Mystery. Remember it? If you’re a hardcore movie lover you may not be as familiar with it as you once were. The studio marketing departments put out tons of clips, images, synopses, trailers, commercials and other ephemera that make it tough for the hardcore to maintain that element of surprise when they walk into a movie theater. Of course it’s our own fault – nobody is making us watch the nine new clips or scroll the 200 pictures in the new online gallery*, but the studios are really enabling us.
Enter Inception, the new Christopher Nolan movie. What’s it about? There have been two trailers so far, and almost nobody knows. What’s well known is that it stars Ellen Page and Leonardo DiCaprio and that it features truly hallucinatory imagery, like the streets of Paris folding up onto themselves. But the story and the characters remain shrouded in mystery. And a lot of people are loving that; in my daily jaunts around the web I’m seeing lots of folks saying that they love not knowing what the film is actually about, that they love being completely in the dark.
But how long will that last? We’re a ways out from the release of Inception. The film hits in the middle of July, and that means the stuff we’re seeing now is the epitome of teasers – posters featuring just provocative images, trailers with cool visuals and little else. The marketing materials released now are about appetite whetting. In other words, they haven’t begun selling it to us yet.
That’s when the trouble sets in. To sell a movie like Inception – with a rumored price tag of 200 million dollars – Warner Bros will have to lift that veil of mystery somewhat. Sure, they’re aided by the fact that it’s the new movie from the guy who directed The Dark Knight, and that along with the stars will go a long way towards selling the film, but there’s going to have to be a point where they tell the audience what they’re in for.
Robert Zemeckis gets a lot of shit – rightly, mind you – for the way he approaches marketing. What Lies Beneath is surely the extreme end of marketing, since the trailer gave away the entire film. And the movie still managed to make money. But has there ever been a film that went the opposite direction and completely hid its plot while also becoming a success? Some smaller films have done admirable jobs of this – World’s Greatest Dad from this year comes to mind – but they’re operating at a level where the marketing isn’t quite so mass. For big films it seems incredibly rare (at least in the modern internet age) to market a film while also keeping the public completely and totally in the dark as to what it’s actually about.
Yes, there are films that hide their twists or don’t give away anything beyond the first act, but even those marketing campaigns set up the basic plot and conflict in some fashion. So far
Inception has not done that. Going by the trailers and the posters you will have no clue what the film is even remotely about, who the characters are, what they’re up against – nothing (although you can begin taking guesses with the latest teaser, where DiCaprio tells Page to only imagine places she has never been; this, coupled with the ‘Your Mind Is the Scene of the Crime’ tagline fills in some blanks for you). And for many this is ideal – you know it looks cool, you know it’s from Christopher Nolan, you know it features Leo, and you know when it comes out. That’s enough!
But it’s not really going to end up being enough. The general audience wants to know what they’re in for, and to a certain extent the studio wants them to know as well. People walk out of movies upset when they see something they weren’t expecting. Now, I’m not saying audiences shouldn’t be surprised – obviously everybody wants thrills and surprises in their films – but they don’t want to walk into what they think is a romantic comedy and find that it morphs into a serial killer film in the second act. Yeah, I’d be pretty psyched about that – and that is part of the allure of Miike’s
Audition – but for the mass audience this is a no-no. So the studio has to figure out a way to give the folks a decent idea of what kind of movie they’re seeing while not giving everything away.
Inception, it turns out, will probably fare better than something like Univeral’s Repo Men, whose red band trailer felt like a beat-for-beat summation of the film**. First of all, it’s from Chris Nolan, who hates having his movie ruined in advance. And coming off The Dark Knight he has a little bit of sway over the marketing; while he may not have final say on the campaign in total (the movie is simply too pricey for him to have complete control over this stuff. This is why the studio has professionals who do this for a living), he has a whole lot of weight to throw around. And he’s dealing with a studio that’s not just artist friendly, but may have created the last campaign for a movie that truly left the plot a mystery – The Matrix. Rewatching the trailer for that film I was surprised by how many shots telegraph the true nature and meaning of The Matrix, but this stuff is only obvious on this side of the divide. At the time I walked out into The Matrix not entirely sure what the heck the movie was about, and walked out with my mind completely blown.
