How much Jeunet is too much Jeunet? MicMacs answered that question for me most definitively. Jean-Pierre Jeunet at his most Jeunetiest, MicMacs is a hyperactive Rube Goldbergian bit of whimsical fluff about… the horrors of land mines. When a mild-mannered video store clerk gets a stray bullet in his head he opts to take a unique form of revenge – going after the company that made the bullet. Along the way he falls in with a veritable circus sideshow of weirdos, living in a repurposed junk pile. Together they take the long way around to giving the execs their comeuppance.
It’s all so overwhelming. MicMacs is a movie turned up to 12, an endless barrage of rusty metal and wacky contraptions, filled with twee characters living saccharine oddball lives. There’s not a moment in MicMacs that feels real, and I don’t mean that in a ‘I don’t believe that happened!’ sense but in a ‘None of these people feel like anything but quirk conglomerations.’ It’s false, trite, and ultimately boring.
There will be many who disagree with me. Jeunet fully cracked out is what they’ve been waiting for. This is a film that’s all about the look, and for many folks that’s what they want. But it was almost impossible for me to sit through, especially because Jeunet’s style feels so cliched here. It’s everything you would expect, with all of the contraptions and pipes and dirt in just the right places. It’s the opposite of the liveliness of a film like The City of Lost Children or Amelie – everything feels plastic and placed and perfectly designed. There’s no messiness to this mess, and the art direction dies like overproduced punk rock.
As for the characters, there’s not much to say as there isn’t much to them. There are quirks and deformities and ‘delightful’ oddities that allow them to stage elaborate heists and scams. But that’s about it; no one reads as having anything deeper going on beyond some occasionally trotted out cheap pathos. And that cheap pathos truly undermines the message that Jeunet is trying to send by couching it in emotional falseness and facile cheesiness. I don’t know that a movie about the horrors of landmines and arms dealers needs to be drenched in misery, but the sugar pop happy-go-lucky vibe of MicMacs just makes those horrors seem unpleasant and give you the urge to not even engage them.
For those looking for a concentrated, high-fructose corn syrup, low brain-power version of a Jean-Pierre Jeunet movie, MicMacs will fit the bill. For everybody else it’s an insufferable, stupid and irritating disaster.
2 out of 10
19 comments
Every since watching Amelie, I realized that Marc Caro (or some special chemistry in the Caro/Jeunet combination) was the true source of the brilliance behind Delicatessen and City of Lost Children.
I have yet to see anything that Caro has done on his own, but I hope it's better than this twee that Jeunet has been churning out (maybe Alien 4 broke him)
definitely this looks nowhere as amazing as HUMAN CENTIPEDE!
This bit with the dog at the airport was gold though, right? Right.
To #1= Churning out? Amelie might be too sweet for some, but I'd love to see any other filmmaker make somethng so original after being "broken" on another film. I wasn't a huge fan of A Very Long Engagement but nothing about it felt twee to me. The only difference I see between their films together and Jeunet's earlier ones is a lack of steampunkishness (which I thought Devin hated.) I haven't seen Micmacs but I still think Jeunet is a brilliant filmmaker and will definitely give it a shot.
I never realized that when people talked about their hatred of mimes they meant that an actual toxic physical reaction was taking place in their bodies – until I saw this movie. Literally felt sick to my stomach. The business with the dog was fun and I actually loved the bit where the main dude sings down the chimney to his girlfriend in helium voice while the dark haired girl watches, alternately laughing and crying. I kind of liked the over-ripe sexed-up moments too. The rest of it is like an intolerably smug United Colors of Bennetton advert.
82% on RT. You're alone, again, Devin.
#1: Caro did 'Dante 01'. Pretty, but otherise fairly minor.
Who cares what Rotten Tomatoes says. Also, fuck this movie, and fuck whimsy. I fucking hate whimsy; it sucks. They should call this movie "The Whimsyorium of Dr. Poofen-stoofer."
I loved this movie! it's bursting with imagination. what's wrong with you Devin?
There are things I like about Dante 01 but it's kind of scattered and the narrative fails to amount to anything meaningful in my opinion. Based on this one movie I wouldn't say Caro has proved he has any more chops than Jeunet. I like Jeunet to a degree but I know exactly what the fuck Devin is talking about in this review. It's the same kind of overstylization that has killed a lot of Terry Gilliam and Tim Burton for me, to name only two high profile examples. Down with twee!
I hope you get back to writing as you used to, or else L.A. has ruined you as it has so many others. Everything seems to come down to a highly condescending vibe, implying that the people who like something you don't are twits who don't deserve the two synapses that manage to fire every now and again. Having seen the poorly acted, scripted, and directed "Human Centipede", I think it's clear that you've lost your spark. All of this cynical, empirical bitterness is every bit as played out as overproduced punk rock (which I'm not defending, for the record).
Uh, Jordan…LA didn't ruin Devin, he's always been a condescending whiner.
Anyway, it is weird that the movies of Jeunet Devin likes are the steampunk ones, but the more artistic ones he doesn't. I don't care either way, I thought City of Lost Children was boring as fuck after twenty minutes.
Devin, thanks for put into words my feelings about this giant bluff called Jean Pierre Jeunet.
@ #9 — I'm tired of people throwing around the word "imagination" as though it is — alone — enough to make a film great. That's how we ended up with shallow twats like Tim Burton — who would be better suited to illustrating children's books or doing production design or working at a goth toy store or something — being praised as great or "visionary" filmmakers. Jeunet lost me after Delicatessen. That's right, I hate City of Lost Children and Amelie as well.
I have seen the movie; and the amount of quirkiness is just right, it blends the right amount of realism and fantasy, much like Amelie. Devin doesn't know what the fuck he's talking about.
I watched about five minutes of Amelie and was unwilling to endure any more. Still not as bad as Moulin Rouge, though.
After what he did with Alien Resurrection, I'll never bother watching anything else he does (or has done).
Don't like Amelie? Who said that? Why i oughta…
In total agreement with you . What's frustrating is that the adj most likely to be used with this garbage is "imaginative". Why is a overly quirky, over done, over saturated, over actioned movie somehow more imaginative? It uses mimes for Christ sakes, the most hackneyed symbol of Frenchness. It reminds me of Wes Anderson where the characters are simply caricature and nothing more, no good dialogue and story, where everything is done for the effect. Sort of like Max's play at the end of Rushmore …
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.