This should have been better.
Clash of the Titans is a perfect film to remake: it’s got awesome, memorable moments, a great title, and it’s not that good of a film. The movie’s charm lies in the Ray Harryhausen effects, but everything in between those scenes is boring and lifeless. I grew up worshipping the film, but as an adult I understand that it’s a movie that can only be improved upon. But the new Clash falls prey to exactly what makes the original so flawed: whenever there isn’t a monster on screen the film’s a snore, or worse, laughable. It seems like director Louis Leterrier realized this and cut the hell out of his movie, leaving us with a film that has no room to breathe and that just careens from monster scene to monster scene.
And that’s the best part of the movie. The new Clash of the Titans feels like a botched adaptation of a really cool novel: in the movie mankind, sick of the whims of the gods, has declared literal war upon them. Like as in bringing armies to Mount Olympus to kick some ass. This is obviously an unwise move, but it’s also kind of awesome, and it gives the entire film a bizarrely secular humanist bent. I’ve always like the Greek gods because they’re so human – they make the whims and vagaries of fate more understandable. After all, when your top god is a guy whose main hobby is raping while in the forms of animals, the misery in the world around you makes more sense. It’s harder to understand why the loving Judeo-Christian God, who leaves all the raping to his priests, inflicts so many horrors on his flock. And the idea that these personal Greek gods finally push humanity too far is great, and a great starting point for the journey of Perseus, himself a demigod and the offspring of Rapey Zeus.
All of these ideas are neat, but few of them live on screen. We’re told about them, and Perseus’ personal journey is about reconciling the god and the man within him, but it all feels like window dressing. There are other excellent conceptual things going on, including a revolutionary religious leader in the city of Argos – doomed to be destroyed by the Kraken unless Perseus can take matters into his own hands – but they never get dealt with properly.
Which is probably a blessing, since the film’s first third, which is all set-up, is a chore. Director Louis Leterrier seems unable to create a reality in the beginning; everything feels silly and goofy. That will probably work with kids who are today the age I was when I enjoyed the goofiness and pomposity of Clash of the Titans, but as a grown-up moviegoer I just couldn’t deal with Pete Postlethwaite as Doomed Expositional Dad with a straight face. There are other characters set up in the most perfunctory way possible – I’m not even remotely clear on the names of anyone who isn’t a direct lift from the original movie – but again, Leterrier can’t give his actors a reality in which to play their early scenes. I’m not saying the film needed to create a ‘realistic’ Ancient Greece – the film is set in a total alternative Mythosverse, which is cool by me – but because no one can find the emotional grounding for their characters I was never able to give a shit about any of them. Or figure out who they were as various monsters dispatched them.
Once Perseus and his merry band of cannon fodder set off the film picks up simply because Leterrier knows how to stage action scenes. Aftere Perseus meets the new film’s version of Calibos things get off and running and there’s a fairly enjoyable hour of going from set piece to set piece; it’s only when the action takes a break and Perseus and new character Io, played by Gemma Arterton, have a heart to heart that you remember how goofy so much of this is. In terms of generic monster action, Clash of the Titans delivers, but this is a movie that introduces a really cool looking Arab guy made totally of wood and then gives him almost no other defining characteristic or personality trait (or even a name outside of the credits, as far as I could tell). This version of Clash of the Titans feels like it was structured to be more of a men on a mission movie – the cannon fodder actually looks different enough that it’s plausible they could have once also been defined in the script – but the film’s mad rush to get to Medusa’s lair means that everyone who isn’t Perseus is cast aside.
The character who is most hurt by this is Io; a much hotter version of Burgess Meredith, Io is a woman who has been cursed with immortality and who has been watching Perseus his whole life, thinking he could be the key to taking down the gods. But Io is so disconnected from the main narrative that it feels like she was CGIed in later; she doesn’t seem to be traveling with the group but she’s always around when needed. She also delivers silly pep talks every now and again, and she and Perseus seem to have the hots for each other*, but she’s so outside the story that I kept waiting for the revelation that only Perseus could see her.
Sam Worthington is fine in the role of Perseus, although I think ten years from now his grossly anachronistic buzz cut is going to be the big joke about this movie. I like that Worthington is willing to make all kinds of whiny noises when Perseus gets hurt or is in trouble, and he doesn’t play the character with the cardboard intensity of Marcus from Terminator Salvation, as I feared. There are a couple of moments where Worthington allows his scowl to fall away and he smiles and you can see a sparkle in his eye that I wish he had brought more often. In those moments you can feel the charisma that got him roles like this, and that he has completely hidden away in his American work.
