Sometimes it feels like film is a young man’s art. So many filmmakers lose the spark as they get older, unable to capture the energy and spirit of their younger works, stuck going through the motions and creating pantomime versions of movies. It’s hard to see your favorites getting old and coming to that place where they can no longer control the elements of cinema with effortless grace, and it’s easy to turn a blind eye and pretend that the latest work contains at least the echoes of the magic that made us fall in love with them in the first place.
Martin Scorsese is not one of those directors.
Scorsese’s latest film, an adaptation of Dennis Lehane’s thriller Shutter Island, is the work of a master. It’s not a great Scorsese work – the script hobbles him – but it’s the work of a master at his height. This is Scorsese flexing his muscles and cracking his knuckles and making a movie that’s intense and thrilling and engrossing and beautiful and dense and, in the end, sadly stupid. But it’s still 95% of a truly great film, and even that other 5% is made with rock steady sureness.
The stupidity that plagues Shutter Island comes at the end; I won’t spoil the ending for you, but it’s a concept that requires an awful huge amount of suspension of disbelief, but to Scorsese’s credit (and to the credit of screenwriter Laeta Kalogridis), Shutter Island doesn’t play the ending like a big mind-blowing twist. The movie all but tells you the ‘twist’ in the opening scenes, and Scorsese plays the ending out as a catharsis rather than as a gut punch. Which is smart, as that ending could never reasonably be a gut punch.
Laying out the pieces of the ending all throughout the film, Scorsese weaves a tapestry of psychological dread and horror. The film begins as a standard police procedural – two US Marshalls are called to Shutter Island, an inaccessible rock in the middle of Boston Harbor, which houses Ashcliffe, am asylum for the criminally insane. One of the patients/prisoners has escaped from the escape-proof island and Teddy Daniels (Leonardo DiCaprio) and his new partner Chuck Aule (Mark Ruffalo) find that things at Ashcliffe are strange and menacing and that the staff and patients seem to be harboring a big secret. But running along all of this is a level of disorienting surreality; nothing on Shutter Island feels quite right, and Teddy keeps flashing back to tragic events in his life – his presence as a soldier at the liberation of Dachau and the death of his wife in an arsonist’s blaze.
You’ve probably figured out the twist by now, just from that basic spoiler-free description and the trailer, but fuck it. I knew the twist walking in and it just deepened the film for me; Shutter Island’s deadly cliffs and Ashcliffe’s twisted corridors are the outward manifestations of Teddy’s own internal turmoil, and the film is a psychological, existential thriller that chills to the bone with its questions about living with guilt and horror. Scorsese never loses an opportunity to fill his frame with something that unsettles, and a sequence in Ashcliffe’s Civil War era building – reserved for the most violent offenders – is a scene not from a thriller but from a balls-out horror movie. Scorsese creates a thick atmosphere in those stone hallways and along rusty metal catwalks, conjuring up nightmare feelings. That’s the tone the film keeps coming back to – a strange, dreamlike feeling where something terrible always lies just around the corner.
DiCaprio feels tattered as Teddy Daniels. He’s got this unexplained cut on his forehead at the beginning of the movie, and that small detail tells you so much about the character. Teddy’s described more than once as a ‘man of violence’ (including one time by Ted Levine in a scene so surreal as to approach being psychedelic), and DiCaprio mostly pulls that off. He’s still the weedy guy who can’t quite seem to get a beard going, but he’s got something in his eyes that makes him believable – you don’t think that Teddy wins fights by being the strongest or the meanest but by being the guy who absorbs the most punishment, who keeps getting up every time he gets knocked down. And that’s what the character does in the film as the investigation becomes sidetracked into a possible government conspiracy, as a massive hurricane batters the island and as a crippling migraine begins to fray his faculties.
There are other actors around DiCaprio, but this is surely his show. They’re all good; Ben Kingsley is creepy in a way that’s hard to pinpoint at first as one of Ashcliffe’s administrators, while Max von Sydow is positively Satanic as another. Jackie Earle Haley appears briefly in a scene filled with dream logic impact where he acts with a scary ferocity. Emily Mortimer is skin-crawling as a woman with a serious delusion that covers up her horrible crime, while Michelle Williams has an ethereal oddness as a hallucinatory version of Teddy’s dead wife. Sadly Mark Ruffalo ends up feeling a little shortchanged, playing faithful sidekick to DiCaprio throughout the film, but even in a role that gives him little to do, Ruffalo is endlessly watchable.
