Pronunciation: \ˈmas-tər-ˌpēs\
Function: noun
Date: 1600
1 : a work done with extraordinary skill; especially : a supreme intellectual or artistic achievement
If you want to go by the definition above at its most cut and dry, Avatar could be considered James Cameron’s masterpiece. It’s the culmination of his career’s work, carries many of the signature throughlines and trademarks the director is known for, and seems to be a punctuation mark on a career filled with substantial genre milestones. Cameron’s a serious talent whose attention to detail and militant approach to his work has been a divisive and vital part of his work and Avatar represents the man exorcizing seemingly every creative demon in his being with almost pinpoint accuracy. This is the work of a man possessed, a vision and execution so singular that it’s hard not to be awestruck by the depth of it. From the effort devoted to the flora and fauna of the film’s world of Pandora to the intrinsic technical detail bestowed on the human aspect of the movie to the sheer force of will and near lunacy it took to create the equipment to make and project the film there is no doubt that Avatar is a work done with extraordinary skill and a supreme intellectual and artistic achievement. The word masterpiece may be too strong or it may be the only word to properly describe Avatar.
More than The Lord of the Rings was an extension of its auteur and more than The Matrix was psychically linked to its duo of filmmakers, Avatar is hardwired to its creator in a way films of this size simply cannot be due to reality and the nature of the business. But it is. That’s why the film took so long to reach screens. That’s why it apparently may be one of the costliest films ever made if not the costliest. That’s why on many levels this is an impossible dream of a film, something that could never meet expectations or justify its own existence under the weight of its ambitions.
But it does and make no mistake, this is a film worthy of being mentioned in the same breath as The Matrix and The Lord of the Rings. It’s epic, visionary, breathtaking, and as immersive as any tentpole film in recent memory.
And no trailer, teaser, or sizzle reel can do it justice until you see it living and breathing on a very big screen in 3-D. As I sat in the theater my doubts, suspension of disbelief, and cynicism melted away as Pandora came to life and took me in her arms.
Avatar is not the future of storytelling or the reinvention of the wheel. It’s pulp, but pulp done with the best toolbox Hollywood can offer and pulp created by someone who knows and loves pulp like very few others. It has as much in common with Edgar Rice Burroughs as it does with Dances with Wolves. It has elements of the work Frank Herbert, Hayao Miyazaki, George Lucas, David Lean, and William Wyler yet is unmistakably James Cameron.
The plot is a familiar one. An indiginous species has something of deep spiritual value to them. An invading species sees monetary value in that thing and will take it by force. An invader becomes close to the indiginous species and sees the purity in their way and tries to defend it, but not before much is lost and many lessons are learned.
Its plot is the least impressive part of Avatar. It’s a formula that has been tried and tested and worked but it’ll never set the world on fire in terms of creativity. The plot is one of the very few areas that the cynics will find faultlines in what is a resoundingly complete experience. The dialogue and execution of the plot is excellent, however.
Sam Worthington is Jake Sully, a Marine who lost the use of his legs in combat whose identical twin brother was part of a massive program linking human beings to the alien race known as the N’avi at the genetic level. His brother was to have donned an ‘Avatar’, walking in the body of the large blue creatures in order to survive in Pandora’s atmosphere and interact with its people. When his brother is killed before able to participate, Jake literally and figuratively steps into his shoes since he shares the same genetic code. No fan of planning, research, and tact, the malleable and untrained Jake represents a man caught between worlds. To Grace (Sigourney Weaver), the project leader and peace-loving liason to the N’avi he represents a clumsy distraction to her mission and to Colonel Quaritch (Stephen Lang) he represents a Trojan Horse to plant amidst the N’avi to gain intel for a messy and resolute endgame.
In actuality, the Avatar program allows Jake to walk again. To run. To have nearly superhuman abilities when compared to his shattered and seemingly useless human form. He doesn’t care about the N’avi. He doesn’t care about the substance [here called unobtanium, which caused snickers from people in the audience who don’t realize that’s a moniker often given to things which defy classification] whose value has brought humans this far into space to mine for. He doesn’t care about much, aside from having something to do and the ability to perform again.
