Throughout Harry Brown I kept waiting for the moment when the movie would turn, when it would say that the violent vigilantism practiced by Michael Caine’s had-it-up-to-here old codger was wrong. When it would point a finger at us in the audience and admonish us for cheering on Caine as he brutally blew away low income, disadvantaged youth.
That moment never came.
And so Harry Brown turns into a terrific, violent revenge thriller that is also incredibly politically troubling, a movie that doesn’t just excuse fascism, it more or less cries out for fascism. By the end of the film the titular character has proven to everyone that nothing will clean up a council estate like some hot lead between the eyes of 17 year olds. The movie feels like it came from the mind of Travis Bickle, but unlike Scorsese’s fucked up antihero, Brown himself is a righteous man… who just happens to have been pushed too far.
That’s pretty standard business for a movie like this. Paul Kersey wasn’t even the first guy to get pushed too far, and Harry Brown certainly won’t be the last, but what sets Harry Brown apart from other films in its genre is how ferociously political it is. Caine’s Brown is an ex-Royal Marine who served in Northern Ireland during The Troubles; when someone reminds him that his neighborhood isn’t Ulster, he says (and I paraphrase), “I know. Those people were fighting for a cause. For these people it’s just entertainment.” The fact that this is said during a massive riot featuring skirmishes between the poor, underprivileged youth of the neighborhood and helmeted police (a riot that was really triggered by an escalation of violence that Brown himself caused) makes the movie’s politics very clear: these people are animals, without honor or dignity. Brown – and the movie – can’t understand that there’s a system that failed these kids, and that maybe it isn’t entertainment that’s happening in those streets but the venting of an inarticulate rage at having been left behind and cast off. That maybe those street toughs gather in the tunnel and exercise power over others through violence because they have nowhere else to go and no other way to find self worth. Maybe – just maybe! – the criminals aren’t simply worthless scum who should be exterminated.
Usually I don’t care about the politics of a revenge film like this – the basic set up needs really bad bad guys, so that you can get behind the hero blowing them away in cold blood. If we felt divided – “He’s not a bad kid, he’s just as much a victim of the streets as you are!” – there would be no entertainment. And while it would be interesting to make a revenge film that actually had a nuanced view of criminals, nobody has a responsibility to make that film if they don’t want to. But screenwriter Gary Young and director Daniel Barber make these politics so front and center, and never ever cast any doubt on the moral rectitude of their hero, that it seems impossible to even watch the film without dealing with the politics.
Politics aside, Harry Brown is a damn well made revenge film. Caine is brilliant as an old man who likes to have a pint at the pub, play chess with an old friend and visit his fading wife in the hospital. Things go south quickly, though, as he discovers the pub is a drug dealers den, he misses his wife’s final moments because thugs have taken over a pedestrian subway, making him late to the hospital, and finally his old pal gets viciously killed by the thugs. And to make it all worse the police seem soft and ineffectual, especially the lead investigator Emily Mortimer, who suspects that Brown’s pal brought his own death upon himself by attacking the thugs (she’s right). Angered and sickened by what has become of his home, Harry Brown takes matters into his own hands.
What follows is a geriatric swath of carnage and torture. Caine us d to be a legitimate bad ass action star in his heyday, and he taps into that for Brown. Cool and collected, Harry Brown is the kind of guy who, after his life is saved by a drug dealer’s gun jamming, admonishes the corpse-to-be about his weapon care regime. He’s the unstoppable tough guy, the sort of dude who just walks forward into a hail of bullets with his gun held at arm’s length… but he’s that guy in his goldenest of years. Rage and hate will take an old feller pretty far, it turns out, but the movie’s drama hinges on the question of whether it will be far enough. It also hinges on the question of whether he’ll be found out; the film seems almost contemptuous of the idea that the police would try to catch a good samaritan working hard at cleaning up the streets through gunplay.
