where it was The Prestige and "that other magic film", I was surprised that it was this one which resonated with me more. neither really hid their tricks and twists far up their sleeves and both featured very solid acting work but this film just felt more timeless and less gimmicky. It also featured fantastic work by Edward Norton and Paul Giamatti (under an unrecognizable voice) and very tactful filmmaking by Neil Burger, whose earlier Interview with the Assassin is another one I dig. A nice little flick.

Current Rating: 8.0 out of 10

Contributing
Factors:
Gorgeous photography. Great acting. A sense of period that’s uncommon.

Performance to
Savor:
Giamatti.

P.R. CHUD.com
Pull-Quote:
“Who needs twists when you have plain ol’ good acting?”

http://chud.com/nextraimages/06nickflick9.jpg9. Casino Royale (CHUD Review)

It’s too long and features one set piece too many, but this is a James Bond film for the ages, a top fiver if not higher. Though Parkour has been done better in other films, Casino Royale hits the ground running and doesn’t let up until Daniel Craig has all but erased a few really shitty films and the huge wasted opportunities with great Bond men named Timothy and Pierce. A lovely effort that makes you wonder just how cool it can get in the future.

Current Rating: 8.3 out of 10

Contributing
Factors:
Sober storytelling and classic James Bond sense of feel. Daniel Craig IS Bond. A smaller and more realistic backdrop works in spades for a franchise that didn’t deserve the grace it got.

Performance to
Savor:
Craig.

P.R. CHUD.com
Pull-Quote:
“Blunt instruments feel nice!”

http://chud.com/nextraimages/06nickflick8.jpg8. Thank You For Smoking (Buy the DVD)

This flick is great even with Cameron Bright’s alien visage in a major role. That’s impressive. Jason Reitman’s film is a bright and masterfully edited bit of satire and cynicism brewed with attitude and filled with really great acting work throughout. Something about seeing Robert Duvall, David Koechner, Robe Lowe, and J.K. Simmons surrounding an absolutely at the top of his game Aaron Eckhart warms the heart. And other places.

Current Rating: 8.7 out of 10

Contributing
Factors:
Great supporting work around an amazing central performance. Great comic timing and editing. Amazing opening credits.

Performance to
Savor:
Eckhart is on fire. Shame thsi didn’t come out in the fall. There’s a Best Actor nom for this boy that’ll go undelivered.

P.R. CHUD.com
Pull-Quote:
"Grab a mint julep and enjoy a great little movie!"

http://chud.com/nextraimages/06nickflick7.jpg7. Miami Vice (CHUD Review) (Order the DVD)

How could Miami Vice ever be an interesting concept as a film? When Michael Mann’s in charge, baby. This is an uncompromising and superbly odd summer action movie, one that has no interest in catering to stereotypes and convention. Good for him and good for us, for this is one of the most surprising big budget films I’ve seen in a long time. I liked it so much I could feel me coming in the air tonight.

Current Rating: 8.9 out of 10

Contributing
Factors:
Michael Mann, the man.

Performance to
Savor:
Colin Farrell.

P.R. CHUD.com
Pull-Quote:
"A sucky show becomes a wonderful film!"

http://chud.com/nextraimages/06nickflick6.jpg6. United 93 (CHUD Review) (Order the DVD) (DVD Review)

I cannot believe I not only saw, but liked both September 11th themed films this year. This one is astonishing both in its fairness in every direction and its ability to never once milk the plentiful opportunities is has to preach, coast on our memories, or get too patriotic just for the sake of it. Paul Greengrass has already established that he’s without peer these days at finding the marrow of political issues and getting right to it. This is a work of grace.

Current Rating: 9.1 out of 10

Contributing
Factors:
Peerless storytelling. One of the most dramatic moments in world history.

Performance to
Savor:
Real-life participant Ben Sliney.

P.R. CHUD.com
Pull-Quote:
"Too soon? Just soon enough, apparently."

http://chud.com/nextraimages/06nickflick5.jpg5. Borat (CHUD Review)

It’s sp easy to get swept up in the backlash, but I have no doubt in my mind that this film is one of the all-time classic comedies in the grand scheme. This is Spinal Tap, Monty Python and the Holy Grail, Trading Places, Animal Crackers, whatever your hallowed halls are filled with. 2006 was a very good year for comedy with Beerfest, Thank You For Smoking, Jackass II, and Talladega Nights. This is the golden cherry on top. Sacha Baron Cohen is a virtuoso and there’s no doubt in my mind about it. This is a funny and wicked little film and one that will outlive the hate bombs thrown at it for its overexposure and watercooler mimickry.