Avatar is sort of a cypher until Jake begins to explore the world of Pandora because everything feels right. There’s a sense of ‘when is he going to drop the ball?’ to the early moments because it almost feels like a follow-up to Cameron’s Aliens. The tech of the human military is incredible, world-worn, and functional rather than showy. This handicapped man as your tour guide [or should I say audience avatar] through this cold and busy new world of man. It’s all engaging and interesting and so very much Cameron [elements of The Abyss and Aliens course through much of this film, something this reviewer considers extremely good qualities to posess]. The x-factor is and always was whether or not these odd cat-like blue creatures are interesting enough and effective enough to sustain such a massive undertaking.
The N’avi are fantastic. They are fantastic as a technical achievement and as characters. The level of expression is considerably better than one is accustomed to seeing in the digital world and there’s a life to them, that fire behind their eyes. Though their movements do at times have that weightless feel to them, a lot can be attributed to the size, proportions, and otherworldly nature to the creatures. This could also be considered apologizing.
Since a large portion of the film is digital and the performances delivered through the painstaking motion capture process, so much rides both on the work of the fine folks at Stan Winston Studios and Weta Digital and the actors themselves. It may not be seamless, but it’s close. The ‘hero’ N’Avi characters as essayed by Worthington, Weaver, Zoe Saldaña, Joel David Moore, Wes Studi, and [the one and only] CCH Pounder are articulate, believable, and deliver excellent performances. They aren’t showy but somewhat invisible once the film gets cranking. The biggest hurdle of the film creatively was to create living, breathing creatures we’ve never seen that coax an audience under their spell and that hurdle is leapt rather early on. From then on it’s a cascade of action, spectacle, and surprisingly moving moments where the spiritual and natural underbelly of Pandora comes into play.
Cameron has made very cold movies and movies that embrace raw emotion and Avatar truly does feel like the marriage of those worlds. The Abyss did it well. This does it better. This feels genuine. It may sometimes border on familiar [the Dances with Wolves comparison is a fair one, but on the same note so are Dune, The Lord of the Rings, and Princess Mononoke] and we’ve seen the “Corporations and military are the ultimate evil” vibe before, in fact quite effectively in previous Cameron films.
It just works. A lot of that is due to the technical work and theme park aspect to watching a gigantic epic [and this is epic, no doubt] film in 3-D but it’s moreso due to the great performances across the board, Cameron’s very tight scripting, and the fact they just don’t make ’em like this anymore. It works. It just requires a little bit of that wonder that made many of us such avid readers and consumers of celluloid.
And the best thing about the film, the absolutely engaging and unforgettable gritty epicenter to what makes this thing not only manna for geeks but something everyone will get a kick out of?
Stephen Lang.
There should be a special Oscar for the man for one-upping nearly every hardass military guy we’ve seen onscreen and chewing scenery in the most appealing and iconic way possible. Every moment the man is onscreen we are seeing an entire career of amazing character work oozing through one focused and delightful performance. He could have easily been the mustache-twirling villain and he embraces that villainy with aplomb but his work is so sublime that you almost want him to win. Almost want him to escape unscathed. I could watch this guy play this character forever.
And there’s a moment late in the film involving him and a little value added aspect to his mech suit that, if you don’t get what kind of movie Avatar is then, you never will nor deserve to.
There are flaws. But in the grand scheme, they’re dust in the wind. I could have done with a few less primal screams from the N’avi but it’s a common trait amongst the tribal and deeply spiritual and animalistic races and there’s no denying Cameron’s attention to detail. He and his craftsmen have created machines, weapons, plant life, enviroments, and creatures that look and act cool but never at the expense of logic. You can believe a world like the one sprung from his imagination could exist. If nothing else Cameron is a perfectionist. His work is far from perfect, but his process and discipline reeks of attention to detail and the man has the ability to explain every screw, muscle, and physical trait’s reason for existence and it’s hard not to fall in line with the sheer vision involved.
