| Film | Weekend | Per | Total | |
| 1 | Avatar | $68,300,000 (-9.7%) | $19,734 | $352,111,000 |
| 2 | Sherlock Holmes | $38,385,000 (-38.5%) | $10,586 | $140,675,000 |
| 3 | Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel | $36,600,000 (-25.1%) | $9,768 | $157,345,000 |
| 4 | It’s Complicated | $18,700,000 (-15.4%) | $6,455 | $59,105,000 |
| 5 | The Blind Side | $12,650,000 (+10.3%) | $4,323 | $209,052,000 |
| 6 | Up in the Air | $11,350,000 (+0.7%) | $5,989 | $45,020,000 |
| 7 | The Princess and the Frog | $10,013,000 (+11.2%) | $3,009 | $86,085,000 |
| 8 | Did You Hear About the Morgans? | $5,200,000 (+4.0%) | $1,913 | $25,620,000 |
| 9 | Nine | $4,250,000 (-22.1%) | $3,010 | $14,047,000 |
| 10 | Invictus | $4,130,000 (+2.1%) | $1,903 | $30,755,000 |
This just in: Moon boots. They are stylish, comfortable and out of this world.
Before I write more about this Avatar picture, let’s focus on some other shit, shall we? I said a while back that I thought The Blind Side would make it to $200 Million – I believe at the amazing second weekend – and here were are looking at the film crossing that line. I also see EW put Bullock on the cover of their Oscar issue, so she’s definitely in play. This film is nothing but a huge win for everyone involved. So there’s that. And like Avatar it crossed an important marker this weekend.
Then there’s Sherlock and The Squeakquel. Playing in the undercurrents of Avatar, which is a huge fucking deal and the first film since The Dark Knight likely to clear half a billion domestic (if not more)… well, more on that later. Anyway, Sherlock did more clean-up business this weekend, and so did Alvin and his fellow chipmunks. Alvin is pretty much a lock for a trilogy at this point, though I don’t know where Sherlock is with sequels. The film isn’t a lock for the $200 mark, but it’ll probably settle in that range if the drops aren’t nightmarish. Iron Man was more of a domestic winner, I have no idea how well Holmes will do internationally as Robert Downey Jr. and Jude Law have never been big box office draws. Perhaps the character is, though. Downey Jr. was coming off of Iron Man at the point of casting, but neither he nor Law strike as big paydayers (RDJ may have gotten more back-end), and though it’s strange to think of a film that costs $100 Million dollars having a low budget, if this cost less than that or around that then there you go, sequel no problem. If this is one of those $200 Million productions, then maybe everyone’s happy to just walk away without any or too much egg on their face.
The Squeakquel is 88 minutes long, and I was told Jason Lee pulls an Anthony Edwards/Nerds 2 wrap-around function. IMDb has him third billed, so that’s probably about right. It stars (or “stars”) the dude from Chuck and David Cross. The first one did over $200 million, and this will get there too, though with the holidays ending and kids returning to school, the wind in the sails should be out. But seeing as how it’s over $150, it’s probably not going to be too hard to get there. Basically, they have until 1/22’s The Tooth Fairy.
Nominations are the next big thing for movies, though January is not without some cinema to keep you company (genre flicks know they can turn a profit in the first months), though there’s also the films that have been sitting in cans, and the hardsells. But with the hundred-million-plus successes last year of Paul Blart, Gran Torino and Taken without any academy support (generally the pictures doing well are the year end holdovers, though expansion runs are now truncated, partly because if the per screen isn’t great in NY/LA, then you’ve got problems.), January and February have shown themselves to be fertile ground for anything. Up in the Air should be able to climb up the charts some next week if The Blind Side and Alvin slow down a good deal, but it’s going to need some Oscar-type energy to hold on longer. The budget was listed around $25 million, and that means the film should be profitable and all that, but it feels like Avatar is the conversation, and if Up in the Air didn’t have that to contend with, you might have something there. Still, the film didn’t drop this holiday weekend, so it’s possible the film could limp its way to $100 with the nominations and such. And though Slumdog was a $100 Million dollar best picture winner, it was also an audience film. Up hasn’t shown that yet, and though it might get a win from the Golden Globes in two weeks, it’s a month out from the Oscar nominations (2/2/10), and then the actual ceremony is a month later. Up in the Air might only be off 10-20% next weekend, and the awards may keep it in the conversation, but this bathwater doesn’t seem to be above room temperature, and it’s already near 2000 screens, so it can’t expand much further. It’s got this: it’s no The Lovely Bones, which is not only not a contender, but unlike King Kong has no freaking chance of in any way turning a profit. There’s no way the film will do the listed $100 Million dollar budget domestically, and unless international flips for it, this is a pile of red ink. But I’ll wait until that goes wide to piss on it some more. Holy terrible, Batman. Same problem with Invictus, which will surely get in the ten best picture nominees, but after that, it’s doubtful it will register at all as anything more then “we still love you, Clint.” I’ll be interested to see if The Lovely Bones makes the ten. My guess is that it’s out of the conversation.
