First things first: Do not see this movie in 48fps. Simply don’t. While some of the action sequences that are primarily digital may benefit from the format, it’s not enough to warrant wading through two hours of uncomfortable dramatic scenes to get there. The format simply isn’t ready for prime time and it makes whatever The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey is a lot less effective.
Second things second: There’s a discussion to be had about the fact the appetizer is following the main course with this new series of Tolkien adaptations. There’s also one to be had about the idea of splitting a small book into three films. This isn’t the place for those discussions. With that handled, let’s proceed.
Forty minutes. That’s the amount of time it took for Peter Jackson’s The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey to start feeling like a true soulmate of his legendary The Lord of the Rings. It looked the part. It sounded the part. Something was askew. There’s a warmth that permeated nearly every frame of The Fellowship of the Ring, a franchise building magic that is free of sales pitch, shortcut, and bland manipulation which has become so transparent in the decade since.
While Howard Shore’s excellent music is there, Martin Freeman’s casting as Bilbo is spot on, Sir Ian McKellan is pitch perfect as Gandalf, and Peter Jackson’s grace with the material is still there something doesn’t click. Until the band of adventurers leaves the confines of Hobbiton to see the riches and dark crevices of middle-Earth it was a facsimile suffering from generation loss. And then it clicked. This is The Fellowship of the Ring all over again, at least structurally. That film is also one which defies the traditional three act structure and goes along at its own pace in its own way. The difference then was that it was fresh and though it was the first foray into this world it slowly introduced the characters audiences were to spend twelve hours of screentime with. The Hobbit unloads a horde of dwarves into the film very early on and it isn’t until the film has clocked nearly an hour that it has hit a stride worth following. Once it’s going it’s quite good though hardly of enough punch and truly epic feel to expect even close to the box office and awards tally of the previous films. As worthy holiday season entertainment, it’s exactly what it needs to be. It’s just not much more than that.
The evil dragon Smaug has commandeered the proud kingdom and riches of the dwarven empire and turned them into a roaming, beaten people. A group of rogue dwarves led by Thorin (Richard Armitage) band together with the mighty Galdalf to reclaim what was lost. They lack one component: A burglar. Bilbo Baggins (portrayed in a prologue and the original films by Sir Ian Holm and here by Martin Freeman) is chosen for that role despite his complete lack of burgling skills and the fact he’s a homebody who abhors adventure. All of this happens in the film’s first forty-five minutes and the combination of exposition and instant immersion into the singing, feasting, and drinking ways of the dwarves is difficult. Especially when the characters are brand new. It helps that excellent actors like Armitage, Graham McTavish and the typically serious James Nesbitt (a revelation here against type as a cheery dwarf) are involved but it’s a tall order. The band eventually leaves the town and begins a journey which in this film involves orcs, goblins, giant spiders, wizards, and other assorted creatures and it’s then that Jackson’s skills as a storyteller come to the fore.
Those long sweeping tracking shots across prairies and classically expanded vistas through FX house Weta’s beautiful work and sensational battle choreography make Tolkien’s text come to life and escalate to pure fun, they are where Jackson is highly articulate. Economy of scenes, tempo, sometimes not as much. Without a Viggo Mortensen or breakout stars like Orlando Bloom and perfectly cast quartet of hobbits too much of the burden is put upon the new characters. As good as McKellan and Freeman are, and they are superb, there’s a lack of resonance. No dwarf does enough to capture the heart to build the goodwill present in the original series. Even with Christopher Lee, Cate Blanchett, Hugo Weaving, and Elijah Wood showing up to marry the films together there’s a sense that the filmmakers were trying to find any tools possible to keep the audience diverted. Luckily the action sequences are a lot of fun. There’s not the sense of loss and danger from the original films and they are very much on rails but Jackson hasn’t atrophied one iota as a director of epic action and the intricate ballet of adventure and combat. The Hobbit as a source is light fare and as a film based on such material goes this builds up momentum and delivers a really entertaining second half. Combat and subterfuge and heroics. And Gollum. Gollum as performed by Andy Serkis and executed by Weta under Jackson’s direction is peerless. The “Riddles in the Dark” sequence anchors the film and is undoubtedly the high point as both a companion to the original trilogy and reason for this film existing.
