How far can a movie float on just charm and fluffiness? Not as far as James Mangold would like Knight and Day to go; at 110 minutes the movie bogs down towards the end, and it feels like a 90 minute version of the movie would have been perfect, nutrition-free summer entertainment. As it is, even with some third act bloat and slowdown, Knight and Day mostly works in a way that too few studio blockbusters do anymore. It’s fun, it’s light, and while it’s not quite ‘smart,’ it’s not so stupid as to be distracting or offensive.
The first thirty or forty minutes of Knight and Day are probably the best; the earliest action scenes are fun and improbable in an engaging way, an improbability the rest of the film never quite tops. Tom Cruise is a secret agent who may or may not have gone rogue and Cameron Diaz is the civilian who inadvertently gets swept up his life. The movie doesn’t really give you a good reason for Cruise’s character to keep Diaz around, but the first half of the film is so well paced and so filled with lively action and winking movie star moments that you don’t really stop to wonder why. By the time you do wonder what the point of lugging Diaz across the globe was you’re well in the film’s grasp.
Cruise plays superspy Roy Miller as the ultimate boy scout – always helpful, smiling and patient, he’s almost too nice. Early on the movie makes a half-hearted attempt to convince the audience that Roy is nuts and has gone rogue, and Cruise’s own public wackiness helps sell that. Sadly this is a big summer Tom Cruise movie, so you know going in that there’s no way he’s actually a murderous rogue lunatic, but for a little while it’s fun to pretend.
It’s a role that Cruise is completely comfortable in, and I bet it’s somewhat similar to how he is in real life. Slightly manic and impossibly kind, Miller is a very old fashioned hero. I got a serious Superman vibe from Cruise in the role, and I think Knight and Day proves that while the actor never had the height to be the Man of Steel, he certainly had the aw shucks charm. More importantly, Knight and Day should mark Cruise’s return from the wilderness – yes, he is still the movie star so many have loved for so many years, and maybe we can forgive him all that couch jumping after all. He’s at ease and he’s having fun, and unless the film uses some truly excellent digital face replacement on stunt men (which is unlikely since the film can’t even make people riding a motorcycle in front of a green screen look modestly convincing), he’s also doing some cool stunts of his own.
The other half of the equation is Cameron Diaz, whose just-this-side-of-frazzled schtick plays well off of Cruise’s cool, calm and sweet. The two have a reasonable chemistry, although it’s nothing world breaking – you can definitely get why Diaz falls for Roy Miller, but it’s harder to see why the superspy takes such a shine this semi-ditzy classic car mechanic (some points, I guess, in trying to make Diaz’s character not just a cookie cutter femme). Diaz is often given the unforgiving stuff – the screaming, the confusion, the passing out – so she isn’t as much fun as Cruise. But the structure of the film is such that we’re seeing things through her eyes – sometimes literally, including a very funny sequence where she keeps passing out and coming to during different action scenes – so it’s important that we can stand her, and that we can.
It’s dicier with some of the supporting cast. Peter Sarsgaard is a dasterdly CIA agent of no fixed accent, while Paul Dano is a whiz kid whose facial hair is so obviously spirit gummed to his face that I thought it was on purpose, like he was in a bad disguise. Dano has invented a super battery called the Zephyr, and Sarsgaard wants to sell it to the highest bidder. The movie makes some half-hearted attempts to trick us into thinking that maybe Cruise is the bad guy but there’s no way anyone in the audience is buying that.
While Cruise is actually pretty great, it’s his presence that hurts some of the film’s attempts at not being cloddingly obvious. When you have Tom Cruise as the lead in your summer blockbuster there are a couple of things you can rule out, and him being evil or getting killed are the first two. It’s too bad because I could see a version of this movie where both the Sarsgaard and Cruise characters are played by actors of equal fame and type, keeping the audience guessing. The film even briefly throws in a competing love interest for Diaz, but if you think Marc Blucas is stealing the lady from Tom Cruise you are out of your mind.
That predictability begins to weigh the film down in the second half. The best stuff is right up front, and there is briefly a feeling that the movie could go anywhere. By the second half you can see the end game coming, and what’s worse is that you can see every step that has to be taken to get there, but there’s still fun to be had. Sadly not as much fun as at the beginning – the first half of the movie feels like nobody gave James Mangold any restrictions and then the second half comes across like a more average high octane summer film, but with a smile. The first two action scenes are patently ludicrous, while the last couple are just standard impossible, as per the expectations of the genre.