The Weinstein’s have let Nine go, so it should be out of the top ten next weekend, and not spoken about much after that. Even with limited award support, the film was panned and did not find an audience. Director Rob Marshall is still attached to the next Pirates movie, but it’ll be interesting to see if this scuttles that (probably not). Ultimately there is a very limited pool of talents that can and will do something like that. No one would hire Shane Carruth or the Duplass brothers to do Pirates 4, and the other side of that is they know doing that might cost them both their career and their integrity. Whether you like them or not, Hollywood will always have a need for directors like Brett Ratner or Shawn Levy. The problem is when they get delusions of grandeur. Marshall seems to be in a position of humility, though Memoirs of a Giesha was not a total disaster. Regardless, Pirates 4 seems tenuous, and this could be the straw that slows it down. Regardless, there will be more Pirates.
The Princess and the Frog should be ale to limp to $100 at this point, but it’ll be slow and not necessarily that honest, but even if it’s off 50% next weekend, it should be able to just get there. But like Chicken Little (which was more successful) I don’t think it speaks well to the traditions of the company. Then again, Disney ruined their brand label in the 90’s and buried it in the 00’s. It’s Complicated is playing okay, and has a shot of crossing the hundred million dollar mark, but the film also strikes as the sort of thing that makes DVD bargain bins so obnoxious to go through.
As per Avatar, the film is over $350 domestically and over One Billion worldwide. All after 17 days of release. Unadjusted for inflation that puts it at #15 domestically and #4 worldwide. By next weekend it will either the third or second worldwide, and somewhere in the top ten of domestic (it’s hard to say if the film will cross the $400 mark next weekend, though I wouldn’t bet against, it all depends on the weekdays). Unadjusted this will definitely beat Star Wars’s $460 Million dollar gross, so it will end up in the top three domestic grossers of all time. David Poland doesn’t think this can do The Dark Knight numbers domestically ($533 Million, the #2) and said that Titanic‘s magic $600 Million is all but out of reach. All I know is that the film has had three weekends in a row of business that was essentially a flatline (it opened to $77 Million, then did $75 the next). So it dropped 2% and this weekend it dropped closer to 10% as of this moment. When the numbers get adjusted for actuals, no one would be surprised with an uptick. Then again, the last two weekends were holiday weekends, so people likely wanted to get the fuck out of their house and not be around their families, etc. Avatar has won, it’s crossed a billion, and even if no one will say the film cost a half-billion, regardless, the film has done what it needed to do to show that it was a smart move all around. What will be interesting next weekend is how it holds. The film has obviously won the year, the only thing left is for it to do is take a shot at passing Titanic. That’s $250 Million away domestically, and $800 Million away worldwide. The film is a lock for five or more Oscar nominations (picture and technicals), so it could conceivably get an Oscar bump in a month, and a second bump if it wins best Picture. This is where we might see some chicken. If the tea leaves and business is favoring Avatar, we might see Disney move Alice in Wonderland. To where, I have no idea, and I don’t think it’s possible. But we may also see Disney and Fox throw money at theaters to make more screens 3-D capable. That though is two months away. Theoretically, Avatar should drop at least 30-50% next weekend. What if it doesn’t?





27 comments
I'm really hoping Avatar continues to do well. There's a little piece of me that would love to see it bump TDK down and see what all the fanboys will say. But that's just me.