Ultimately, the structure of the film hurts it with its awkward cliffhanger ending but the end result is a film that is fun, interesting, and once they’re given time to shine, graced with some memorable characters. It’s far from a classic but a safe above grade holiday season family movie night out. See it in 3-D at 24fps.
Rating: 




Out of a Possible 5 Stars





18 comments
I can assure you that James Nesbit isn’t “typically serious”. Try his work on British television, such as COLD FEET or even his performance in the excellent JEKYLL where his version of the title character is as funny as he is unhinged.
I’d amend your recommendation to say see it in 2D 24fps, where it will echo the original trilogy in marvelous ways. I thought it was very good, and I am for the first time happy I live in a podunk town that can’t deliver the 48fps version.
It’s starting to sound like this 48 fps nonsense is dead on arrival. Good riddance.
OK, well I know him from his features. Bloody Sunday’s a laugh a minute.
It really encapsulates the frustrations of a Sunday.
Ok, so it is agreed that the 48fps is an EPIC FAIL. But, would it be a mistake for me to see this in 70mm IMAX? I can’t believe i just typed that out.
My local theater only has the 3D presentation for now. I’ll wait.
Sooner or later, Chud will hire a proof reader. Every article and review is latent with typos. I enjoy the personality of Chud’s contributors, so that helps ease my suffering. However, I find much fault with claiming that An Unexpected Journey had an awkward ending. It ended the only logical way it could, and at the only place it really could for a nearly two plus hour film paving the way for two more films. While the final scene won’t come as much of a surprise to anyone who’s breathing, it still leaves you excited for what’s to come. I welcome any journey Jackson makes into this world.
CHUD eases my suffering too. Hooray for CHUD!
If you’re losing sleep over a few typos on a movie site, you must lead a very charmed life indeed.
Well, by saying I was “suffering” I was indeed poking fun at my own statement. Guess I forgot my smiley emoticon. Believe me, no one knows more than I do that if that is my big complaint of the day, then yes, life is charmed.
Sounds good. But, where can someone see it in 24 fps…and should we be afraid of Cameron using 60 fps.
You can go to 48fpsmovies.com (it is legit) and they give a handy list by state of what theaters are showing the 48 fps. Not every theater is equipped for it, so if you check your state and the theater is NOT listed, you’ll be seeing the 24 fps version.
I fucking loved the 48fps. By no means would I want it to become the standard of cinema, but for the right movies….wow. I just saw some of THE most breath-taking images I’ve ever seen in a theater, thanks mainly to the HFR. I thought parts of the Shire were gorgeous, but I wasn’t completely sold…until the first dwarf/orc war flashback. That shit, in 48fps, was jaw-dropping. From that point on I was down. And Rivendell, and the the brief eagle flying montage…I was literally blown away by how beautiful and CLEAR everything was. Again, if used for the right movies, and for the right reasons, I’m totally in on HFR.
See it for yourself, dude. You be the judge. I had NO idea what I was in for, I was curious but highly skeptical….I ended up loving it.
Nick Nunziata, I did not see The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey in HFR, I watched it in IMAX 3D, and The film is…Excellent! It is one of my favorites of 2012! I was never bored. Also, I am…Down, with Radagast…The Brown. I say that…Sylvester is not a…Dr. Who you may have heard of, but the real…McCoy as a fellow wizard to Gandalf and Saruman!
Watched the HFR version. It’s jarring for about the first 20 minutes or so, then basically becomes completely unnoticeable and ultimately I’d say it’s a “win” for the clarity of action in provides.
Definitely the weakest of the Middle Earth films, but that’s like saying it’s the smallest and least-shiny gold nugget in your pan. It’s still good. Definitely true that most of the Dwarves don’t make much of an impression. Then again, the same was largely true of the book, in my recollection.
Saw both 2D and 3D 48fps versions over the weekend with my 2 very enthusiastic sons. The unanimous opinion was that the 2D version just felt “right”. Agree 48 fps is mangnificent for showing us Erebor, the soaring eagles and also enhanced the riddles in the dark scene. But overall my feeling is best summed up as:- 2D felt like watching a great movie, 3D 48 fps felt like you were on set watching someone shooting a great movie. Does that make sense?
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.