There’s a good fifteen minutes that could be easily cut – the revelation of why the movie is called Knight and Day is pretty worthless, all told (and it really only explains why it’s called Knight. I never figured out what the hell the Day part was. It’s not Diaz’s character’s last name – but there’s plenty in the film that works as it is. Knight and Day is the rare sort of modern film shot on locations; maybe I’m just getting to be an old man, but I’m more interested in seeing a practical action scene taking place in a beautiful real foreign locale as opposed to a CGI action scene taking place against a green screen. Knight and Day is a globehopper, and in many ways the locations are worth the price of the ticket. Fifty years ago the poster for a movie like Knight and Day would have boasted of being shot in Austria and Spain and the tropics.
Knight and Day is like a daredevil jumping his bike over a row of school buses. You’re amazed at how far he gets and how high he goes, but you’re not that surprised when he can’t quite stick the landing. The film has a couple of fairly brilliant action-comedy moments, and it’s filled with plenty of feather light entertainment.
Knight and Day is an enjoyable matinee that will dissolve away from you as step out into the summer sun, refreshed and smiling.
7 out of 10
22 comments
Agent/spy dragging civilian into the intrigue? I smell Scarecrow & Mrs King.
Great review. I just saw this and it was pretty damn good. Probably the best romantic action spy comedy since True Lies. The only thing I wished they would have done is make Diaz' character more important to the story as it seemed like Cruises' character was keeping her around for a reason but in the end there was absolutely no reason for her to be involved after the plane crashes. I also think the film really needed an opening action scene showing Cruise going "rogue" to better establish Cruises' and the agency's motivations and make it seem like something was actually at stake. Probably the most enjoyable action movie I've seen all year and puts The A-Team's too close/shaky cam action scenes to shame. It's also probably the first movie since The Mask that I could actually stand Diaz in.
Huh. KILLERS and KNIGHT AND DAY. I feel a DANTE'S PEAK/VOLCANO and DEEP IMPACT/ARMAGEDDON vibe going on here.
Kyle = Plant
This is one of your best reviews in a long time, dev. I had NO interest in this, and now i think i might go see it. This is what a good review should do.
Good review, now I want to see it. You need a right parentheses to close that parenthetical statement about the name of the movie, though.
I actually like Mangold, but he never seems to be able to bring his movies home. Needs a new writing partner or something.
diaz is so ugly and annoying irl i don't think i could watch this unless there's a scene where she gets punched in the face or something.
*super mild spoiler*
I saw the movie yesterday and enjoyed it for what it was. the first action sequence (*plane*) was pretty awesome and very humourous. The ending left a bit to be desired but thats the summer for you. I will see it again…on TNT…. in two years..with three chances to watch!!
Huh, this review actually makes me somewhat interested in seeing this. I had assumed it would be garbage. If I'm bored on Saturday maybe I'll check it out, since there aren't really any movies on that I'm crazy about this weekend.
Whoa. How did I miss that this was Mangold?
"When you have Tom Cruise as the lead in your summer blockbuster there are a couple of things you can rule out, and him being evil or getting killed". You obviously haven't seen Collateral, as Cruise is evil and dies – that second thing is a spoiler, BTW.
Bird on a Wire
@#12(jib) Collateral wasn't really intended to be a big budget blockbuster. It's a great film. Almost certainly better than this. But, it was far more experimental.
The movie was pointless and boring, but I guess I wasn't pissed off when I left the theater.
Cruise has had 2 decent movies in the past 10 years…vanilla sky and magnolia….grossman is schtick, and cruise is played out….Tug Speedman was not based on Stallone, it was based on cruise…and the fact that cruise did not even understand that belies the problem. As for Diaz, she is an appealing and capable actress…however, she is not going to pull people into the theatre to view her hotness anymore. This is the kind of summer movie that is worthless, no matter how well executed, these stars have lost their appeal and unless they transition to meatiier, more interesting roles….they are done.
There are several face-replaced Cruise and Cameron scenes in there.
Also most of the bulls are CG.
The only thing more pathetic than the review is the fucking sheeple in the comment section who now want to see the movie. Even my fucking Grandma is sick of Tom Cruise and shouldn't Diaz be making sitcoms by now?
Spot on review with a welcomed lack of cynicism. One thing that perpetually bothers me is when people use parenthesis but don't close them. I read them in a different voice and they tend to break the flow of the article momentarily, so when they're not closed off I get taken out of the review looking for the logical stopping point of that parenthesized thought.
I agree with the written review, but a 7 is too generous. I'd say it is a solid 6.
Whatever Cruise does I just cannot forgive him for being so deep in that cult. I used to like him but nowadays I avoid his films.
Cameron Diaz has always been sweet and a good actress, and I don't really understand the 'ugly'-comments about her. I mean, really?
Yeah, but Devin, what does any of this have to do with the fact that you're a fat, hairy twat?
Comments are shown as archived from the original site; new comments are closed.