Current Rating: 9.1 out of 10

Contributing
Factors:
Fearless comic brilliance.

Performance to
Savor:
Duh.

P.R. CHUD.com
Pull-Quote:
"What the hell just happened to me?"

http://chud.com/nextraimages/06nickflick4.jpg4. Children of Men (CHUD Review)

Alfonso Cuaron is better than you and me put together and I’m pretty proud of you and I, so that’s saying something. The kind of gear shifting and output this guy manages is awe inspiring. This film is really cool but that’s the last reason this is so special as every nuance is filled with smaller nuance and this thing somehow manages to visit oft-visited territory and make it its own. The action scenes are like the sweetest video game you’ve ever placed, having been placed in the action but they give way to amazing little soft and introspective moments that make the violence hit home. A really special film, a companion piece to the best Dystopian films and stories ever made and if you don’t worship Clive Owen yet, here’s the firecracker.

Current Rating: 9.2 out of 10

Contributing
Factors:
Amazingly confident filmmaking. Amazing work by Clive Owen. True Science Fiction theory and logic. Balls, lots of ’em.

Performance to
Savor:
Clive.

P.R. CHUD.com
Pull-Quote:
"A mind fuck, or at least a mind blowjob!"

http://chud.com/nextraimages/06nickflick3.jpg3. The Fountain (CHUD Review) (Order the Graphic Novel)

I still can’t believe this film exists. It’s as if someone allowed Darren Aronofsky to go back to the late 60’s and create an art film masquerading as mainstream entertainment. That the mainstream didn’t give this much of a chance is proof of the mainstream’s failures as a demographic. This is an amazing emotional and spritual journey that doesn’t pander to its audience and doesn’t have the gall to try to create a mystique in a long running time. Seriously, this year marks the true arrival of the three legendary filmmakers of the next twenty years. Darren’s one of them.

Current Rating: 9.5 out of 10

Contributing
Factors:
Darren Aronofsky unloading full-on brilliance and unrestrained romanticism.

Performance to
Savor:
Hugh Jackman ain’t boring no more.

P.R. CHUD.com
Pull-Quote:
"A classic science fiction film."

http://chud.com/nextraimages/06nickflick2.jpg2. The Departed (CHUD Review) (Order the DVD)

This is the most entertaining movie of the year. One of my favorite scripts, especially adapted ones, in a very long time. It’s funny as hell, rich and layered with stuff that resonates with each viewing, and loaded with explosive violence that recalls Scorsese’s best work. This is his most fun movie, but it’s also one of his best. Infernal Affairs is fine, but this is legendary.

Current Rating: 9.7 out of 10

Contributing
Factors:
An ensemble that is the definition of an ensemble. How the heck did this many leading men share a screen without a moment of distraction? Thelma Schoonmaker is a Goddess.

Performance to
Savor:
Leo. Matt. Jack. Alec. Martin. Mark. And on and on…

P.R. CHUD.com
Pull-Quote:
"Films like this come around only 5 or 6 times a lifetime!"

http://chud.com/nextraimages/06nickflick1.jpg1. Pan’s Labyrinth (My Review, Devin’s Review)

This film is alive. Every frame pulses with imagination and magic, and anyone who still doesn’t get the genius of Guillermo del Toro needs to just see this to understand what kind of insane and slightly fucked toolbox the man is working with. It’s no coincidence that folks like Spielberg, Soderbergh, Darabont, and many more like them geek out over his work. It’s that fucking good.

Current Rating: 9.8 out of 10

Contributing
Factors:
Guillermo del Toro firing on all cylinders.

Performance to
Savor:
Captain Vidal, baby.

P.R. CHUD.com
Pull-Quote:
"The most imaginative, original, and inspiring film in a decade."

Honorable mentions: Hard Candy. Dreamgirls. Dead Man’s Shoes. The Amateurs. Monster House. Slither. Brick. A Scanner Darkly. The Prestige. World Trade Center. Babel.

Wish I could have seen: Little Children. Behind the Mask.

Discuss this column here.






Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

YOU DON’T LOOK A DAY OVER 110

http://chud.com/nextraimages/Cinematographe_Lumiere.jpgToday is the eleventy-first birthday of projected film. Is that experience, the big audience seeing a movie projected on a screen, about to slip on a ring and sneak away from its own party? I don’t think so, but it’s at a crossroads that will determine if it’ll be around for another 111 years.

