I’m overjoyed that the writers’ strike is over, but I’d be perfectly happy if Saturday Night Live would stay dark until mid-November. For the first time since the 2000 election, I feel like they’re influencing the already-debased political discourse in this country. And they’re doing it in bad faith.
This is not an anti-Tina Fey screed. Though I am 100-percent behind Barack Obama (i.e. until someone unearths photos of him kicking newborn infants through the uprights at Soldier Field – at which point I pledge the max donation), only a humorless partisan could fail to appreciate Fey’s “Bitch is the new Black” Hillary endorsement that closed the “Weekend Update” two weeks ago. With the country (and the media) leaning heavily toward Obama, it took some chutzpah to come out and throw down for Clinton in such a confrontational manner. Fey surely pissed off lots of people with her rant (to be honest, I was a tad peeved), but that’s what great political comedy is supposed to do. And that’s why Fey is one of the most vital comedy minds working today.
If only SNL had an Obama backer with an equally ballsy bit for next week’s episode. If only they had anyone other than Jim Downey writing the show’s opening debate sketch.
Whereas I could only admire Fey’s defiance, the Downey-penned parody of the banal Cleveland, Ohio debate was a predictably skewed bust. Moderated by the Obama-fawning duo of Brian Williams and Tim Russert, the skit painted Hillary as a nervous, besieged victim while Obama fielded softball questions by droning empty-headed platitudes. Not only did he come off as a rank amateur; he appeared to be an imbecile. Hillary, on the other hand, was the jittery voice of reason with her stunned, “Mind if I break up the blow-job?” reactions.
And then the real Hillary showed up.
The timing couldn’t have been any better for the Clinton campaign, but fair is fair; Obama appeared on SNL back in early November, so Senator Clinton was due a cameo. But, c’mon, the weekend before the most pivotal primaries since Super Tuesday? You couldn’t work her in for the Tina Fey show? With SNL‘s Hillary (Amy Poehler) standing awestruck next to the genuine article, the appearance amounted to a secondary endorsement. More than that, it was indictment of the allegedly imbalanced coverage of the Democratic primary process, and it all but forced the major news outlets (which always air the highlights of the SNL‘s political skits) to hammer Obama for the next couple of news cycles.
When John McCain trounces Hillary Clinton in this fall’s presidential contest, the Republican National Committee better make sure Jim Downey and Lorne Michaels get front row seats at the inauguration. After all, it was Michaels, a McCain donor, who implored Downey to follow Fey’s news-grabbing lead; and it was Downey, a longtime Republican, who delivered the potential coup de grace to the upstart junior Senator from Illinois. And they did it to do their part to ensure that McCain would face Clinton, against whom he fares much better in early polling (and from whom he’ll be able to snag a hefty number of independent or undecided voters).
Downey’s wreaked havoc with American politics before; as former SNL writer Adam McKay notes in this Huffington Post blog entry (blog more, man!), Downey was responsible for speciously writing Gore as an idiot to offset the unquestionable buffoonery of George W. Bush during the 2000 presidential campaign. As a Daily Show convert around that time, I wasn’t watching a whole lot of SNL, but I do recall the “lock-box” debate sketch, and I remember finding it unusually partisan (as well as expectedly lame). By this point, I knew that Downey was the head political writer on SNL, but I still sympathized with him; it hardly seemed fair that the Democrats’ guy was much more polished and, well, educated. I suppose he could’ve played Bush as the common man versus an erudite prick, but Gore’s southern accent softened his intellectual arrogance. If Downey were going to be a help to his party (and isn’t that the goal of every satirist?), he had to create a completely fictional Gore.
And now he’s making mischief again. As one of the alpha dogs of Studio 8H, Downey’s always going to get his views wedged into the major political sketches. But who’s there to challenge him? Even if Fey were still around, she’d be in cahoots until the Democrats settled their interminable primary scuffle. How about an African-American voice? I guess Maya Rudolph could throw some elbows, but her boyfriend, Paul Thomas Anderson, is apparently cozy with Downey (he appeared in There Will Be Blood). Kenan Thompson? All depends on whether he can work in a Bill Cosby impersonation.