If Scorsese and DiCaprio are integral parts in making the film overcome its source material, the third man here must be cinematographer Robert Richardson. Shutter Island is nothing short of beautiful, with moody lighting that deepens the sense of dread Scorsese is conjuring. There are some flat out wonderful shots in the film – not much in the way of showstoppers, but all simply great moments of cinema. The introduction to Ashcliffe, for instance, is a visually arresting and iconic moment, immediately establishing the asylum as a character in the story. Shutter Island was once scheduled to be released during Oscar season, and while I don’t think much else in the film cries out ‘awards bait,’ Richardson’s cinematography is simply statue worthy.
The more I think about Shutter Island the more I like it. A second viewing is demanded, as the film is filled with small clues and moments of understated symbolism that reveal themselves once the crux of the twist is fully explained. But even after a first viewing (albeit one forearmed with knowledge of the ending), Shutter Island is a dense film, and there’s a lot that Scorsese layers in that demands to be discussed; for instance the Dachau scenes take on a whole new meaning when viewed through the prism of the ending (and a couple of almost throwaway lines of dialogue). In fact, up until the ending, the film feels fairly flawless, making that reveal all the more irritating. Scorsese does what he can with the ending, but any reveal that demands one character pull out a chalk or dry erase board to spell things out is a bad reveal.
Again, knowing you’re in for a disappointment helps cushion the blow and allows you to really sink into the hypnagogic mood that Scorsese creates.
Shutter Island could have been a disposable thriller but Scorsese makes it his own by meditating on the concept of guilt and its cost. Thirty-six years after Mean Streets Scorsese is still finding deep psychological and emotional veins to mine in what could have been standard genre material. That’s why he’s a genius. And that’s why Shutter Island is great.
8.5 out of 10
44 comments
The shape of the island gives it away too. Based on a very famous piece of art. Glad this is finally coming out anyway.
Michelle Williams, surely? Otherwise, great review. Looking forward to this.
I'm all about checking this out.
Bless Marty's dear, old heart.
i thought it looked terrible, and as much as i love scorsese, but devin gives everything he does the highest marks. the departed was ok (althought it is a technical blunder), but aviator and gangs of new york felt cold and impersonal…worse, i think scorsese still wants dicaprio to be his deniro…and dicaprio is in NO was a deniro
One of my favorite books of the past decade. Can't wait.
The book is great and the ending is a mind bender given the way it was so detailed and written. Can't wait to see this and see how it's handled. Although, according to Aintitcool who screened this last week, it's not the finished article. Devin?
The Departed was a technical blunder? Really?
Yeah, which cut are you reviewing? I heard this was not finished.
Also, this book was written by Dennis Lehane, whose novels so far have brought us the movies Mystic River and Gone, Baby, Gone. Why that wasn't mentioned…
sounds like its set in Arkham asylum…viva score-zay-ze
Could you please not constantly talk about the twist ending. The rest of us have to wait to see this.
The trailer makes this look like Silent Hill 2. I really haven't loved a Scorsese film since the '80s, so not sure whether I'll bother with this one. Though I am intrigued to see how Marty handles a this sort of genre film.
Maybe you should mention in your review that this is based on a book, so they stayed true to the ending.
Jeez, the ending isn't the movie for chrisakes!!! Or the book for that matter. Getting there is most of the story, ain't it, Dev? I do wish folks would stop going on and on about the "twist" as if this was some cheap parlour trick and nothing else matters much. Methinks people have gotten just a wee bit jaded and see twists as tricks rather than just the finale. Just sit back and enjoy the flick. Don't try to be thinking 5 or 10 steps ahead of what you're watching. It's like you have to have some instant gratification or you get all upset. Like a spoiled child. Heck, I read Psycho before seeing the movie but I still loved the ending even if I knew what the heck was in the cards. I wish I was back in the days before movie geeks went out of their way to spoil everything. That's a bummer.
" It's not a great Scorsese work"
"And that's why Shutter Island is great."
Say what?
It looks absolutely fantastic to me. Martin Scorsese is my favorite director of all time,and he has not made a film that really is a thriller since CAPE FEAR. That is one of the reasons that I am really looking foward to seeing his new film. I definately think is the greatest mafia movie director in the world. I don't think anyone would really deny that. I mean CASINO is my absolute favorite movie of his, and it is my favorite movie of all time. To close out I just want to say that anything Martin Scorsese decides to direct I will go see. Because I never miss a Martin Scorsese picture.
