Vincenzo Natali may be insane. In the best possible way. The director of Cube, which premiered at Sundance in 1997, returned to Park City with his new movie, Splice, which has been many, many years in the making. A movie that begins with a tone of ‘kind of nuts’ and quickly shifts gears into ‘utterly out of fucking control,’ Splice is not a perfect film but one that any CHUD reader simply has to respect.
Adrien Brody and Sarah Polley are married genetic engineers who happen to be utter rock stars in their field. They’re on the cover of Wired, they dress like punks, they blast metal in their lab and they get to do whatever they want as long as the pharmaceutical company who funds them keeps seeing results. The latest result: Fred and Ginger, the world’s first bioengineered new life forms. They look more of less like penis slugs, and they’re a cornucopia of chemicals that can change the world.
When the pharmaceutical company wants to change directions the two scientists (Clive and Elsa, delightful references to the Universal Frankenstein movies) decide to forge ahead in secret. They’ve already perfected splicing together animal genes, and now they want to move to the next step: humans. The result, a creature they call Dren, rapidly goes through multiple stages of a lifecycle and continues to evolve from a weird slug to a little beastie that reminded me of the Isz from The Maxx to a more humanoid shape that quickly grows into a strangely beautiful woman. Woman-thing, really.
The character of Dren is a triumph. Using subtle CGI manipulation to play with the geography of French actress Delphine Chaneac’s face (as well as to modify other parts of her body, like her legs and hands), Natali’s FX crews do what mocap creatures never will: allow the reality of the actor to co-exist with the weirdness of the creature. This, more than full pixelization, feels like the next step up from physical prosthetics. Chaneac’s face is right there, and not recreated in pixels but actually there. It gives Dren a life that no CGI creation has ever had.
The trickiest thing in Splice isn’t the creature design and FX but rather the tone. Someone described it to me as in the vein of Re-Animator, and I would agree to an extent. Splice is less obviously jokey than Re-Animator, but it does go large, and it goes large with gusto. I don’t know that any of the choices the characters make actually make real world sense, but they all lead to wonderful things, and to an ending that keeps going places I didn’t think it would. Natali and his team of co-writers certainly didn’t feel the need to every play it safe.
Brody and Polley get the tone, and they go for it. Brody especially embraces it, which is the only way for him to get through some of the third act business when the movie gets extremely weird. Natali isn’t just exploring gene splicing through the lens of scifi-horror, he’s examining it through the lens of procreation. Natali is interested in how we deal with our offspring, whether naturally born or lab-grown, and how our own upbringing impacts that. A genetically engineered life form won’t be the next leap, he’s saying, it’ll be just the next turn in a cycle of abuse that has gone on for generations.
There are a lot of problems with Splice; for a movie that had been in development for so long the script felt slightly half-baked, and the odd tone of the film means you either go with it right from the start when Adrien Brody looks like he just stepped off stage at a Hong Kong Cavaliers show or you’ll be totally lost. If you can get in, the film is exceptionally rewarding with strangeness and cool creatures and a lingering aura of simple madness. Splice is exactly the kind of movie I keep waiting to see: strange, over the top, cool, thoughtful, monster-filled and just plain crazy.
8 out of 10
37 comments
So, that would be Sarah Polley, not Sarah Brody? Check out paragraph two.
Is that a thinly veiled Avatar burn I see? Love it. Vincenzo Natali is one of my favorite directors, if not my favorite. Though his films have flaws, they're so unique and made with such love that every single one has been a treat. I can't wait for this. Hopefully someone will one day give this man a giant budget to play with.
Glad to see computers manipulating reality and not failing to create it again.
I just nabbed Cube on DVD after the longest time, that this was made by the same director seals the see deal. My wish to see this on the big screen has now morphed into an obsessive urge. No matter where it shows, I will go see it.
To #1
Didn't you know? They spliced Adrien Brody and Sarah Polley together to make this film.
Sounds great. Looking forward to it.
Looks and sounds interesting. I'm really liking the direction that Hollywood is taking towards smart intelligent sci-fi that not only entertains but challenges our brains… I cannot wait for this movie ( I am a HUGE fan of Cube) and this just looks cool. Cannot wait for this and Repo Men
Finally.
Everyone should also watch the excellent, but slighty flawed 'Cypher' and the brilliant and also weird 'Nothing'.
I made a monster movie with Sarah Polley too. Plus, you get to see her big jugs in mine. Take that Splice.
By 'like Re-Animator' does that mean it is like a Stuart Gorden movie? Still want to see it.
It seems to me that a review from Devin that is mostly positive will usually get an 8, yet a review that is downright negative will still end up with a 6. Wtf?
Devin gave Edge of Darkness a 3 and everybody damn near had a fanboy shit fit over it. Great review Devin
Sorry, but I already saw Species….
Sounds like the sort of sci-fi, we need and have been without. You don't need hundreds of millions and loads of fancy CGI to make a good sci-fi flick. A subtlety goes a long ways with the effects.
I remember catching Cube on cable back in college. It was like 5am and I was wasted and it BLEW MY FUCKING MIND. Definitely have to check this out.
My hopes were dashed once I learned it wasn't about Starr.
This movie is quite awful, actually. Both the leads completely overact. And the ending is so weird and over-the-top. Seeing both Brody and Polley do the nasty with the gender-changing "child" they created was just too surreal. I'd rather see another of the godawful "Species" movies than sit thru this again.
At Marco: Since when has Hollywood taken a turn for smart, challenging Sci-Fi? Anything produced (not distributed, such as "Moon" or "Children of Men") by Hollywood recently has been nothing but watered down, neutered dullard chow.
Great movie. Caught an advance screening a few weeks back with the director there and such. The closest thing I think we're going to get this year in regards to last year's triumphs District 9 and Moon.