As always, I'm a big fan of the Wrap-Up! All the talk of possible award nominations and wins has me wondering, is there any chance we can get you to address the topic of movies being "too old" for awards contention sometime? I've always thought that that's been one of the biggest cop-outs over the years for why certain films aren't considered when awards season rolls around. For every "English Patient" that swoops in in the final weeks of the year, cleans house at the Oscars, and then is never really talked about again, you've got films like "Silence of the Lambs", "Braveheart", "Forrest Gump", "Gladiator", and "Unforgiven" that all came out the previous summer or spring or even (in "Lambs" case) a full year before the awards are handed out, and are talked about and still find new fans years later. Also, not that it would ever happen, but how do you think studios would treat their releases if the Oscars were actually held AT the end of the year and not 2 months into the next?
Interesting analysis as usual. The bigger picture is how Avatar is going to affect the digital picture and home theater industry, with DVD sales being far below expectations for not providing the same experience. Pixar is already claiming they will take 3D "to the next level" with Toy Story 3, knowing full well that they are releasing a film based on obsolete technology and Avatar has set the bar very very high. Will other pictures be forced to re-tool or re-shoot with Cameron's new 3d technology providing him with the intended back end profitability a la Lucas and Jackson? Or will we see a gap of 2-3 years while new pictures choose to go Avatar after the greenlight?
This is the article that keeps me checking this site throughout the weekend, since all other news slows to a crawl. Keep up the good work.
Question… what was the last movie that only had a single digit drop after two weeks released?
Avatar just passed 1 billion in 17 days.
Where is Devin now? Is he readying another article how everyone is a stupid moron and only he knows the true quality of films?
He, amongst many others predicted the movie to "flop lolz" and yet Cameron showed why the man is the King of the box office.
I mean Devin needs to spin this around in a way to make himself look good right, so he might aswell go for it.
ERB- http://www.boxofficemojo.com/alltime/weekends/smallestdrops.htm?page=SMALLDROP20&p=.htm
unknown user = Yes, Devin sucks, but box office has nothing to do with quality.
I've seen Avatar 4 times now and might just keep on going every week until it breaks the world record or I get sick of it, whichever comes first. My best on are it beating the record first though!
White Ribbon review next, yes?
Just out of curiousity, but what does Devin not liking the movie as much as some of you have to do with him predicting it was going to be a "Flop"?? I think ALOT of people thought this was gonna be a FLOP including myself cause it just seemed like such an odd looking movie with very unappealing looking characters and it's still true.. The only reason this movie is selling the way it is is because of "Ticket Inflation" and how much $$$ it cost to see this in 3-D IMAX the way it's supposedly supposed to be seen.. If it does beat TITANIC,it's not because of the Quality but because of higher ticket prices and the concept of 3-D Peaking..
Avatar is nothing without the 3D aspect.. first. $15.25 a ticket instead of the usual 9ish bucks (lookin at about 200mill domestic instead of 350).. second. too much important stuff was removed from the plot for me to care about any of these fools (why does a dying planet need a luxury metal, if this is our first contact with life, why are we treating the planet like a piece of shit.. i guess these kinds of things aren't important to the general public)..
My brother in law has two daughters, age 13 and 14. They just came back from "Avatar" (non 3D) and they both thought it was "The best movie ever." And if memory serves, "Titanic" was powered to its historic gross by such an audience.
Just like Titanic, everyone talked shit before it came out (Most exspensive movie ever made etc) and just like Titanic the movie has gone to be a huge succses, regardless of the naysayers
PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN:
DEAD MAN'S CHEST a billion dollars ,
Transformers 2 and Ice Age 3 made 800 + million dollars. They must be great movies too….. RIGHT? If Transformers 2 and POTC 2 were in 3D they would made 2 billion dollars. Story characters and dialogue matter. Nobody cares anymore Avatar is just like Transformers 2 ……a movie for ADHD simple minded mouthbreathers, explosions and pretty colors will beat story character and dialogue everytime.
As has been pointed out elsewhere, people need a motivation to fork over $15 dollars to see a movie. I would *never* have given that sort of money to watch "Pirates of the Caribbean" or "Transformers"… however, with Avatar, I thought the movie looked like it was worth the ticket price, so I bought it.