The film is gorgeous, the relationships are effective, you actually feel for these collections of pixels and polygons, and I left the theater energized and entertained in a manner in which rarely happens. What you will get from Avatar resides in how much of a sense of wonder you still carry to the movie theater with you. If you are willing to fall prey to the magical escapism of movies and love the idea that true science fiction and true pulp adventure is alive and kicking in the theatrical world, you like me, will eat this film up.
If not, I’m sorry for you. This is what The Phantom Menace should have been. It’s proof that all that buzz about Sam Worthington is legit. It’s proof that the only downside to Avatar is how it allowed us to forget what a powerhouse James Cameron is.
I love this movie. Is it perfect? No. Is it immersive, entertaining, and breathtaking? Yes. Is it a masterpiece?
If you go by the definition above, I think it just may be.





100 comments
And here cometh the rants from fans… watch out, Nick.
But I'm glad you liked it
You lost me at "It has elements of the work Frank Herbert, Hayao Miyazaki, George Lucas, David Lean, and William Wyler yet is unmistakably James Cameron." Wyler? Seriously? I mean, come on…
I'm excited. I don't understand the James Cameron hate, it's not like he's punched us in the balls like so many 'auteurs' (Lucas, Spielberg) have done recently. He seems to be genuinely interested in reinventing cinema, something that desperately needs to happen. I like your comparison to Phantom Menace – a film made by a man who could afford the latest goodies but hadn't a clue how to use them. This looks like the work of a director who KNOWS how to use technology in film. Looking forward to it.
fuck George Lucas.
Nick lost you? Oh well. Please let the door hit you in the ass on your way out.
FUCK YEAH IM SO HAPPY
IM RAPING MY SISTER AND CUMMING ALL OVER HER FACE
WOOO!
MY DAD JUST CAME ON HER FACE TOO!!
THATS HWO EXCITED I AM!
FROM, TEXAS HILLBILYL
Fantastic.
I wish you reviewed currently in theater movies more often Nick.
Damn, Nick. You usually bury your reviews so deep in shitty non sequiturs that I forget how well you can actually write when you care about something. Good work.
Ghost Writer.
I'm glad you liked it Nick. I still think it will suck because of all those well-worn Cameronisms. But yeah, Stephen Lang is actually the single aspect I'm looking forward to, because in most JC films there are one or two performers who perform miracles with his terrible scripting.
I think people are just being thrown off by unbiased positivity in a CHUD article. It's been a while. Reviews like this remind me why I've been coming to this site for almost 10 years. Let's hope we see more posts like this and less inflammatory negativity in the future.
I have had no opinion about this film, but suddenly feel very excited about it. Nice review.
Well written. A very accurate, informative and expressive review. I can especially relate to and agree with your statement that:
"no trailer, teaser, or sizzle reel can do it justice until you see it living and breathing on a very big screen in 3-D."
Definitely worth seeing several times in the theater because it really does live up to the hype AND you'll see more details with each viewing.
nice review. but i'm going to see Planet 51 instead.
Brainwashed bandwagon reviews are in full effect.
CGI and action > story, dialogue, and acting = MASTERPIECE dur dur dur
GTFO lmao
I want to like it, but the fact that Nick is gushing so much and in many of the same ways he did for the Hellboy movies… it makes me wary…
Excellent review. Perhaps the best review I've ever read on this site in 10 years.
sounds like what i was hoping for.. pulp and entertaining.. this film looks complete, not lacking in important areas like the star wars prequels were (no fucking kids, thank you cameron!!!).. i cannot imagine the time spent in Camerons editing room as he moves his polygon actors mere inches left or right for every seen..
What is this Avatar you speak or?
But is it better than DELGO?
In order to be a cinematic masterpiece, a film must excel at all aspects of filmmaking. This includes story, characters, and dialogue, for which "Avatar" only gets a passing grade.
I saw it last night at a press screening, but they gave us all a gag order…..can't talk about the film till Dec 18th
Glad you got around that and posted this review. I agree with you, it was jaw-dropping
Jesus fucking christ. The movie gets praised everywhere and you still have turds so hung up on their pride, they can't accept it. What a bunch of fucking babies.
great review Nick, should be fun.
