CGI is an amazing tool that many filmmakers wield like a digital Mjolnir, creating worlds and creatures that take our breath away. Unfortunately through the years some have used it as a scythe, slashing our dreams and severing that muscle that connects our sexual pleasure organs to the muscle that tells our mind we’re really good at using our sexual pleasure organs. The result is oblivion.
So with that we bring you CHUD’s latest glorious list. The twenty worst instances of CGI in movie history. In no order. Well, except the order we decide to do them.
Brought to you by Elizabeth Rappe
The Offender: E.T. The Extra Terrestrial: 20th Anniversary Special Edition (2002)
The Scene: Just one? Well, the most grievous offender has to be E.T. in the bathtub. You just can’t go back and add a CGI character to an older film, not even one you digitally upgrade. It sticks out like the shiny, computerized monstrosity it is.
But let’s not kid ourselves. If the bathtub scene was the only thing Spielberg had tinkered with, it would be no big deal. It’d be easily skipped with the push of a remote button. But there’s not a single “enhancement” of E.T. that works in this 2002 revision – not the CGI walkie-talkies (the fake hands are visible on any HD television, and computers just can’t erase the FBI posture of “clutching a rifle”), not a rubbery E.T running through the forests and cornfield, and certainly not the scene where he screams at Gertie. I’m sure there are more I’ve forgotten. I can’t make myself watch this again, and my memory is still trying to bury that one and only viewing. Wolverine’s selective memory has nothing on mine.
Where It All Goes Wrong: Spielberg’s kooky revisionist imagination. There was nothing wrong with the original E.T. Children had been happily watching that film since 1982, and never questioned the reality of the gentle alien. I will never understand how Spielberg convinced himself no modern children could love and believe a character that wasn’t created by CGI. In this, he’s no different than his good friend, George Lucas. We like to think they’re wildly different – that Spielberg is pure and still in touch with things like “story” and “character” – but this proves he had lost touch in exactly the same fashion. He couldn’t understand that people still liked E.T. and that it was his personality that made him real, thus allowing us to always suspend our disbelief even after encountering Woody, Buzz, Gollum, Dr. Manhattan, Neytiri, and all the other pixelized people we have yet to meet.

But now? Now you see E.T. within the first five minutes. The suspense and magic is gone. And he’s suddenly able to run as opposed to the waddling puppet E.T. who can barely shuffle down a hallway.
How Bad Is It: It ruined a classic. I feel for the kids who encounter the film in its corny revisionist state. E.T. is no more real to them than Shrek. Possibly less so. It’s so bad that a regular, unaltered version quietly accompanied it’s re-release. That limited 2-disc set is still a hot sell on Ebay. I still watch my battered VHS. It has sentimental value anyway, it’s the first VHS I ever owned.
Even today, the 20th Anniversary trailer seems desperate to convince itself and anyone watching that this new E.T. is better. Really, please God, we spent so much money….






23 comments
Oh GOD, yes.
Horrible, horrible stuff, every bit as bad if not worse than the Star Wars special editions.
Fantastic example! I, like you, watched this one time and could barely stomach it. Steven Spielberg really raped E.T.
Hopefully the Blu Ray has a properly restored and remastered copy of the theatrical cut on it, whenever they decide to release it. Revisionist CGI wouldn't be so egregious if they handled these things like the Blade Runner set, the one that had like 5 lovingly presented versions on it. I mean even George Lucas eventually caved and released the original theatrical Star Wars trilogy, but it was a Laserdisc rip that was unceremoniously dumped on bare bones discs with crappy Photoshopped covers.
Hopefully not the way I think. 😐
wow.. I didn't know there was a CGI-ET out there. dammit Spielberg!!!
Thank God you included this. With all the anti-walkie-talkie chat thats been going on I thought it was just me that hated the CGI E.T.
Another great entry in this series. Maybe someday Spielberg will semi-retire the 2002 version to "bonus feature" status the way he did with the Close Encounters Special Edition.
But it gave us that South Park episode with the FBI guys blowing people away with their walkie-talkies, so it's not all bad. If memory serves, Carlo Rambaldi never revealed the recipe for the laytex skin of his creations so even in terms of the animatronics of the day we were getting beyond state-of-the-art. We were getting one-of-a-kind. Good call on the scariness of the early parts of the movie. It would be so easy to imagine those scenes as being from an actual horror movie. Perhaps inspired by the original Night Skies concept?
I hated this movie as a kid and I hate it now. E.T can suck a fat set of alien balls.
I think that Spielberg deserves a big fat pass on this one, since he released the original version packaged with the updated version. At least that proves he has an understanding that movies are a snapshot of when they are made (although, interestingly, ET is just old enough that all of the clothes have come back into style). I wouldn't be surprised if the "updating" was purely a financial choice by the property-owners that Spielberg didn't have a lot to do with. At least, that's what me and my complete lack of facts to base that on are telling myself.
OMG. I had NO idea he'd changed all this, i just thought it was the walkie-talkie part he changed…..havent seen this film since i was like 9, and now i REALLY wont revisit it….*shakes head* …..wtf….
Reader #4, my last name is pronounced "Rap." Like the music. 🙂
I don't know what family idiot added the E, but they've doomed me to years of rape jokes.
Good call. Never would have thought of this recent monstrosity.
I actually hated ET when I first saw it in the theater. Manipulative, schmaltzy, sacharine shit.
The new version is even worse.
Nice addition to the column, Elisabeth. ET was one of my favorite movies when I was a youngling, and I hated the specially added CGI bits too. By the way you're pretty cute. A little about me, I swear like a drunken sailor. I also squint and sneer alot. Let's go dutch and see a matinee at the local bijou someday. Just sayin'.
Excellent write up Ms Rappe. I must admit curiosity got the better of me and I clicked on your profile page so I must congratulate you on being a terrific writer as well as what we English gents describe 'extremely fit'
Agreed. Best of the series, thus far.
I've noticed there's no way to discuss this one in the forums….
So, where's #4? It's been a week already…
Speilberg isn't exactly the same as Lucas despite these changes and Crystal Skulls. In my DVD version of E.T. it includes the original feature and the 2002 version with the CGI. You have a choice, which is something Lucas never gave us with the original STAR WARS trilogy.
Nice!, but I'm a little confused. Were the walkie-talkies mentioned in this article?
I have the 2 disc collector's set & it has both versions. Disc 2 is the 1982, unaltered version. that's the one I watch.
Wow. I forgot they had CGI on ET too. I never bothered with this revisionist garbage and just kept my old VHS. Even if I also get the original version, I can't stand that I'm buying the new version with the old one as a bonus.
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.