The Matrix had a huge advantage over Inception: everybody was still on dial-up. Back then the internet wasn’t clogged with thirty minutes of clips from the film. Movies didn’t have an endless series of posters and photos released – I believe you could create a flipbook of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince using just the publicity stills and myriad posters and banners Warner Bros put out before the movie opened. Back when The Matrix hit movie marketing was still about TV and newspapers. Mystery was much more possible.
I think it’s likely that the campaign for Inception will maintain the aura of mystery; after all, that seems to be part of the point of the movie, a surreal feeling of dislocation. But I also think that the aura of mystery is going to start getting lifted in the coming months. We may see one more mysterious teaser, but by the time the summer movie season starts we’ll be getting glimpses of the plot, and once TV commercials hit I bet informed, smart and savvy viewers – ie, the kind of people who tend to read a site like CHUD – will be able to really piece things together.
So if you like knowing exactly what you know about Inception right now, stop looking at trailers. Turn the channel when the ads start. Don’t click on links that have interviews with the stars, offer clips, or boast new photos. You’re at the last moments of true, complete mystery for Inception. The question is: can you do it?
* and by the way, this is why I rarely cover this stuff on CHUD. These clips and images often feel like nothing short of overkill.
** let it be known that they could be fucking with us. This wouldn’t be the first time a trailer makes you think you’ve seen it all and then you realize you’ve just seen the first 45 minutes. That said, remember what I said about audiences – they want to know what to expect. If Repo Men turns into a slapstick comedy at the 45 minute mark and none of that is in the trailer, people will be pissed and will walk out badmouthing the film.
42 comments
I don't 100% agree with your comment that when people don't get what they expect they get "pissed." Now, that's definitely the case sometimes, but there's plenty of examples that contradict that. Prime example: Inglorious Basterds. The ads all sold Pitt and the "ACTION," but that wasn't like the final product at all. And yet general audiences still embraced it. If it's an actual "good" movie then you may be able to avoid that pitfall of not equaling expectations. And Inception could easily do the same- which most likely will at least be a good movie.
One thing about Inglourious Basterds was even regular film goers know if you watch a Tarentino film there is going to be tons of talking in it. Plus, even the talking scenes were so full of tension that you as a viewer feel that you just experienced a big action scene at the end, you are so exhausted from it.
Which is the one thing that could help Nolan. The Dark Knight is the closest any of his movies have been to having a normal, coherent plot. Even Batman Begins played with time a bit. And his other movies are the kind that do play with the audience. Granted, The Prestige had nowhere near the budget of Inception, and it just broke even, but I could see Inception having a similar marketing campaign, where they give away enough of the film, but leave all the great stuff out of the marketing. If everything was fair, I could walk into it like The Matrix, which somehow I had missed and caught when it appeared on HBO, which made it great. I had a similar experience with Memento, catching it when it premiered on Cinemax.
The red-band Legion trailer is 5 minutes and 12 seconds long.
Amen. I really do think that teaser trailers should be the only trailers. They should be like a song without lyrics; setting the mood without spelling the whole thing out for you.
I remember watching "what lies beneath" on VHS (those were the days!) not knowing anything about it and was pleasantly surprised by the twist. Then I watched the trailer by chance a few years later- and if I had seen the trailer before the movie, it would have pretty much destroyed the movie for me. Speaking of spoilers, Devin your review of Sherlock Holmes spoils the entire fucking movie. Good thing I didn't bother reading it until after, because your opinion means so little to me. Read some of Eberts reviews to get a drift on how to a real film critic reviews films without spoiling them completely for his audience, you filthy blogger.