As for the rest of the cast: Mads Mikkelsen makes a good show of it. I like the conflict between his character and Perseus; Mikkelsen wants Perseus to dig deep into his godhood, while antigodist Perseus just wants to do it all as a man. Mikkelsen has a force of personality that blows through the screen, and often eclipses Worthington. There’s a hint of a great rivalry turned mentorship here, but the film doesn’t linger enough to let this blossom into anything. Everybody else is sort of just there, getting killed by CGI monsters and all that jazz.
Then there’s the gods. I hope they got paid well. Ralph Fiennes is warming up for Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, while Liam Neeson is happily settling into the corny phase of his career (see the upcoming The A-Team for more of that phase). The only other god who even gets a name put to a face is Apollo, but he’s in it for like a moment. The Mount Olympus stuff is so odd that I actually wish more time was spent there. The script, by Travis Beacham and Phil Hay & Matt Manfredi, adds interesting wrinkles to the behind the scenes machinations of the gods, and they set up a larger story that could be followed up in sequels. But the gods stuff gets kind of shortchanged, and we’re left with very strange cheeseball theatrics and glowiness. That said, Leterrier actually manages to make the Olympus stuff feel more real than any moment in the city of Argos; his heightened take works better in that realm.
Finally it must all come down to the real stars of any movie called Clash of the Titans – the monsters. They acquit themselves pretty well here, with the giant scorpion scene having the most Harryhausenian vibe to me, complete with animated guys riding on their backs trying to kill them by stabbing between their plates of armor. I like this new version of the Kraken if only because he fucks things up immediately, as opposed to the very polite and sticking to the ocean version in the original movie. This Kraken, and the scene featuring Perseus’ attempt to destroy him, feels incredibly epic in scope and is a lot of fun. Medusa doesn’t fare as well; I always thought that she could have been improved from the original, in terms of personality, and making her almost completely (sometimes seemingly unfinished) CGI doesn’t help matters.
The heroic beasts get short shrift. Bubo is the butt of an early joke, and Pegasus is but a plot point. I loved the look of the heroic Djinn, Sheikh Suleiman, but wish he had been given something to do in the picture. He’s practical, as are the Stygian Witches and Charon, the Boat Man of the River Styx. Calibos is practical as well, and I like the conceptual idea behind his rejiggered origin and the way he’s used in the film, but the actual implementation leaves much to be desired. The practical effects are all terrific, and even much of the CGI is acceptable for what it is.
I didn’t hate Clash of the Titans, but I find it difficult to defend. There are so many missed opportunities that it’s hard not to be disappointed. The script opens up some original and fun ideas that never get followed up on, and too many characters are left undefined and uninteresting. At this point I don’t know what to make of Louis Leterrier; I like his The Incredible Hulk better than this, but all of the flaws in that film are in Clash of the Titans, magnified a hundredfold. I think he’s a terrific action director, but once the movie turns to the characters he loses his way, sometimes fatally. There’s a romantic scene between Io and Perseus in the hold of Charon’s ship that’s simply a joke.
The version of Clash I saw was the converted 3D release, and I thought the 3D was terrible. The movie should be seen in only 2D. I think Clash will be a film I enjoy on Blu-Ray, and I’m sure I’ll watch it more often then the very slow original. Still, I wanted to walk out of the theater excited about the possibilities of future adventures of Perseus, and instead I walked out wishing this adventure had lived up to its full potential.
6 out of 10
* this really bugged me for one simple plot reason: if Perseus isn’t in love with Andromeda, the princess who will be sacrificed to satiate the Kraken so it doesn’t destroy Argos, why bother going on the mission to kill the Kraken in the first place? Perseus has more of a Death Wish story here – Hades killed his family and he wants vengeance – but the quest he undertakes is essentially suicidal. He could have definitely figured out a better way to get revenge, especially since the quest to kill the Kraken is undertaken under a very heavy time constraint. I hate to drag in stuff from interviews or set visits into reviews, but while on the Clash set Arterton told us that Io and Perseus had a brother/sister relationship, which is definitely not the case in the final movie. Unless the brother and sister in question are Angelina Jolie and James Haven Voight.