Barber makes his feature debut with Harry Brown, but his visual style and sense of pacing mark him as someone who has been in the business for a while. He shoots the action with a brutal intensity, eliciting lots of loud responses from the audience; the only debit against him is that he settles for CGI blood in a movie that otherwise keeps a down to earth, 1970s vibe going. The digital blood isn’t bad but it feels weirdly out of place, like an iPhone in a period piece.
It’s all the Michael Caine show, though. His performance will transport you back to the original Get Carter, and he deftly maneuvers between being a destroyed old man and a furious killing machine, sometimes within the same moment. The script gives Harry Brown the bare minimum humanity, much of it set up in a heavy handed manner in the opening, but it’s Caine who infuses the guy with a reality and a likability, which is crucial as the movie slides into a paean to exterminating the lower classes.
The classes are really what it’s all about. Harry Brown was a working class man, and he’s seen the modern world push him away and down and into the lower classes. Fifty years ago he was a respectable man in a respectable neighborhood, but today he’s a guy living in a dump that’s run by a group of drug-crazed assholes (they almost feel like a grounded version of the parkour gang from Punisher War Zone); the middle class disappeared out from under his feet. That’s the rage at the center of the movie, the rage of an endangered middle class confronted with chavs and other noxious youth who are suddenly their equals. I was thinking that Harry Brown was Thatcher-era nostalgia, but maybe it’s really the first post-recession revenge film.
A tightly wound, well-made revenge thriller with great action and some terrific performances,
Harry Brown is also a deeply troubling ode to harsh, totalitarian responses to crime. It’s interesting to watch a film that’s so engaging, so well made and so satisfying only to be mostly repulsed by its politics and meaning. Now I finally know how the Tea Baggers feel when they watch movies espousing tolerance, peace or reason.
8 out of 10
32 comments
Great review Faraci, Harry Brown has been available for a while over here. We described it as the British Gran Torino, although darker. I think, as the viewer you have to decide for yourself whether you're appalled at Harry or not. I have to admit I was cheering away with the rest.
As a British citizen I loved seeing the chavs 'get Cartered'
The characters in this movie deserved everything that happened to them, and unfortunately, represents modern life in Britain all too well – especially in London. I'm not saying we should follow Harry Brown's example, but something needs to be done. This is an important film about the youth of today…as depressing as that is.
I saw this in the UK some time back. This movie ROCKS!!!
Unfortunately Devin, it isn't the system that has failed the kids at all. It is the 'don't give a fuck' attitude of the parents which has led to the utter travesty of a modern Britain that I unfortunately live in. Having been a victim of assault by kids like those depicted in the film twice in the past year or so, my sympathies were firmly with Harry. It would be brilliant to just 'blame the system', but those of us who actually live in the society being depicted know that there is no such easy answer.
Still, Caine is bloody brilliant in it.
Hugely overrated film that completely falls apart in the last 25 minutes. Everything up until the riot is great though.
I had the same qualms about Harry Brown's politics, but it's just such a well done throwback revenge thriller. I was surprised to see Matthew Vaughn's name during the end credits as a producer. Harry Brown and Kick-Ass could make for an interesting young/old vigilante double feature.
Good review Dev, for once I agree completely with you and it's nice to see the film get the respect it deserves overseas. Special mention should go to Sean Harris for being the scariest drug-dealer EVER in a movie – that guy scared the bejesus out of me. There's an excellent (and hilarious) commentary from Mr Caine and Mr Barber on the blu-ray – it's well worth a listen.