Haneke's 'Funny Games' is another notorious example of a flick that pissed a lot of people off … I caught it on cable a while back and was like, "wtf?" but in a good way.
Chris Nolan's first feature film, "Following," can be watched instantly on netflix!
What do you think about the reverse situation Devin? When you went to see Executive Decision to see a Steven Seagal billed movie and instead he died in the first act (spoiler) and you had a Kurt Russel movie. Not reverse for you I'm sure being a huge closet Seagal fan, but most of the mass audience prolly came in their pants. Mebbe you could even call it a chick flick – surely girlfriends unhappily dragged to a Seagal movie (okay, talkin' single figures here) would find their 0/10 night gain 2 or even 3 points. Minimum.
I think the latest trailer spells out pretty clearly what the film is about. DiCaprio literally says it: He's going to steal an idea. So, obviously it takes place in somebody's mind, like the trailer also says. We don't get every plot point, but to say that people will have no clue what the film is about after seeing the trailer is stretching things a bit…
I'd say the script review spoilt the film pretty solidly.
I can see why they are hiding the plot. It's not very interesting.
This is a film that has to be sold on imagery.
Much like Avatar, it's going to be more a cinematic experience than a good story.
I do find the massive influx of marketing on every film irritating. I just don't get the point of practically seeing a movie BEFORE seeing the actual movie.
I guess some people can't handle not trying before buying.
It especially ruins comedies.
I think I can do it but with general audiences, there's always some loser in the office who's whole sense of social standing is wrapped up in his ability to disseminate movie gossip. THAT guy will happily gather up all the spoilers he can find and tell all and sundry just so he feels like a big shot.
The general rule is that if the director's last film was a hit, he has some say in how the trailer is cut. If it wasn't, the marketing department does it for him. After TDK, I'd say Nolan has some pull in this area.
I kinda think I figured one or two things out when I caught the Inception teaser in front of Sherlock Holmes. But I could be wrong. And I dig that. The last movie I remember pulling a bait-and-switch like that was Unbreakable. Not surprising since Shyamalan was coming off The Sixth Sense.
I just LOVVVVVEEE the trailer for Precious. It suggests the movie is a fun little family flick, showing the chubbo going to the oscars and all that. HAHAHA! But she has a little mongo baby from pops!
The Lovely Bones trailer spoils the whole movie in a good way – it saves you your money and 2 hours of your life you would waste on this baffling piece of nothing. So when it comes to bad movies, spoil away!
To #5 While all critics could learn a thing or two by reading Ebert, do not laud him for something he is as guilty of as Devin. I made it all the way to opening day for Zombieland not knowing the cameo (something Devin went out of his way to warn us to avoid, to his credit) and Ebert states it plainly in his review. It would be nice to see a marketing department actually use the mystery of the movie plot as the device to create buzz. Cloverfield succeeded (to a point) doing this. I see no reason that couldn't work well here.
God job #17; you missed the point by a mile.
I think we already know too much.
I rarely watch trailers all the way through … just long enough to get a sense of the movie. Even for movies with no real story. Big stunts and effects are better seen fresh, anyway.
this was an article about how teasers are better than trailers.. Inception will soon have trailers out instead of teasers.. like every movie..
@16: "I made it all the way to opening day for Zombieland not knowing the cameo (something Devin went out of his way to warn us to avoid, to his credit" You do know that Devin, in his mighty wisdom, posted a spoiler story about that cameo months before the movie even had a trailer released, and then admitted to doing so later on. Don't compliment the fun-killing prick for being such.
