TV has killed movies like Street Kings.
Once upon a time a slight film like this would be part of a good double
feature; you may even have ended up liking the smaller, unpretentious
feature more than the bigger movie driving that double bill. But now
movies like that have become TV shows on cable. The truth is that
besides some cursing, there’s not much in Street Kings that you couldn’t find in an episode of The Shield, all the way down to its setting.
Which isn’t to say that Street Kings isn’t
any good. It’s a fine movie, but it doesn’t bring a single new thing to
the table. It’s hard to justify the cost of a night out at the movies
when it comes to a movie like this. Middle of the road programmers:
they’re the biggest casualty of rising movie ticket prices.
Keanu Reeves is miscast as a cop who is not quite dirty; he doesn’t
take bribes or deal drugs, but he is a triggerman for a vice squad that
takes the law into their own hands. Keanu is the guy who knocks down
the door and puts a bullet in the face of a guy on the toilet because
he’s part of a ring that kidnaps and rapes young girls. He’s the muscle
of the Dirty Harry squad, essentially. But when his former partner, who
has been going to Internal Affairs about the inner dealings of the
Dirty Harry squad, gets blown away by machine gun toting gangbangers
after Keanu accidentally put a bullet in his shoulder (it’s just as
plausibility stretching in the film as it is in text), Keanu starts to
go even outside of the squad who goes outside the law in an attempt to
find out the truth. And if you can’t guess what he finds out… well,
you’re the ideal audience for Street Kings.
I like Street Kings’ varying shades
of grey when it comes to dirty cops; Keanu is technically a dirty cop
because he executes criminals, but we’re pretty sure all these
criminals could really use some executing, and besides, we see that
it’s impacting his conscience. He tells the other cops in his unit
(including a seriously hilariously miscast and mustachioed Jay Mohr)
that he’s pulling the trigger because he doesn’t want these killings on
their shoulders. Again, it’s not original – it’s sort of the whole
basis of The Shield – but it’s a relevant area to examine in this post-Ramparts era.
But so much else of Street Kings just
slides away from you. There are good performances – Chris Evans
continues to prove that he’s one of the best young mainstream actors
out there (why he’s not getting better roles in better films eludes
me), and Hugh Laurie makes a good Internal Affairs investigator who is
convinced the police department is riddled with lupus*. I don’t know
that Forrest Whitaker gives a good performance, but
it’s a fun one; emboldened with his Oscar he takes the opportunity to
chew his way through all of the scenery with abandon, especially in his
big capper scene at the end. But as is so often the case, Keanu Reeves
just drags the whole thing down.
Reeves is not a hard edged drunk who kills for a living. It’s sort of
amazing that John Cusack could play a role like that but Keanu Reeves
is totally incapable, and there’s no way to get past it in all of Street Kings’ runtime.
I do think I would buy him as a serial killer, though – there’s a
certain blankness to him, even in real life, that feels like it could
contain massive amounts of icy hearted hate. I don’t think that Keanu
kills Street Kings – Evans, who doesn’t get enough screentime at all, keeps it afloat – but he never helps the movie transcend its TV showitis.
David Ayer is becoming the modern Homer of criminal LA; he wrote Training Day, and he directed Harsh Times.
There doesn’t feel like there’s a whole lot more for him to mine in
this milieu, and I hope he moves on to something different for his next
film. Ayer isn’t a great director, but he’s certainly competent enough
– and does a good job of shooting the most overshot city on Earth –
that I’m interested in seeing what he has coming up next. As long as
it’s a little bit different.
It would have been nice if Street Kings had in some way distinguished itself. Never going completely into gritty realism while also never going into slambang action, Street Kings is a film in search of its own Vic Mackey.
*This is a House joke. I’m not sure I needed to explain that.





13 comments
Nice review. Shame about Keanu. As an aplogist, I was hoping he'd suprise. ( I think he pulled off dark way back in The Gift) The Jay Mohr thing sounds like the miscasting of the year! Like you said before, I'm suprised Ellroy hasn't ripped this a new one.
Good review. $$$ is t-i-g-h-t right now, so I'll skip this in the theatre and catch it on dvd(rental). I'm a sucker for Keanu.
Don't you mean a sucker of Keanu?
Yeah but MAN that poster is ace!
Good review.sounds like my imppresion of the trailers are right.Oh and it is Never lupus…well one time it was.
Evans is really fun in the movie as Disco. I do agree that he is a fine young actor who just seems to be languishing in pictures that are almost big movies, but not enough to push him into stardom. I keep complaining about this to people, but my main problem (apart from the fact that the movie is too Shield like) is that it plays out like a reimagining of LA Confidential. With Keanu playing a mixture of the three main characters, and Evans doing the same. Even other characters and situations seem to be echoes of LA Confidential. Such as when Keanu kills the guy on the toilet, and then plants the guns. But it seems to be missing a lot of the setting that makes Ellroy great.
I was actually looking forward to seeing this film then I found out that both Jay Mohr & Cedric the Entertainer are in this. Needless to say but I think I'll wait for this to come to video instead of seeing it in the theatres.
I've always really liked James Ellroy's novels, even the not-so-great ones are at least fun. So why is it that he keeps trusting his screenplays with that fucking hack Ayer? Ellroy disowned Dark Blue, why is he even working with this twit?
Ellroy is pulp, but fun pulp – and fun pulp that can turn out to be a great movie like L.A. Confidential. I just don't get it.
I considered seeing this movie in theaters merely because Hugh Laurie is in it, but then I realized that I couldn't sit through 2 hours of Keanu just because House is in reruns.
Keanu is great in the role. It's a shame that some "critics" and haters can't get past his youthfull look. He gave a good performance, a believable one, where he was a train wreck outside but had some type of warm inside. He wasn't tottally a monster, he managed to mix the two sides of Ludlow's personality and we can see it on screen. Incredible how people praises evrything, even the dead shark, and can't recognized that the man has some talent and isn't afraid and choose projects that obvioursly won't be critics darlings. It's the safe route to go related to Reeves' movies — "praise everyone but don't ever try to give the man credit" — Reeves is good in it and it's him that puts the average movie in a higher level. And nope, I'm not one of his die hard fans. But this bash fest towards him is tired already.
John Corbett as Detective Dante Demille vs
Jay Mohr as Sgt. Mike Clady. who wins the battle of worst miscast in the film…it's a tie they both lose
It's never lupus man.
The Watcher (2000) – Keanu Reaves as a SERIAL KILLER
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.