I watched them film this a few years ago from my fishing spot in boston harbor. Looked pretty cool, but what do I know. The book is unreal, but so is anything that Dennis Lenane writes. I wasn't sure it would translate to the screen but Scorsese looks like he has a feel for the pacing and atmosphere of this one, combined with the nagging feeling of dread. Ultimately people probably won't like the ending, just like gone baby gone.
I knew I shouldnt have read too much on here-you have spoiled the movie for many of us
Okay first off sheila hah I disagree with you completely!! The ending is a major part of the movie. the movie can be totally awesome but then the ending bites and I feel cheated. And call me whatever you will but I like a happy ending I like horror and psychological thrillers and love stories all that but I love a good ending one that successfully ends the movie and hopefully resolves the issue its not real life I watch movies and read books to escape reality which sometimes very much sucks so I dont want a movie where they have to have a crappy ending because life usually has crappy endings… NO no NO no I pay the $13 to go and escape reality for an hour and a half. that being said I am a big girl and I already know what happens and Ill be sad but I still plan on going and seeing the movie. And if you dont want to know the ending then get off theses sites because this is what they are there for. Some of love plot spoilers… I read the end of a book before I ever even start it!
I'm responding to comment #1- I worked on the film (I designed and painted the matte painting master shot of the island that's in the trailer). My only inspiration for the look of the island was the script itself. Can you point me to the work of art you mentioned? Curious….
Devin, thanks for spoiling the movie you STUPID FUCKING MORON!!! Thank God for movie critics like Roger Ebert who take their jobs seriously unlike Devin the FUCKING TWAT!!!
I saw this movie last night, it was good but very weird. Made you wonder if he was crazy or not until you looked closer at his delusions
This movie was beautiful. Lush & surreal–just how i like 'em. The acting was incredible and I loved the touches of film noir.
however, the story fell flat. Open-soda-in-august-flat specifically because of the way the ending was treated. Not only do you need to be able suspend your belief more than usual, but it was complete let done b/c it was done as catharsis. I understand WHY it was done that way & why it was necessary, but it just drug everything down with it.
There was no suspense. There was no thrill–other than getting out of there.
If the ending of the movie stayed true to the book and you didn't like it, why are you giving Scorsese a hard time? Shouldn't you give the author of the book a hard time, because he wrote the plot?
Saw the movie at matinee price…and I want my money back. Nuff said.
Saw the flick last night and I guess I'd agree with you: an 8 would be appropriate. The musical score was a little overwhelming for me though. In the beginning, the orchestra builds up to the two marshals walking through the front gates of the facility and it felt out of place and distracting. I'd almost put this film up on the same shelf as 'Memento.'
There is only one word that can sum up that ending, which literally turns a terrific masterpiece into a piece of shit: GAY.
I think this movie is on the level with Kubrick's The Shining. This has nothing to do with the fact that both films contain music composed by Krzysztof Penderecki. It's just a matter of opinion based on the layered atmospheres and subtexts that are present in the film. This is one hell of a ride and not once did I feel cheated. Even Ben Kingsley was fantastic in this film and not once did I get the impression that he/his character was full of shit. Great film!
@UnknownUser who says that the last couple of marty movies were bad and that the departed was a technical blunder? I don't know how you can say stuff like that. I think Dicaprio is a very good actor, capable of playing parts which are very hard to play, did you see shutter island? Obviously not. Robert de Niro is my favourite actor, and Dicaprio is rising in my list, the guy could be and is capable of being Marty's new De niro, if he not already is.
later
I was less bothered by the twist than the multiple scenes near the end of characters spewing exposition for five-plus minutes. It felt lazy and frankly made me bored.
@ comment #27 – agreed with you totally about the music until I thought about it again. It makes sense that the music would be so bombastic when you consider the ending and, specifically, Teddy's state of mind. It matches the tone of the whole film when you look back and consider it as a whole piece and not 2 minutes of music at the outset.
WOW, okay first of all, I have to say to all the cry baby pussies leaving comments about the critic here ruining the ending…SMARTEN UP YOU IDIOTS. Don't google an explanation or review or a plot summary of a movie you haven't seen yet IF YOU DON'T WANT THE ENDING RUINED, OR THE MOVIE RUINED FOR THAT MATTER. It was a great movie through and through!
The ending ruins the movie,book or no book. There is no way the guy spends two years there and somehow doesn't recognize the doctors or other patients.
Having seen the movie, and now reading this review, there is no spoiler here so everyone should stop bitching. Even knowing the ending going in, at one point the movie convinces you that you are wrong. And that being said, its not a major twist anyway. As stated, it wasn't a gut punch – just an ending. So lighten up on Dev because if anything this review was too kind. The movie had some definite flaws and probably could have been 20 minutes shorter.