This is VERY encouraging. I'll, of course, decide for myself when I see it, but I'll be happy to have my skepticism subverted. BTW, Nick, this review was exhilarating. Folks who read this site should send this friends who are on the fence about this.
Nick, where have you been? This review was an amazing piece from a guy I thought had let his skill evaporate into filth and nothingness… I love Devin's writing but Nick has the chops to overcome that love. Nick, do not waste your talent… with more writing like this from Nick and Devin, CHUD could be THE PLACE for movie info… walter chaw better look over his shoulder! Now I am dying to read Nick's zombie screenplay!
Two realisations for me: 1) apart from Terminator I don't actually like Cameron films. The more I watch Aliens the less I like it (and I LOVED it as a kid) and the same is True of T2. I loathed Titanic because of the weak plot and the stereotype characters so to say thus is Uber Cameron concerns me more than anything. 2) EVERY glowing review has said 'see it in 3d to get the impressive masterpiece experience'. That's ahuge fucking hassle as I have to wrangle a pass from the wife who's already fucked off with looking after the kids over the christmas hols and then drive 150k to the nearest cinema that does 3d. Not something that endears it to me. Having said all that I will make the effort but i can't see it getting repeat viewings or even being watched at home. I really hope I come out of it energized like you Nick but I still worry it'll be a waste of my time and money
Thanks for the early review. Recently played the game and was completely taken with the depth of the world he's helped create. Glad to read it carries over into the theater experience too. Question: How does the 3D compare with all the others? Better/Same?
great review Nick, you need to do this more often.
Why are the Prequels always named checked in genre pictures these days? If they're so damn hated, why still compare them to the likes of Rings, Matrix, and now this?
It's been 10 years since Episode I. Let the fuck go!
Can't wait for this though…
When Cameron invents 3D WITHOUT the geeky colored glasses I'm in … otherwise the 2D version …
Your review is the best i've seen. The way you describe your analysis is amazing, I love your writing. This review makes me so anxious to see the movie I could scream. I'm sick to death of all of the people putting this movie and JC down, because HE IS THE KING.
My question: how will it play in 10 years, after technology has leap-frog'd beyond the current state? And how will it play on a smaller screen (ie, at home) ?
Really nicely written. I wish everything Nick wrote was like this.
SUCK IT DEVIN!! LETS SEE YOUR REVIEW
MEH.
A good review from Nick ranks somewhere between a good review from Gene Shalit and that douche from Maxim. Can we get a review from one of the real writers and not from the emotionally stunted manchild that owns the domain name and haunts this place like a stale fart?
The immaturity of most commenters simply astonishes me.
How anyone who is a fan of sci-fi or action films say they are not going to see this film is pathetic.
Cameron puts a $500 million dollar movie in the theaters and you wont spend a couple hours and 12 bucks to go see it? LOL. sucks to be you. truly does.
And, God help me for saying this, but Jar-Jar laid the ground work for this to happen. Blame him.
As much as I hated PM (but I did go see it!) .. and as much as I abhor Jar-Jar .. the fact that he succeeded as a truly believable character in a live action film (albeit a hot fucking mess) .. but believable nonetheless.
blame Lucas.
for everything.
Hater go back to spending your precious time getting that 5th level prestige on COD MW2. Dont forget to be assholes with your mic on either.
-b
Great review. Naysayers can suck it cause what Nick just wrote is across the board critical sentiment. Avatar is a winner on all levels.
Hail Cameron..down with Lucas! This movie will be the best thing I have seen in 2009 since the Dark Knight!
Sounds awesome. Stephen Lang ruled in Public Enemies too. Was he in Tombstone also? Gotta watch that again to see.
Yeah, for 12 or so bucks you can see the most visualy stunning movie you've ever witnessed, not a bad deal.
Poor haters must be feeling gut kicked about now, yeah there are some less that stunning reviews, but even those aren't anywhere near bad. Jesus, Avatar is getting some amazing across the board reviews, maybe it's time to stop hating and enjoy this moment in cinema history… Of course, that's just a suggestion!