42 comments
Interesting…I wonder how this will age. Because while this is a negative review, and I can understand the problems Devin has here, the review has an ambition in thoroughness I wouldn't expect from a film rating so in the middle. I expect I'll wait for DVD.
sounds like they edited for 3D sake, even if it wasn't initially made for it.. the story of Clash is just an epic big fish story, and big fish stories are just built on filling your head with ridiculous visual eye candy. a full CGI medusa is a big failure, as well as not allowing subplots to pan out.. paranoid studio doesn't want trouble, man. not the right group it seems to make a movie of profound imagination..
Funny you mention the buzz cut. Ont the posters and previews, that's one of the main things that caused an initial negative reaction from me.
does Mads Mikkelsen's character have a name, or is there a reason you refer to the actor while in the same sentence you name Sam Worthington's character name (Perseus)? Yes, in fact Mikkelsen's character's name is "Draco." A simple drop over to IMDB and your paragraph about "Mikkelsen vs. Perseus" would've succeeded.
Christ, that rape line killed me.
Can anybody explain to me what is the deal with the Arab wood guy's blue grenade heart? No one at the sneak screening I attended seemed to get it.
They could have had my money at the theater, but the retrofit 3D means I'll wait for the DVD.
Why do people give a shit what kind of haircut he has?
Because Kiebler, the ancient greeks didn't have electric clippers. Sodomy and ceaser salad recipes, yes, but buzzcuts? No.
"Rapey Zeus"… that is all.
Do you even run spell check before posting. Up your game you fat fuck.
Saw quite a fun interview with Worthington yesterday – says his "Christmas Hams" get a regular showing during the movie, ladies. I think Devin's right in they need to let this guy lighten the fuck up on screen as he seems extremely likable and easy-going off screen.
what does Kraken has to do with Greek Gods ? Actually nothing … but bet you, Devin, did not know that …
In my opinion a snore is worse than laughable, so is this movie more or a snore or is it more laughable? Because if it's more laughable it would probably be closer to a 7 for me and if it's more of a snore than laughable it would be more like a 4 or 5, but if it's an even mix of the two i would have to say your score is dead on.
"After all, when your top god is a guy whose main hobby is raping while in the forms of animals, the misery in the world around you makes more sense. It's harder to understand why the loving Judeo-Christian God, who leaves all the raping to his priests, inflicts so many horrors on his flock." LMFAO
I like the review, and the action is all I want from this movie with a touch of mythology.
The knock on the priests is old and tiresome. I'm not even a weekly church-goer, but there are hundred of thousands of good priests.
Let's all call every Muslim a terrorist! Even though are millions that are very good people.
Eh. Wrong site to even "defend" this.
PICK OF THE WEEK!
#16.. its not really old and tiresome when its always in the news, just this past week, the pope is under fire for covering up pedo priests.. shouldn't be thousands of bad eggs, how many more haven't been caught?
Great point Will.
Devin's review is obviously tempered by his set visit. If he hadn't gone on it, this would be his typical ridiculous 1/10 review.
"It's harder to understand why the loving Judeo-Christian God, who leaves all the raping to his priests, inflicts so many horrors on his flock."Wrong. Our own sin causes the horrors of the world, not God.
#21 … not quite there, but nice try and I hope you play again.
Priests AND truck drivers.
Hey, at least truck drivers are doing it consensually. Two lonely dudes consensually doing gross things is fine. Having a religion that takes away the ability for men to engage in consensual activity is bound to cause some to engage in the unforgivable, fucked up abuse we see today.
As for this movie, I think I will go see it in 2D.
Now THAT is Cool News!
Love how Devin never ever says anything negative about Islam. I'm sure it's because he's afraid he'll be called a racist. Gotta love white guilt.
Pedophile, schmedophile, who cares?!
I want… nay, NEED to know if the bull rape scene is as hot as I've been imagining it for over two decades now…
people are aware there are priests from other christian denominations who can get married right ? that the catholic church isnt representative of every corner of christian faith ? right ? because it seems like everyone lumps the two together as one and the same which is sort of annoying.
#28…know what else is sort of annoying? GETTING RAPED.
#29…you bring it on yourself. just look at the way you dress.
#29 im sure it is "annoying" but that has nothing to do with my point, which was that there are lots of other denominations out there, who have priests or other religious figure heads who dont rape anyone.
Does anyone think that Liam Neeson is taking these "corny" roles, along with everything else under the sun to keep himself buried and busy in work and not having to deal or dwell on the passing of his wife?
Just saw the flick, and have to say I enjoyed it. Now, I am just a stupid sheep … so that is probably blasphemy. I guess I should wait and go be one of the people that sees Kick Ass to truly be a fan of cinema.