Really looking forward to this movie very much. I'm a displaced Brit so am still waiting for it to get to where I now live. But Devin as another has already pointed out, your review of the facism of Brown's behaviour in relation to children failed by the government and the 'system' doesn't apply to the UK. For rather a long time now there has been such a nanny state in Britain, so many safety nets, so many outlets and so many opportunites for educating even the poorest kid – so many opportunities for even housing those that are homeless – that your argument just doesn't hold up. Britain is in a terrible state for a lot of reasons but one thing it hasn't done in a long time is 'fail' kids. If anything, it's given them so much that those who have no interest in education can live off the state completely, often with a higher standard of living than those working to a level much beyond that possible by people in the same circumstances in the US or Canada. The comment you mentioned by Brown is indeed correct – the violence we see in inner cities in the UK is nothing to do with desperation, or frustration, or because of much needed political statement – it is purely for the entertainment of a growing number of kids/teens/twentysomethings who just want to do harm to everyone and everything around them for their own entertainment. As a police officer in the UK for over 13 years I saw it day in and day out, and it got so bad I moved to Canada so my own kids wouldn't have to grow up surrounded by such casual evil on a day to day basis. There's an awful lot of great kids in the UK with nothing who achieve marvelous things. There's a large amount though, with everything they could ever need at their fingertips to better themselves who as Caine also said in another movie, 'just want to see the world burn'. The system has in no way failed the children of Britain. The pathetic parents who can't control their kids or who don't want to, and the arsey British attitude of certain sections of society who believe they're owed everything – when they already have it – is the problem. You couldn't pay me to move back to the UK.
As someone who works in education in America I can say that the kids aren't lacking in opportunities. Teachers will bend over backwards to help students, money or loans can be had and tutoring is available to eveyone who struggles.
But none of that matters when terrible parents raise spoiled lazy children who can't find it in themselves to do ANYTHING for their own betterment.
#9 your thoughts are greatly appreciated… I would love to see a response from Devin, although this is a movie site after all…
So the British majority is still racist and classist. Big surprise, coming from the society that helped perfect those ideals. I can easily picture most of the above posters yelling "Fucking Pakis!" and smashing the window of a curry shop for fun.
I'd just like to disagree with almost all of the (apparently) British commentators here – they're pedalling the right-wing tabloid/Conservative Party message of 'broken Britain' which just doesn't do justice to the actual state of the country. We do have problems, like every country, but the kind of comments (casual evil ?) left here are incredibly simplistic and troubling (although this is the internet so it's to be expected to an extent).
The idea that the disadvantaged have had 'every opportunity' is so utterly ridiculously wrong that I can't believe anyone could write that with a straight face.
Anyway, good review Devin.
I felt like this when watching "Law Abiding Citizen"… ugly creepy movie that one. Especially when Gerald Butler yells at the judge "I bet you take it in the ass, bitch!" Leaving me with the same "Whoa! Where's THAT coming from?!" that I feel when I see Tea Party people in the states. Will avoid Harry Brown at the cinema. Too much hatred already about.
"And while it would be interesting to make a revenge film that actually had a nuanced view of criminals…" – Shane Meadows already made it. Dead Man's Shoes. A far more interesting movie than this wretched tabloid wankfest.
#13….if you take issue with comments such as 'casual evil' then clearly you've not had the same experiences I have. Also, please keep your assumptions about my politics or other peoples politics to yourself as painting someone with different experience to yourself as some sort of right-winger is as simplistic a viewpoint as you're trying to assign to myself and others. This is indeed the internet and people do exagerrate, they lie, things get distorted but in this case you're hearing someone tell you the truth as they see it. It was my job for a long time to deal with people like this, and over that period the acts that certain groups of kids and adults have been willing to indulge in have gotten worse and worse and the bar keeps being set lower. When Jamie Bulger had his fingers cut off, batteries inserted into his body cavity and his head stoved in with bricks by two other children it was a massive shock to the country. Nowadays I've seen worse personally, more often than you would believe I have no doubt, and it often doesn't even get reported properly because it's too commonplace an occurrence these days. You attempting to make out that this viewpoint is somehow invalid is absolutely ridiculous. Also, if you don't believe the UK is a nanny state (and I'm not being political, I'm making an objective statement) then go live in Europe, Canada and the US for several years as I've been lucky to, then go back. You might have a different viewpoint on the behaviour of certain sections of society in the UK then, not to mention a different viewpoint on how the British people are viewed by their own government. There are massive opportunities in the UK provided by the government for people to improve themselves and avoid falling through the cracks – at the same time however, I've not lived in a country that has more invasion of personal freedoms, more interference in daily lives, more taxation for less useful service, and more stripping of personal responsibility for those commiting criminal acts. Whether you want to admit it or not in your leap to paint people as right-wing, the UK is in a terrible state because these people have no sense of genuine pride, no personal responsibility, and no fear of repurcussions. This is a direct result of the increase in the nanny-state mentality over the last 20 years and the decrease in the harshness of how people are dealt with by police, courts, and mainly their own families. They have no rules to follow, so increasingly for part of the population there are no limits to their behaviour and some take that to horrible extremes. More now than before. If you don't believe the UK is in a bad state, open your eyes.