…did he just say primal screams are common among the "animalistic races?"
do explain, Nick. Do explain.
The movie the phantom menace should have been… Interesting point though I'd remind everyone that tpm was given alot of slack in hopes that the sequels would enhance its quality later, which of course we all know didn't happen. You know what was the phantom menace, and in fact the prequel trilogy we should have gotten? Lord of the Rings. I watch these again and no they're not the best movies I'll have ever seen but they're more in line with the original star wars trilogy in their simplicity than the prequels. I'm guessing Avatar isn't a kitchen sinker like the prequels ended up being. I hope so. Just because you can have palpatine and Yoda duel doesn't mean you have to.
Nicely written review, Nick. I'm not expecting a "game-changer" with Avatar. I just want it to be a good, well-made Jim Cameron movie. Its been almost two decades since he's played in this kind of sandbox, and this kind of thing what Cameron does best.
I can't wait for Faraci's inevitable trashing review though. If his "Avatar" review is half as full of horse piss and bullshit as his TDK review, we'll all be in for treat from that delusional hipster.
I only have one question for some of the commenters here: How does Devin's cock taste?
Cause some of you suckle at it like its fucking delicious.
It tastes a tad like irish spring, must be devin's favorite brand of body wash. And Fuck all you assholes talking shit about JC just to make yourself look cool. Go watch terminator salvation then.
It's a little irritating to continuously hear people trash the Star Wars prequels. They weren't perfect, but they were fun, enjoyable additions to George Lucas' saga. Anyway, Avatar looks okay….I'm not sold on the footage I've seen so far, but I am a big fan of the Terminator movies, Aliens, The Abyss, and True Lies. I imagine I'll give it a chance, although I doubt it will be a "masterpiece". We'll see.
It's a little irritating to continuously hear people trash the Star Wars prequels. They weren't perfect, but they were fun, enjoyable additions to George Lucas' saga. Anyway, Avatar looks okay….I'm not sold on the footage I've seen so far, but I am a big fan of the Terminator movies, Aliens, The Abyss, and True Lies. I imagine I'll give it a chance, although I doubt it will be a "masterpiece". We'll see.
".2"? Really? Freaking ridiculous.
"This is what The Phantom Menace should have been"
Holla out ta George Lucas : Get yer fat ass in gear muthafu&%a cuz theres a new "wiz" in town! XD!!!
Actually Nick, the snickers in the audience at "unobtanium" were precisely from people who realize that it's a joke name for nonexistent materials. Using that name with an apparently straight face was colossally stupid of Mr. Cameron.
The comparisons to the prequels are apt simply because both are sci-fi and both encompass a similar approach to the technology used to create the spfx. And hopes were high. I remember that first trailer to episode 1 and thought "oh my God this is going to be the best movie ever!" And then look what happened. Hopes were dashed and it was all downhill from there. George really let down an entire generation of fans with the prequels.
Just gonna chime in with everyone else and say that I wish Nick would write more reviews like this. Devin's just a douchebg troll blogger who writes reviews to get a rise out of people. This review reads like it's from someone who enjoys going to the movies, which is what this site needs more off.
Where is my Avatar review?
Hell yeah!
This movie will overcome the ignorance which stubbornly clings to people concerning modern 3D. That is why it will be a gamechanger. There are no "geeky colored glasses" people. The glasses are clear and quite comfortable to wear…same as a pair of sunglasses. If you don't want to enjoy the evolution in movie immersion, and watch it in 2D or on a small TV screen…I feel bad for what you will miss.
I can't wait to see this movie. I'm also glad Nick gave it a 9.2, and not a 9.1. I can imagine Cameron running around showing this result to all the losers who never got more than a 8.7
Great review Nick! Very well written with articulate and detailed descriptions of your feelings and impressions during the movie.
For all those people who cannot seem to bring themselves to like Avatar, or even to go see it in the theater, You summed it up best when you wrote:
"As I sat in the theater my doubts, suspension of disbelief, and cynicism melted away as Pandora came to life…..