On December 28, 1895, the Lumière Brothers screened ten shorts at the Salon Indien du Grand Café in Paris. They had projected films in private as early as March of that year, but the audience at the Grand Café was the first in the world to pay to see a movie. Other, more technically important moments and innovations would come later, but the basic magic of the movies first happened there. That magic wasn’t capturing the images or using light to display them again – it was the group of people, gathered in the dark, experiencing it together. People had sat together in the dark together before, but plays and concerts were not the same as cinema. When you’re watching a live performance the thrill is being there in the theater with the performers; when you’re watching a movie the thrill is being taken away from the theater, of being transported en masse to another time and place. There’s electricity in that, a current that leaps through every member of the audience, connecting them and uniting them. When a movie is good (and when the audience is good), every person reacts as one. There’s a joy in laughing at a funny movie, and that joy is multiplied by every single person laughing alongside you. It’s fun to be scared by a movie, but it’s even more fun when everyone in the theater jumps at once.

That magic doesn’t end with the credits – a good audience leaving a good movie takes that magic with them as they talk about what they just saw. I love coming out of the theater in a big group of strangers, all of us excited and exhilarated by the film, and all of us in private conversations that are really small parts of one bigger conversation. The best movies end outside the theater, with discussions on the sidewalk or at a restaurant or a bar. Film is about community, and that’s what the Lumières proved in 1895. Thomas Edison had created the first moving pictures, but his Kinetoscope was a solitary experience – you stood and watched the short loop of film through an eye piece. It was the Lumière genius to take the film out of isolation and make it communal. The Kinetoscope was small and close to you, while film projection was big and slightly distanced. The experience of projected film, as much as future advancements in editing and technology, is what has shaped the direction of the movies as art and entertainment over the past 111 years.

And for most of the past 111 someone or other has prophesied the end of the movies. Doomsayers pointed at every technological advance as the coming killer – talkies will destroy the movies! – but none was as scary as the invention of television. That little box in the living room terrified the purveyors of big movies. Why would people go out and pay when they could be entertained at home for free? In response movies got quite literally bigger, as wider and wider widescreen lenses and film stocks were pushed to highlight the difference between the little screen at home and the huge one at the theater.

It turned out that nobody needed to worry, though. TV didn’t kill the movies, and in later years became an important part of how the movies worked. First studios began making money by selling their films to the few existing TV channels, which needed to fill air time. Then came cable, which devoted whole channels just to movies. Then came home video, which proved that TV wasn’t the enemy, but maybe the savior. All of a sudden there was a new and major way to make a profit on a movie, even if it hadn’t done well in theaters. And those profits only ballooned when DVD was introduced. In one of the savviest moves in recent business history, the studios opted to price DVDs for sale, not for rental (some of you may be too young to remember this, but once upon a time a new movie on VHS tape would cost well over a hundred dollars), and it turned out that people couldn’t buy enough movies for their home collections.

But has TV really been the savior? Or was there a silent, bloodless coup? Did we wake up one day and find that home delivery had won the day? I think so. Right now movie studios pump out more and more films every year because the ancillary markets – cable, in-flight entertainment, DVD sales and rental – demand more and more product. This isn’t exactly a new development, since in my grandparents’ day a trip to the movies included newsreels, cartoons and often two features, so plenty of product had to be cranked out to fill the time. And a lot of that content was terrible (it’s funny how we romanticize the motion picture past because we only remember the good movies. Look at 1939 on IMDB – sure, some of the best movies ever made were released, but so were hordes of sub-par programmers), but it was conceived of and made as movie content. Now studios are churning out product that they mostly intend to end up on our non-widescreen TVs, or on our computers, or maybe even on our iPods. Universal has discovered that they can slap a franchise name on some random straight to video dreck and sell a load of DVDs. And people have become very used to experiencing movies not in theaters but on the secondary market. A recent thread on the CHUD message board – surely as much a place where people who like to go to the movies gather as anywhere else – showed that a lot of our readers only made it to the theater a handful of times this year.

That’s the biggest change, and it’s the subtle one that TV and home video has wrought. In 1939, you had to go to the movies to see a movie. And since there was no TV to show the film later, and since you had no way to take the film home and see it again, you had to make sure you saw it when it came out. The movie might get a revival – Gone With the Wind played for years – but to be safe you needed to make sure you were there when it opened. Plus going to the movies was an activity in itself, regardless of what was playing. I’ve talked to a lot of old timers who would just go on every Saturday afternoon and find out what the movies were when they started. People today would probably consider that unthinkable. After all, it’s the exact opposite of the modern philosophy of “everything on demand.” Hell, even the days of turning on the radio and dealing with whatever stations came in are just about over as satellite and internet radio bring us exactly what we want, when we want it, and to wherever we are.

