On Friday I watched Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home on the big screen for the first time since I saw it during its original run. Even better than that, the film was followed by a nearly hour long Q&A with Leonard Nimoy himself; the only other original series actor I had ever seen in person was a very decrepit James Doohan at a convention (he was escorted by a Klingon honor guard and died not long after). There’s nothing like getting Spock himself to answer your question about Trek IV (in this case I asked him about Eddie Murphy’s one-time involvement in The Voyage Home. You can read my Movies That Never Were column about that right here. And you can read Nimoy’s insights at Ain’t It Cool News. Quint was sitting with me and he’s run a very comprehensive look at the Q&A).
But more than that, this viewing of The Voyage Home really opened my eyes to something about this film – it could be the ultimate Star Trek movie. There’s no question that Wrath of Khan is the best Trek film, and likely always will be – the movie mixes a great story with compelling character drama that resonates because we’ve known these actors since they were young – but I think The Voyage Home is the film that could truly encapsulate everything that Trek wanted to be.
It’s the most human of the Trek films, for one thing. It’s no mistake that Star Trek has been billed as ‘The Human Adventure,’ as that was primarily Gene Roddenberry’s vision for his series. The Voyage Home is the film that dispenses the most with the space ships and scifi – the Enterprise is only in the movie in the final shots! – and completely focuses on the characters. The whole story about Kirk and his crew needing to save the Earth from a probe is classic MacGuffin, only existing to get the characters into unique and humorous situations. There isn’t the heavy drama that Khan captured, but there is the feeling of people who have been working together for decades interaction. It’s not great drama, but it’s a delight to see these people in these situations.
What’s great is that Nicholas Meyer, who wrote most of the San Francisco stuff, understands that Roddenberry’s vision of the future is sort of naive and silly and he embraces it. These are people who have dealt with life and death situations and the fate of the universe on more than one occasion, but when plopped down in the 1980s they come across as sweetly childlike. I think that’s part of what makes this such a great Trek movie is that it allows us to really see the difference between the world of today and the world of the 23rd century, as embodied by these characters we love.
Which leads to a scene that I think is the complete embodiment of everything Star Trek was and should be. It’s a simple scene, a goofy scene, and a very light scene, but it’s Roddenberry’s vision for the future distilled in a couple of minutes. While on the bus out to Sausalito, Kirk and Spock are confronted by a noxious punk rocker blasting his boombox at top volume. Spock reaches over and gives the guy the Vulcan nerve pinch, which makes him fall forward on his radio, turning it off. What’s key here is that the punk has been listening to completely nihilistic music – a song called I Hate You by the band Edge of Etiquette. Here are the lyrics:
Just where is our future, the things we’ve done and said!
Let’s just push the button, we’d be better off dead!
‘Cause I hate you!
And I berate you!
And I can’t wait to get to you!
The sins of all our fathers, being dumped on us — the sons.
The only choice we’re given is how many megatons?
And I eschew you!
And I say, screw you!
And I hope you’re blue, too.
We’re all bloody worthless…
To have Spock lean over and silence that nihilism – a hand from the future shutting up the anger of the then present day – sums it all up. Things will get better, and these two guys are proof. Of course the song is a bit of a ringer; I Hate You was written and recorded by the very same punk on the bus, Kirk Thatcher, who was an associate producer on the film. The band Edge of Etiquette is simply what Thatcher and friends called themselves on the day when they played the song.
The other thing that makes The Voyage Home a quintessential Trek movie is the lack of a villain, something Quint notes in his write-up. That’s so key, as many of the original series episodes lack traditional villains. Often Kirk and company will deal with something strange or unknowable, or perhaps something confused and acting out. Look at The Squire of Gothos, where the villain turns out to be a cosmic child who gets punished by his parents, or Devil in the Dark, where the monster is actually a previously unknown form of life trying to save its young. Star Trek: The Motion Picture is the only Trek movie that comes close to that, but it does so by essentially remaking The Changeling from the original series. I like the gentle nature of the film – the probe doesn’t need to be defeated, it needs to be communicated with – and it’s something that’s so uniquely Star Trek that it’s hard to imagine another series really using it as well and not coming across as impossibly cheesy.
There are other elements that make The Voyage Home feel the most Trekky of all Treks – small moments like Captain Kirk immediately and without hesitation (or question) deciding that he and his outlaw crew must take action to save the Earth (modern movies, please learn from this. I am sick of the reluctant hero. I don’t need an entire act of a movie dedicated to forcing a hero to take action. I like an old fashioned proactive hero, and I suspect many folks reading this do as well), or the perfection of the Kirk/Spock/McCoy triad.
There’s
a story on TrekMovie today about Orci and Kurtzman trying to juggle darkness and fun with the new
Star Trek 2, but all they have to do is look to
The Voyage Home to find their bearings. Yeah, it’s the lightest film in the franchise, but this movie makes the threat to Earth real without making the film too grim, and it allows the characters to have fun and express a hopeful vision for the future.
