| Film | Weekend | Per | Total | |
| 1 | Shrek Forever After | $43,345,000 (-38.8%) | $9,926 | $133,095,000 |
| 2 | Sex and the City 2 | $32,125,000 | $9,325 | $46,333,000 |
| 3 | Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time | $30,170,000 | $8,275 | $30,170,000 |
| 4 | Iron Man 2 | $16,035,000 (-39.2%) | $4,215 | $274,612,000 |
| 5 | Robin Hood | $10,305,000 (-45.1%) | $3,055 | $83,024,000 |
| 6 | Letters to Juliet | $5,900,000 (-34.5%) | $2,088 | $36,600,000 |
| 7 | Just Wright | $2,200,000 (-48.7%) | $1,841 | $18,197,000 |
| 8 | Date Night | $1,750,000 (-39.9%) | $1,554 | $93,447,000 |
| 9 | MacGruber | $1,477,000 (-63.5%) | $580 | $7,127,000 |
| 10 | How to Train Your Dragon | $1,025,000 (-46.1%) | $1,242 | $212,629,000 |
This just in: a profound sense of shame.
Should we start with the bad news? Prince of Persia has a reported budget of $200 Million dollars, and if it didn’t work in America, it’s not going to work that much better over seas. It’s a strange perfect storm of half-good ideas, and had enough of them worked (Harry Potter director, up and coming actor and actress, brand name, etc.) you might have had a movie. But they also had a lot working against them (beautiful weekend, blockbuster fatigue, low cultural interest, a hurting economy) and they BLEW IT. They blew it. Throw in an ad campaign that didn’t excite, and the theory of the film is better than the practice. With a big budget action movie, it is fair to guess that a film like this was having pre-viz done in 2008, so – with a number of the big summer releases – we may still be suffering the ripple effects of the writer’s strike. It may get close to $40 Mil by the end of business Monday, but the picture is going to have a hard time get anywhere near $100, and probably won’t. There’s also some inside baseball on this one as the film was one of the last of the old Disney regime, and studios have a habit of letting films like that fail because it makes no one look good if they do well. It’s petty, but it’s also a factor, and when you can say something looks like a piece of crap from a distance a lot of that is bad marketing. And even with a lot of money at stake, sometimes they leave money on the table.
Sex and the City 2 should have had a bigger opening, theoretically. The first film was a surprise hit, and they had to figure this would do about the same business at the end of the day, maybe a little less. But women didn’t run to the new one as men often do with sequels. Though it will be close to $60 Million tomorrow, the first one did $57 Million in three days and this might not do that in five. Women may not be as geared for opening weekend and all that as men, and it could play stronger, but I would expect it’s not going to do much more than double this five day for a grand total of around $120-$140 Million at best. Though international will make this profitable, the film has a reported budget of $100 Million, so what could have been a big money earner for everyone involved is going to be modestly profitable. With all the product placement, shouldn’t the budget even out to around six bucks? Seriously.
And in number one is Shrek 4, which won the weekend by default. Maybe they squeeze another $10-15 Million tomorrow, which gets it close but not quite to $150 Million. Next weekend everything should take a sizable hit, and we are three weeks away from Toy Story 3. Which means this Shrek film gets to $200. And maybe a little more. There’s a strong possibility it will do less than half what the second film did. I saw David Poland trying to spin this positively, but there’s no way to read these numbers in a positive light, especially with the bottom out of home video. Yes the film will make money, but Dreamworks ran the franchise into the ground.
Iron Man 2 is on the sure road to $300, which is good, though the franchise hasn’t grown, t’s doing about the same business as the last one. Playing level is a victory in comparison to everything else this weekend, though, and this should do as well – if not margially better – than the first film. Robin Hood shouldn’t have a problem getting to $100 million domestic, so hopefully international will kick ass (it’s now at $237 all-in, which was the film’s supposed budget. HALFWAY THERE, guys!). Date Night is on the hundred million dollar limp, and I think they’ll get it by hook or crook.
MACGRUBER! (so very sad) Next week there’s four major releases, so expect it to be gone. As John Lennon would say “So this is summer, and what have you done? One month over, and a new one… about to begin?”





14 comments
I have not seen MacGruber, because in spite of all the positive word this site and some others have given, the trailers and commercials made it look fucking horrible. If it is indeed as good as you guys claim, then the marketing dept at Universal needs to be water boarded, because these guys keep fucking up the selling of movies that should be no brainer hits.
Damn, I normally love the summer movie season, for better or worse, but really – worst line-up EVER. Hopefully, Pixar and Christopher Nolan (or anyone with a good movie at least) save our summer.
The problem with MacGruber is the best gags are so sick and dark that it's hard to show them off in the marketing. The Red Band trailer only scratched the surface of how demented this movie is. And this should have never been a May release.
both michael and troy took the words right out of my mouf. they are 1,001% right.
"Sex" will play for a while. I've heard multiple ladies say they are wating for next weekend. The female population doesn't have another movie out till Eclipse.
This is the most disappointing, uninteresting summer i've literally ever seen, or not seen as the case may be. Iron Man 2, Inception. That's it. Macgruber? No, it's simply not as good as this site claims.
Is it possible that Iron Man 2 doesn't match the original's gross? Ouch!
comment #5—i disagree. the first one didn`t have legs (it made around half of it`s overall haul in it`s first week), and that was one that the fans were excited about. my theater got crushed for the first 2 nights of the first one, all college and middle-aged women, and then it died a quick death. we did noooooooo big business for this new one, and of course it was still the same type of crowd. if someone wasn`t into it to begin with, the first one probably wasn`t going to win anyone over, so it can only really LOSE it`s audience at this point, which seems to be the trend everywhere. it`s not going to hang around for a long time just because it`s the only movie for that audience out there.
A Couple things.
1) It's hard to "Ouch" a movie that will gross 300 million, Dry. Let's get real how much was Iron Man 2 going to make? 300 million domestic is nothing to sneeze at. The X franchise never got near 300 million.
2) I completely disagree with the first paragraph of this article. Persia will work internationally. Look for at least 200 million. I could be wrong but I doubt it. It's still a bomb, but I expect a 75 million total Us gross and 200 international.
#7, even if Iron Man 2 doesn't quite match the gross of the first one (though it probably will) it's still a big hit and no one who worked on it is going to bed crying. You can't say that about every other big release that's come out since, literally all of which have performed below expectations.
I would like to one day be involved with films that gross in the neighborhood of 300 million bucks that are considered by some to be "disappointments". Damn, better luck next time…
So should we take this stance if TDK Sequel grosses what IRONMAN 2 will, about 300 Million plus as a disappointment??? Would TDK fanboys admit that's a disappointment or praise Nolan and the movie itself??? I'll never quite understand how that much $$$ can be declared a "Disappointment" for what IRONMAN 2 cost to make???
#7 — Iron Man 1: $585m worldwide. Iron Man 2: $550m thus far. If IM2 makes it to $300m domestically then it ends up making about what the first one did, slightly more if it continues to do well internationally. Too bad RDJ, Sam Rockwell, or Mickey Rourke hadn't died right before the release, otherwise IM2 would've made more.
Regarding the Robin Hood quote: "it's now at $237 all-in, which was the film's supposed budget. HALFWAY THERE, guys!" what does the halfway there remark mean? Is it true movies spend the same amount on advertising as they do production and Robin Hood will have to make $474 worldwide to break even? If I'm way off base here how much do movies actually spend on advertising?
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.