
Steven Soderbergh’s two Che Guevara films (The Argentine and Guerilla or, collectively and unofficially, Che) continue to make the festival rounds. They’ve just run as part of the New York Film Festival, where Soderbergh took part in a post-show Q&A. (Actually, the Q&A might have been on its own, as at least one NYFF screening is yet to come.) The Playlist was there, and so got to hear the director talk up a potential third film about the famous figure. This isn’t the first time he’s mentioned a third movie; he first broached the subject during Cannes.
“Even though we’ve made two parts we still haven’t shown everything. There’s actually another movie, I think, to be made about what happens between these two parts but we didn’t have enough money.”
And with Che not likely to make a boatload of cash, money remains the rub. At the NYFF Q&A Soderbergh joked that he’d make the third film if the other two made $100m, which is staggeringly unlikely.
“We (writer Peter Buchman and I) talked about [the third film]. The story of Che in the Congo was absolutely fascinating. We actually sort of sketched an idea for a small film, that would take place in the Congo and Prague, where he went after fighting in the Congo to sort of lick his wounds and write a very self-critical book on what happened [there].”
“The [real] answer is that we didn’t have enough money to do that. Also, it’s a fascinating chapter, but it didn’t really fall into the bookend idea we ended up with.”
Head over to The Playlist to read more about how the films developed from one idea meant only to be Guerilla, and how Soderbergh & Co. realized they needed to tell a lot more of the story to have any of it make sense.
When all this is said and done I’d love to see a book about the film(s) emerge from Soderbergh’s camp; not even having seen the current films yet, I get the feeling that this is a master class in working within economics and film technique to adapt history to the screen.





13 comments
Jesus, you scared me. I double checked my tickets and Che plays next Tuesday at NYFF. Was there a special screening or is that a mistake?
Hooray for muderous scum glorified by mornonic Hollywood trash.
Dude! You need to shut the fuck up. Che is the man. I have a tee-shirt with this face on it!
does the war on terror stretch to Soderbergh's vanity projects?
"Hooray for muderous scum glorified by mornonic Hollywood trash."
Are you talking about George W. Bush, because Ernesto Guevara was an humanitarian.
Other than the brutal imprisonment and execution of those who opposed, yes, he was a humanitarian. Other than being a murderer and a tyrant, yes, he was a kind soul.
I love how liberals idolize Che for executing thousands without trial in Cuba but call us imprisoning international terrorists a war crime.
Mike is right. Good post..I can't believe these "hollowood" types that believe that glorifying a tyrant and murderer is cool. Read just a LITTLE bit about history you liberal morons. Fuck the t-shirt too.
if you have yet to see the film(s), please reserve your judgment for it and us "liberal morons." I won't give anything away, but Che is not glorified in any way as a martyr or humanitarion hero. He is shown as the complicated and nuanced figure he was. Do you really think Soderburgh would risk being that trite? Then again, you probably know nothing about movies, otherwise you wouldnt be wasting your time on your political soapbox on a movie site where folks just want to talk about one of the more fascinating film projects this year.
John's right. See the movie first, then speak. Soderbergh never glorifies Che, nor does he try to explain away Guevara's shortcomings. This flick is a straight up telling of two of his campaigns. One alongside Fidel in the battle to overthrow Bautista in Cuba. The other in Bolivia. The difference between the two campaigns, and Guevara's stringent ideology related to guiding a revolution, arming indigenous people, guerilla warfare etc, is at the heart of the story Soderbergh tells. Really brilliant piece of work.
Dear Sir/Madam,
we are a Greek Publishing House that since 1985 is publishing educational books and materials in German as a foreign language. You can access our detailed catalogue and more information in our web site
http://www.praxis.gr. For one of our current projects which will be used in private and public schools – we would like to use the photo titeled "Che The Third".
Therefore, we would like to ask for your permission, in order to avoid any legal problems.
If you should agree to that, the photo source will be mentioned on the photo/image list located on the back of the book.
We would appreciate for your prompt and positive answer!
Sincerely,
PRAXIS PUBLICATIONS
Andrea Näfken
Hooray. Are you still talking about George Bush?. If this is the case, he also tortured people, you missed that
Che Guevara didn't imprison or execute anyone with trial. And here's why:
1. Fidel Castro called the shots, not Che.
2. All members of Batista's regime took part in the famous revolutionary tribunals. Che overlooked the trials, and no one was executed or imprisoned without trial. Those people were murderers and rapists, not people who opposed the regime.
3. The population in Cuba dropped nearly 2 million because they don't didn't kill the opposition, they let them leave.
4. During the Guerrilla armed struggle, those convicted of treachery were executed. Many were killed by Che, but if he didn't kill them he risked his column being detected by enemy soldiers and the entire movement being wiped out. All of his men would have died.
Hasta la victoria siempre!
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.