
I watch Rounders more than I care to admit. I’ll cop to five times a year and the rest is my business. It’s a very special movie to me and its creators Brian Koppelman & David Levien are guys I really love the work of and champion because they are such good, smart writers who have just scratched the surface of the good stuff they’re going to bring to the industry. We had them on the show yesterday, and Justin asked them about the status of Rounders 2. The results won’t have any of us planning a visit to the theater anytime soon it’s nice to see that when it finally does come to screens it’ll be for the right reasons. The entire audio of the interview will be up shortly, but here’s the skinny straight from the people in charge of making it happen:
David Levien: It got mentioned in some article. As the years go by and we run into Damon or Norton, who we’ve always stayed in touch with… Even checking in with Malkovich and John Dahl. Everybody wants to do another one. We do also. It’s just a question of telling the right story. We sort of have a way in, but we want to protect the first one and do the right movie. We don’t just want to jam another sequel. Everybody is on board. We think it’ll happen at some point. Someone mentioned it in an article and it got this little bit of life on the internet.
Brian Koppelman: Matt mentioned it and you mentioned it in an interview for your book. We don’t have a script. It’s all nonsense until we have a script.
No Rounders 2 yet, but the team is in place and when they’ve locked a perfect idea down it’ll happen. That pleases me greatly. In the audio you’ll hear them explain that process in more detail, punctuated by a lot of messy questions from me and one ill-timed joke from Justin. Until then, enjoy!





18 comments
Meh, Rounders was middling at best.
Seriously, outside of John Malkovich eating Oreos, Rounders represents everything that is wrong with douche bags that think gambling is, like, all cool and stuff. With a seriously awful performance by Edward Norton("hey, I just found a game", "look I just heard about this game", "do you know of any good games?") and a way too serious performance by Damon. I watched this once, folded, and walked away from the table. Hey look! a poker reference!
For a douchebag…Damon is a pretty good actor.
pyeh thet man his money
now that's a sequel I can look forward to..
I'm on board with you, Nick. There's something immediately accessible about the movie and I find myself drawn to wanting to watch it more than I should be. And I'm not really even a fan of gambling/playing cards!
Rounders is Dahl at his best. He takes a classic golden era plot and reinvents it for a new generation. Rounders has got atmosphere to kill for. Sadly I don't think this film would have been made today.
Rounders is awesome. I hope they find a way to make a sequel worthwhile. It could be really interesting to see a few of those characters again after so long.
Cookie Monster has a point. "Rounders" would have been so much better if it was just 2 hours of Norton and Damon trying to find a poker game. *rolls eyes*
What makes "Rounders" a great movie about poker is that it's the only one I'm aware of that depicts gambling as it really works instead having to rely on the protaganist pulling an amazing hand out of his ass. That's the kind of lazy writing that can scuttle an otherwise good film. "Casino Royal" anyone?
Isn't this the opposite of news? "It's not actually happening but everybody might want to do it if we ever do it but we need the right story" – that's the generic Hollywood holding pattern for pretty much every movie NOT being made right now. You could say the same thing about Minority Report 2, Fantastic Four 3, Austin Powers 4 or Ghoulies 5.
Rounders was piffle.
So the premise of this article is that there are no plans for a sequel to Rounders, but the writers would be open to it if they ever come up with an idea?
Oh Don Piano.
Why not just make Rounders a movie of the week feature if you wanted to give it some love randomly before the podcast?
"GEEF THAT MAH-HAN HYEES MOHNAY." Rounders = badass. Doubters can suck it.
It's a strong film. Enjoyable. It's easy for me to see why this isn't getting made. I kinda forgot about it. Is this article meant to generate some heat?
OH DON PIANO!
"mentioned in some article" They didn't even mention the name, what a slight to my hard work!
In case you wanted to read the article they're talking about:
http://www.pokerlistings.com/irounders-2i-a-reality-42927
-Sean Lind
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.