
2010 is going to be a great year for movies. I’m confident of this. Since we’re in this ride together I figured we’d get ready for the year in a fun and exciting new way. First, over the course of the next fifteen weekdays we’re going to highlight one mainstream film a day. Some of them are slam dunks, some of them have a cloud of trouble floating above them, but all represent a great way to spend a Friday night at the movie theater even if it results in you ripping its ass thereafter.
One of the things this site is built on is a love of movies. Some folks think we’ve let some of that go by the wayside. I disagree, but regardless, I want 2010 to be a year where this site restores some of that wonder. Though the glass can never truly be half-full in a business so driven by rehashes and hollow entertainment, we’re going to have fun with it and prepare you guys with as many tools as possible to make the moviegoing experience worth it. Especially as the internet gets more and more bogged down with people who have no right serving as an authority of film blabbering all over blogs and Twitter and beyond.
There’s a reason you come here.
The Wolfman
Directed by Joe Johnston
Starring Benicio Del Toro, Emily Blunt, Hugo Weaving, Anthony Hopkins
Written by Andrew Kevin Walker and David Self
Based on the original screenplay by Curt Siodmak
The Gist
A remake of the great 1941 Lon Chaney flick, shepherded by star Benicio Del Toro, directed by Joe Johnston after original director Mark Romanek abruptly left the project. The story focuses on Lawrence Talbot, a man who is bitten and cursed upon his return to his ancestral home and forced to spend his full moons kicking ass and whisking bearded men offscreen in the blink of an eye. It’s one of the simple, classic horror stories and werewolves have always been sorta the (for lack of a better word) black sheep of the horror world. They aren’t as sexy and malleable as vampires, not as simple and cheap as zombies, and not as big business as giant monsters that terrorize cities.
But they’re great. And there aren’t enough great werewolf movies, so there’s always room in the genre for another one.
Participants to Watch
Rick Baker is the make-up designer for the film, but how much of his work actually makes it to the finished film is a major issue. An American Werewolf in London is still the high water mark for werewolf movies and the film that put Baker on the map. If the film is a big CGI-fest and Baker’s work is rarely used, it could be a sad time for the home team. That said, his design for the wolf man is good but there’s always something a little harder to swallow about an upright creature that maintains a lot more of the man than the wolf. It’s less of a monster and finding a balance that’ll work with modern audiences is difficult. Baker is the star of this movie as far as I’m concerned and how excited I’ll be is almost wholly dependent on just how much of his work they use.
Hugo Weaving looks really perfect as Abberline. He’s an actor who I feel may have the chops to be one of the “go to” character actors. And you’d think Mark Strong can’t play EVERY ROLE. Abberline’s a good character and if handled well, it could be a great role for Hugo. It’s not easy to rock the period look and he’s one of those guys who is as reliable as they get.
Joe Johnston has the semi-thankless job of being the guy who comes in to clean up after Romanek. He also had to follow Spielberg with the dinosaur flicks but he’s a director who should get a lot more credit than he does. The Rocketeer is a blast, Honey, I Shrunk the Kids is fun for what it is, and October Sky is a terrific little movie. Hell, even Hidalgo‘s got merit. He’s a very good technical filmmaker and the trailers have at the very least showcased a visually striking movie. I think the guy has the potential to become a really interesting genre possibility if this film isn’t a dud.
The Buzz
Not good. The film has been delayed for quite some time, has endured many reshoots, and already faces an uphill battle because the material isn’t a lock with today’s audiences even with complete A-List participation. Benicio doesn’t have the same pull as a Brad Pitt or Leonardo DiCaprio, and even though there’s no doubt he’s immersed himself deeply into the project, he has never opened a movie on his name before. The release date (February 12) isn’t very inspiring, though the marketing has definitely increased in intensity. There’s also the risk that the trailer showcases too many of the film’s big moments. It’s a good, aggressive trailer but you have to wonder if it’s overcompensating.
Best Case
The film is good and makes money, but more importantly adds a modicum of respect to the werewolf genre. 100 million is the mark it needs to crest and though that won’t make the film profitable (rumors have the budget between 90 and 150 million) it’ll send the impression of success. I don’t think it’s possible for this film to come out on top, but it needs to at least make a dent and not put a cork in a subgenre with a lot of potential.
And frankly, the Universal Monsters are one of the few things that benefit from being revisited every generation, if for nothing else than to reintroduce audiences with the impeccable films that began the trend.
Worst Case
The film, which already faces huge odds, is a failure and the mess that many fear it’ll be. As a result, these kind of middle-of-the-road (and in mind mind vital) kinds of horror films go back into hibernation.
CHUD’s Prognosis
A double. Maybe 90 million, mixed reviews, and the kind of film that sees a 60% decline in its second week. But I have to admit that a part of me thinks it’s going to be a really fun flick and if it’s as brutally violent and effects happy as the trailers suggest, it’ll be one that helps make these dreadful early months of the year much more bearable.
Useful links
Official Site
Pictures Galore
The Original on Amazon
Nice long Rick Baker interview
Tomorrow: My most anticipated movie of the year!





29 comments
First! Oh wait. Wrong nerd forum.
Nice one Nick – great idea and great start. Here's hoping we can get some of that good-natured love of cinema and sense of wonder back to CHUD. Devin's relentless bile needs to be balanced out.
It is obvious Devin has gotten in trouble, and given this site such a bad name that NIck s having to have a more proactve role, Devin really did damage to Chud and his rep, so much so that he is a poster child for online critic hatred!
