Who cares if Cloverfield nose-dived 68% in its second weekend at the box office? It cost a reported $25 million, and opened to $40 million; even with its exorbitant marketing budget, the international gross will bump Cloverfield well into profit before it hits DVD. And while we’ve all doubts as to how it’ll hold up on repeat viewings, isn’t it possible that the hand-held aesthetic will work better on a smaller screen? If so, Paramount’s got a healthy library title, and every reason to seriously consider a sequel.
Variety‘s Michael Fleming is reporting that this is precisely what Paramount is doing, though he cautions that a greenlight may be contingent on the studio closing deals quickly with director Matt Reeves, writer Drew Goddard and producer J.J. Abrams. Obviously, nothing’s going into production until the WGA strike is settled, but with an agreement possibly on the horizon, Cloverfield 2 seems a pretty safe bet (provided the budget stays under $30 million).
At least it’s a known quantity, whereas Reeves’s other project, The Invisible Woman, sounds like less of a sure thing. Variety calls it “a Hitchcock-style thriller that probes the mind of a former beauty queen who turns to a life of crime to protect her family.” Sounds interesting. But what in Reeves’s oeuvre suggests that he’s ready to work variations on Hitchcock? I should probably back off. The man’s worked with Martin Kove.
It’s early days for both projects, but if you thought Cloverfield was a one-and-done deal, you underestimated a studio’s love for a quick, easy buck.





6 comments
Am I the only one who thinks that Cloverfield was a revelation in telling a big budget effects picture?
Sure, the marketing was over-baked and hyped the picture to hell and back – automatically negating any objective review based solely on the merits of the picture. However, this could have easily been "Godzilla meets Independence Day" but they reduced the scope and increased the impact of the events by making it personal.
I thought it was a brilliant take on what the Blair Witch tried to do (and failed miserably). While I'm sure most people saw the ending coming from a billion miles away it was still a well told story with an aesthetic that was original and gripping. It wasn't perfect, but it was fantastic and the best theater experience I've had in a while (a close second was an entirely still theater during No Country for Old Men…an audience that actually watching a movie, huzzah!).
In a roundabout way I'm getting to my point: a sequel to this is about as well-advised as the sequel to Blair Witch.
I WANTED TO JUST SAY THAT THE MOVIE WAS REAL GOOD. I THINK ALOT OF PEOPLE WHO SAW IT WERE EXPECTING SOME 200 MILLION DOLLAR EPIC. I FOLLOWED THIS FILM SINCE THE PREVIEW DURING TRANSFORMERS LIKE MANY OTHERS. THE MARKETING WAS GREAT. IF YOU THINK ABOUT ALL THE HYPE OF THIS FILM……IT WAS A GREAT WAY TO MARKET THE MOVIE. BEING A HUGE FAN OF GODZILLA TYPE MONSTER MOVIES, I LOVED IT. THE FILM APPEARED TO ME TO BE MORE PERSONAL TO THE CAST, AND MADE YOU USE YOUR MIND TO PICTURE THINGS YOU DIDN'T SEE. IT ALSO APPEARED TO BE A TEST MOVIE…..TO SEE HOW A NEW MONSTER MOVIE WOULD BE RECEIVED. THEY USED A SMALL BUDGET AND TURNED OUT A HUGE PROFIT FOR THE FILM…….THINK ABOUT GRINDHOUSE…..HOW MUCH MONEY DID THAT PIECE OF CRAP COST? THAT MOVIE SUCKED! SO KUDOS TO ABRAMS/HIS CREW FOR MAKING MONEY AND CREATING A FILM THAT COULD BE MANY INTERESTING THINGS. IF YOU THINK ABOUT IT THERE IS SO MUCH TO TELL THE IDEAS COULD BE ENDLESS. I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THIS MONSTER ALONG WITH MAYBE A FEW OTHER DIFFERENT MONSTERS ATTACKING IN THE NEXT FILM. I WOULD SAY EVEN THE DVD WILL HAVE SOME SUPRISES SINCE THE FILM WAS PG-13……WITH A SECOND FILM ON THE WAY…….IT MAY BE SOMETHING MORE EXICTING THAN THE FIRST……SO TO EVERYONE WHO THINK IT WASN'T A GOOD FILM…..GIVE IT TIME LOOK AT IT FOR WHAT IT IS, AND I BELIEVE THE NEXT FILM WILL HAVE MORE ACTION, AND SOME GOOD GORE/MONSTER STUFF. OVERALL IT WAS A SOLID B+ I WOULD HAVE LIKED TO SEE MORE MONSTER STUFF/FIGHTING……THE STEALTH BOMBER SHOT WAS COOL. IT WOULD HAVE BEEN NICE TO KNOW WHAT HAPPENED TO MARLENA/ DID SHE HAVE A MONSTER INSIDE HER/ DID SHE MUTATE? OR JUST EXPLODE….MAYBE WE'LL FIND OUT IN THE DVD/NEXT FILM…..
I loved Cloverfield. While I would love to see the sequel be the big-budget blockbuster that was happening all around this movie, I have no problem with a movie that slightly expands the universe.
Cloverfield was the biggest budgeted student movie of all time and it was mediocre at best.
#2 hitting caps makes you a grade A+ tard.
"Cloverfield" sucked. Let that shit go.
Paramount forgot one crucial fact – that Nick is forsworn to rape the pets of anyone connected to a Cloverfield sequel. Dear, oh dear. The pet psychiatrists will be busy tonight!!!
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.