About Devin not spoiling the "Zombieland" cameo, it was the world's worst-kept secret anyway. A trip to the "Zombieland" IMDB page, even before Devin's review, revealed that someone would be playing "Himself" in the film. IMDB is a pretty commonly used site, not just for film news geeks, so it wasn't like a super top secret thing that only very few knew of. Also, whether the marketing of a film seems good to us or not, it really doesn't mean a thing. There was a certain most expensive film ever that was released recently that everyone agreed was marketed like shit, yet it's gone on to be the big hit that no one thought it would be. Personally, I don't mind trailers SHOWING too much, just as long as I don't know WHAT it's showing. Confuse the hell out of me and I'll be even happier when the movie itself isn't exactly what I thought it would be. Confusing can be interesting, and I like pleasant surprises, but to each their own. It's better than a trailer that tells the story of the film from beginning to end over the course of 2 and a half minutes, leaving maybe a question or 2 that will be answered in the final scene. "Did he end up shooting him? No? Okay, that's all I wanted to know…".
I've actually been able to tone down my exposure to promotional material ever since the passing of Revenge of the Sith, using it as sort of the apex of my spoiler whoring.
I think #17 has said all there is to say. The logline for Inception has been out there for a while now. You should probably check it out if you haven't already, Devin. You probably could have saved yourself from writing an article.
The shitty thing with these sorts of ad campaigns is that you always end up in the situation where you end up in a theater showing the trailer, or walk into a room with the TV spot already on, etc. etc. etc. There's only so much you can do before bad luck sets in.
Today's filmmakers and studio marketing hacks could really benefit from watching the trailers for Kubrick's films or early Ridley Scott. Look at the original teaser for "Alien", that unsettling image of the egg and the tagline. They didn't even need to show a frame from the film to disturb people and make them say "I've gotta see what this is". I'm geniunely intrigued about "Inception" from the two teasers that have been released. As a film geek, there's not much worse than plunking down $9.50 on a movie only to find out that all the money shots and plot developments were in the trailer.
Put simply: if you want to enjoy movies, don't watch the trailer! I stopped watching (most) trailers of films I got excited by about 10 years ago, and it's made moviegoing so much more enjoyable. I bet everyone who sits down to Inception will be thinking: 'I wonder when that amazing shot of (SPOILER!) the folding streets is going to come up?' The worst offender of this was Star Wars Ep 1: I literally watched the movie ticking off in my mind all the images I had soaked in from seeing those trailers again, and again, and again.
spoilers? my theory is it's story is in a similar vein to this deep space 9 episode
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extreme_Measures_(DS9_episode)
I think, as Devin suggested, that audiences get pissed when a film pulls a genre switcharoo on them – like The Break Up, which was sold as a romantic comedy and ended up being almost all drama. I think if Inception's marketing can capture an honest tone/genre for the film – the ominous music and sci-fi trappings seem pretty fucking cool – but keep the overall plot a secret, then they're onto a winner. The Matrix was one of the last times that a movie took me completely by surprise – I'd love to get that again. So, I'll try to avoid Inception spoilage… I hope I'm strong enough to resist. I am, after all, only a man.
I agree with #26.
Psycho also had a great classic trailer.
There have always been bad and good trailers though.
Best to avoid the crappy ones I suppose.
I have learned in the past to take a second before watching the trailer/reading a review/browsing through a new story on a specific movie and ask myself: "Am I interested in seeing it?" If the answer is "Yes", then I can safely avoid all the trailers and whatnot, because the main purpose of them is to MAKE YOU WANT TO SEE THE MOVIE. I stayed away from a lot of the preamble to "Avatar" and thoroughly enjoyed it…. and Devin, I did exactly what you are suggesting when "Revenge Of The Sith" came out. After spoiling Episdoes I & II for myself ahead of time (not knowing when to quit reading, natch), I stayed away from ANY and ALL promotional materials for III: I even walked out of an "Incredibles" screening with my hands over my ears to avoid the trailer. I figured it would be my last time to see a "Star Wars" movie completely clean. And it paid off. We should do that for more movies, I agree!
This article contains BS that stinks with a couple of distinct aromas:
1. When did Devin get such a hard-on for Nolan? I was underwhelmed by Dark Knight and see him as a stylish formalist, not much more.