Shouldn't the remake have MORE monsters than the original? This movie needed a third more budget and it would have been good.
No bubo, no two-headed cerberus, no vulture. Medusa sucked, and the only part they really nailed was the Kraken attack. Io was hot though. Immortal chicks in skimpy togas are all good with me.
I never saw the original but saw this one last night. A 6 or a 7 is reasonable, perhaps a bit generous. Io was fugly. I think the biggest letdown in the movie was her coming back to life. Interesting to note: the fat, bearded, and clumsy hunter looked a lot like Devin.
A 6 is VERY generous if you ask me. This was the most joyless cinema experience since, well, Alice in Wonderland, but before that – Transformers. It really was a CG borefest, with no charm or atmosphere to be found. Any movie that makes you fell nostalgic for The Mummy isn't one you should be shelling out for. I know I opted for the 2D version so why do I feel I watched a 1D film? If you haven't seen it yet and was perhaps going to take a son or nephew or something, then save yourself and buy the DVD of the superior original or go see the FAR better How to Train Your Dragon.
Perseus' denial of his godhood is what ruins this movie. He wants to achieve his goal as a man, so who cares? Most of us **want** the supernatural sword (and shield, and helmet from the original movie). We would love to be a demi-god. We want to obtain Olympus. The movie loses the geek and juvenile demographic here. Gods are cool, humans aren't. We're already human. Give me some godhood. It's mankind's orginal sin for pete's sake. To make matters worse Perseus **does** eventually use the sword and his demi-god abilities. If he had done so from the get go he might have been able to save a few of his buddies' lives along the way. But when push comes to shove he breaks his own honor code. It comes across as stubborn foolishness to me and detracts from the story.
Come on, Devin. I thought Sam showed a good deal of charisma in Avatar. I mean, he actually smiled and emoted in that film
I dunno, this new Clash kind of looks pointless to me. I understand the reasoning to remake a film that had a built in audience and was not really that great to begin with, but it just looks like a bunch of stuff crashing into each other.
Warners have been doing a lot fo good in the last few years, but adaptations of Greek myth ain't one of them. First it was Troy, which was a two hour bore fest, then there was 300, which was too pretentious for its own good, and now this.
why is everyone complaining about Io's and Perseus's relationship??? It's a new movie, it doesn't have to be exactly like the original one!!! and I thought it was a great movie!! stop talking shit about it!! I agree there were some things left in the air, but I believe it will be developed later on the sequels, because it's a triology. btw the chemestry between Io & Perseus was amazing!! I hope they stay together in the next movies!!! and ohh I'll give the movie a BIG 10!!! ;);)
Not everyone appreciated the deviation from the original story. Perseus and Andromeda's relationship was set among stars as constellations showing their bravery and heroism, all scrapped in favor of a suicidal revenge seeking demigod and a character that was supposed to be a cow. I hope the story is set right in the sequel.
What is the wooden guy's name I can't figure it out. I hope he's on the game.
So disappointed. These great actors and the cgi seem to be where the production budget was spent. With the incredible richness and psychic power of authentic myth, why does hollywood need to rewrite mythology? This plot does not make sense. The hair braiding and pec sculpted armor does not match the low budget stock production value of the street scenes and the swordfighting that seems to happen in front of the same cgi black rock ravine every time. Continuity is cursory. Jokes were made in this film mocking the previous film which is going to remain my favorite because it tells a better and more logical story.
Some of the dialog had me laughing:
"Is our boat the last to come in?"
A military commander would be unlikely to call his vessel a "boat", more likely he would call it a ship. Who proofread this?
The subject matter affords the chance to use the most amazing special effects and possibilities, yet all they do is go for a walk in the woods. The character of Io is never explained and not related to the perseus myth in the way the writers have depicted. This could have been a bad action tv episode. And it was short! The last thing I expected from this film was that it would be so short.
All that talent, those costumes, the cgi, and the lousy sets and settings in a quick one-two misstelling of the myth in a way that is sure to confuse c students for years to come. I recently saw percy jackson with a 13 year old, and I was so saddened to see Perseus depicted as a son of Posiedon instead of Zeus. Why are these writers so intent of rewriting Greek myth? The original myth is so far superior as a story that I don't understand the hubris of the authors.
A great movie remains to be made using the authentic framework of greek myth, using the historical versions of the stories written and embellished faithfully by more talented writers and producers.
At least Liam Neeson boomed " Release the Krakkon". The poor Krakkon deserves to be released from this film.
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.