Hmm. I like Devin. I like Nick, too.
Saw an interview with Mark Romanek a while back who pretty much said the studio had fucked it up from the start, which is why he left. I want it to be good, but I get a feeling this might be the next Van Helsing
AWESOME! Thanks Nick! Good nerd speak with some good evidence behind it. Good work sir
Tomorrow: Scott Pilgrim Vs The World.
Right? Am I right?
It's my most anticipated, anyhoo…
"He's an actor who I feel may have the chops to be one of the "go to" character actors"… ummmm yeah, like maybe he will get a part in a Matrix flick or maybe the new Lord of the Rings…..
Great idea, Nick. I'm loving it.
Great to see Nick writing more. This is why I like CHUD.
There is a reason we come here… Damn right. Thanks for giving me optimism in this project. Werewolves are my favorite of the film monsters and there really are very few genuinely worthwhile movies. I really want, no… NEED this one to be – at least – good.
Oh, for fucks sake. This is an article that has absolutely nothing to do with Devin and there are still people bitching about him. Nick, I vote for getting rid of comments again. Either that or do some pretty intensive moderation. I'm tired of all this mindless bile at the bottom of every article. I think CHUD is one of the smartest film sites around, but let's hope no one is judging it by the comments.
If you hate Devin go lurk somewhere else on the Internets.
Nice article. I am hoping this one does well also.
I didn't think people were bitching about Devin, they were just saying it's good to balance the positive and the negative. Devin tends to go the pessimistic route and Nick tends to be more optomistic and willing to be surprised by something.
Folks, this isn't about Devin. The site at its best, is one with a couple or several very distinct voices. I'm making mine known again. But seriously… why waste all that energy hating?
Why are we talking about Devin? This talkback is for "The Wolfman". Despite the troubled production history, I find myself getting more excited by every preview I see for this movie. A fun, bloody werewolf movie would be much appreciated. In the age of vampire/zombie overkill, the werewolf movie has been sorely lacking.
Devin is too much about piss and vinegar. It's refreshing to read an article on this site that's actually optimistic. When I first started reading this I was like 'Oh hey, Nick Nunziata wrote this' =)
Looking forward to Wolfman, though. This is Johnston's first R-rated movie (imagine how cool Jurassic Park III would have been if it was rated that) and if there's one thing Joe knows it's action. Looking forward to his Captain America film as well (even though I think the character is ridiculous)
Great read Nick. I love everyone here on CHUD but I do hope to see more of your presence on here in 2010.
I wish someone would approve my forum registration.
Chaney's Wolfman has always been my favorite because he is a Wolf MAN, not a man who turns into a wolf. That's my biggest gripe with American Werewolf in London and all of the movies that have followed it. The star of the movie isn't in its crucial scenes. He's been replaced by a Muppet. The essence of the werewolf story is, "Oh my god! What did I do last night?!?" It is one thing to know that you turned into a monster. It is another to know that you acted like a monster and couldn't stop yourself. I've been waiting forty years for a truly great werewolf movie. This may not be it, but I can dream.
Why waste all that energy hating on Devin? Nick, Nick … don't you understand that it takes almost no effort to develop an intense dislike of Faraci?
What happened to that Oliver guy? I seem to remember him as being funny. Sadly, most of the entertainment on this site of late has come courtesy of the comment section. I don't come to this site thinking I'll agree with the reviewer, I do however expect an objective, thought-provoking, and hopefully entertaining viewpoint on certain movies. This article is more in line of what I expect to find on this site. And to the Devin haters, you should focus your attention on Sam Strange. That guy is just a waste of oxygen. He's like anti-talent that comes to this site to sap it's remaining soul. At least Devin can be funny and entertaining. At times. Sam Strange is so completely unfunny that he's offensive.
DEVIN DIDN'T LIKE AVATAR QQQ HE"S A HORRIBLE HUMAN BEING!!11 :''''(
Since we are on the subject, I respect devin's opinions and I like his point of view but I do think he is a little too negative sometimes and his view overshadows the site. He is like the reverse Harry where you sometimes to just have to discount his opinion because you know what he's all about. Doesn't mean he is wrong, just means you don't agree.
This is excellent. I'm looking forward to a whole series of these. And I agree with Nick; the best movie sites are the ones with differing points of view. Sometimes you agree with one and not the other. That's the very nature of opinion. I will say that I'm glad that Nick's is a voice that is once again being heard here though. Back when I started reading CHUD (back in the stone age, it seems), his was the predominate voice here and it's what made me love this site to begin with.
To the people saying "if you don't like Devin, go somewhere else," Thats a lot like saying, don't go home to your family reunion just because you have that one drunk uncle who touched you every weekend in the bad place and even now oogles your children in front of you… I mean hey, you still like the REST of the family.
Good piece, Nick. For me, stories/series like these are the main draw to this site.
Good article Nick, cant wait to see tomorrows
Classic monster movie, set in the 1800s or early 1900s and stars Anthony Hopkins. This might not be Bram Stoker's Dracula…which would have been a perfect film had Coppela been allowed to use Johnny Depp as Jonathan Harker. It's a really good movie in spite of Keanu (though it still gets me that Tom Waites is a better actor). I hoping this movie does well because it looks kind of cool, and I want werewolves and vampires to be bad again. Note: If I misspelled names, I'm too damn lazy to look them up.
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.