Tobey Maguire is the dark, compelling heart of Jim Sheridan’s surprising new film, Brothers. A remake of a recent Danish film (that I have not seen), Brothers is one of those small character dramas that tend to go so wrong once their budgets have been elevated out of the indie range, but the film – thanks largely to a subtle, smart script by David Benioff and a couple of firecracker performances – works much more often than it doesn’t.
Maguire is Sam Cahill, a captain in the Marines with a wife and two daughters, who is about to go back to Afghanistan. He’s the good one, while Jake Gyllenhaal is Tommy, the bad one, tattooed and just getting out of prison for a robbery. Both men are the result of pressure exerted by their drunken, abusive Marine of a father, although each reacted to that pressure in very different ways. When Sam’s chopper goes down everyone thinks he’s dead and tries to move on from the pain. Grace, Sam’s wife played with serious dignity by Natalie Portman, is paralyzed by grief but finds a way out of the darkness as Tommy steps up into the void left by Sam and starts being a father to the two girls and maybe something special to Grace. But meanwhile Sam is held by Taliban in the mountains of Afghanistan, brutally tortured and eventually completely broken. When he returns home, Sam finds the family that kept him going in the worst of circumstances is no longer there.
A problem that many will have with Brothers is that the basic set up of the movie – as told above and shown in every one of the trailers – takes up the first two acts of the film. Sam returning home is a crucial component in the story but it happens late in the game, and that can lead to a feeling that the film is predictable. But Brothers is a character film, not a plot-driven film (although the plot does take over in the final minutes), and what makes the first two acts absorbing are the characters and the actors. But there are small surprises along the way – Sam never drops out of the movie, and Sheridan follows him through truly awful tortures at the hands of Islamic extremists, offering a chilling counterpoint to the slowly developing domestic bliss at home. For the most part, though, Brothers goes exactly where you think it will go, but it does so with grace and skill.
It’s the counterpoints between the two settings – Afghanistan and the homefront – that made Brothers work so well for me. As Tommy slowly discovers the responsible man inside of him we see Sam slowly discover the angry beast he has hidden away. The two brothers slowly change places – not a new conceit, but one played out with deft craft. The dread and horror of the Afghanistan scenes slowly leaks into the happiness of the homefront scenes as you realize the savagely broken Sam will be returning home soon. There are moments in the homefront scenes where you forget that there even is a Sam, but soon enough Sheridan draws the focus back to the cage in which he’s held. Sheridan makes the great choice to remove almost all conflict from the homefront scenes; without the Afghanistan counterpoints Brothers would be a treacly film with a slightly creepy romance – is it okay for Tommy and Grace to fall in love? – but with the storm on the horizon the warmth of home feels fleeting.
That storm is Tobey Maguire. The actor gives a performance unlike any I’ve ever seen from him; fierce and wounded and very often quite terrifying. He plays Sam in three distinct stages: in the beginning Sam is a fairly ordinary if fairly stiff family man; in Afghanistan he crumbles and breaks in a totally real way (semi-spoilers: Sam does something reprehensible to survive, and one of the things I really like about the script is that Sam doesn’t just do it because he wants to live or because he wants to get home and see his family – he also does it because he is disgusted by weakness. I can’t say more without spoiling it, and the movie doesn’t make it explicit, but it’s there and it’s part of the film’s unusual subtlety); and then back at home he is deeply wounded and confused and angry. Maguire seems to physically transform with each change in Sam, and by the end he’s a bomb waiting to explode. Maguire does it all with his eyes, though – late stage Sam is all formal Marine stillness, which is scarier than a twitching mess. His huge, watery eyes have the feel of a vicious, trapped animal, looking for danger in every moment, even as he’s shaving. In a lot of ways Brothers is a throwback to those 70s Vietnam vet movies, the Coming Home type of films, but I’m glad it’s set in the modern day, as period pieces can be too distancing.
At any rate, Maguire is excellent. In a better world he’d be getting Oscar buzz right now, if only for the fact that scrawny, silly Tobey Maguire scared me in the third act of the film. A birthday party becomes a scene of escalating, unbearable tension and the ramrod straight Maguire slowly convinced me that he could and would kill a little girl who was disobeying him; never falling back on hacky signifiers of insanity, Maguire creates a complexly terrifying character.
Also strong is Natalie Portman. Stuck in a role that’s half thankless she manages to find the quiet strength in this smalltown girl facing unthinkable tragedy. Lots of characters in the film acknowledge how beautiful she is – finally! A movie where the super pretty Hollywood types are actually super pretty! – but she never feels like an LA type making a visit to a small town. She may be smarter than my prejudices tell me a cheerleader who marries a football player turned Marine would be, but she’s got the inner stability that I find believable in a mother of two. Portman doesn’t go for cheap histrionics and plays Grace as a character who keeps it together, turning her grief into catatonia. She also has a great rapport with Gyllenhaal; the scenes of their ‘courtship,’ such as it is, ring true and believable.
Which, sadly, is more than can be said for Gyllenhaal at the beginning of the movie. Tommy is supposed to be a bad kid, one who drank and fought all through high school and one who spent years in prison on an armed robbery beef. But Gyllenhaal doesn’t have a bad bone in his body, and all the fake neck tattoos in the world don’t change that. He’s too good natured and sweet; I would have bought Tommy as a drug smuggler or something, but there’s zero violence in Gyllenhaal. To be fair I would have said the same about Maguire before seeing this film, but he proved me wrong in the performance, while Gyllenhaal does no such thing.
