I can already see the headlines and think-pieces and outrage brewing for this one. If you thought the Cloud Atlas “yellowface” outrage (read: nonsense) that peppered the internet was bad, just wait for a controversy with an actual basis in something…
You will recall that David Ayer has been prepping a new Scarface film since about this time last year, and that he was angling at directing as well as writing. With all of the critical favor that surrounded End Of Watch and the relatively strong returns on the low-budget film, I expect that directing opportunity will be open for him if he wants it. In any event, the news of the day is actually that the background and general synopsis of Ayer’s film has been dug up by the gentleman at Latino Review, despite the character’s origin being “kept under wraps.”
Turns out, Tony III is going to hail from Mexico, and he’ll be introducing the mexican drug cartels to his little friend. It makes me wonder if Michael Pena –the End of Watch star born of Mexican immigrants– is being measured for some sharp suits and picking out cigars somewhere…
There are a few things to consider here, not least of which is how much shit is going to fly when one of the most notorious criminal icons ever to exist in fiction is recast as a Mexican drug lord taking the American dream to its most intense extreme in a contemporary USA. That’s delicate, hot-button ground to tread on, lest you provide more ammunition to the fearful by feeding stereotypes of Mexican immigrants as thugs. You can already feel Rush Limbaugh having a minor heart attack with glee out there somewhere.
That being said, let’s not act like this isn’t a completely natural choice with some resonance to it. For one thing, Hispanic people have become a great force in the movie-ticket buying market, so more and more films are going to cater to that demographic, regardless of the context. Beyond that, the Mexican drug cartels are genuinely frightening, massive organizations that are as powerful now as ever. In other words, the cartels represent a potent playground for such a story, as the way over-maligned Savages demonstrated earlier this year. It’s also not out of the realm of possibility that Ayers will do something genuine interesting with this dynamic, and will have worthwhile things to say in the course of the film.
The real danger here is that Scarface is perhaps the film to have its iconography most aggressively appropriated by gangster culture, without regard to the actual subtext of the films. The expectations are going to be high and the dice very loaded in this case, even if Ayer is fixed on the idea of drawing from the spirit of both films to tell something new. How do you draw on that iconography without reveling in it and just handing more gangster posing to guys like James Franco’s Spring Breakers character?* I think the filmmaker has built up some benefit of the doubt with the unexpected impact of End Of Watch, but I’ll still be curious to see how the politics of this all play out.
*I haven’t seen the film, but apparently he keeps Scarface playing on a loop in his house.





6 comments
Oddly enough, I don’t see this as all that controversial. It’s not really treading too different a terrain that the DePalma/Stone version did, with Tony being of latin american decent. I bet the average dumb white viewer already thinks Tony was a Mexican in that version anyway. I feel like if they wanted to make a “scarface” character more scary and controversial for the blue haired demographic, they’d make him middle eastern and have him become the distributor for taliban grown heroin.
New origin: He DID get the scar from eating pussy. And holy shit, it looks like I made the same comment last year…
Actually I think it would be more interesting if they made him causasian. Maybe making his fortune in something like bathsalts, to make it more interesting. For one it seems kind of crappy to do the whole minority making his money off something illicit. Hasn’t that been done to death? This way you play into the whole classist argument that anyone poor needs to do something illegal get get anywhere. I don’t see why he has to be Hispanic that seems like a total cop out.
As a Mexican American myself, I can say that…I don’t give a shit. Scarface as a film has less resonance with me than most of the other 80’s films that have been remade, so I could care less about it in the first place. Far as making him a Mexican, that actually seems logical, considering everything that’s going on with the cartels. If the material is treated with seriousness there’s nothing wrong with it. That being said, we’ve seen the basic idea of this story play out so many goddamn times by now that I can’t imagine Ayer will have much interesting to say with it. The 80’s version put a new spin on things by making Scarface’s crimes a reflection of Regan-era wealth worship. In the 20 years since then it’s not as though things have changed so much that it’ll seem fresh.
Just so long as they don’t dress some white actor up in brownface.
How dare you dismiss the ‘yellow face’ controversy… Let me guess… you are a white man?
A lot of people with ZERO fucking experience with racial insensitivity can posture all they want about how ‘nonsense’ a claim is, but you come off as a total asshole with this one buddy. Who the fuck do you think you are? Jesus man…
I feel the need to protect a group/culture from a fictional character(s) who exhibits a negative aspect of *all* humanity way more offensive than the portrayal itself, even if it appears to be a current hot button. It’s one character and his cohorts, not the race personified. As a hispanic, I don’t need all my fictional ‘brethren’ to be the noble, blemish-free protagonists. I want my fucking Iagos and Darth Vaders too!
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.