The Voyage Home has some problems – how weird is it that Kirk brings a fairly bland blonde from the 20th century to the future with him and then she basically tells him ‘Don’t call me, I’ll call you’? – and it’ll never have the grimness to please Fanboy Nation, but it’s a sweet and honest and heartfelt movie that manages to get across, better than any other film in the series, what Gene Roddenberry believed people could one day accomplish.
20 comments
Good point Devin. While I think the reboot is excellent, I want to see more exploration in the next ST, boldly going and all that. Don't try to give me the next Khan, I don't want war with the klingons; give me something fresh.
Wow. No comments yet on this article? Well-written, interesting, smart. Nicely done, Dev. Loved it!
Totally agree, Devin. The fact part IV has no villain to speak of and is about, beyond the characters, a mysterious and unknown celestial being and how our characters learn about it and from it, makes it the Trekkiest of the Treks.
I wonder what it says about me that the only thing I liked about this damn movie was that song!
Very good article Devin. As a kid, I always thought the whole plot involving a probe and some whales and time travel to the 1980's was scatterbrained hokum, but as I got older and looked at things differently, the plot and character motivations are a symbiotic merging of the basic things that made Star Trek endure. Star Trek IV is the best example of this, in that it all at once is eloquent, humble, optimist and provoking.
Hear, hear. Nicely done.
I like your point about the idea of a proactive hero. I too am sick of people who need to be drawn into the action because "it gets personal" in the third act.
We all get that life is complicated, but our heroes don't need complicated motivation. The heroes we have these days are so 'flawed' and need a family member killed or abducted to fly into action. That's why I like Kirk. He doesn't need all the answers right away. He knows something needs to be done to fix the problem, and he will work it out along the way, in brilliant fashion.
Thanks for spelling everything out that I felt made this one of the best Trek films. Infact, back when it first came out on VHS, I paid the full $90 or so purchase price. The only thing I would add to your piece good sir, is the pitch perfect interplay between all the TOS actors. Everyone gets a chance to shine in their own way, it is by fair the most balanced of ensemble pieces. That, I think adds to the fun, playfull and relax performances. Bravo!
Devin I know you don't respond here but have you read Meyers book?? is it any good??
Great piece by the way.
Yes, this truly sums up what Star Trek was all about…..and the Next Generation movies made sure to do the OPPOSITE of that. RedLetterMedia's reviews of those movies summed them up perfectly. I remember before EVERY one of those movies, the genius producers ALWAYS said, "Our villian will be BETTER than Khan!" I always thought "WHY do you need a villain in EVERY damn movie, and why do you have to try to one-up the SECOND movie?!" So we ended up with 4 Wrath of Khan rip-offs. No villain would have the history, acting skills, pecks, real life humilty, or sheer screen presence that Ricardo Montalban possessed. Will the new Treks have this wonder of exploration, especially since we're learning more and more daily with the probes, Hubble, and Space Station?
HELL NO!
Producers to fans: "Our next bad guy will be….better than Khan!"
Nice article, despite my inability to enjoy anything Star Trek related.
Articles like this remind me why I read CHUD every day.
Kirk definitely has a "refusing the call" beat in Abrams' STAR TREK. Which is of course a modern revisionist take on the franchise the follows the Hero's Journey via STAR WARS, but it's not like it feels out of place in that movie.
Haven't read an article like this on CHUD in some time. Great thoughts, Devin. I'll appreciate them on my next viewing.
What the hell? The Voyage Home was the worst Trek movie. It was smug, sloppy, stupid, and spit on Trek by having all the actors behave like they were doing a skit at a Trek convention. After the amazing heartfelt films that were Khan and Search for Spock, it was a slap in the face of the fans. Saying this is the "trekkiest" of movies is a slap in the face to Trek. It's "trekky" because it depends so heavily on Fandom to forgive its laziness and lack of caring FOR Trek.
Although it's a nice bit of writing Devin, I have to admit this Trek film, for me is almost as unwatchable than 5. It smacks of 80's "look at me" culture, and while I'm not America-bashing, it reflects on all that was ugly coming out of there that decade. It just doesn't seem to hold it's dignity some 30 yrs later.
Really insightful piece Devin. How interesting to find out all the information you shared about the punk character in the bus scene.
Ham&Cheeze as far as I'm concerned. Remember enjoying it on the big screen in the '80s as a teenager, but seeing it today I find the premise very contrived, and the movie executed like campsite summer theater vaudeville.
Bravo, Devin! Bravo!
I have to join the minority here and say that The Voyage Home ranks almost dead last in TOS films, coming in just above The Final Frontier. It was a mainstream fish-out-of-water comedy with some trekkish bookends. If my mom can enjoy it, then it has lost something inherently Star Trek. But I also think TMP is an excellent Trek film (especially the Director's Cut), so I may have a different criteria than most.
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.