Every year the on demand world gets more pervasive and more convenient. You don’t even have to be stuck watching movies on a TV – there are a myriad of devices that let you take films on the go with you. At least TV, as much as it shrank and diluted the power of cinema, could still be communal. You could still sit on a couch with someone and get lost in a film together. The four inch portable screens barely accommodate one person, let alone a group (although this never stops people on the subway from trying to look over my shoulder when I’m watching movies on my PSP). It’s a return to the aesthetic of the Kinetoscope.

One of the things that kept TV and movies separate was the level of quality – movies always looked better in a cinema. Now even that isn’t the case, as HDTV prices plummet, and as the big theater chains, looking to save money, skimp on presentation. I saw Eragon at the AMC Empire 25 in Times Square – surely one of THE flagship theatrical locations for the chain – and the bulb wasn’t just dim, making the picture murky, it actually was flickering. As if Eragon wasn’t painful enough. But as I sat there I realized I would get a better picture at home.

I wouldn’t have had to wait long, either. The window between theatrical release and home video release shrinks every year (and that’s not taking piracy into account). Once you waited in excitement for a movie to come to the video store – now it’s about 12 weeks. That’s too long for some people, who are trying to introduce day and date releases, putting movies into theaters, on cable and on DVD on the same day.

Strangely enough, I think that’s exactly what needs to happen to save the communal moviegoing experience. First of all, having movies easily available at home will remove the more annoying elements of the theatrical audience – the people who talk and the people who can’t turn off their cell phones and the people who bring their kids to R-rated movies. For the most part these people don’t really care about the movies, and they’ll just as happily and mindlessly consume them at home.

But most importantly, a day and date system will force theaters to compete with convenience, a very formidable enemy. The audience will never dry up – just because people can see any sports game on TV doesn’t mean the stadiums sit empty. The true lovers will always come out, and the casual fans will still want to get out of their house on a Saturday night. But to make sure that theaters still get enough patronage to make the whole thing fiscally worthwhile, theater owners will have to offer more perks. I don’t think we’ll go back to the newsreels, cartoons and two features format, but I do think that we’ll see more theaters in line with Los Angeles’ ArcLight, which has assigned seating. Or more theaters like Austin’s Alamo Drafthouse, which serves good food. And we’ll see more events like the recent Dreamgirls roadshow, where people paid 25 bucks to see the movie early and without ads, get a nice program and enjoy lobby displays of costumes from the film. Dreamgirls played to packed houses at these roadshows – which were based on a fairly common practice from decades ago. If the theatrical exhibitors don’t step up their game, they’re going to find themselves limping along as people continue to get used to watching movies in more convenient, on demand ways. And while movies won’t end, maybe the magical aspect that makes it worth being fanatical about them will.

I saw Rocky Balboa as a paying member of the public last week. The experience was fantastic. The crowd cheered and clapped throughout, and the energy in the room was palpable. The movie created reactions, and those reactions created more reactions in the crowd – it just kept building. Other people saw Rocky Balboa at home – MGM sent out awards screener DVDs. I imagine that many of the people who saw Rocky Balboa on DVD have nice TVs, and excellent sound systems. They probably have very comfortable couches that are aligned to create the perfect audio-visual experience. But they didn’t have 200 people shouting at the screen when Rocky struggled back to his feet during the climactic fight scene. There’s no substitute for that.






Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email

PRIME RIBBING

Two Glowing Navels. One big Codpiece.I’d seen this image of Optimus Prime doing his best Mr. Universe impression with glowing eyes and ribcage a few days ago, but since it was on the cover of Empire, and since Optimus Prime can be seen in bootlegged sketches all over the internet and since this reveal was covered in a few other places, I forbore. In the mean time, I’ve received a couple emails from folks who wanted us to cover it, so being a new-blooded bitch out to buy friends and manipulate people, here it is: Frank Miller’s Optimus Prime via Empire magazine. Well, if it was actually done by Frank Miller. Which it wasn’t. Or if Frank Miller actually did his signature style in 3D. Which he didn’t.

And so, with the release of the trailer, Transformers hype is in the infancy of hump your leg mode– before all the inevitable whimpering and howling. To be honest, I’ve been totally uninterested in this movie until seeing the trailer last week. While I haven’t gone out to buy the toys in the name of my little guy or boned up on the names/history I’ve forgotten since 1986, I am a little butterflies-in-my-gut for this movie– and I’m not the only one. In what may be proof-positive that Transformers has a good chance of transcending the toy collector/genre-lover circle of box office death, even my buddy’s wife, a Jane Austin-loving kind of gal, got all giddy at seeing the clip.

The name of the game is still "wait and see", but at the very least- I’ve never seen a Bay movie I couldn’t capture a frame from and make a postcard out of.







Author Links: Author's Page · AIM · Twitter · Facebook · Twitter · Email