He’s not the most likely choice for action hero, but Warner Bros is
banking on turning Leonardo Da Vinci into just that. They’ve just picked
up a treatment titled Leonardo da Vinci and the Soldiers of Forever from
producer Adrian Askarieh, who’s teamed up with Roy Lee and Doug Davison
from Vertigo.
While the real Da Vinci was of course a famous painter and inventor (to
say the least) he’s never exactly been portrayed as a badass. The
closest a portrayal of him has come to that was probably last year in Assassin’s Creed 2. In the game he appeared as a comic-relief sidekick character that supplied
main character Ezio with weapons and gadgets, like a Renaissance Q.
In Soldiers of Forever he’ll be doing all his fighting himself. It will reveal that he is actually a member
of a secret society that finds him fighting against Biblical demons in
“a story involving secret codes, lost civilizations, hidden fortresses
and fallen angels.” Ahh, if only the genius could see how we revere him centuries later with silly adventure films. Askarieh is now looking for a writer for the project.
If this seems eerily similar to Sherlock Holmes, well of course it does.
That movie was a success and WB wants to emulate it with more period
action/adventure films. Two cases in point- Guy Ritchie’s doing King Arthur next,
and the studio also just picked up a pitch for a supernatural Marco Polo
flick. I eagerly await future films that show Charles Dickens fighting off figments of his imagination, and Christopher Columbus battling Poseidon trident-a-trident. Don’t let me down, Hollywood.





16 comments
Leonardo da Vinci and the Soldiers of Forever?
What a retarded movie title. It sounds like a mixture of all of the worst elements in films like National Treasure, The Da Vinci Code, and Guy Ritchie's Sherlock Holmes.
I wonder if they'll make him straight for the movie.
Didn't we already have this kind of thing in the misguided and utterly terrible League of Extraordinary Gentlemen? I cannot believe that Hollywood is so inept at creating new ideas they have to go with this kind of nonsense. And of course, it will be in 3d.
…okay, that idea about a Charles Dickens movie is pretty goddamn amazing. I know it was presented as tongue-in-cheek, but seriously…I'd see the HELL out of that movie.
Is historical figures battling the supernatural now officially a subgenre?
They should just call it "Leonardo da Vinci and His Fightin' Genius Time Commandos!".
Yeah, I'd pay 12 bucks to see that.
Ritchie's doing King Arthur? Wasn't there a King Arthur movie like four years ago? Clive Owen or some such dude? THERE WAS!!! From the director of Replacement Killers!! Do we really need to cover any Arthurian ground again?
Uh, hello? "Quest of the Delta Knights" anyone? I just hope they have something in mind for David Warner.
Heh, that bit about Dickens fighting against figments of his imagination. Switch it to A C Doyle and check out Dan Simmons "Drood"…
Hullo! Has everyone forgotten Hudson Hawk? Leo's best film to date.
Bunny! Ball ball!
Comment #6-"They should just call it 'Leonardo da Vinci and His Fightin' Genius Time Commandos!'"—-Tick reference? I can't remember right this second. However, if anyone has seen the Marvel Previews in the last couple of months, there is a new SHIELD title coming out soon, showing how they've operated through the ages, and I believe Leonardo Da Vinci is involved…
@#10 & #11: Fuckin' A – this guy remembers! Leo rocks up to inspect his marvelous gold-making device and cracks his fingers like a mother-fucker. You just know THAT guy had death rays and other cool shit on the go.
LAME
If this becomes a trend and spreads to Lovecraft dealing with Cthulhu it will all be worth it.
Comment #9 – Um… Whippersnapper, Drood IS about Charles Dickens! Now if you want fictionalised AC Doyle check out "The List of Seven!" Guillermo Del Toro needs to get his arse into gear and make that sharpish!!
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.