"They're on the cover of Wired, they dress like punks, they blast metal in their lab" – Absolutley terrible
"They're on the cover of Wired, they dress like punks, they blast metal in their lab" – Absolutley killer!!!!
Thanks for the spoiler you jackass.
Gah, cannot wait to see this one, it's been nearly a year now… about time those quirky weird flicks come around that same time as Whatever III.
@ #22, You're welcome! Now you don't have to go waste your money on this drivel.
@ 24 I sure wish I'd seen your comment before I checked it out. I loved Cube and hoped for the best. This movie is beyond stupid. The plot goes like this: boring, boring, boring, boring, totally stupidly fucked up. Also, the 'twists' were totally predictable once you realized the director was god damned retarded. The opening night audience was openly laughing at this film and mocking it throughout. AVOID AT ALL COSTS.
I agree this movie sucked pretty hard. Interspecies-incest-rape + shitty acting = all-around bad movie.
The creature design and effect were pretty cool, everything else about this movie blew. It really is an overhyped piece of crap.
That was so terrible I think it gave me cancer.
That forth act through goes strait to fucking hell, that chase in the forest nearly killed the whole movie for me.
Devin overhype a crappy genre movie? Say it ain't so….
a wonderful movie. BLAME CANADA!
Fuck it. No one deserves good movies anymore. Natali delivers a smart, interesting thriller and fanboys shit all over it? It's over. Lock it up. Enjoy Marmaduke 3: Revenge Of The Mailman.
And assuming Natali gets to make Neuromancer, I'd love to see Brody as Case.
OMFG that movie looks awesome ^^ I must see it :3 yay genetic manipulation! 8D
I can't help but wonder if film geeks born after the mid-80s just have different tastes, or if there's just more mainstream filmgoers on sites like AICN and Chud due to all the popular novel and comic book adaptations that have been coming out since the early 00s but film geeks lately have been pissing me off. It feels like an entire generation of kids has been raised to think that films have to behave a certain way and anything that's a little campy, weird, different gets shat on and ridiculed by the types of people I would have thought would have appreciated it. iI's a shame that so many fans on a site like Chud or AICN are shitting on this movie with the kinds of mainstream criticisms normally reserved for Holllywood blockbusters. There used to be a time where film geeks bought magazines, went to conventions and spoke lovingly about makeup gore, special effects, and just about any movie that pushed the boundaries of good taste. Guys like John Carpenter, David Cronenberg, Sam Raimi, etc could pack thousands into convention halls for their autographs. These guys seemed rebellious. They were making movies on their terms and putting up images of dark humor, violence, gore, sex, etc in ways the rest of us could only imagine in our dreams or nightmares. There was this cool little underground aspect to it all and the midnight showings were the best because people didn't walk out complaining and bitching about how unrealistic things were, or acting, or whatever… The bad became good. Poorly delivered lines became classic quotes. Tree rape scenes became legendary. People were appreciative and willing to suspend disbelief because they felt privileged to be able to see the kinds of sights, sounds and ideas that the studios wouldn't dare show us because 7 out 10 average, everyday citizens wouldn't approve of those images. "Fans" these days feel so entitled and haters look up criticisms from professional critics and feel validated to spread that hate anywhere that will let them. In the past, those voices weren't heard so fandom was more positive and appreciative. Ahhh, look at me getting all nostalgic. Splice isn't a masterpiece or an instant classic in my books (I've seen a shitload of movies) but it's good and I appreciate Chud trying to build box office support.
Well said sir Dhelix…brought a tear to my eye, a single nostalgic tear. The people who shit on a movie like this are most likely the same people who line up to see The A-Team, which in comparison looks like trash. Come on, parachuting tanks…?? Not that films need to be grounded in any kind of reality but still…parachuting tanks??
@batphantom….I have to disagree with you a bit. I think people DO deserve good movies; but I do agree with a lot of people on here in the fact that Natali did NOT deliver a "smart, interesting thriller" as you put it. Splice definitely wasn't the worst movie I've ever seen, and it was definitely DIFFERENT from the typical Hollywood cookie-cutter film, but that doesn't make it a good film. The concept was cool, but the acting was awful and the last act fell apart completely. It was just laughably bad. But, having said that, I do think that there have been more good films made in the past decade or 2 than we've given credit for. But as is usually the case, we do have to step outside the box to find the good ones. I agree with you, batphantom, that a lot of the movie-going public would eat up dogshit like Marmaduke VI: Doggy's Day Out, but I still believe that there are many talented filmmakers & storytellers out there who can deliver excellent films, but not everyone is going to agree on those films. So I'm glad you like Splice; I found it to be a well-made and good-looking film, but the style outweighed the content by far. But these are just our opinions, and that's what makes watching movies so fun….there's a huge variety of films out there for everyone to enjoy. And while I didn't enjoy Splice, I appreciate it…much more so than I would The A-Team, Marmaduke vs. The Chipmunks, or Saw XXVIII.
I guarantee this film will be taught in multiple NYU Gender Studies and Media Studies courses for years to come. There’s a pseudo-intellectual element to how the film deals with sexuality that I can imagine academics would drool over. Perhaps this is what fooled A.O. Scott, who’s own very positive review is the reason I went to see the film to begin with, or the 76% of critics on Rotten Tomatoes who have written about it positively. Ah well.
The problem with the film is that it never gives you a way into the story that makes sense or that you might care about. The dramatic scenes are leaden and dull, full of really terrible, workmanlike lines, just getting the story from one scene to the next. All of this would be forgivable if it were a straight “B” picture, and it had some good old-fashioned frights in store for us. Unfortunately, for the most part, it is often caught taking itself far too seriously.
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.