That’s not to say that Gyllenhaal is bad – he delivers a fine performance, and he’s a sweet surrogate dad. But there’s no transformation like that which Maguire undergoes. Tommy doesn’t so much change as adjust, which is dramatically unsatisfying. The script thinks Tommy changes, but Gyllenhaal is unable to play it. He basically holds his own in the film, but in the end he’s totally outclassed by Maguire and Portman.
Brothers mostly steers away from melodrama, going instead for character drama. The basic story is melodramatic at its heart, but Benioff’s script shies away from pushing things, and it wisely keeps the relationship between Grace and Tommy in check. It also allows you to see all sides of the situation. You can feel the heartbreak Sam feels upon coming home and seeing that everyone has moved on, you can see the disappointment that Tommy feels when the new adult life he has been building for himself is taken away and you can understand the strange place in which Grace finds herself, stuck with this changed man who was once her love while the memories of an improved life are still fresh. And Sheridan cuts it all with a sense of building doom and dread; not everyone will like the resolution of the film, but I think the movie earns the ending.
It’s rare that a movie surprises me as thoroughly as
Brothers did. I expected overblown Oscarbait and instead got a fairly restrained character drama featuring a career best performance from an actor I had never taken all that seriously before. It’s not one of the best films of the year, but it’s the kind of movie I’d like to see the indie majors attempt to make more often.
8.5 out of 10
16 comments
Great Review. I was on the fence on this one, but I think I'll check it out now.
I was starting to wonder if it was something in her contracts that prevented any dialogue in her movies referring in any way to her looks. Miss Appeared-on-1000s-of-fashion-magazine-covers is finally fessing up to being a looker? I smell a Therapy breakthrough!!
I'm sure BROTHERS is great but, let's face it, it's not in the same league of excellent movies that Pearl Harbor, Changing Lanes, Daredevil or Hollywoodland are.
If the movie is half as boring as this review, it will be one of the worst films ever made.
I guess you're gonna have to start using a shit load of exclamation points to make your reviews less boring for the ADD crowd out there.
Movie sounds good, though I am kinda pissed that Affleck didn't get a story credit. Why is he always getting snubbed when it comes to these things? he get no recognition for his genius.
I find it strange that you don't mention the fact that Jim Sheridan was inspired by the life of Ben Afflekc to make this movie. Makes you look like a bad and uniformed writer.
The trailer looked like pure "made for Lifetime" dross with A listers. I liked "In America" alot, and my opinion just might be swayed. Thanks Dev.
Great, another Hollywood movie about the military. I'm sure this one, like all the others, will portray the troops as a) victims, b) vicious animals, or c) victims because they've been turned into vicious animals. Let me look at the review…YES! It's c) all the way. I won't be going to see this piece of crap, and I hope it doesn't make back its costs. As for Devin liking it, well…we ARE talking about the same man who gave the Friday the 13th remake an 8.0 out of 10. Can you really trust the critical judgment of anyone who would give that ranking to that movie?
This movie is pure horseshit the only thing it's missing is Donnie Darko screaming "I think World War 3 just started!"
At least it wasn't as bad as Lovely Bones, its becoming pretty clear that the rumors of Affleck being the main creative force behind the Lord of the rings trilogy are true. Remake Loverly bones Asap with Affleck as director and star.
Took the wife to this one with much apprehension, fearing it would be too much forced drama. I walked away pretty impressed and even a bit emotionally unsettled (soldier stories get to me so easy ever since reading Lone Survivor).
Devin, you clearly didn't see the original Danish version of the movie because Jake Gyllenhaal is perfectly spot on in this movie and you would have to have seen the original character to get that.
Jake was pretty brilliant in my opinion and in no way outclassed by Tobey or Natalie. He does more than hold his own. Your hatred of him is so apparent in every mention you make of him that it keeps you from even seeing any movie of his without dismissing him. Sad that you miss out on a great actor who doesn't need histrionics to give a great performance.
He clearly didn't see it because he mentions it in the second sentence. Thanks for playing!
It's always great to see a performance that makes absolutely no sense unless you've seen a different movie first. Fuck playing a character to fit into the movie you're filming.
Christ, these talkbacks fucking suck worse than ever. It's plagued with stupid, unfunny trash. Oh but you dipshits posting excuse your behavior with pretending to be dipshits, well you are what you pretend to be.
Please set it up to require a login. It's broken window theory. Once one window is broken people will come along and throw rocks at all the rest breaking them too, because hey, the first one's already screwed up.
Good review, and as usual I check it out afterward to see how it jives with my impressions.
Tobey, while great, has used those talents for a long time and it's a shame you haven't seen that before. He was impressive, but having seen since just about Ice Storm on, I knew how he would play the character.
Jake was brilliant, and completely believable as an ex-con finding his way in life. He only had to lose his temper once, to see what a restrained force he was. For the subtlety you praise the movie for, I'm surprised you missed this. He's not supposed to be overtly visible with his aggression, he could then believably fill the shoes as surrogate dad/husband.
Natalie Portman deserves an Oscar nod. She was strong, lovely, and a picture perfect display of grief.
Their oldest daughter played by Bailee Madison was superb. Wow, what a talent.
I think this was a phenomenal piece of film making.
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.