If you are willing to fall prey to the magical escapism of movies and love the idea that true science fiction and true pulp adventure is alive and kicking in the theatrical world, you like me, will eat this film up.
If not, I'm sorry for you."
Congratulations Nick, for just like Avatar, you have risen to the occasion and written a truly stellar review. For anyone reading your review, you have opened a window into Avatar and the world of Pandora. Excellent!!!
James Cameron always wins
Unconvinced.
From what I understand, there was a theoretical substance called "unobtanium" with all the qualities of the real one long before the real one was ever discovered. When it WAS actually discovered (in Pandora), the old fake name stuck. Seems like a very plausible and likely course of events in our culture. Shit, we call two people "Brangelina" and whenever there's a scandal in Washington we add the completely pointless suffix "-gate" to the end of it. I kind of dug the term when I heard that explanation. I, for one, have been beyond stoked to see this movie from the first teaser I saw. I'm a sucker for this kind of epic SF shit. I can't wait until next week!
Nice to see you writing so passionately Nick. Not so nice to see all these talkbackers of lesser intellects still throwing their babyish anti-Devin tantrums (even after he's explicitly said he hopes the movie is good), not to mention all the ignorant twats who don't realise that you consistently write well and this article is no one off rarity from you.
Brilliant review, Nick. I hope you let it stand alone here, not alongside a subsequent review from Devin Faraci, who has already cast doubt on his integrity as a critic with his inexplicable about-face after Comic-Con. He went from praising the footage, saying he was impressed to later saying "nothing I've seen so far interests me" and "looks like a Pixar film." These are verbatim quotes from him on this site. Which ones were sincere? That we even have to ask says enough.
because two differing opinions can't be valid of course, and naturally they should never be put side by side because that would be far too confusing. I mean why should anyone be allowed to make their own mind up? Lets all be led by the nose and feed from the same trough. There's another thread on CHUD about how eveythings black and white and that is SO on the money. With regards Avatar, for fucks sake it's a fucking movie and everyone is going to have their own opinion on it, and not one of them is going to be objectively RIGHT because your interpretation of any art form is entirely subjective.
$12?? Does that come with a free car wash?
Yeah, think I'll wait for Avatar to hit $1 Redbox.
Hey Alboone or albune or whatever the fuck. Hows bout you not speak for the legions of star wars fans and just speak for yourself, dicklick? Or do you hsave some kind of dick sucking geek portal that plugs your dipshit ass into the mainstream?
Seriously though, bravo for your courage. To bash on Lucas on an internet forum in this bandwagon age of hate, boy, you are one brave little girl.
Also, fuck you.
Come on Devin, We want your review
Great work Nick btw
Devin already wrote his review. Didn't you see all the editorials prior to Avatar's release?
Yeah, not a .1 or .3, but a .2 ??? Still can't say I have any big interest in seeing it, but I will for nerd's sake. I've got an open mind. Maybe it'll blow me away, but I'll be happy if it's just entertaining for the run-time. I guess that's all I can ask of any movie.
Humph.
I've read any number of reviews in online and print media, and it's always fun to find the critics who've sold their by-lines to the studio. Great review, Nick. Glad to see your bank account balance is up! I eagerly anticipate Bombatar. Lossleaderatar? Water Worldatar!
@Hooper McFinney
So you really think that all those critics were paid off by Fox? Ebert, Peter Travers, etc… Are you being serious?
Gee, according to devin's twitter he thought the movie was 'middling'. What a surprise! Hopefully his review will involve his saying constantly how neither Cameron or Lucas have had any lasting effect on film.
'Beaks' called it 'meticulously rendered but strangely inert' in his precis of BNAT. I think thats my issue with Cameron films. While they are technically great (if not excellent in so many ways) they don't (to me) have any soul. TheTerminator in that regard is almost the ultimate epitome of Cameron, a ruthlessly efficient machine, excellent at doing what he does, but with no feeling. I haven't seen Avatar yet and I'm prepared to be wrong about the central 'love story' but even the positive reviews I've read so far have reinforced to me the stuff that I don't like about Cameron's work. Like I say I'm prepared to be wrong with this one, and I hope I am, but I worry that I'll still feel dosconnected from it all.