I don’t mean to reduce this to a question of race (especially since I’m hopelessly caucasian), but it’s telling that SNL has Fred Armisen (who is of Venezuelan, Japanese and German descent) playing Obama in… heavily shaded makeup. This is where the show could use a Chris Rock disciple instead of a guy who made his name doing family-safe schtick on Nickelodeon. Though they don’t get airtime on the deplorable Def Comedy Jam (where I recently saw host D.L. Hughley ripping off Patton Oswalt’s KFC Bowls bit), there must be comedians of color who aren’t content to settle for twenty-minutes of “Women do this, Men do this” material. Why can’t Lorne offer up a featured spot to someone with an actual point-of-view?
The answer, of course, is that he’d rather stick with talent that’s easily bullied and/or devoid of perspective; that way, he can ram through his establishment ideology during pivotal election years. I just wish the nation’s media were smart enough to see the show’s political “satire” for what it really is: campaigning.





37 comments
McCain's a national hero, but he won't trounce Hillary like the Viet Cong stepped foot on his ass.
Aaron Sorkin wishes everyone cared like you.
Oh my god, I thought that was just a guy that looked like Downey in TWBB.
Nope. That was the CEO of the First Citiwide Change Bank!
OH MY GOD! Another Republican "conspiracy" to bring down the poor poor Democratic Party.
When will you folks stop with the nonsense?
Yes, because Jon Stewart's Obama-fest is anything but campaignig. Get off your high horse you fucking prick.
SNL is still on the air?
I thought the back-to-back timing of the Hillary sketches was spurious, at best, but SNL this week managed to get some barbs back at Senator Clinton, with Seth Meyers referring to Hillary's post-March 4th "I'm just warming up," remark with, "Yeah, that really shows someone ready to lead on Day One: the person who took 31 primaries to get warmed up."
But really, are you serious? SNL has long favored democrat politicians. They even let that anti-semite scumbag Al Sharpton host the show. This argument of yours is tenous, to be kind.
Man, who knew so many reactionary shitheads were into genre film?
Speaking as an independent, I have a certain amount of sympathy for the public meltdowns Democrats and Democrat-supporters are having over this primary: They've been gearing up for eight years to simply jump full-throttle behind an early-annointed candidate on the basis of "Anybody to take back the white house!" – and instead they're spending it tearing EACHOTHER apart because this Obama kid had to show up and do the starry-eyed-idealist bit and get half the party all wishy-washy.
That being said, this constant drumbeat of boos and denounciations of Tina Fey and Downey – as though they'd just re-staged Triumph of The Will – for the HEINOUS crime of poking fun at Barack The Hopeful, Patron Saint of Change is tiresome and shameful. SNL etc. spent the last SIXTEEN YEARS smashing the crap out of the Clinton I and Bush II administrations and hardly anyone worth taking seriously complained… but now they give Obama a SLIVER of that same ribbing and it's the end of the world? Give me a break.
I can agree with or at least see where you're coming from on a lot of this. However, this portion is where you sunk: "When John McCain trounces Hillary Clinton in this fall's presidential contest, the Republican National Committee better make sure Jim Downey and Lorne Michaels get front row seats at the inauguration." Well, that was just stupid. Your slippery slope argument is that a) SNL has a major influence on voters [I can agree that political humor does affect such matters to a certain degree, so I'll go with you this far], b) Clinton will become the Democratic Candidate because of these skits [not really buying that], and c) Clinton could not possibly beat McCain, whereas Obama would be a shoe-in [that is so blatantly lopsided and unprovable as an opinion that everything before it becomes meaningless, no matter how reasoned it was]. I find it ridiculous how heated Democrats are allowing themselves to get over this Obama/Clinton split. Get your heads out of your asses and realize that Clinton and Obama have more in common than they differ. To throw away your vote on an Independent or Republican out of protest would have more to do with McCain winning than any skit on SNL.
The only reason why they're backing Hilary is because they have no one to play Obama, Fred Armison does a pretty good job, but it's very forced and couldn't last 4 years or maybe 8. Amy Poehler, who does Hilary is glorious, and I doubt she's going to leave the show anytime soon, especially if Hilary wins, because then she'll be in 90% of the political sketches. (I think this is circular logic, but it's too late and I'm too tired to figure it out)
More people read this post about SNL then the actual show, no one gives a fuck. Find something better to do on a Saturday night.
I consider myself a moderate, and as such I cannot stand either candidates on either side. One side would wish to continue giving hand outs to the rich, while the others for the poor. What about the middle class? When are we going to get a candidate who puts aside their bias to help out the majority of the nation? But I digress. This is why I detest two-party politics: Each side can dish out the satire or the mudslinging, but God FORBID they be able to take it as well.
