Apparently 50 Shades Of Grey isn’t going to be just a sanitized name-brand cash-in, as the writer has apparently confirmed they’re shooting for an NC-17 rating, promising that they will, “be getting all up in dat.” So it will be a name-brand cash-in with dicks and stuff in it!
Okay, fine. What she actually said was:
“This isn’t going to be Twilight. It’s going to be raunchy… We are 100% going there.”
I’m not sure where this will make the film fit in the history of major studio features and ratings, but surely it has to be among a very select few films made with the intention of nabbing an X. Or will Universal ultimately waffle, pull a Von Trier, and offer two different versions?
Profoundly stupid as the books may be and misguided as its fans most certainly are*, this does present a genuinely intriguing scenario. A major studio has shelled out $5m for the rights to what will obviously be a massive hit film. It’s a true cultural phenomenon that, though not quite on the scale of Hunger Games/Twilight/Potter, is scarily close. Will this finally break the MPAA’s power, as major theater chains and other movie houses break with tradition so they don’t miss out on the major cash? Or, again, will Universal go with a multi-version release so as not to upset the apple cart?
Beyond that- who gets cast? Who directs? How far will the film actually go? There are so many opportunities for this to gather buzz and stoke the fever around this property it borders on money printing. Hell, I won’t pretend I’m not at least a little interested in what the unapologetic Kelly Marcel –who was a script editor on Bronson and wrote the Tom Hanks Walt Disney biopic— will do with this vapid stack of prose
Source | Yahoo! Movies
*Holy shit people, cheap and inane fan-written smut has been available on the internet for over a decade. There is nothing dangerous or cutting edge about this bubblegum literotica!





8 comments
Can’t wait to hear about Fred Willard getting arrested at this.
His next paying gig.
There Will Be Cock
I bet there will be loads more penises than an R-rated film, yet still nary vagina.
So you’ve read it, Renn? Never took you to be the cliterature browsing type.
About 85% of it yeah. A big group of assholes thought it would be just HILARIOUS to buy it as an audiobook and listen to all 23 hours across the course of their US Jurassic Park show. It took less than an hour for everyone but the two ladies aboard to deeply regret it. They somehow managed to keep finding things funny long after I’d gone comatose from the shitty prose.
Renn,
Any way we can get NC-17 films into the mainstream with studio and theater chain support is a good thing for all. Long ago I hoped that after the success of “Basic Instinct”, that Paul Verhoeven and Joe Eszterhas would be the ones to make it so with “Showgirls”….
So let’s just hope they don’t fuck this up for us all for another 15-20 years, mmm kay?
It’ll likely be another Showgirls situation, where the studio loses its ass trying to market a wide release NC-17 film. Also, why did she use the word “raunchy”? “Daring”, “erotic”, “risque”? All these words would’ve been better than “raunchy”. Hell, “graphic” would’ve been better. “Raunchy” makes me think of a Wayans brothers directed Scary Movie, not a weirdo S&M sex film.
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.