Where is Devin's review where he admits he is wrong and Avatar is a good time?
#38 – Bryan
Just because I'm a fan of sci-fi and action does not mean I'm obligated to see every film of said genres in the theatre. I owe nothing to the movie industry. $12 is a lot of money for some people, especially families.
#57 – SomeDude
The glasses are cheap plastic, one size fits all, and very uncomfortable. They are not the evolution of movie watching.
the problem with 3D is the glasses especially if you already wear glasses. It's very distracting watching a movie wearing two pair of glasses, they don't fit over each other very well and it causes headaches.
I planned to see the 2D version for the first viewing so I can enjoy the movie without the distraction of wearing two pair of glasses and if it's good enough I may give the 3D a chance.
Not only does Devin not admit he's wrong, but his review is closer to my experience seeing this film than the above review. Cool looking. Action packed. Moved fast. Over predictable. 2D characters. It was "Dances with Lion King" basically. 7 out of 10 because I wanted to like it.
This was a bad movie, and a waste of 300 million dollars. It was boring, had inconsistent pseudoscience, and it was ridiculously predictable.
Excellent review-I saw the movie last night and took my 2 daughters and did not expect much-being jaded. But the film immersed me totally, and although the theme has been extracted from well worn paths, this film has been masterfully constructed. The dialogue is childlike in places, and there are a few too many tribal shrieks- but aside from that this movie was amazing- I would describe it as exquisite in its beauty and totally immersive and what cinema needs to compete with computer games etc.
The review was spot on.
I wholeheartedly agree with the review. Besides Avatar, I can't think of a movie lately that actually gave the audience an experience. The fact that Devin remarked that the film looks like a cartoony Pixar movie says volumes about his credibility. The lighting was unbelievable.
You nailed it on the very deliberate pulpiness of the story. The Avatar detractors seem to be unanimously missing this important point. Once I entertained and embraced the perspective that Avatar was deliberatily tongue-in-cheek, and very skillfully recreating adventure motifs from a bygone era – cliches and all – the movie clicked and made sense.
Avatar is, in a way, sort of an antique. Geeky Baby boomers with money aren't going to be around much longer to make sprawling, ambitious homages to the stuff they grew up reading.
Also, I too noticed the apparent weightlessness of their movements at times. It became glaring during the initiation ceremony when he's dangling from the branch and effortlessly springs onto flat ground. But I seem to recall there being mention of lower gravity on Pandora. If you watch the film through that prism of thought, you'll notice consistently effortless Na'vi leaping. I don't think that's too much apology. And if it is, patching that tiny plot hole helped me enjoy the shit out of this movie.
If I had any major complaint, it was Horner's schmaltzy score. That and the fucking Papyrus font were the painful hammers to the head in Avatar.
Otherwise, a great time at the movies.
AVATAR is visually stunning…
but its really THE LAST SAMURAI & CAPTAIN PLANET put together ;p
Avatar was the best movie i have seen all year. It was long but very breath taking. Jake was the perfect person for the role. He was very talented and really drawed me into the movie. The movie flowed with excitement and knocked me out of my seat. but there is one thing you should of added!!! The history of the avatars and tells us more about them.
I really liked this movie. It reminded me of how much I wished Cameron had directed T3 and Salvation. I watched the 2D first. The comparison is like night and day. The 3D is just so much better. Everything is 3D in it. Not just the gimicky "OH they reached into the audience". Everything has a depth to it, and everything feels like you tell exactly how far away something is from any other object on screen. The part of this film that excites me the most is the filming process. They way they discribed it makes me believe that realistic virtual reality is possible in my lifetime. It's a good movie on the whole.
Avatar was shit. White man's guilt much?
Since when is "pretty" the only requirement for a good film?