Amy Poehler is "glorious" as Hillary? Are you fucking kidding me? She doesn't even do an impersonation! All she does is throw on a bad wig and talk like her regular self. It's the worst thing about SNL, and that's saying a lot. The show has fallen really far from when Carvey was Bush and Lovitz was Dukakis. THAT shit was funny and "glorious. Amy Poehler is an awful performer with no talent whatsoever. Bring back Jan Hooks!
Somehow, I have to trust that the Democratic viewers aren't so stupid as to let SNL sketches decide their vote…
So… because SNL isn't giving Obama a blow job like everyone else in the media, they're now doing it in bad faith?
RRRREEEEEAAAAACCCCCHHHHH! I can understand you're upset because they aren't "100 percent" behind Obama like you. But you wouldn't complain if the roles were reversed. Hell, you haven't complained when the roles were reversed.
Good piece Beaks. The political skits have come off bordering on racist. The only way to overcome that is bring the funny. They didn't. The staff dropped the ball. Sad. Conservative or not, Downey used to be a sketch comedy genius. WTF happened? Instead of classic SNL- level moments, we're served "Cracked" one-note jokes. With the long lay-off, i'm amazed & offended they didn't hire someone black to play Obama. We're talking an important person in a real historical moment here! Watching Fred is just awkward. If even the political humor sucks..is the show finally dead?
Hillary Clinton is the Democratic Party's secret weapon to lose an election that would have seemed to be a "gimme". She's hated, uniquely, almost as much among Democrats as she is among Republicans. Mark my words, McCain would disembowel her in a general election. Pray that Obama can stop her, or else it's Four More Years of Republican tyranny at a moment when we could really use a kinder, gentler tyranny for a little while.
A Bush or Clinton has been President or Vice President since NINETEEN FUCKING EIGHTY. When Bush the First spoke of his New World Order, he wasn't just freestyling. He knew exactly what he was saying, what it meant, and who he was talking to. The former head of CIA, particularly from the era when Bush was running CIA, wouldn't just shoot his mouth off carelessly.
No more Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton, for fuck's sake. It negates everything we were founded on as a nation. America deserves better.
Jesus, dude. I'm an Ohioan that voted for Obama (not 100% but I favor him), but if he can't overcome the SNL-taint then he's Gerry Ford, and we don't need that again.
And if Michaels and Downey deserve chastisement then Jon Stewart deserves execution–by flaying.
Although you're entirely right that SNL needs a viable male African-American comic, it simply cannot be a big problem that Armisen isn't "brown enough". A white boy in black makeup can be funny so long as he nails the essence (which Armisen does) rather than simply play a stereotype. It's the reason there hasn't been a huge outcry over Hammond playing Jackson–because he plays a decent Jackson. SNL has tried several times in the last five years (Finesse Mitchell, Dean Edwards) to bring on a black male, but they simply did not catch much like a half dozen talents of other races.
First, Reggie-wanker (aka Phil Owen), it's been *1980* since either a Clinton or Bush has held the 1 or 2 jobs.
Interesting… http://www.newsweek.com/id/120068
"Bitch is the new black" FTW!!!
Also, I love me some Beaks but he comes across like a petulant child in this piece…I think the Owen proximity is causing some sort of infection here.
Obviously, the political shit used to be the show's bread and butter. Like "National Lampoon", multi-layered jokes were the standard, not the exception. I don't know if it's a lack of a cohesive or sophisticated collection of writers or what. But the magic's gone baby, gone. Remember that classic Reagen sketch w/ Phil Hartman. He played him as the sophisticated brain behind Iran-Contra; the man running everything, with his surragates confused & in the dark. Then he'd be called to do some little thing like meet with a girl scout, or have a photo op, and he puts on the dumb mask. Great, great stuff!(Jimmy, don't make me kill you!) The true glory days!
I was talking with someone the other day who said Obama has a "messiah-like quality." Is this true? To me he comes off as awkward, posturing and foolish, with no charm or charisma, and he looks like a praying mantis. Why the love? And he is SUCH a poser. When he spoke before an all-black audience at a black church, as shown on CNN, he actually adopted the tones, rhetoric and inflections of a black preacher. Can we say pander? And anybody that wants to socialize heath care is an idiot. In Europe where they have socialized health care people regularly have to wait a year to see a doctor and the doctors aren't as good as they are in the U.S. Do we want that to happen here?