#34 – he wasn't there for 2 years… That was all part of trying to make him think he was crazy. The movie makes u take one side -then jump to another. Sorry all u ppl who googled movie review and don't want ending info and what not; then STOP READING HERE. This was my take… Remember when he wakes up in the bed and admits he's not Teddy? He tells them all exactly what they want to hear. He tells that he did kill his wife (bc she drowned the children). Well, at that point ur thinking "wow he really was a looney the whole time" then him and "Chuck" are on the stairs and he snaps back into being Teddy… Chuck (actually a dr who was put in place to work with Teddy – who, as a marshall is onto the place) signals that he's relapsed. Well, before he relapses (which he's doing on purpose bc he KNOWS he's stuck! And would just rather b killed ie. Labotomy) he says to "Chuck" "…is it better to die a monster or a good man?…" That statement is symbolic of the fact that he's purposefully taking on the role of the marshall, the "good man" (who didn't kill his wife) vs dying while being the "monster." He gets up from the steps to be labotomized bc he knows he's stuck there. He has given up. The movie was dark and twisted. A definite psyhological thriller. Some ppl just critique too hard. The movie was extremely entertaining – and that's the point, right?
Saw this this afternoon. The twist is rather straightforward as twists go, but it was tied into the character's sense of himself, so it wasn't like a cheat or sleight of hand. I liked it. You really feel that Teddy is at huge risk at the end – more so than a traditional "bad guy fight" type ending.
Simple story. What defines a good guy and what defines a bad guy? Is the line always easy to draw? As the song goes: "cruel to be kind" The partner/Kingsley (with his heart in right place?) wanting to "help" Andrew to know his true self (monster), or the older psych guy wanting to do the practical (yet seemingly cruel) thing of giving hin a "labotomy" (so he could forget). The older psych guy knew the struggles of a "man of violence" better than the partner/Kingsley. Symbolism: Andrew kicked the gun away from the Nazi and allowed him to be tortured instead of shooting him and putting him out of his misery. (he was being cruel to make the guy suffer). Likewise, the good psych guys were trying to do the right thing, yet being cruel by trying to get him to see who he was and be tortured by that every day for the rest of his life. The bad psych guy was actually aligned with Andrew's desires in the end and was actually being kind to Andrew in the end. Andrew faked being Teddy to get what he wanted (complete erasure of his monster side through a labotomy) so he could die a good man. The bad psych guys helped to put him out of his misery by giving him a labotomy whereas the alleged good guys wanted him to face reality only to be tortured for the rest of his life. So, in the end who were the good (psych)guys and who were the bad (psych)guys?
are u serious? that the facility went thru an elaborate, and expensive ruse! including boat rides and the whole staff of guards in on it, to try to make one man better (sane). did u notice the extent, the similarity of uniforming (ss officers) the total expense they would have gone thru and the possibility of danger to otherwise just unknowing employees and doctors just to make one nazi-hunter pay. he was set up for his interest in investigating. they research him and brought him there after he requested the job, so they could make sure he never left. His mental condition was somewhat damaged before he took the job. They just turn it into a nightmare script to keep their experiments alive. He unwittingly became a subject. the shift happen when he and his partner were made to wear white. His partner was lying from the first moment and was a bishop in the kingsley game!
i predicted the entire movie the first 2 minutes of the opening scene. very unoriginal.
This <strong><a href="http://www.jerseysol.com"> nfl jerseys</a></strong> is a very special one and it comes in a commemorative box, permiting you to keep a piece of German history in your own house . Personally, I would love to have it in my boxroom!
Guys… Did everyone miss the symbolism of the little bandage on his forehead? That little detail tells you all you need to know about the story and what is reality and what is part of his psychosis. Watch the memory sequences carefully and compare them to his psychotic episodes. The entire story will become very clear. I think that Scorsese is a genius for adding this one visual detail that obviously could not be easily written into the book story.
Clue: It wasn't there in all the scenes, and it had nothing to do with him undergoing a lobotomy.
i love thix movie another one of leox hit……a complete blend ov thrll drama nd coolnex…….thx encouragd me to watch tll the end…………..:P
What a shame you knew the 'twist' going in. Because without that (very necessary) frame of reference guiding the experience, you couldn't possibly then understand what a masterwork this film is on every level. Of course you feel disappointed by the ending. You've been robbed of the shock and subtlety of experiencing it one way the first time, and another the next. No wonder you're bitter, lol
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.