…And judging by the almost non-existent drop-off in audience, I'd say that others are thinking the same thing. Which couldn't be said for "Transformers 2" or "Pirates 3" both of which had *much* steeper drop-offs. In other words, even though the tickets were higher, if it were a bad movie then fewer people would be willing to pay that price, and the box office gross would balance out just like any other film.
It's meaningful, not meaningless, that people are willing to pay top dollar to see this picture.
To be fair, as severely problematic as Avatar's script may be, it's definitely nowhere near as bad as Ice Age or Transformers or the Pirate sequels. It's practically Casablanca compared to the likes of them.
I hope Avatar does the exact same take as TDK, so the psycho fanboys from each camp can start attacking each other and the rest of us can get a freakin' break from their shit.
I finally caught Avatar this weekend. I compare it to a beautiful woman who's got nothing new to say but says it in a beautiful manner. You can't take your eyes off the screen, but your ears are going "AHH!!! AHHH!!!!" It would have been nice to have seen the pressure from Earth mounting for success (they make reference to a possible war). That could have made the actions of Giovanni Ribisi and the Colonel much more balanced and less cartoony.
I remember seeing Titanic on its opening day, twelve years ago. I like my Cameron films on the biggest possible screen and seeing as how Titanic would flop, it wouldn't get the marquee screens for very long… After the showing, I felt it might do some good business, maybe even recuperate its huge budget.
I remember seeing Avatar on opening day, last year. The film would eventually flop, considering its huge budget and unappealing characters. When I came out, I was elated and I knew this film would make huge numbers, because there were speechless kids and smiling seniors walking out of the theater with me. Also, the applause had successfully muted that horrible song at the end.
I will say, however, I didn't expect the film to catch on so quickly. Ticket inflation or not, this film is a home-run: commercially, technologically and, to me, artistically. It's also a B.O. word-of-mouth phenomenon for a non-sequel/remake. Who cares? As people have noted: box office does not equate with quality. There are exceptions, however, and Avatar is one of them.
It's getting really expensive to travel but for 12-15 bucks and three hours of your time, you can get a bargain trip to a moon (though you'll have to sleep with the locals because the hotel infrastructure just isn't up to scratch yet).
According to Wiki (I know, I know) the budget for Sherlock is $80 million. If so then the film is well on its way to a sequel.
I won't get drawn into the pro-/anti-Avatar debate. You either like it or you don't. But what I find really interesting is the fact that, for the first time, I'm seeing social networking sites like Facebook and Twitter being used by regular people to recommend a movie. The studios tried to fake it in the summer (eg. Transformers) but failed because word of mouth needs to be genuine. I must have seen posts by at least twenty different people (male and female, young and old) all taking to Facebook to tell their friends to go see Avatar. That kind of recommendation is worth more than anything Rotten Tomatoes could aggregate. And it's the reason why the takings are showing little sign of dropping, even after three weeks.
To the people talking about expensive tickets, I would say the near 3 hour running time offsets that. Also, I thought Avatar was Ok fun. I'm mainly glad to see Devin look like such a moron.
b b b b b b but Jude Law is box-office poison! Devin said so!
In between the pro or anti Avatar people, is there room for us middle of the roaders? The ones who thought that Avatar was just sort of 'okay' (kind of like Sherlock Holmes)?
I also thought Avatar was just ok. I am surprised at how much it has made but whatever, Devin couldn't have possibly been further off base but I'm sure he will just say "it proves what retards people are" due to his out of control ego. Pathetic.
Oh Devin, you are such a sad sack. First the film you decided to hate turns out to be good, and make billion dollars and counting. Face it chump, you fucked up, you backed the wrong horse, your credibility is shot. You are a clown.
I'll forever remember you as the pathetic, hate filled fuck up you are.
And as for you sycophantic Devin lovers, you do realize you worship a clown don't you? A fat clown with an opinion and a forum to voice it, that's all.
"Just like Titanic, everyone talked shit before it came out (Most exspensive movie ever made etc) and just like Titanic the movie has gone to be a huge succses, regardless of the naysayers"
And if you thought the naysayers were pissed when Titanic made a shit load of cash, won critics over, and won awards out the wazzoo, they are blowing their brains out right about now over Avatar repeating history.
It really sucks to be a Cameron hater.
great article as always
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.