Captain Planet!! LOL!!! He is blue too! Maybe Captain Planet is a flying navi
Fuck all the jaded haters. This jaded film goer shed some tears. Despite the familiar story, this movie was fucking brilliant.
you're a reviewer. there is no way to correctly review a movie. you get paid to just voice your opinion. you get paid to pick out things you don't like when other will love them, and then you get to argue. what a pathetic life you lead to have a job that has no true meaning. you review things that cannot be measured, at all. you are a fucking slacker. enjoy your sin.
Finally saw this movie. You're a fucking idiot. I've visited this site since pre-2000 and I'm certain that sometime during the last few years you've been absorbed by pod people. You no longer have any real taste or insight. Since you once did, you must be an alien now. OR, more likely, you're just sucking cock to get a Bridger movie made. Way to sell out, Fanook.
Wow I really can't believe all the hate for this movie. It's almost like people are haters just because it's the cool thing to do? This movie was made for us "geeks", yes you have a little geekiness if you come to this site, sorry. All of the sudden every sci-fi movie has to have absolutely incredible acting for you to enjoy it? Give me a break you fucking geeks enjoy it for what it is, a great escape for 2 1/2 hrs. Sorry you didn't enjoy it your loss… can't wait to get it on blu-ray.
I adore the people on here posting that Cameron's movies are "predictable." The man's passion lies in advancing technologies, not writing memento.
Predictable? The guys last two movies were about a real life boat that wrecked, and a movie about a robot sent from the future to stop the future (Which can't happen). You knew what was going to happen walking into those movies, so shut the hell up.
I am in total agreement with this review. The clock turned back 33 years for me and I found myself 7 years old again seeing Star Wars at the Park Place movie theater. It was magical.
James Cameron has become George Lucas, which I am sure a lot of you would love, since it seems most of you liked the prequels. Unfortunatley a story stolen from many movies before it and dialoge an 8 year old could write better doesn't get points because it has good visuals and sexy blue aliens. How retarded are people these days?? It seems very considering the number of fan boys still throwing love all over Cameron.
Don't get me wrong, I used to like Cameron, before he became so full of himself that he beleives he shits gold bricks. Like Lucas he has too many people around him telling him how great he is and not a single one pointing out the flaws. Maybe one day he will come out with another hit like the original Terminator, but not today.
The plot was predictable and had some typical lame Hollywood sappy moments (esp. the chic who painted her face and helicopter blue towards the end). But the graphics were beautiful. If you haven't seen the movie, I suggest you bring your iPod and enjoy the graphics. If you have seen Dances with Wolves or Pocahontas, you already know the story.
AVATAR is a movie masterpiece. AVATAR is a morality play which fairly depicts the U.S. military as conquering heathens, but not as inept, bungling soldiers. AVATAR taps into human archetypes and mythology and it tries to convey a much-needed message of humanity reconnecting with Nature. AVATAR'S computer-generated artistic beauty is amazing!
Visually, Avatar is an enthralling work of art, and the first half of the story is intriguing, but then it feels like someone else took over and just wrapped everything up in typical "Independence Day" machismo. I was sorely disappointed in the plot. Sad that this could have been a really profound story, but went the cut and paste route.
Not sure this was the movie I anticipated going in, but first reaction early on was how grateful I was for the new memory foam seats in the IMAX. While I wasn't totally balled up in despair despite having one of those running interior monologues going in my head about Xmas, my wife's underwear choices, wanting to blow up my bosses' house – I did wish I was watching The Devil Thumb's a Ride and Lawrence Tierney robbing and murdering the theater manager – the IMAX theater manager that is. Whatever was supposed to be submersive about this new 3D was actually keeping from connecting to a single character in any meaningful way, everything was going shades of hot pink and purple and swaying, spraying, flensing, lensing. I was cornered by Cameron's big head that bulged down from the now fully dissolved screen from every angle. When it was over, I aked my 11 year old what he liked best about the movie and he said the machine guns. I couldn't have said it better myself.
the problem with 3D is the glasses especially if you already wear glasses. It's very distracting watching a movie wearing two pair of glasses, they don't fit over each other very well and it causes headaches.
<a href="http://www.youaremysmile.com">สถานที่ท่à¸à¸‡à¹€à¸—ี่ยว</a>
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.