The show at it's greatest heights pissed off the right & the left equally with barbed political satire and skewed absurdest impersonations that embraced both the slapstick and screwball sensibilities of writers and audience. No more. How the mighty has fallen! The last couple of show openers could have been written by a middle-school class. I feel nothing but bemused contempt, and embarassment for James Downey and co..
I don't have cable, but I really appreciated this article. See, it's not a problem to editorialize on a largely news-based site when it's as sound and well-reasoned as this article. Also, to the guy before me, all politicians pander…it's kind of in the job description. As to health care, I would rather wait a little while and know I will actually get care than none at all. I pay for my own health insurance which covers not even a fucking annual physical. It is amazing to me that there are still people who don't see the tragedy of our health care system.
lol fags
SNL has been pathetic and irrelevant for as long as i can remember. Like a rotting drowned body, it's popped back up again because cable news channels (like MSNBC) endlessly recycle anything with even a trace of humor as evidence of their own "edginess" and to distract their mindless viewers from the fact that they provide no original content of their own.
In response to the few comments that said "nobody watches SNL, who cares?": I know that people of more-than-moderate intelligence don't watch SNL, but it's pretty naive to assume that the thing doesn't have a substantial audience, especially one that gets more of of its political content from TV "satarists" than from the news. Let's not undermine the huge pull that this show has with the American public. Just think about how their caricatures of HW Bush, Clinton, Perot, GW, Gore, Cheney etc. have endured in the public consciousness, if only due to repetition in some cases.
Also, after reading all of the above quotes (with the exception of "lol fags" of course), I'm again reminded of how much I love CHUD and the quality of its readership. Never would you find discourse like this on AICN.
So wait.. the media has been licking Obama's balls the past 4 months and most definitely giving Hillary the unfair coverage, a media that is supposed to be "fair" and have no obvious preferences, and we don't get a single article from CHUD complaining about it. Finally an unfunny sketch comedy show brings light to this unfair coverage, thus bringing a balance by helping out Hillary some, and we get whining and bitching? I'm at a loss for words…
I didn't expect such a strong and political essay. You got the right headspace for something more, because that's Slate level analysis right there.
Jeremy's right. The only negative thing that could be said about Gore is that he's too smart. The only valid satire is the satire that I agree with.
While I'll agree that the quality of the satire on SNL has fallen mightily, and that Jim Downey's best years are apparently behind him comicly, I don't think that there's some conpiracy bewtween Michaels and Downey to sabotage Obama's campaign. You're a smart guy, so I'm hoping you're joking. The perfomers don't srtike me as McCain fans, and they do have some input in the process, right? Armisen does a terrible Obama though. He has some of the mannerisms, but he exudes none of the confidence. But I think you need to relax, because you're beginning to sound like Jeff Wells, which is not a good thing.
All this rant does is point out the fact that Obama has way too many apologists as his followers. Anyone who has followed politics could see that the press has had a major woody for this man whose success in the campaign is due more to his charisma and people's hate for Hillary than anything substantive. Yes, I know there's a website which puts into detail what his policies will be if he becomes president. Reading it just told me that while he has lofty goals he has no concrete agenda on how to make the other party join him in passing such policies. While I don't like Hillary and any of the candidates in either party I do think that she has gotten some undue hatred from people blinded by the charisma and promises of a politician who can't seem to take a punch to the chin. The Texas and Ohio primaries proved that.
SNL has always been pretty fair at skewering everybody equally. That is up until this season, my jaw dropped when Fey openly campaigned for Clinton. I can't remember ANY snl show doing that so blatantly. And now its become quite predicatble, every sketch is overwhelmingly pro-clinton. Seth Myers writes his own stuff for the update, so That is why he made that comment. This last saturday was so transparent and pathetic, entirely pro clinton. Played obama like he was an inexperience idiot. That's not skewering hillary. I also agree at Clinton appearing on SNL right before the primary, what wonderful campaign boost that was, especially where she signed onto the show, specifically addressing the states that were voting on that tuesday. It's laughable how much they lean towards clinton, and sad.
Back in the 80's/90's did Downey have a partner or ever write with anyone else(the political sketches)? I always pictured a smoke-filled room with Franken, Davis, Smigel, O'Brien, Miller, or MacDonald just riffing off the news/each other. Also, any comedian out there doing a good/funny Obama impression?(Don't/won't watch"MAD")
Enjoyed reading this and the discussion created. Thanks as always, Beaks!
wait… are people really basing their political rational on who looks better on tv?
never mind. if forgot whom i was dealing with; people.
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.