The fact that someone could use the phrase "nanny state" and claim to not be political is hilarious. That phrase is political rhetoric — a talking point — not in any sense an "objective statement."
Brundlefly, it is indeed a phrase that's been loaded with political intent but there's a time and place to look at the context – common sense, really. It is a phrase that's also pretty anti-government in it's origin and is certainly applicable to the way the UK is run, and has been increasingly so since the early 80's. Tories, Labour, it doesn't matter – the country has over that time increased it's interference in the lives of ordinary people, decreased it's interference and inconvenience to the lives of those engaged in criminal activity whilst making it easier and easier for people who wish to avoid work to do so – and along with that goes the rather steep drop in personal responsibility and morality that the UK is increasingly suffering from. If that comment is the best rebuttal you can come up with against my points, you've got no argument at all. A phrase may be co-opted by politicians to use against each other, it may be co-opted to be used by those opposing government itself, but that doesn't make it a phrase that can't be used in objective analysis. Again, go live in other countries. Then go back to the UK. I'm sure more emotive terms than 'nanny state' will come to your mind then when looking at the situation.
Whatever. This is a movie that basically has at its core the idea that actions have consequences, kids live by the sword and now die by the sword. Another way you could look at it is to view Caine as the oppressed, going outside the "system" and taking up arms against those who would have him live in fear. In that light it would be more Marxist.
That being said, fuck social determinism. Woe is me, the system failed these kids! Because they weren't given free money, healthcare and homes (or were they? I'm not a Brit) in addition to the free education offered as a means to better themselves and gain some independence, that FORCED them to kill people. They're not really at fault here and shouldn't be held to account for their actions. In fact, we shouldn't even arrest murderers any more, so long as they're poor. They just need a hug and some more money.
Wild. Need more movies like this obviously! Really hitting a raw nerve. I was thinking more along the lines of the wrap-up of The Simpsons episode featuring Stampy the Elephant: "Some are just jerks". I'm sure there are class pressures etc at play, but there are no shortage of sociopaths at any level of society to take gleeful advantage of a system breakdown.
A review of a film that's been out on DVD for a year? Kaaay…
Devin, you smug cunt, feel free to suck my sweaty balls.
If you have no morals, it's not because you're poor.
I'm with you Jim.
To those who think this movie is "fascist", because it's unfair to certain types of youths (although I can appreciate your review, Devin), check out the following interview with British social commentator Anthony Daniels (a.k.a. Theodore Dalrymple). He discusses the kind of world view leading to much of the aggressive mindset of nowadays.
http://cgi.omroep.nl/cgi-bin/streams?/ncrv/netwerk/X64739_dalrymple-compl_WM_bb.wmv
He has also published a few collections of essays dealing with the subject, most notably: Life at the Bottom.