2. Spreading gossip and spoiling plot-points are the bread-and-butter of film sites like CHUD. Is Dev actually encouraging readers to NOT click on links to future articles re. INCEPTION? Until he's seen and the reviewed the film, of course (which will likely include inviso-text spoilers).
3. The notion of knowing the plot in advance spoiling one's initial viewing of a film is an ongoing argument. But good movies will survive that "spoiler" in repeat viewings (like Nolan's own "Memento", and Shamalangadingdong's "Sixth Sense").
But there is a difference between knowing a film's basic plot and a "twist ending".
4. The trailer itself does nothing for me. The music is awful and overbearing. Leo has always been a non-entity on screen. Ellen Page speaks no lines of excrutiating hipster dialogue. CGI-effects in an urban setting are a dime-a-dozen nowadays. Color me unimpressed.
So tell me, if you don't know what the movie is about, why should I care about it?
Actually, Latino Review posted a review of the script a couple of months ago…for what its worth…
I don't see how they could spoil Inception any worse than they've already spoiled Shutter Island, they give away the twist at the end in the trailer
Yeah, the plot for Inception has been out for a while now. It's very easy to find. I usually enjoy reading Devin's articles and reviews, but this one is laughable. Trailers either make you want to see a movie or not want to see a movie. If people want to know as little about Inception as they possibly can, they'll stay away from all the promotional shit until it comes out. There simply is no aura of mystery because the plot's been "leaked" long ago. What are you talking about, Devin? Didn't you know this?
Well, correct me if I'm wrong, but I remember someone in the trailer yelling "Wake me up!". I believe it was ellen pages' character. My guess is it involves hypnosis or dreams in some way.
I remember the posters for the Matrix. When I saw Keeanu Reeves I thought "They're making a Johnny Mnemonic sequel? wtf cool…" The trailer for Inception just made me laugh. That fucking thudding noise was just silly after a while.
I think the marketing for The Prestige worked pretty great. I only remember one full trailer and the twisty elements were not revealed at all.
Devin Faraci pontificating and judging about studio marketing spoiling films, hell, anyone spoiling films, as if he has any room to talk. That's like a whore telling you that sucking cock is bad once she's turned the cash over to her pimp. What a joke.
#38, what's with the cynical comment? are you by any chance working in marketing department?
To # 10s comment.
"This is a film that has to be sold on imagery. Much like Avatar, it's going to be more a cinematic experience than a good story"
This is a CHRIS NOLAN movie. The story will be the #1 best thing about it, like all of his movies and many other movies in general. Look at CHRIS NOLAN's other films. This will market as another blockbuster crap piece, yes. But that's exciting, because everyone who knows anything bout Mr. Nolan knows that audiences will be blown away and surprised that the story will be the true carrier of it's greatness after seeing it.
#10 – Tourist
Are you mentally deficient? This is a NOLAN movie! The story is going to be the 100% focus of the film, visuals are only a bonus.
#32 – Finnias Jones
Go blow your dad.
#36 – Josh
I'd like to see how many teasers/trailers you've scored. Oh wait, you haven't.
I like what #40 said. haha, i want to see it for the story . I quite frankly enjoy his movies. tehee.
What i don't like is the fact that It's only marketed online. I wish with the budget they have they would .. I have an idea. Seeming how many Eclipse and Airbender people want to go see those films, What if the trailer was realease with these films? it will prompt more and more people to watch this film right ? && not only that, but they should go and do interviews or more like something to market. Launch some kind of creative thing like to stores at hot topic.
I remember when the Dark knight was being marketed haha. I don't think it was that much. But the billboards defenetly need to be shown of the movie. He needs to get all the money he earns. && he has my money . I have been waiting for a year now to go watch this film hehe. When i saw the trailer 8 months ago that's when I decided. ' I am going to watch this!'
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.