http://www.amazon.com/Life-Bottom-Worldview-Makes-Underclass/dp/1566635055/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1271846304&sr=8-1
"Fascism," Devin? C'mon, you sound like Pauline Kael in her excoriation of 'Dirty Harry' 40 years ago. The movie obviously takes an extreme right-wing stance toward crime and punishment, but so have a million other films over the years. I think most people (especially those who will view a film starring Michael Caine) are wise enough not to adopt the film's stance as their own. You come from New York, Devin . . . how many more Bernie Goetzes have we seen over the years? Just him. Are we to decry the politics of every violent action/revenge film out there? These movies are almost by necessity right-wing in outlook. I beg you to re-read George Orwell's classic "Politics and the English Language." Fascism should have a very specific meaning. It is not a tactic, or an outlook on life, but a system of organization and government. You, like Bill O'Reilly and countless others on every side of the political spectrum, haphazardly throw it around to describe any view you find extreme or distasteful. http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/orwell46.htm
Jim634, "nanny state" is a phrase used when the government expands its role in a way that the speaker doesn't like. In the US, any increase in social services is greeted with a whining chorus of "nanny state." Hell, people over here blamed the deaths in Katrina on a "nanny state" mentality (something I addressed here: http://blacksundae.shannonhubbell.com/2005/09/three-cheers-for-the-nanny-state/) I'm not from the UK, so I'll defer to you on how things are over there, but please don't pretend that your political views are non-political and "objective," especially when talking about things like "moral decline" that defy quantification. It's a cheap rhetorical trick.
"system that failed them".
Mumbai has a system that failed it's young. Hell, even Detroit, Baltimore and any impoverished U.S. city. Having lived in England for a large chunk of my life, the only way you can fail there is to choose to. The kid gloves, indulgent welfare and criminal justice system there is part of why youth crime (and to a large extent, general stupidity and an eroding culture) is so bad. There are comfortable balances. Where I live now (Australia) is far from perfect, but it's not as "every dog for himself" as the U.S., nor as pathetically cancerous as the U.K. It's strange that anyone who espouses self defence or using the rod to protect the community from violence is automatically a facist. I'm fairly left leaning on most topics, but having had to live in council estates growing up, and near them as an adult, I can tell you from first hand experience that the "kids" beating random people to death for mobile phones and a few laughs or stealing cars so they can hold up the local bottle shop really don't give a shit about being reformed, not when they can indulge in their criminal enterprises without fear of reprisal. Anyway, even if this movie was balls, it's pretty easy to stir up these sorts of reactions from audiences. It's such a potent genre. Also, the comparison to Taxi Drive is always dead on. Anyone whose spent a lot of time living with these people will know how easy it is to start thinking "Hmmm. Gas chambers, you say? Good idea."
michael caine grew up in elephant and castle, the area of london where this was shot. recently he was at a david cameron speech supporting a charity. he was talking abiout one of the locals they used in the movie. he said that thekid was complainingto him that he never had a chance. Cain said to the audience, "he probablly hadhis chances and just missed them." He publically calls the kids of his old area animals and maybe he is right. some girls just got shot in the neck by one in a pizza place another kid got stabbed more than ten times two miles away when he was comming out of a club.
oh and its poseur Not poser!
So the UK has tried ultra-liberalism and granted numerous entitlements and has turned into a shit hole. What a surprise. At least the west has a death wish. Thanks left-wing! At least you banned smoking in bars so all of your problems are solved!
Caine is a pretty cool actor but like Clint Eastwood his politics are fucked. People who like violence find reasons for violence. As the saw goes 'when the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail." I'm an Afghanstan vet, so before any of you comic book nerds call me a hippie, walk down to your fucking recruiters office and work off the Funyuns.
It aint just "the rage of an endangered middle class"; The Daily Mail actually draws on all kind of ignorant shit scared over media sensitised readers & members of the discerning public. I'd say its more generally the rage of an endagered right wing/conservative/post working class type that doesnt have the BNP or immigration or 'the glory of Britain in its (Philip as an avatar of Impirical cultural discrimination) hey day' to stick to so openly anymore.
Doubt you're still tracking talkbacks Devin, but if you are, let me note that the film does (spoilers) show that the gang is not led by the benighted punks but in fact by the local publician, a genial peer of Brown who is manipulating these drug-besotted losers. The other comment I have is that this particular movie is not empathetic to the gangsters; but so what? I don't like to review movies that might have been made. This one is good. Troubling, yes. And good.
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.